Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T03:04:33.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Polyradiate Specimens of Taenia pisiformis and Dipylidium caninum, with a bibliography of the abnormalities occurring among Cestodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Phyllis A. Clapham
Phyllis A. Clapham
Affiliation:
Research Assistant, Institute of Agricultural Parasitology, St. Albans.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A brief summary of abnormalities among Cestodes is given.

A new record of melanism in T. pisiformis is made. The pigment was deposited in the vas deferens and cirrus sac in every segment.

18 specimens of tri-radiate and 3 specimens of quadri-radiate T. pisiformis are described from dogs.

A single case of tri-radiate D. caninum is reported.

A bibliography containing records of cestode abnormalities is appended.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , August 1939 , pp. 163 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahlborn, F., 1893.— “Ein verzweigter Bandwurm.” Verh. naturw. Ver., Hamburg, I, 37–38. (W.L. 22296.)Google Scholar
Albini, G., 1879.— “Singolare forme di proglottidi d'un bothriocefhalo.” R.C. Accad, Napoli., XVIII, 46–48. (W.L. 17833.)Google Scholar
Andry, N., 1701. “De la generation des vers dans le corps de l'homme” Pub. Thomas Lombrail. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Barker, F. D., 1910.— “Some new cases of trihedral Taenia.” Science N. S. (804) V, 31, 837. (W.L. 19938.)Google Scholar
Barker, F. D., 1916.— “Are the polyradiate cestodes mutations?” Anat. Rec., XI, 507. (W.L. 763.)Google Scholar
Barrois, T., 1893.— “Sur un nouveau cas de Ténia trièdre de l'espèce Taenia saginata Goeze.” Rev. biol. du Nord de la France, V(11), 423Google Scholar
Bateson-Williams, M. A., 1894.— “Materials for the Study of Variation.” MacMillan & Co., London.Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J. van., 1871.—“Les poissons des côtes de Belgique, leurs parasites et leurs commensaux.” Mém. Acad. R. Belg. Cl, Sci., XXXVIII (4), 100 pp. (W.L. 13221.Google Scholar
Blanc, H., 1888.— “Taenia saginata et Bothriocephalus latus avec anneaux perforés.” Arch. Sci. phys. nat., XX (3), 347–348. (W.L. 1907.)Google Scholar
Blanchard, R., 1890.— “Anomalies des organes genitaux chez un Taenia saginata.” Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr., XV, 166–168. (W.L. 5401.)Google Scholar
Blanchard, R., 1889.— “Traité de zoologie médicale.” Tome 1.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R., 1891.— “Notices helminthologiques. 2 ème. Ser.” Mém. Soc. Zool. Fr., IV (3/4), 420–489. (W.L. 13343.)Google Scholar
Blanchard, R., 1891.— “Histoire zoologique et médicale des Téniadés du genre Hymenolepis. Weinland.” Paris.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R., 1894.— “Sur quelques Cestodes monstrueux.” Progré. méd. Paris Anno XXII, 2nd Ser., XX (27), 1–4, 17–20. (W.L. 17035.)Google Scholar
Blanchard, R., 1895.— “Sur un Taenia saginata bifurqué.” Mém. Soc. Zool. Fr., VIII (2), 232–243. (W.L. 13343.)Google Scholar
Blanchard, R., 1901.— “Note sur les Ténias noirs.” Arch. Parasit. Paris., IV (2), 227–232. (W.L. 1886.)Google Scholar
Blochmann, F., 1893.— “Ueber Sommer's sog. ‘plasmatische Längsgefasse’ bei Taenia saginata G. und Taenia solium L.” Zbl. Bakt., XII (11/12), 373–379. (W.L. 23684.)Google Scholar
