Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T22:52:10.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cavitation nuclei in water exposed to transient pressures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2015

Anders Andersen  and
Knud Aage Mørch
Anders Andersen
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Center for Fluid Dynamics, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Knud Aage Mørch*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Center for Fluid Dynamics, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
*
†Email address for correspondence: kam@fysik.dtu.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A model of skin-stabilized interfacial cavitation nuclei and their response to tensile and compressive stressing is presented. The model is evaluated in relation to experimental tensile strength results for water at rest at the bottom of an open water-filled container at atmospheric pressure and room temperature. These results are obtained by recording the initial growth of cavities generated by a short tensile pulse applied to the bottom of the container. It is found that the cavitation nuclei shift their tensile strength depending on their pressure history. Static pressurization for an extended period of time prior to testing is known to increase the tensile strength of water, but little information is available on how it is affected by compression pulses of short duration. This is addressed by imposing compression pulses of approximately 1 ms duration and a peak intensity of a few bar prior to the tension pulse. The observations are interpreted on the basis of the new model.

JFM classification

Drops and Bubbles: Bubble dynamics Drops and Bubbles: Cavitation Drops and Bubbles: Drops and Bubbles

Information

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 771 , 25 May 2015 , pp. 424 - 448
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2015 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andersen, A. & Mørch, K. A. 2011 In-situ measurement of the tensile strength of water. In WIMRC 3rd International Cavitation Forum 2011, University of Warwick, 4th–6th July 2011, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Andersen, A. & Mørch, K. A. 2012 Tensile strength of water exposed to pressure pulses. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV 2012), pp. 540–545.Google Scholar
Arora, M., Ohl, C.-D. & Mørch, K. A. 2004 Cavitation inception on microparticles: a self-propelled particle accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 174501.Google Scholar
Atchley, A. A. & Prosperetti, A. 1989 The crevice model of bubble nucleation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86, 1065–1084.Google Scholar
Azouzi, M. E. M., Ramboz, C., Lenain, J.-F. & Caupin, F. 2013 A coherent picture of water at extreme negative pressure. Nat. Phys. 9, 38–41.Google Scholar
Berthelot, M. 1850 Sur quelques phenomenes de dilation forcee de liquides. Ann. de Chimie et de Physique 30, 232–237.Google Scholar
Blake, F. G.1949, The onset of cavitation in liquids: I, Acoustics Res. Lab., Harvard University, Tech. Memo. No. 12.Google Scholar
Borkent, B. M., Arora, M., Ohl, C.-D., de Jong, N., Versluis, M., Lohse, D., Mørch, K. A., Klaseboer, E. & Khoo, B. C. 2008 The acceleration of solid particles subjected to cavitation nucleation. J. Fluid Mech. 610, 157–182.Google Scholar
Borkent, B. M., Dammer, S. M., Schönherr, H., Vancso, G. J. & Lohse, D. 2007 Superstability of surface nanobubbles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 204502.Google Scholar
Borkent, B. M., Gekle, S., Prosperetti, A. & Lohse, D. 2009 Nucleation threshold and deactivation mechanisms of nanoscopic cavitation nuclei. Phys. Fluids 21, 102003.Google Scholar
Brennen, C. E. 1995 Cavitation and Bubble Dynamics, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, L. J. 1950 Limiting negative pressure in water. J. Appl. Phys. 21, 721–722.Google Scholar
Church, C. C. 2002 Spontaneous homogeneous nucleation, inertial cavitation and the safety of diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 28, 1349–1364.Google Scholar
Ducker, W. A. 2009 Contact angle and stability of interfacial nanobubbles. Langmuir 25, 8907–8910.Google Scholar
