Lost in Translation: Intrusion Detection Research with “Kaggle Datasets”

23 May 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Intrusion detection research has proliferated rapidly in recent years due to applications of deep learning models in particular. While advances might have also happened, these are impossible to evaluate or even understand because the research is almost entirely incomparable and irreproducible. As the position paper argues, the issues cover also data provenance problems. By reviewing a few datasets openly released on the Kaggle platform, various severe problems are easy to demonstrate. The paper also presents a few ideas on what the long-term consequences may be and how the problems could be at least partially remedied.

Keywords

data provenance
meta-data
research integrity
reproducibility

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.