Bork, G. A. W., 1891.— “Über die Missbildungen bei Tänien.” Inang. Diss. Kiel. 16 pp.Google Scholar
Brandes, G., 1899.— “Teratalogische Cestoden.” Z. Naturw. LXXII (1/2), 105–110. (W.L. 23515.)Google Scholar
Braun, M., 1894–1900.— “Cestodes” in Bronn's Klassen und Ordungen des Tierreichs.” V.Google Scholar
Braun, M.&Seifert, O., 1891–1900.— “Die thierischen Parasiten des Menschen.” O. Stüber, Wurzburg.Google Scholar
Bremser, J. G., 1819.— “Über lebende Würmer in lebenden Menschen.” Wein, 284 pp.Google Scholar
Bremser, J. G., 1824.— “Icones helminthum systema Rudolphii entozoologicum illustrantes.” Viennae. 12 pp.Google Scholar
Brera, V. L., 1811.— “Memorie fisico-medische sopra i principali vermi del corpo umano—viventa.” Crema.Google Scholar
Brumpt, E., 1936.— “Précis de Parasitologie.” 5th Ed. Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Cazeles, M. de, 1768. “Observations sur le Taenia, ou vers solitaire et plus particulièrement sur un Taenia percé a jour.” J. méd. Chir. Pharm., V (29) 26–43.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. C., 1930. “On a specimen of Taenia pisiformis with a completely double strobila.” Trans. Amer. micr. Soc., XLIX (2) 168–173. (W.L. 21400 a.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaussat, J. B., 1850.— “Exposé des principales observations sur les anomalies des Helminths.” C. R. Soc. Biol., V (2) 18–20. (W.L. 6630.)Google Scholar
Chiaje, S.della, 1833.— “Compendio di elmintografia umana.” 2nd Ed. Napoli, 140 pp.Google Scholar
Child, C. M., 1900.— “Abnormalities in the cestode Moniezia expansa.” Biol. Bull. Wood's Hole, I (5) 215–250, 261–290. (W.L. 2975.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, C. M., 1903.— “Abnormalities in the cestode Moniezia expansa.” Biol. Bull. Wood's Hole. III (3) 95–114 (4) 143–160. (W.L. 2975.)Google Scholar
Coats, J., 1891.— “A specimen of the prismatic variety of the Taenia saginata (mediocanellata).” Glasg. med. J. XXXV (2) 103–107. (W.L. 9208.)Google Scholar
Cobbold, T. S., 1866.— “New species of human Tapeworm.” Trans. path. Soc. Lond. XVII 438–439. (W.L., 21641.)Google Scholar
Cobbold, T. S., 1871.— “On a rare and remarkable parasite from the collection of the Rev. W. Dallinger.” Rep. British Ass. 40th meeting. p. 135 of the Transactions. (W.L. 17977.)Google Scholar
Cobbold, T. S., 1879.— “Parasites, a treatise on the entozoa of man and animals.”Google Scholar
Colin, L., 1876.— “Taenia inerme.” Gaz. hôp. Paris. (74), 589. (W.L. 8922.)Google Scholar
Cram, E. B., 1928.— “A case of abnormal development in Taenia balaniceps.” J. Parasit., XIV (1) 54–55. (Reported in Proc. Wash. Helminth. Soc.) (W.L., 11428.)Google Scholar
Creplin, , 1829.— “Taeniae monstruum rarum. Novae observationes de entozois.” 131 pp. Berolini.Google Scholar
Cuenot, L., 1932.— “La genèse des espèces animales.” 3rd Ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Cullingworth, C. J., 1873.— “Notes of a remarkable specimen of Tapeworm, Taenia lophosoma, (Cobbold).” Med. Times Lond., II (1224), 660. (W.L., 13074.)Google Scholar
Danysz, J., 1888.— “Recherches sur un Taenia fenêtré.” J. anat. Paris., XXIV (5) 518–524. (W.L., 11024.)Google Scholar
Davaine, C., 1873. “Cestodes” in Dictionnaire encyclopédique des Sciences medicales. XIV, 561–563.Google Scholar
