Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T17:26:01.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects on inbreeding of different strategies aimed at eliminating scrapie sensitivity alleles in rare sheep breeds in The Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

J. J. Windig ,
H. Eding ,
L. Moll  and
L. Kaal
J. J. Windig*
Affiliation:
Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen University and Research, Division Animal Resources Development (D&O), PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
H. Eding
Affiliation:
Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen University and Research, Division Animal Resources Development (D&O), PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
L. Moll
Affiliation:
Dutch Animal Health Service, PO Box 9, 7400 AA Deventer, The Netherlands
L. Kaal
Affiliation:
Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen University and Research, Division Animal Resources Development (D&O), PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
*
E-mail: Jack.Wmdig@wur.nl
Get access

Abstract

The Dutch scrapie eradication programme aims at the exclusive use of homozygous ARR/ARR breeding rams by the end of 2004. As a consequence, breeds with a small population size and a low frequency of the ARR allele may suffer unacceptable losses of genetic diversity and high inbreeding levels. We simulated three breeding strategies to assess their efficacy in eliminating scrapie sensitive alleles and their effect on inbreeding levels. Under mild selection, both homozygous and heterozygous ARR rams were used indiscriminately. Under moderate selection, homozygous ARR rams were used preferably but they were supplemented with heterozygous rams when necessary. Under severe selection, only homozygous rams were used. Severe selection mimics then the proposed eradication programme. Simulations were carried out with allelic frequencies and population parameters of existent rare breeds in The Netherlands. With severe selection all simulated breeds showed unacceptably high inbreeding rates (> 0·5% per year). For some breeds, moderate selection resulted in acceptable inbreeding rates, while for other breeds only mild selection resulted in acceptable rates. The frequency of the ARR allele after 5 years of selection was only slightly lower with moderate selection than with severe selection (0·8% lower on average), but it was clearly lower with mild selection. Based on these simulations, we propose a selection programme where with low frequencies of the ARR allele, mild selection is used initially. Once the ARR frequencies rise to a particular value, the switch can be made to moderate selection. The population size (e.g. below 750, 750 to 3750 and above 3750 ewes) determines the frequency of the ARR allele at which the switch can be made (33%, 25% and 10%, respectively). With even higher ARR frequencies (above 70%, 50% and 33%, respectively) the regime can be changed to severe selection.

Keywords

control programmesgeneticsinbreedingrare breedsscrapie

Information

Type
Breeding genetics
Information
Animal Science , Volume 79 , Issue 1 , August 2004 , pp. 11 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arnold, M., Meek, C., Webb, C. R. and Hoinville, L. J. 2002. Assessing the efficacy of a ram-genotyping programme to reduce susceptibility to scrapie in Great Britain. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 56: 227–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barillet, F., Andreoletti, O., Palhière, I., Aguerre, X., Arranz, J. M., Minery, S., Soulas, C., Belloc, J. P., Briois, M., Frégeat, G., Teinturier, P., Amigues, Y., Astruc, J. M., Boscher, M. Y. and Schelcher, F. 2002. Breeding for scrapie resistance using PrP genotyping in the French dairy sheep breeds. Proceedings of the seventh world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Montpellier, CD-ROM communication no. 13–20.Google Scholar
Belt, P. B. G. M., Muileman, I. H., Schreuder, B. E. C., Bos-De Ruijter, J., Gielkens, A. L. J. and Smits, M. A. 1995. Identification of 5 allelic variants of the sheep PrP gene and their association with natural scrapie. Journal of General Virology 76: 509–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossers, A., Harders, F. L. and Smits, M. A. 1999. PrP genotype frequencies of the most dominant sheep breed in a country free from scrapie. Archives of Virology 144: 829–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossers, A., Schreuder, B. E. C., Muileman, I. H., Belt, P. and Smits, M. A. 1996. PrP genotype contributes to determining survival times of sheep with natural scrapie. Journal of General Virology 77: 2669–2673.Google Scholar
Brandsma, J. H., Janss, L. L. G. and Visscher, A. H. 2004. Association between PrP genotypes and littersize and 135 days weight in Texel sheep. Livestock Production Science 85: 59–64.Google Scholar
Bruce, M. E., Boyle, A., Cousens, S., McConnell, I., Foster, J., Goldmann, W. and Fraser, H. 2002. Strain characterization of natural sheep scrapie and comparison with BSE. Journal of General Virology 83: 695–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clouscard, C., Beaudry, P., Elsen, J. M., Milan, D., Dussaucy, M., Bounneau, C., Schelcher, F., Chatelain, J., Launay, J. M. and Laplanche, J. L. 1995. Different allelic effects of the codons 136 and 171 of the prion protein gene in sheep with natural scrapie. Journal of General Virology 76: 2097–2101.Google Scholar
Detwiler, L. A. and Baylis, M. 2003. The epidemiology of scrapie. Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International des Épizooties 22: 121–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drögemüller, C., Leeb, T. and Distl, O. 2001. Prp genotype frequencies in German breeding sheep and the potential to breed for resistance to scrapie. Veterinary Record 149: 349–352.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. and Mackay, T. F. C. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, Harlow, Essex.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization. 1998. Secondary guidelines for the management of small populations at risk. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Foster, J. D., Parnham, D., Chong, A., Goldmann, W. and Hunter, N. 2001. Clinical signs, histopathology and genetics of experimental transmission of BSE and natural scrapie to sheep and goats. Veterinary Record 148: 165–171.Google Scholar
Hedrick, P. W. and Kalinowski, S. T. 2000. Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 139–162.Google Scholar
Hunter, N., Goldmann, W., Smith, G. and Hope, J. 1994. The association of a codon 136 PrP gene variant with the occurence of natural scrapie. Archives of Virology 137: 171–177.Google Scholar
Kao, R. R., Gravenor, M. B. and Mclean, A. R. 2001. Modelling the national scrapie eradication programme in the UK. Mathematical Bioscience 174: 61–76.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. and Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Meuwissen, T. H.E. 1997. Maximising the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Journal of Animal Science 75: 934–940.Google Scholar
Meuwissen, T. H. E. and Woolliams, J. A. 1994. Effective sizes of livestock populations to prevent a decline in fitness. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89: 1019–1026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Doherty, E., Healy, A., Aherne, M., Hanrahan, J. P., Weavers, E., Doherty, M., Roche, J. F., Gunn, M. and Sweeney, T. 2002. Prion protein (PrP) gene polymorphisms associated with natural scrapie cases and their flock-mates in Ireland. Research in Veterinary Science 73: 243–250.Google Scholar
Palhière, I., François, D., Elsen, J. M., Barillet, F., Amigues, Y., Perret, G. and Bouix, J. 2002. Allele frequencies of the PrP gene in 29 French sheep breeds. Possible use in selection for resistance to scrapie. Proceedings of the seventh world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Montpellier, CD-ROM communication no. 13–13.Google Scholar
Sonesson, A. K., Janss, L. L. G. and Meuwissen, T. H. E. 2003. Selection against genetic defects in conservation schemes while controlling inbreeding. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 35: 353–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vellema, P. 2002. Verplichte inzet ARR/ARR-rammen vanaf 1 juli 2004. Het Schaap 3: 16–17.Google Scholar
Wiener, G., Lee, G. J. and Woolliams, J. A. 1992. Effects of rapid inbreeding and crossing of inbred lines on conception rate, prolificacy and ewe survival in sheep. Animal Production 55: 115–121.Google Scholar