Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-gmt7q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-24T11:30:25.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immediate response of Atlantic bottlenose dolphins to high-speed personal watercraft in the Mississippi Sound

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2008

Lance J. Miller ,
Moby Solangi  and
Stan A. Kuczaj II
Lance J. Miller*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, 118 College Drive #5025, Hattiesburg, MS 39406-5025, USA
Moby Solangi
Affiliation:
Institute for Marine Mammal Studies, PO Box 4078, Gulfport, MS 39502, USA
Stan A. Kuczaj II
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, 118 College Drive #5025, Hattiesburg, MS 39406-5025, USA
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Lance J. Miller, Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, 118 College Drive #5025, Hattiesburg, MS 39406-5025, USA email: lancejmiller@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Measuring the impact of anthropogenic factors on marine mammals is critical to the conservation of these species. Recently, the effect of personal watercraft on marine mammal behaviour and well-being has become a topic of increasing concern. The purpose of this study was to examine the immediate effects of high-speed personal watercraft on Atlantic bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) behaviour. Opportunistic surveys were conducted from a research vessel in the Mississippi Sound (30º13′22.6″N 89º01′36.5″W) from September 2003 through to August 2005. The passing of a high-speed personal watercraft significantly increased dolphin dive duration, dolphin group cohesion and dolphin breathing synchrony. Additionally, in 47% of the encounters a dolphin group's behaviour changed within one minute of the presence of a high-speed personal watercraft. The most notable changes were an increase in dolphin travelling behaviour and a decrease in feeding behaviour following the boat's presence. The results demonstrated an immediate, short-term change in dolphin behaviour, suggesting that an increase in the frequency of high-speed personal watercraft in this area could produce long-term detrimental effects. Research on the long-term effects of boat traffic on marine mammals is clearly needed to assess and hopefully mediate any potential long-term effects.

Keywords

human disturbanceTursiops truncatuspersonal watercraftconservation
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 88 , Special Issue 6: Marine Mammals , September 2008 , pp. 1139 - 1143
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Baker, C.S. and Herman, L.M. (1989) Behavioral responses of summering humpback whales to vessel traffic: experimental and opportunistic observations. United States Department of the Interior National Park Service, NPS-NR-TRS-89-01, pp. 50.Google Scholar
Barco, S.G., Swingle, W.M., Mclellan, W.A., Harris, R.N. and Pabst, D.A. (1999) Local abundance and distribution of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the nearshore waters of Virginia Beach, Virginia. Marine Mammal Science 15, 394–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejder, L., Dawson, S.M. and Harraway, A. (1999) Responses by Hector's dolphins to boats and swimmers in Porpoise Bay, New Zealand. Marine Mammal Science 15, 738–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejder, L., Samuels, A., Whitehead, H. and Gales, N. (2006a) Interpreting short-term behavioural responses to disturbance within a longitudinal perspective. Animal Behaviour 72, 1149–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejder, L. et al. (2006b) Decline in relative abundance of bottlenose dolphins exposed to long-term disturbance. Conservation Biology 20, 1791–1798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connor, R.C. and Heithaus, M.R. (1996) Approach of a great white shark elicits flight response in bottlenose dolphins. Marine Mammal Science 12, 602–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantine, R., Brunton, D.H. and Dennis, T. (2004) Dolphin-watching tour boats change bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) behaviour. Biological Conservation 117, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, L. and Cotton, P.A. (2004) Effects of boat traffic on the behaviour of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Aquatic Mammals 30, 279–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, G.D., Wilson, B., Tufft, L.H. and Thompson, P.M. (2003) Bottlenose dolphins increase breathing synchrony in response to boat traffic. Marine Mammal Science 19, 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hik, D.S. (1995) Does risk of predation influence population dynamics? Evidence from the cyclic decline of snowshoe hares. Wildlife Research 22, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janik, V.M. and Thompson, P.M. (1996) Changes in surfacing patterns of bottlenose dolphins in response to boat traffic. Marine Mammal Science 12, 597–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, S.L. (1998) Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator–prey interactions. Bioscience 48, 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusseau, D. (2003) Male and female bottlenose dolphins Tursiops spp. have different strategies to avoid interactions with tour boats in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand. Marine Ecology Progress Series 257, 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusseau, D. (2004) The hidden cost of ecotourism: detecting long-term effects of tourism using behavioral information. Ecology and Society 9, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusseau, D. (2005) The residency pattern of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.) in Fiordland, New Zealand, is related to boat traffic. Marine Ecology Progress Series 295, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowacek, S.M., Wells, R.S. and Solow, A.R. (2001) Short-term effects of boat traffic on bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, in Sarasota Bay, Florida. Marine Mammal Science 17, 673–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, S., Viddi, F.A. and Freitas, T.R.O. (2005) Behavioral responses of Chilean dolphins (Cephalorhynchus eutropia) to boats in Yaldad Bay, Southern Chile. Aquatic Mammals 31, 234–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salerno, B.M. (2006) Boating statistics—2005. US Department of Homeland Security United States Coast Guard, P16754.19, pp. 48.Google Scholar
Scott, M.D., Wells, R.S. and Irvine, A.B. (1990) A long-term study of bottlenose dolphins on the west coast of Florida. In Leatherwood, S. and Reeves, R.R. (eds) The bottlenose dolphin. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, S.H. (1990a) Behavior and ecology of the bottlenose dolphin at Sanibel Island, Florida. In Leatherwood, S. and Reeves, R.R. (eds) The bottlenose dolphin. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 245–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, S.H. (1990b) Comparison of bottlenose dolphin behavior in Texas and Florida, with a critique of methods for studying dolphin behavior. In Leatherwood, S. and Reeves, R.R. (eds) The bottlenose dolphin. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 541–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, A.R.E. and Arcese, P. (1995) Population consequences of predation-sensitive foraging: the Serengeti wildebeest. Ecology 76, 882–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skelly, D.K. and Werner, E.E. (1990) Behavioral and life historical responses of larval American toads to an odonate predator. Ecology 71, 2313–2322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, P.W., Medved, R.J., Hyman, M.A.M. and Winn, H.E. (1984) Distribution and abundance of cetaceans in the vicinity of human activities along the continental shelf of the north-western Atlantic. Marine Environmental Resources 12, 69–81.Google Scholar
Tayler, C.K. and Saayman, G.S. (1972) The social organization and behaviour of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) and baboons (Papio ursinus): some comparisons and assessments. Annals of the Cape Provincial Museums, Natural History 9, 11–49.Google Scholar
Wells, R.S. (1993) The marine mammals of Sarasota Bay. In Roat, P. et al. (eds) Sarasota Bay: 1992 framework for action. Sarasota: Sarasota Bay National Estuary Program, pp. 9.1–9.23.Google Scholar
Wells, R.S. and Scott, M.D. (1997) Seasonal incidence of boat strikes on bottlenose dolphins near Sarasota, Florida. Marine Mammal Science 13, 475–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R., Lusseau, D. and Hammond, P.S. (2006) Estimating relative energetic costs of human disturbance to killer whales (Orcinus orca). Biological Conservation 133, 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, A.J. (2006) A review of the NRC's ‘Marine mammal populations and ocean noise: determining when noise causes biologically significant effects’ Report. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 9, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Würsig, B. and Würsig, M. (1979) Behavior and ecology of the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus, in the South Atlantic. Fishery Bulletin 77, 399–412.Google Scholar