A geometric-mean CMB temperature law in an FRW RH = ct cosmology with modified redshift and comparison with Melia’s Rh = ct universe

12 May 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

We examine whether a recently suggested geometric-mean expression, \[ T_{\rm cmb}=\sqrt{T_{\max}T_{\min}} = \frac{\hbar c}{4\pi k_B\sqrt{2R_Hl_p}}, \] for the cosmic microwave background temperature can be incorporated into a Friedmann--Robertson--Walker cosmology satisfying $R_H=ct$. In Haug and Tatum's formulation, the CMB temperature is related to the geometric mean of two Hawking temperatures: a minimum temperature associated with the Hubble radius and a maximum temperature associated with a Planck-mass Schwarzschild black hole. Related work by Haug and Wojnow has demonstrated that the same temperature expression can be obtained from the Stefan--Boltzmann law, while Tatum, Seshavatharam and Lakshminarayana earlier arrived at a closely related expression by a more heuristic route. We also discuss Haug's recent derivation of an exact photon energy-density parameter and an associated CMB photon number-density formula in an $R_H=ct$ framework, as well as Haug and Tatum's reported fit to the PantheonPlusSH0ES supernova database using a modified redshift relation. We show that if the standard FRW metric redshift is used, the geometric-mean temperature scales as $T_{\rm cmb}\propto (1+z_{\rm FRW})^{1/2}$. However, if one adopts the modified redshift definition $1+z_{\rm H}=(R_{H0}/R_H)^{1/2}$, then the same temperature law gives the linear relation $T_{\rm cmb}=T_0(1+z_{\rm H})$. The resulting CMB energy-density fraction is constant and equal to $1/(5760\pi)$, while the blackbody photon number density may be written directly in terms of $H$ and $l_p$.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.