Epstein, P. S. & Plesset, M. S. 1950 On the stability of gas bubbles in liquid–gas solutions. J. Chem. Phys. 18, 1505–1509.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. C. 1948 The fracture of liquids. J. Appl. Phys. 19, 1062–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, F. E. & Herzfeld, K. F. 1954 Gas bubbles with organic skin as cavitation nuclei. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 26, 984–989.Google Scholar
Franks, F. 2000 Water: A Matrix of Life, 2nd edn. Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
Fuster, D., Pham, K. & Zaleski, S. 2014 Stability of bubbly liquids and its connection to the process of cavitation inception. Phys. Fluids 26, 042002.Google Scholar
Greenspan, M. & Tschiegg, C. E. 1967 Radiation-induced acoustic cavitation; apparatus and some results. J. Res. Natl Bur. Stand. C. Engng Instrument. 71C, 299–312.Google Scholar
Harvey, E. N., Whiteley, A. H., McElroy, W. D., Peace, D. C. & Barnes, D. K. 1944 Bubble formation in animals II. J. Cell Comparative Physiol. 24, 23–34.Google Scholar
Herbert, E., Balibar, S. & Caupin, F. 2006 Cavitation pressure in water. Phys. Rev. E 74, 041603.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. D. & Cooke, R. C. 1981 Generation of stabilized microbubbles in seawater. Science 213, 209–211.Google Scholar
Keller, A. P., Rott, H. K., Stoffel, B. & Striedinger, R. 1999 Scale effects on cavitation phenomena.. Forsch. Ing. Wes. 65, 48–57.Google Scholar
Knapp, R. T. 1958 Cavitation and nuclei. Trans. ASME 80, 1315–1324.Google Scholar
Marschall, H. B., Mørch, K. A., Keller, A. P. & Kjeldsen, M. 2003 Cavitation inception by almost spherical solid particles in water. Phys. Fluids 15, 545–553.Google Scholar
Maxwell, A. D., Cain, C. A., Hall, T. L., Fowlkes, J. B. & Xu, Z. 2013 Probability of cavitation for single ultrasound pulses applied to tissue and tissue-mimicking materials. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 39, 449–465.Google Scholar
Mørch, K. A. 2007 Reflections on cavitation nuclei in water. Phys. Fluids 19, 072104.Google Scholar
Mørch, K. A. 2009 Cavitation nuclei: experiments and theory. J. Hydrodyn. 21, 176–189.Google Scholar
Overton, G. D. N. & Trevena, D. H. 1980 Cavitation experiments with water in a steel Berthelot tube. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 13, 1309–1314.Google Scholar
Overton, G. D. N. & Trevena, D. H. 1982 Some factors which influence the observed dynamic breaking tensions of a liquid. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 15, L3–L6.Google Scholar
Sankin, G. & Teslenko, V. 2003 Two-threshold cavitation regime. Dokl. Phys. 48, 665–668.Google Scholar
Seddon, J. R. T. & Lohse, D. 2011 Nanobubbles and micropancakes: gaseous domains on immersed substrates. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23, 133001.Google Scholar
Song, J. P., Mørch, K. A., Carneiro, K. & Thölén, A. R. 1993 STM investigations of solid surfaces in water and air. Surf. Sci. 296, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strasberg, M. 1959 Onset of ultrasonic cavitation in tap water. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31, 163–176.Google Scholar
Trevena, D. H. 1982 Time effects in cavitation experiments. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 15, L111–L114.Google Scholar
Yount, D. E. 1997 On the elastic properties of the interfaces that stabilize gas cavitation nuclei. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 193, 50–59.Google Scholar
Zhang, X. H., Quinn, A. & Ducker, W. A. 2008 Nanobubbles at the interface between water and a hydrophobic solid. Langmuir 24, 4756–4764.Google Scholar
Zheng, Q., Durben, D. J., Wolf, G. H. & Angell, C. A. 1991 Liquids at large negative pressures: water at the homogeneous nucleation limit. Science 254, 829–832.Google Scholar

Andersen et al. supplementary movie

High-speed video of the CT-pulse cavitation in figure 12. Single-frame cavitation occurs followed by pulsating clusters until they all cease after about 2 ms. After a period with no activity, the T-pulse leads to inception of new as well as earlier observed bubbles in the subsequent frames.

Download Andersen et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 3 MB

Andersen et al. supplementary movie

High-speed video of the CT-pulse cavitation in figure 12. Single-frame cavitation occurs followed by pulsating clusters until they all cease after about 2 ms. After a period with no activity, the T-pulse leads to inception of new as well as earlier observed bubbles in the subsequent frames.

Download Andersen et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 86.1 KB