Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T22:26:29.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

238 Equity Considerations and Impacts when Implementing Remote Technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2024

Gigi Perez
Affiliation:
University of Washington - Institute of Translational Health Sciences
Kathryn M. Porter
Affiliation:
Seattle Children’s Hospital - Institute of Translational Health Sciences
Brian Saelens
Affiliation:
Seattle Children’s Hospital - Institute of Translational Health Sciences
Allison A. Lambert
Affiliation:
University of Washington - Institute of Translational Health Sciences
Maria Savage
Affiliation:
University of Washington - Human Subjects Division
Lindsie Boerger
Affiliation:
University of Washington - Institute of Translational Health Sciences
Charlie Gregor
Affiliation:
University of Washington - Institute of Translational Health Sciences
Ann Melvin
Affiliation:
Seattle Children’s Hospital - Institute of Translational Health Sciences
Christopher H. Goss
Affiliation:
University of Washington - Institute of Translational Health Sciences
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The Institute of Translational Health Science (ITHS) Remote Technologies for Research Reference Center (REMOTECH) aims to support researchers using remote technologies. Understanding barriers specifically for engagement of diverse populations is critical to improve equitable access and increase diverse participation in research. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We conducted semi-structured interviews with researchers (N=30) within the WWAMI (Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana and Idaho) region, identified through participation in a previous survey as well as those known to have previously implemented remote technologies at ITHS institutions. We solicited specific concerns regarding equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) related to remote research participant recruitment, retention, and implementation, as well as outcomes and potential solutions. Interview transcripts were coded, summarized, and emerging themes were identified. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The pandemic necessitated a shift to the use of remote research engagement strategies. Our interview findings show that researchers have a desire to: increase diversity through remote engagement options; decrease participant burden; and understand and include strategies that advance equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) efforts. While geographic diversity was positively impacted by the use of remote technologies, significant barriers and challenges currently exist in the use of remote technologies with respect to other types of diversity, for example access to technologies and limited financial resources. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Remote technologies in research could increase diversity, but interviewees shared barriers and challenges that prevent that from happening. Researchers would benefit from equity-oriented digital literacy resources to use with diverse populations. Such tools can also be used to guide study design/procedures, materials, and processes.

Type
Health Equity and Community Engagement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. The Association for Clinical and Translational Science