Delore, X., 1863.— “Cysticercus acanthotrias observé chez une jeune fille.” Mem. Soc. Sci. méd. Lyon, II, 203–288. (W.L.13329.)Google Scholar
Diamare, V., 1893.— “Il genere DipylidiumLkt.” Atti. Accad. Sci. fis. nat. Napoli. Ser. 2, VI (7), 31. (W.L.2128.)Google Scholar
Diesing, C. M., 1855.— “Sechzehn Gattungen von Binnenwürmern und ihre Arten.” Denkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wein. IX (1) 171–185. (W.L.7134.)Google Scholar
Diesing, C. M., 1856.— “Zwanzig Arten von Cephalocotylen.” Denkschr. Acad. Wiss. Wein., XII (1) 23–38. (W.L.7134.)Google Scholar
Diorio, V., 1868.— “Sulle animalie di una Taenia saginata.” Atti. Accad. ‘Nuovi Lincei’ XXI 45–47. (W.L.2123.)Google Scholar
Dobrovolny, C. G.Dobrovolny, M. P., 1935— “Polyradiate tapeworms from a dog.” Trans. Amer. micr. Soc., LIV (1) 22–27. (W.L.21400 a.)Google Scholar
Dujardin, F., 1845.— “Histoire naturelle des helminthes ou vers intestinaux.” Paris, 669 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faust, E. C., 1925.— “On a case of tri-radiate Taenia solium from North China.” China Med. (Miss.) J., XXXIX (9) 800–804. (W.L.6177.)Google Scholar
Foster, W. D., 1915.— “Two new cases of polyradiate Cestodes, with a summary of the cases already known.” J. Parasit., II, 7–19. (W.L., 11428.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmann, O., 1925.— “Le phenomène des mutations chez les Cestodes.” Rev. Suisse. Zool., XXXII (8) 95–97. (W.L., 19288.)Google Scholar
Goeze, J. A. E., 1782.— “Versuch einer Naturgeschichte der Eingeweidewürmer thierischer Körper.” Blankenburg. 471 pp.Google Scholar
Goltz, 1894.— “Ueber Schwarzfärbung des Rostellum und Fehlen des Hakenkranzes bei Cysticercus cellulosae.” Z. Fleisch-u. Milch-hyg., IV (4) 65–67. (W.L., 23410.)Google Scholar
Gomes, B. A., 1822.— “Memoria sobre a virtude taenifuga da romeira, com observaçòes zoologicas e zoonomicas relativos a taenia, e com huma estampa.” Lisboa, 39pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassi, B. &Ferrara, 1886— “Zur Bothriocephalusfrage, offener Brief an den hochgeehrten Herrn Medicinalrath Dr. F. Küchenmeister.” Disch. med. Wschr. XII (40), 699. (W.L., 7276.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grobben, C., 1887.— “Ueber eine Missbildung von Taenia saginata, G.” Verh. zool.-bot. Ges. Wein. XXXVII 679–682. (W.L., 22327.)Google Scholar
Grohmann, W., 1906.— “Die Anormalitäten in den Proglottiden der Cestoden, insbesondere der Bothriocephaliden.” Thèse de Giessen. 42 pp.Google Scholar
Hall, M. C., 1915.— “Taenia saginata. A case presenting structural abnormalities and associated with spurious parasitism in an infant.” J. Amer. med. Ass., LXIV, 1972–1973. (W.L., 11006.)Google Scholar
Meggitt, F. J., 1916.— “A tri-radiate tapeworm (Anoplocephala perfoliata Goeze) from the horse.” Parasitology, VIII (4) 379–389. (W.L., 16035.)Google Scholar
Moniez, R., 1878.— “Observations teratologiques sur les taenias.” Bull. Sci. departement Nord. Lille, 2nd Ser., I (8/9), 199–202.Google Scholar
Moniez, R., 1880.— “Essai monographique sur les Cysticerques.” Inang-Diss. Travaux l'Univ. Lille. med. Sci., III (1), 103. (W.L., 21766a.)Google Scholar
Moniez, R., 1890–1891.— “Sur la bifurcation accidentelle que peut présenter la chaine des Cestodes et sur les anneaux dits surnumeraires.” Rev. biol. Nord. de la France Lille, III (4) 135–142.Google Scholar
