Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T04:53:34.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sherds as archaeobotanical assemblages: Gua Sireh reconsidered

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2020

Aleese Barron ,
Ipoi Datan ,
Peter Bellwood ,
Rachel Wood ,
Dorian Q Fuller  and
Tim Denham Open the ORCID record for Tim Denham [Opens in a new window]
Aleese Barron*
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Australia
Ipoi Datan
Affiliation:
Retired Director of Sarawak Museum, Kuching, Malaysia
Peter Bellwood
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Australia
Rachel Wood
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Australia Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Australia
Dorian Q Fuller
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, UK Northwest University, School of Cultural Heritage, Xi'an Shaanxi, China
Tim Denham
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Australia
*
*Author for correspondence: ✉ aleese.barron@anu.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The earliest claim for domesticated rice in Island Southeast Asia (4960–3565 cal BP) derives from a single grain embedded in a ceramic sherd from Gua Sireh Cave, Borneo. In a first assessment of spikelet-base assemblages within pottery sherds using quantitative microCT analysis, the authors found no additional rice remains within this sherd to support the early date of rice farming; analysis of a more recent Gua Sireh sherd (1990–830 cal BP), however, indicates that 70 per cent of spikelet bases are from domesticated rice. This technique offers a high degree of contextual and temporal resolution for approaching organic-tempered ceramics as well-preserved archaeobotanical assemblages.

