Asymmetry for the Riemann Hypothesis

30 June 2026, Version 16
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

We show that, under a certain rigidity inequality, the Riemann zeta function satisfies $(\zeta(s),\zeta(1-\overline{s}))\neq(0,0)$ for every $s$ in the critical strip off the critical line. The verification of this rigidity inequality is left to number theorists.

Keywords

Zeta function
Riemann Hypothesis
Euler differential equation

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.
Comment number 1, Walid OUKIL: Jul 01, 2026, 11:32

Here is a numerical test of the rigidity inequality from Theorem applied to the Riemann zeta function: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1ICP-fBZgE9t3elHp9X4B5BqhnraEQJKS?usp=sharing The test uses a special case of the holomorphic Wronskian framework introduced in the companion paper. By choosing a specific holomorphic weight function, the complicated boundary oscillations of the zeta function are absorbed into a simpler oscillatory profile. The notebook then plots this profile over a large range of the imaginary part and all phase parameters. If no zero contour appears, the rigidity condition holds numerically, which prevents the simultaneous vanishing of the zeta function off the critical line. Parameters can be modified directly in the notebook.