Monticelli, F. S., 1890.— “Di una forma teratologica di Bothriocephalus microcephalus, Rud.” Boll. Soc. Nat. Napoli, Ser. 1, IV (2) 128–130. (W.L., 3382.)Google Scholar
Monticelli, F. S., 1893.— “Intorno ad alcuni elminta della collezione del Museo zoologica della R. Universitá di Palermo.” Nat. sicil., XII (9) 208–216. (W.L., 14893.)Google Scholar
Monticelli, F. S. & Crety, C., 1891.— “Richerche intorno alla sotto-famiglia Solenophorinae Montic. & Crety.” Mem. R. Accad. Torino., 2nd Ser., XLI, 381–402. (W.L., 13497.)Google Scholar
Nabias, B.de, 1893.— “Ténia noir observé chez l'homme; étude chimique et expérimentale de la coloration.” Sem. med. Paris., XII, 401–409. (W.L., 20080.)Google Scholar
Neumann, L. G., 1890.— “A propos d'un ténia triédre de l'éspece ‘Taenia perfoliata’ Goeze.” Rev. vét. Toulouse. New. Ser., XLVII, 478–486. (W.L., 19315.)Google Scholar
Neveu-Lemaire, M., 1900.— “Sur deux ténias trièdres.” Arch. Parasit. Paris, III (3) 492–508. (W.L., 1886.)Google Scholar
Neveu-Lemaire, M.& Deschiens, R., 1925.— “Anomalie observé chez un Taenia saginata.” Ann. Parasit. hum. comp., III (3) 267–269. (W.L., 899a.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitzulescu, V., 1924.— “Anomalies of Bothriocephalus; taenioid aspect.” C.R. Soc. Biol. Paris, XC, 155–156. (W.L., 6630.)Google Scholar
Oelkers, L., 1889.— “Ueber das Vorkommen von Quecksilber in den Bandwürmern eines mit Quecksilber behandelten Syphilitikers.” Ber. disch. chem. Ges., XXII, 3316–3317. (W.L., 2627.)Google Scholar
Palais, M., 1933.— “Les anomalies des cestodes. Recherches expérimentales sur Hymenolepis diminuta, (Rud).” Ann. Fac. Sci. Marseille. 2nd Ser., VI, 109–163. (W.L., 836.)Google Scholar
Pallas., — “Triaenophore à deuz tétes.” Cited by Rudolphi in Synopsis, etc., p.598.Google Scholar
Pouchet, G., 1886.— “Recherches sur un Taenia solium, fenétré.” Sem. méd. Paris, VI, p. 65. (W.L., 20080.)Google Scholar
Railliet, A., 1892.— “Notices parasitologiques 1. Cysticercus pisiformis, à six ventouses.” Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., XVI (5) 110–117. (W.L., 5401.)Google Scholar
Railliet, A., 1892.— “Notices parasitologiques. II. Téniadé de coloration ardoisée recueilli chez un lapin de garenne.” Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., XVIII (1), p. 111. (W.L., 5401.)Google Scholar
Railliet, A., 1899.— “Anomalies des scolex chez le Coenurus serialis.” C.R. Soc. Biol. Paris., 2nd Ser., 1 (2) 18–21. (W.L., 6630.)Google Scholar
Rao, M. A. N. & Ayyar, L.S.P., 1932.— “Tri-radiate Tapeworms from Hounds and Jackal.” Ind. J. vet. Sci., II (4) 397–399. (W.L., 99416.)Google Scholar
Redon, , 1877. “Expériences sur le développement rubanaire du cysticerque de l'homme.” C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, LXXXV (15) 675–678. (W.L., 6628.)Google Scholar
Riehm, G., 1881.— “Studien an Cestoden.” Zeit. Naturw. Berlin, LIV (3) 545–610. (W.L., 23515.)Google Scholar
Rosenberger, R. C., 1903.— “Notes from the Pathological Laboratory of the Jefferson Medical College. A peculiar teratologic form of Taenia saginata.” Am. med., VI (3) 93–97. (W.L., 639.)Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A., 1810.— “Entozoorum sive vermium intestinalum historia naturalis.' II (2), 386 pp.Google Scholar
