No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Fantastic Fauna in a Global Perspective: understanding composites in early Eurasian Antiquity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 December 2021
Abstract
Ancient tombs and hoards across the Eurasian steppe call for a thorough revision of art-historical categories associated with pastoral societies from Mongolia to Crimea. This study focuses on one such category. “Animal style” is an umbrella term traditionally used to categorise portable precious metalwork ornamented with dynamic scenes of vigorous animal fights and entwined zoomorphic designs. With its emphasis on irregular animal anatomies and deeply rooted in a “pars-pro-toto” mode of expression, steppe imagery of fantastic fauna presents a useful case study in broader investigations of composites in the ancient world and their diffusion across cultural spheres. This study views beasts through a binary lens, the structured monsters of Greco-Roman thinkers and the organic composites of nomadic steppe artisans. In the Western canon, “composites” existed within a politically-manufactured framework of governable “otherness”, in which fantastic fauna conveys a certain tension with the exotic, unknown and uncontrollable East. Meanwhile, in the visual rhetoric of steppe artisans, monsters represented a tension with the (cyclical) shifts occurring in one's biota rather than the tumultuous events in one's constructed environment. This paper explores how the contrasting steppe pastoralist and sedentary imperial world-views came to define the various functions and meanings of “composites” in Eurasian Antiquity.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Asiatic Society
References
1 A pioneer in this field, and the first to propose that the early nomads of Mongolia and Siberia had in fact a complex visual language was Esther Jacobson, who focused on pastoralists in Mongolia and Siberia of the Late Bronze and early Iron Age. See Jacobson, E., The Deer Goddess of Ancient Siberia: A study in the Ecology of Belief (Leiden, 1993)Google Scholar; Jacobson-Tepfer, E., The Hunter, the Stag and the Mother of Animals (Oxford, 2015)Google Scholar.
2 E. Korolkova, “The Siberian Collection of Peter the Great”, in Scythians: Warriors of Ancient Siberia, (ed.) J. Simpson, S. Pankova, (London, 2017), pp. 34-69.
3 Ibid; For more on the history of the Tsar's collection, see Cunliffe, B., The Scythians: Nomad Warriors of the Steppe (Oxford 2019), pp. 1-8Google Scholar.
4 For the most recent discussion of radiocarbon dating and other related problems in the study of Pazyryk nomads, see Linduff, K. and Rubinson, K., “Pazyryk Cuture Up in the Altai”, (New York, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Marazov, I., Ancient Gold: The Wealth of the Thracians, (New York, 1998)Google Scholar.
6 Ch. Tzochev, “Trade”, in A Companion to Ancient Thrace, (ed.). J. Valeva et.al. (Hoboken, 2015), pp. 416-422.
7 Venedikov, I., Gerasimov, T, Trakiiskoto izkustvo (Sofia, 1973), pl. 152Google Scholar.
8 Bussagli, M., “Painting of Central Asia” (Geneva, 1963)Google Scholar; Rowland, B., The Art of Central Asia. (New York, 1974)Google Scholar.
9 W. Hartner: “The Earliest History of the Constellations in the near East and the Motif of the Lion-Bull Combat”, Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 01 (1965), pp. 1-16.
10 D. Hardesty (ed): “Archaeology Volume 1”, (ebook, 2010), p. 380.
11 Aruz, J., The Golden Deer of Eurasia: Perspectives on the Steppe Nomads of the Ancient World. (New Haven, 2007)Google Scholar.
12 S. West, Scythians, in Brill's Companion to Herodotus, (ed.) E. Bakker (Leiden, 2002), pp. 437-456.
13 A. Zournatzi, "The Apadana Coin Hoards, Darius I, and the West". American Journal of Numismatics (15) (2003), pp. 1–28.
14 For further analysis of the visual synecdoche trope, see P. Andreeva, “Animal Style at the Penn Museum: Conceptualising Portable Steppe Art and its Visual Rhetoric”, Orientations 52 (4), pp. 49-57.
