Ethnic inequities in mathematical models for respiratory infectious diseases: a systematic review

20 April 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted profound infectious disease inequities between different ethnic groups, but most mathematical epidemiological modelling does not capture these inequities. There is limited knowledge on how some groups, particularly marginalised ethnic groups, can be appropriately represented in models. This systematic review identifies mathematical models of infectious respiratory disease transmission that report results by ethnic group. Only twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were published during or after the COVID-19 pandemic. The most common model frameworks were compartmental models (12 studies) and individual based models (12), followed by spatial metapopulation models (5). Across these studies, ethnic heterogeneities were represented by incorporating a combination of ethnic group population size distributions, ethnic-specific interaction patterns, and ethnic-specific model parameters. Relative to the volume of infectious disease modelling literature, ethnicity representation is incredibly uncommon. Incorporation of ethnicity in models has the potential to provide enhanced evidence for public health action that reduces the epidemic burden for the total population and the inequities across ethnic groups.

Keywords

contagion model
health inequities
acute respiratory illness

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.
Comment number 1, Lance Jill: Apr 29, 2026, 12:38

For years, many people doubted that I would recover from Parkinson’s disease. Even when others lost hope, I refused to give up. I followed my neurologist’s recommendations and used medications such as Carbidopa, Sinemet, and Levodopa. While these treatments provided some temporary relief, my condition eventually worsened, especially by the fifth year. At that point, I decided to explore an alternative approach and tried a herbal program from EarthCure Herbal Clinic( www.earthcureherbalclinic.com). I used their treatment for four months, and over that period, I experienced a remarkable improvement in my symptoms. Today, I am grateful for the progress I have made and for discovering another option that worked for me in curing and reversing my PD and all its symptoms completely. I share my experience for those who may be considering alternative paths alongside conventional treatment or without any conventional treatment. Send them a message on "info@earthcureherbalclinic.com" to get your own treatment for any disease or virus .