Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-28T10:26:50.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of a nutraceutical additive on health and growth of preweaned dairy calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2025

Karen Dunkel
Affiliation:
EthoLab – Applied Ethology and Animal Welfare Lab, Graduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
Michail Sabino Moroz
Affiliation:
EthoLab – Applied Ethology and Animal Welfare Lab, Graduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
Beatriz Suares
Affiliation:
EthoLab – Applied Ethology and Animal Welfare Lab, Graduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
Ruan Daros*
Affiliation:
EthoLab – Applied Ethology and Animal Welfare Lab, Graduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
*
Corresponding author: Ruan Daros; Email: r.daros@pucpr.br

Abstract

This research article aimed to evaluate the effect of a commercial nutraceutical additive in milk replacer on the health and weight gain of dairy calves during the pre-weaning phase. A total of 126 female Holstein calves were randomly assigned to two groups: a treatment group (TRT, n = 63) receiving a commercial nutraceutical additive in the milk replacer, and a control group (CON, n = 63) receiving only the milk replacer. Health assessments included clinical diagnosis, Wisconsin scores and lung ultrasonography to assess the incidence and severity of respiratory and enteric diseases, as well as the average daily gain (ADG). The TRT group showed a reduction in the number of antibiotic treatments for respiratory diseases compared to the CON group. However, calves in the TRT group exhibited greater lung consolidation scores at 75 days of age and lower odds of recovery from pulmonary lesions. No differences were observed between groups in ADG and weaning weight. Additionally, the use of the product did not reduce the incidence or severity of diarrhoea. In fact, calves in the TRT group experienced the first episode of diarrhoea earlier than those in the CON group. These findings indicate that the nutraceutical additive did not contribute to improved enteric or respiratory health. Under real farm conditions, the use of the applied nutraceutical does not consistently lead to beneficial or additive effects across health parameters. These results underscore the importance of context-specific evaluation, as well as the consideration that formulation and environmental factors can significantly influence the outcomes of such interventions.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