Salzmann, , 1861.— “Einige Notizen über Taenien.” Wurtemb. vaterl. Naturk. in Wurttemb., XVII (1) 102–107. (W.L., 10870.)Google Scholar
Seeger, G., 1852.— “Die Bandwürmer des Menschen” in “Naturhistorischer, pathologische und therapeutischer Beziehung.” Pub. Ebner Seubert. Stuttgart. 222 pp.Google Scholar
Shennan, T., 1898.— “Tri-radiate Taenia saginata.” Scot. med. surg. J., II (5), 404. (W.L., 20011.)Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E., 1898.— “Note of an abnormality in Dipylidium caninum, (Linné).” Arch. Parasit. Paris, I (2), 354. (W.L., 1886.)Google Scholar
Siebold, C. T. E. von, 1853.— “Ueber die verwandlung der Echinococcus Brut in Taenien.” Z. wiss. Zool., V (4/5), 409–424. (W.L., 23635.)Google Scholar
Sonsino, P., 1901.— “Colorazione accidentale di strobila di Taenia saginata, Göeze dovula a solfuro di bismuto.” Arch. Parasit. Paris. IV, 222. (W.L., 1886.)Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W., 1894.— “An interesting anomaly in Moniezia planissima.” Vet. Mag., I, 433.Google Scholar
Stiles, , 1895.— “Notes on Parasites. XXXVI. A double pored cestode with occasional single pores.” Zbl. Bakt., XVII (13/14), 457. (W.L., 23684.)Google Scholar
Stossich, M., 1895.— “Osserverzioni sul Solenophorus megalocephalus.” Boll. soc. adriat. Sci. nat. Trieste, XVI, 27–32. (W.L., 3359.)Google Scholar
Strom, J., 1929.— “Einige Anomalien bei den parasitischen Plattwürmer.” Zbl. Bakt., III (6/8), 500–502. (W.L., 23684.)Google Scholar
Trabut, L., 1889.— “Observations teratologiques sur un Taenia saginata à six ventouses et de forme triquétre.” Arch. Zool. éxp. gen., 2me Ser., XVII (2), Notes et Revue X–XI. (W.L., 1915.)Google Scholar
Tuckermann, F., 1888.— “An interesting specimen of Taenia saginata.” Zool. Anz., XI (272) 94–95 (287) 374–375. (W.L., 23833.)Google Scholar
Vaillant, L., 1870.— “Note sur un Taenia monstrueux de l'homme.” C.R. Soc. Biol. Paris, 5th Ser., I, 168–169. (W.L., 6630.)Google Scholar
Vigener, J., 1903.— “Uber dreikantige Bandwümer aus der Familie der Taeniiden.” Jb. nassau. Ver. Naturk., LVI, 115–177. (W.L., 10540.)Google Scholar
Wagener, G. R., 1854.— “Die Entwicklung der Cestoden.” Supplement to Verh. kais. Leop. Carol. Akad., XXIV, 1–90.Google Scholar
Weinland, D. F., 1861.— “Beschreibung zweier neuer Taenioiden aus dem Menschen. Notiz über die Bandwürmer der Indianer und Neger's Beschreibung einer Monstrosität von Taenia solium, L. und Versuch einer Systematik der Taenien uberhaupt.” Nova. Acta. Leop. Carol. Jenae, XXVIII, 24 pp. (W.L., 15318.)Google Scholar
Williams, S. R., 1939.— “Variation in Monieza expansa.” Ohio. J. Sci., XXXIX (1) 37–42. (W.L., 15627.)Google Scholar
Yoshida, S. O., 1913.— “Tri-radiate Taenia crassicollis Rud.” Parasitology, VI (3) 279–282. (W.L., 16035.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zchokke, F., 1886–1889.— “Recherches sur la structure anatomique et histologique des Cestodes.” Mém. Inst. nat. genev., XVII, 63–73. (W.L., 13250.)Google Scholar
Zenker, F. A., 1882.— “Ueber den Cysticercus racemosus des Gehirnes.” Beitr. z. Anat. u. Embryol. Fest. f. J. Henle., LV, 22 pp.Google Scholar
Zurn, G. A., 1898.— “Band- und Blasen- würmer mit sechs Saugnäpfen.” Z. Fleisch-u.Milch-hyg., VIII (12), 228). (W.L., 23410.)Google Scholar