15 D. Hasan., and V. M. Masson, History of Civilizations of Central Asia. Paris (Unesco, 1992)., p. 450.
16 E. Jacobson-Tepfer, The Hunter, the Stag and the Mother of Animals (Oxford, 2015), p. 252; See also: Allard, Francis, and Diimajav Erdenebaataar. 2005. “Khirisguurs, Ritual and Moblity in the Bronze Age of Mongolia”. Antiquity 79, no. 305, pp. 547-563.
17 A. Farkas: “Style and Subject Matter in Native Thracian Art”. Metropolitan Museum Journal. Vol.16 (1981), pp. 33-48.
18 Whitfield 2018, pp. 9-33; For a comprehensive study of the occurrence of steppe objects in Han-dynasty tombs, see K. Cost: “Heightened Receptivity: Steppe Objects and Steppe Influences in Royal Tombs of the Western Han dynasty”. Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 137 (2), pp. 349-381.
19 H. Yang: “Hubei Zhushanxian bowuguan shoucang de yi jian xihan jin daikou”. Wenwu 2010 (9), p. 77.
20 Alexeyev, A., The Gold of the Scythian Kings in the Hermitage Collection (St Petersburg, 2012), p. 106Google Scholar.
21 Artamonov, M. I., The Splendor of Scythian Art; Treasures from Scythian Tombs (New York, 1969), pl. 59Google Scholar.
22 Wittkower, R., “Marvels of the East, A study in the History of Monsters”, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 1 (1942), p. 160Google Scholar.
23 Ibid.
24 H. Rackham, Pliny's Natural History, (Massachusetts, 1949), Book II, p LXXV.
25 M. Troy, "The Scythian Perspective in Col 3:11." Novum Testamentum 37, no. 3 (1995), pp. 249-261.
26 Horace, Epistoles and Ars Poetica, translated by H. Rushton Fairclough (Cambridge, Mass, 1970).
27 Vitruvius, P., and Gwilt., J. The Architecture of Marcus Vitruvius Pollio, in ten books. (London, 1926), p. 75Google Scholar.
28 Aldrete, G. and Aldrete., A. The Long Shadow of Antiquity: What Have the Greeks and Romans Done for Us? (London, 2012), p. 321Google Scholar.
29 Naturally, dragons constitute an entirely category of their own, and have occupied a vast space in early Chinese discourse. However, they do not organically fall under what one would normally consider “composites” or “hybrids”, both of which have been often overshadowed by the general excitement around dragons and their diffusion. It is for this reason, that here, we allow composites, and their fragmented bodies to be at the centre.
30 K. Chugunov: Der skythenzeitliche Fürstenkurgan Arzhan 2 in Tuva. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern, 2010; See also Zaitzeva, G. et al. : “Chronological Studies of the Arzhan-2 Scythian Monument in Tuva (Russia)”. Radiocarbon 46 (2004), pp. 277-284Google Scholar.
31 The term “minimally counterintuitive” was recently applied by David Wengrow in his book “Origins of Monsters” which explores the trajectory of ancient monster imagery with a focus on the Ancient Near East. See Wengrow, D.: The Origins of Monsters, (Princeton, 2013), p. 24Google Scholar.
32 L. T. Yablonsky, “The Archaeology of Eurasian Nomads”, in Archaeology Vol. 1 (ed.) D. L. Hardesty, (ebook, 2010), p. 372.
33 Stockhammer, P. (ed.), Conceptualizing Cultural Hybridization (Heidelberg, 2012), pp. 1-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
34 P. Stockhammer, “From Hybridity to Entanglement, from Essentialism to Practice”, Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 28 (1), pp. 11-28.
Andreeva supplementary material
Andreeva supplementary material 1
File
13.2 KB
Andreeva supplementary material
Andreeva supplementary material 2
Image
1.8 MB