Abstract
Megalophobia—the specific phobia characterized by an intense, irrational fear of large objects, structures, or vast environments—is relatively common, yet remains underrepresented in psychometric research. This study evaluates the psychometric properties, internal consistency, dimensional profile, and international norms of the Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20), a 20-item multidimensional instrument designed to assess megalophobic symptoms across four subscales: Size Fear, Environmental Anxiety, Object Avoidance, and Visual Discomfort.
Method: A cross-sectional sample of 351 participants across 37 countries completed the MSSS-20 through an online psychometric screening portal between June 11, 2026, and July 12, 2026. The sample was primarily represented by participants from India (29.9%), the United States (15.4%), and Germany (9.4%). Basic demographics (age and gender) were voluntarily recorded. Statistical evaluation involved descriptive analysis, internal consistency estimation (Cronbach's alpha), item-total correlation analysis, and percentile normative mapping.
Results: The overall observed mean score was 50.92% (SD = 15, Median = 49, Variance = 224.89, SE = 0.8). Skewness (0.57) and kurtosis (0.51) fell within acceptable parameters for a normal distribution. The MSSS-20 demonstrated acceptable overall internal consistency (alpha = 0.713). Item-total correlations ranged from r = -0.02 to r = 0.52, with ten items performing weakly (r < 0.30), highlighting areas for future revision. Subscale analysis indicated the highest mean scores in the Size Fear dimension (59.59%) and the lowest in Visual Discomfort (44.72%).
Supplementary materials
Title
RESEARCH DATASET Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20)
Description
This psychometric dataset currently includes 351 anonymous participant responses collected through voluntary participation.
Actions
Supplementary weblinks
Title
Web version with graphical illustrations
Description
The Megalophobia Severity Screening Scale (MSSS-20) is available in a computerized, web-based format. The interactive version incorporates automated scoring and generates immediate graphical feedback to facilitate clear and user-friendly interpretation of assessment results.
Actions
View Title
Questionnaire, Scoring and Instructions
Description
Comprehensive scoring procedures, administration guidelines, and methodological documentation are available in the official scoring manual:
Actions
View 


![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://www.cambridge.org/engage/assets/public/coe/logo/orcid.png)