Twin Primes… (Revolution Way )

11 July 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

This work proposes a structural approach to identifying infinitely many twin prime pairs by examining arithmetic progressions generated from the linear forms y3=3+2x and y5=5+2x. By analyzing values of x that simultaneously produce primes in both sequences, the method partitions the natural numbers into excluded subsets—specific odd and even values of x that yield composite outputs—and an infinite admissible subset A for which both expressions generate prime numbers. Since the excluded subsets are infinite and proper subsets of the positive integers, the remaining admissible set A is also infinite. Each x∈A corresponds to a pair (y3,y5) differing by 2, forming a twin prime pair. Therefore, the structure of the admissible set implies the existence of infinitely many twin primes. This framework is presented as a conceptual challenge to the long standing stagnation surrounding the twin prime problem.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.
Comment number 1, Peter M: Jul 11, 2026, 15:46

This paper is riddled with extremely basic math and logical errors. Based on your repeated preprints claiming to solve famous open problems, this is just another crankish attempt at a proof and will never be accepted by any reputable journal or conference. I suggest actually doing your research because you are only wasting your time otherwise. This website is for scholarly content and yours is nowhere near that level.