Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-xlmdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-08T22:00:05.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic and Environmental Impacts of Planting Flexibility and Conservation Compliance: Lessons from the 1985 and 1990 Farm Bills for Future Farm Legislation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Shunxiang Wu ,
David J. Walker  and
Merlyn A. Brusven
Shunxiang Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology
David J. Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology
Merlyn A. Brusven
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil and Entomological Science, University of Idaho, Moscow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The interaction of the planting flexibility and conservation compliance provisions from the 1985 and 1990 farm bills was evaluated using an integrated systems model. Results showed that flex and compliance policy in combination reduced net returns and government costs, diluted environmental benefits of conservation compliance, and increased grower responsiveness to market signals, compared with conservation compliance alone. Strict compliance and higher flex levels were the most detrimental to farm income and environmental goals. Decoupling in current and future policy proposals will promote conservation goals. Budgetary reductions in future farm policy could reduce conservation incentives.

Type
Articles
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , October 1997 , pp. 216 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brooke, A., Kendrick, D., and Meeraus, A. 1989. GAMS User's Guide: 2.05. Redwood City, Calif.: Scientific Press.Google Scholar
Chien, M.C, and Leatham, D.J. 1994. “The Value of Planting Flexibility Provisions in the 1990 Farm Bill to Three Representative Texas Farms.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 16: 148–57.Google Scholar
Cochrane, W.W., and Runge, C.F. 1992. Reforming Farm Policy: Toward a National Agenda. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Coombs, J.E., Dicks, M.R., and Just, W.B. 1994. “Factors Affecting Commodity Program Participation and Planting Flexibility.” Research Report P-937. Stillwater: Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
Crosson, P.R., and Stout, A.T. 1983. Productivity Effects of Cropland Erosion in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, Inc.Google Scholar
Dailey, G.F. 1994. “Intergrating Non-point Source Pollution Costs into a Comparative Advantage Analysis of White Wheat Production in Idaho's Tom Beall Watershed.” M.S. thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Idaho, Moscow.Google Scholar
Dicks, M.R., Ray, D.E., and Walker, O.L. 1994. “Estimated Impacts of Increased Planting Flexibility.” Research Report P-915. Stillwater: Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
Duffy, P.A., Cain, D.L., and Young, G.J. 1993. “Incorporating the 1990 Farm Bill into Farm-Level Decision Models: An Application to Cotton Farms.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 25: 119–33.Google Scholar
Eastman, J.R. 1992. IDRISI User's Guide, Version 4.0. Worchester, Mass.: Clark University, Graduate School of Geography.Google Scholar
Gardner, B.D. 1995. Plowing Ground in Washington: The Political Economy of U.S. Agriculture. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
Govindasamy, R., and Huffman, W. 1993. “Efficiency of U.S. Conservation Compliance Program.” Agricultural Economics 8: 173–85.Google Scholar
Heady, E.O. 1948. “The Economics and Rotations with Farm and Production Policy Applications.” Journal of Farm Economics 30: 645–64.Google Scholar
Hoag, D.L., and Holloway, H.A. 1991. “Farm Production Decisions under Cross and Conservation Compliance.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73: 184–93.Google Scholar
Huang, W.Y. 1989. “Costs and Implications of Conservation Compliance.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44: 521–26.Google Scholar
Magleby, R., Sandretto, C., Crosswhite, W., and Osborn, C.T. 1995. “Soil Erosion and Conservation in the United States.” Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 718. Natural Resources and Environmental Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Miranda, M.L. 1992. “Landowner Incorporation of Onsite Soil Erosion Costs: An Application to the Conservation Reserve Program.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74: 434–43.Google Scholar
Painter, K.M., and Young, D.L. 1995. “Environmental and Economic Impacts of Agricultural Policy Reform: An Interregional Comparison.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 26: 451–62.Google Scholar
Perry, G.M., McCarl, B.A., Rister, M.E., and Richardson, J.W. 1989. “Modelling Government Program Participation Decisions at the Farm Level.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71: 1011–20.Google Scholar
Prato, T., and Wu, Shunxiang. 1991. “Erosion, Sediment, and Economic Effects of Conservation Compliance in an Agriculture Watershed.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 46: 568–76.Google Scholar
Prato, T., and Wu, Shunxiang. 1996. “Alternative Spatial Criteria for Targeting Soil and Water Quality Improvements in an Agricultural Watershed.” Review of Agricultural Economics 18: 293–301.Google Scholar
Richardson, J.W., Gerloff, D.C., Harris, B.L., and Dollar, L.L. 1989. “Economic Impacts of Conservation Compliance on a Representative Dawson County, Texas, Farm.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44: 527–31.Google Scholar
Thompson, L.C., Atwood, J.D., Johnson, S.R., and Robertson, T. 1989. “National Implications of Mandatory Conservation Compliance.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44: 517–21.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1995. 1995 Farm Bill: Guideline of the Administration. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Economics Research Service. 1991. Provisions of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 624. July.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Soil Conservation Service (USDA-SCS). 1984. National Summary—1982 National Resources Inventory. July.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Soil Conservation Service (USDA-SCS). 1994. National Summary—1992 National Resources Inventory. July.Google Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO), Controller General. 1983. Agriculture's Soil Conservation Programs Miss Full Potential in the Fight against Soil Erosion. Report to the Congress. Washington, D.C.: GAO. RECD-84-48.Google Scholar
Walker, D.J. 1982. “A Damage Function to Evaluate Erosion Control Economics.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63: 590–98.Google Scholar
Walker, D.J., and Painter, K.M. 1994. “Measuring Erosion Rate and Onsite Damage Using GIS: A Policy Application.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Agricultural Economic Association, San Diego. Aug. 7-10, 1994.Google Scholar
Walker, D.J., Wu, Shunxiang, and Brusven, M.A. 1995. “The Value of Conservation Compliance Provisions in the 1985 and 1990 Farm Bills to a Highly Erodible Idaho Watershed.” Working paper, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Idaho, Moscow.Google Scholar
Westcott, P.C. 1991. “Planting Flexibility and Land Allocation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73: 1105–15.Google Scholar
Wischmeier, W.H., and Smith, D.D. 1978. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses. Agricultural handbook 537. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Wu, Shunxiang, Walker, D.J., Brusven, M.A., King, L.G., and McCool, D.K. 1995. “An Integrated Analysis of Economic, Erosion, and Water Quality Impacts of Alternative Conservation Policies: A Watershed Planning Tool.” Paper presented at the First Annual Pacific Northwest Water Issues and Pacific Northwest/Oceania Conferences, Portland, Ore. February 27-28, 1995.Google Scholar
Young, D.L., Walker, D.J., and Kanjo, P.L. 1991. “Cost Effectiveness and Equity Aspects of Soil Conservation Programs in a Highly Erodible Region.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73: 1053–62.Google Scholar