Keywords

Island Southeast AsiaBorneoarchaeobotanyrice domesticationmicroCT
Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 94 , Issue 377 , October 2020 , pp. 1325 - 1336
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, G. & Farr, L.. 2016. Archaeological investigations in the Niah Caves, Sarawak. Cambridge: McDonald Institute of Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Barker, G. & Richards, M.B.. 2013. Foraging–farming transitions in Island Southeast Asia. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 20: 256–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-012-9150-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, G., Hunt, C. & Carlos, J.. 2011. Transitions to farming in Island Southeast Asia: archaeological, biomolecular and palaeoecological perspectives, in Barker, G. & Janowski, M. (ed.) Why cultivate? Anthropological and archaeological approaches to foraging–farming transitions in Southeast Asia: 61–74. Oxford: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Barron, A. & Denham, T.. 2018. A microCT protocol for the visualisation and identification of domesticated plant remains within pottery sherds. Journal of Archaeological Science Reports 21: 350–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.07.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, A. et al. 2017. MicroCT reveals domesticated rice (Oryza sativa) within pottery sherds from early Neolithic sites (4150–3265 cal BP) in Southeast Asia. Scientific Reports 7: 7410. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04338-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, H. 2012. The reversed fortunes of sago and rice, Oryza sativa, in the rainforests of Sarawak, Borneo. Quaternary International 249: 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2011.03.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beavitt, P., Kurui, E. & Thompson, G.B.. 1996. Confirmation of an early date for the presence of rice in Borneo: preliminary evidence for possible Bidayuh/Asian links. Borneo Research Bulletin 27: 29–33.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P. 2017. First islanders: prehistory and human migration in Island Southeast Asia. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119251583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellwood, P., Gillespie, R., Thompson, G.B., Vogel, J.S., Ardika, I.W. & Datan, I.. 1992. New dates for prehistoric Asian rice. Asian Perspectives 31: 161–70.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P. et al. 2011. An Son and the Neolithic of southern Vietnam. Asian Perspectives 50: 144–75. https://doi.org/10.1353/asi.2011.0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo, C. 2011. Rice in Thailand: the archaeobotanical contribution. Rice 4: 114–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12284-011-9070-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo, C. & Fuller, D.Q.. 2010. Still too fragmentary and dependent upon chance? Advances in the study of early Southeast Asian archaeobotany, in Bellina, B. (ed.) 50 years of archaeology in Southeast Asia: essays in honour of Ian Glover: 91–111. London: River.Google Scholar
Castillo, C. et al. 2016. Archaeogenetic study of prehistoric rice remains from Thailand and India: evidence of early japonica in South and Southeast Asia. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 8: 523–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-015-0236-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo, C., Fuller, D.Q., Piper, P.J., Bellwood, P. & Oxenham, M.. 2017. Hunter-gatherer specialization in the Late Neolithic of southern Vietnam: the case of Rach Nui. Quaternary International 489: 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.11.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo, C., Higham, C., Miller, K., Chang, N., Douka, K., Higham, T. & Fuller, D.Q.. 2018. Social responses to climate change in Iron Age north-east Thailand: new archaeobotanical evidence. Antiquity 92: 1274–91. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2018.198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Z., Qin, L., Gao, Y., Weisskopf, A.R., Zhang, C. & Fuller, D.Q.. 2015. From early domesticated rice of the Middle Yangtze Basin to millet, rice and wheat agriculture: archaeobotanical macro-remains from Baligang, Nanyang Basin, central China (6700–500 BC). PLoS ONE 10: e0139885. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Z., Hung, H.C., Fan, X., Huang, Y. & Lu, H.. 2018. The ancient dispersal of millets in southern China: new archaeological evidence. The Holocene 28: 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683617714603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doherty, C., Beavitt, P. & Kurui, E.. 2000. Recent observations of rice temper in pottery from Miah and other sites in Sarawak. Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association Bulletin 20(4): 147–52. https://doi.org/10.7152/bippa.v20i0.11750Google Scholar
Donohue, M. & Denham, T.. 2010. Farming and language in Island Southeast Asia: reframing Austronesian history. Current Anthropology 51: 223–56. https://doi.org/10.1086/650991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, D.Q. & Qin, L.. 2008. Immature rice and its archaeobotanical recognition: a reply to Pan. Antiquity 82: 316. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X0009520XGoogle Scholar
Fuller, D.Q., Qin, L., Zheng, Y., Zhao, Z., Chen, X., Hosoya, L.A. & Sun, G.-P.. 2009. The domestication process and domestication rate in rice: spikelet bases from the Lower Yangtze. Science 323: 1607–10. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1166605CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuller, D.Q., Sato, Y.-I., Castillo, C., Qin, L., Weisskopf, A.R., Kingwell-Banham, E.J., Song, J., Ahn, S.-M. & van Etten, J.. 2010. Consilience of genetics and archaeobotany in the entangled history of rice. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 2: 115–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-010-0035-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, D.Q., Ling, Q., Zhijun, Z., Yunfei, Z., Leo-Aoi, H., Xuguo, C. & Guo-Ping, S.. 2011. Archaeobotanical analysis at Tianluoshan: evidence for wild-food gathering, rice cultivation and the process of the evolution of morphologically domesticated rice, in Center for the Study of Chinese Archaeology, Peking University and Zhejiang Province Institute of Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (ed.)Integrated studies on the natural remains from Tianluoshan. Beijing: Wenwu: 47–96 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Fuller, D.Q., Denham, T., Arroyo-Kalin, M., Lucas, L., Stevens, C.J., Qin, L., Allaby, R. & Purugganan, M.D.. 2014. Convergent evolution and parallelism in plant domestication revealed by an expanding archaeological record. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 111: 6147–52. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308937110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuller, D.Q., Weisskopf, A.R. & Castillo, C. 2016. Pathways of rice diversification across Asia. Archaeology International 19: 84–96. https://doi.org/10.5334/ai.1915Google Scholar
Hayden, B. 2011. Rice: the first Asian luxury food?, in Barker, G. & Janowski, M. (ed.) Why cultivate? Anthropological and archaeological approaches to foraging–farmer transitions in Southeast Asia: 75–93. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs.Google Scholar
Hunt, C.O. & Premathilake, R.. 2012. Early Holocene vegetation, human activity and climate from Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo. Quaternary International 249: 105–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2011.04.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ipoi, D. 1993. Archaeological excavations at Gua Sireh (Serian) and Lubang Angin (Gunung Mulu National Park), Sarawak, Malaysia. Sarawak Museum Journal 45: Special Monograph 6.Google Scholar
Ipoi, D. & Bellwood, P.. 1991. Recent research at Gua Sireh (Serian) and Lubang Angin (Gunung Mulu National Park), Sarawak. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 11: 386–405.Google Scholar
Latham, S., Varslot, T. & Sheppard, A.. 2008. Automated registration for augmenting micro-CT 3D images. Australian and New Zealand Industrial and Applied Mathematics Journal 50: C534–48. https://doi.org/10.21914/anziamj.v50i0.1389Google Scholar
Limaye, A. 2012. Drishti: a volume exploration and presentation tool. SPIE Proceedings, Developments in X-Ray Tomography 8: 8506. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.935640Google Scholar
Myers, G., Kingston, A., Varslot, T. & Sheppard, A.. 2011. Extending reference scan drift correction to high-magnification high-cone-angle tomography. Optics Letters 36: 4809–11. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.36.004809CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paz, V. 1999. Neolithic human movement to Island Southeast Asia: the search for archaeobotanical evidence. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 18: 151–57. https://doi.org/10.7152/bippa.v18i0.11710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paz, V. 2005. Rock shelters, caves, and archaeobotany in Island Southeast Asia. Asian Perspectives 44: 107–18. https://doi.org/10.1353/asi.2005.0012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, B.E., Shutler, R., Nelson, D.E., Vogel, J.S. & Southon, J.R.. 1986. Evidence of early rice cultivation in the Philippines. Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society 14: 3–11.Google Scholar
Thompson, G.B. 1992. Archaeobotanical investigations at Khok Phanom Di, central Thailand. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Vaughan, D.A. 1994. The wild relatives of rice: a genetic resources handbook. Los Baños: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Weatherwax, P. 1929. The morphology of the spikelets of six genera of Oryzeae. American Journal of Botany 16: 547–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1929.tb09502.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisskopf, A., Harvey, E., Kingwell-Banham, E., Kajale, M., Mohanty, R. & Fuller, D.Q.. 2014. Archaeobotanical implications of phytolith assemblages from cultivated rice systems, wild rice stands and macro-regional patterns. Journal of Archaeological Science 51: 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.04.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X. et al. 2018. New radiocarbon and archaeobotanical evidence reveal the timing and route of southward dispersal of rice farming in south China. Science Bulletin 63: 1495–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2018.10.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Barron et al. supplementary material

Barron et al. supplementary material

Download Barron et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 2.6 MB