A Ramanujan view of Robin’s inequality

09 July 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

We study the Robin defect, the difference between the two sides of Robin’s inequality, which is closely connected to the Riemann Hypothesis. We use Ramanujan’s transformation for the divisor Lambert series to write an exact identity for the Laplace transform of this defect. The main point is that positivity after smoothing is not the same as positivity for each integer. This explains why Ramanujan’s transformed identities give strong global control, but cannot alone prove the Riemann Hypothesis. We also show that any possible failure of Robin’s inequality must be checked on special divisor-rich integers, especially colossally abundant and highest abundant numbers. Numerical examples illustrate how the defect behaves for early extremal values. This work separates what Ramanujan’s identities can prove from the pointwise positivity that Robin’s criterion truly requires.

Keywords

Ramanujan identities
Riemann Hypothesis
Robin inequality

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.