#

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Abuelo, A, Cullens, F and E Brester, JL (2021) Effect of preweaning disease on the reproductive performance and first-lactation milk production of heifers in a large dairy herd. Journal of Dairy Science 104, 70087017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, EA and Buczinski, S (2016) Short communication: Ultrasonographic assessment of lung consolidation postweaning and survival to the first lactation in dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 99(2), 14651470.10.3168/jds.2015-10260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agazzi, A, Tirloni, E, Stella, S, Maroccolo, S, Ripamonti, B, Bersani, C, Caputo, JM, Dell'Orto, V, Rota, N and Savoini, G (2014) Effects of species-specific probiotic addition to milk replacer on calf health and performance during the first month of life. Annals of Animal Science 14(1), 101115.10.2478/aoas-2013-0089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alawneh, JI, Barreto, MO, Moore, RJ, Soust, M, Al-harbi, H, James, AS, Krishnan, D and Olchowy, TWJ (2020) Systematic review of an intervention: The use of probiotics to improve health and productivity of calves. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 183, 105147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buczinski, S, Achard, D and Timsit, E (2021) Effects of calfhood respiratory disease on health and performance of dairy cattle: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dairy Science 104(7), 82148227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaway, TR, Lillehoj, H, Chuanchuen, R and E Gay, CG (2021) Erratum: callaway et al. Alternatives to antibiotics: A symposium on the challenges and solutions for animal health and production. Antibiotics 2021 10, 471. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) 10, 1024.Google ScholarPubMed
Cramer, MC Ollivett, TL (2019) Growth of preweaned, group-housed dairy calves diagnosed with respiratory disease using clinical respiratory scoring and thoracic ultrasound-A cohort study. Journal of Dairy Science 102, 43224331. doi:10.3168/jds.2018-15420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cramer, MC, Ollivett, TL and Stanton, AL (2016) Associations of behavior-based measurements and clinical disease in preweaned, group-housed dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 99(9), 74347443.10.3168/jds.2015-10207CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delabouglise, A, James, A, Valarcher, JF, Hagglünd, S, Raboisson, D and Rushton, J (2017) Linking disease epidemiology and livestock productivity: The case of bovine respiratory disease in France. PLoS ONE 12(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El Jeni, R, Villot, C, Koyun, OY, Osorio-Doblado, A, Baloyi, JJ, Lourenco, JM, Steele, M and Callaway, TR (2024) Invited review: “Probiotic” approaches to improving dairy production: Reassessing “magic foo-foo dust”. Journal of Dairy Science 107, 18321856.10.3168/jds.2023-23831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frizzo, LS, Soto, LP, Zbrun, MV, Signorini, ML, Bertozzi, E, Sequeira, G, Armesto, RR and Rosmini, MR (2011) Effect of lactic acid bacteria and lactose on growth performance and intestinal microbial balance of artificially reared calves. Livestock Science 140(1–3), 246252.10.1016/j.livsci.2011.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, V, Madureira, KM, Borges, JRJ, Pinheiro, FA, Martin, CC, Baccili, CC, Santos, JF, Yasuoka, MM, Decaris, N, Bombardelli, JA et al. (2021) Doenças na fase de aleitamento e práticas de manejo sanitário na criação de bezerras. Revista Brasileira de Buiatria - RBB 1, 2762.10.4322/2763-955X.2021.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrichs, AJ and Hargrove, GL (1987) Standards of weight and height for Holstein heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 70(3), 653660.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80055-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kandasamy, S, Vlasova, AN, Fischer, DD, Chattha, KS, Shao, L, Kumar, A, Langel, SN, Rauf, A, Huang, HC, Rajashekara, G and Saif, LJ (2017) Unraveling the differences between Gram-positive and Gram-negative probiotics in modulating protective immunity to enteric infections. Frontiers in Immunology 8, 334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCoy, GC, Reneau, JK, Hunter, AG and Williams, JB (1970) Effects of diet and time on blood serum proteins in the newborn calf. Journal of Dairy Science 53, 358362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuirk, SM (2003) Solving calf morbidity and mortality problems. In American Association of Bovine Practitioners, 36th Annual Conference. Columbus, OH. https://www.vetmed.wisc.edu/dms/fapm/fapmtools/8calf/calfmorbid.pdfGoogle Scholar
McGuirk, SM (2008) Disease management of dairy calves and heifers. Veterinary Clinics of North America - Food Animal Practice 24(1), 139153.10.1016/j.cvfa.2007.10.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Modi, SR, Lee, HH, Spina, CS and Collins, JJ (2013) Antibiotic treatment expands the resistance reservoir and ecological network of the phage metagenome. Nature 499(7457), 219222. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morein, B, Abusugra, I and Blomqvist, G (2002) Immunity in neonates. Veterinary immunology and immunopathology 87(3-4), 207213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NRC, Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle (2021) Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, Eighth revised edition. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Ollivett, TL and Buczinski, S (2016) On-farm use of ultrasonography for bovine respiratory disease. Veterinary Clinics of North America - Food Animal Practice 32(1), 1935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parreño, V, Saif, LJ and Strain, S (2022) Where it all starts: GL system and immunity. In Chase, CCL (ed.), Bovine Immunity: Making Immunology and Vaccinology Come Alive. Espanha: Hypra S.A., 237.Google Scholar
Peter, AT (2013) Bovine placenta: a review on morphology, components, and defects from terminology and clinical perspectives. Theriogenology 80, 693705.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.06.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RStudio Team (2022) RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA. https://www.rstudio.com/.Google Scholar
Volpato, A, da Silva, AS, Crecencio, RB, Tomasi, T, Fortuoso, BF, Ribeiro, MP, Secco, R, Pereira, WAB, Bottari, NB, Schetinger, MRC, Morsch, VMM, Baldissera, MD, Stefani, LM and Machado, G (2018) A prophylactic protocol to stimulate the immune response also controls infectious disease and, consequently, minimizes diarrhea in newborn heifers. Microbial Pathogenesis 121, 262268.10.1016/j.micpath.2018.05.031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilms, J, Berends, H and Martín-Tereso, J (2019) Hypertonic milk replacers increase gastrointestinal permeability in healthy dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 102, 12371246.10.3168/jds.2018-15265CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanetti, MA, Schalch, E, Rossini, AJ et al. (1999) Use of additives in Dutch calf diets. In Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Society of Animal Science. Porto Alegre: Brazilian Society of Animal Science, Vol. 36.Google Scholar