Introduction
Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto is the aetiological agent of most cases of cystic echinococcosis in humans (Alvarez Rojas et al., Reference Alvarez Rojas, Romig and Lightowlers2014). The parasite is commonly transmitted by sheep and canines (Cardona and Carmena, Reference Cardona and Carmena2013). The EG95 vaccine against E. granulosus has been found to be highly effective in reducing susceptibility of sheep to an experimental challenge infection with E. granulosus eggs (Lightowlers et al., Reference Lightowlers, Lawrence, Gauci, Young, Ralston, Maas and Health1996, Reference Lightowlers, Jensen, Fernandez, Iriarte, Woollard, Gauci, Jenkins and Heath1999; Lightowlers, Reference Lightowlers2006), and in reducing the prevalence of cystic echinococcosis in naturally exposed animals (Heath et al., Reference Heath, Jensen and Lightowlers2003; Larrieu et al., Reference Larrieu, Mujica, Gauci, Vizcaychipi, Seleiman, Herrero, Labanchi, Araya, Sepulveda, Grizmado, Calabro, Talmon, Poggio, Crowley, Cespedes, Santillan, Garcia Cachau, Lamberti, Gino, Donadeu and Lightowlers2015). The vaccine is now available as a commercial product manufactured in Argentina, as well as China, where it has been implemented as part of a national disease control programme so as to reduce the parasite's transmission and, indirectly, the incidence of human infection (Lightowlers, Reference Lightowlers and Bowman2021).
The EG95 recombinant antigen comprises an approximately 16.6 kDa parasite-encoded protein expressed as an amino-terminal fusion with glutathione S-transferase (GST) using a pGEX vector in Escherichia coli, with the protective responses clearly associated with the EG95 component rather than the GST fusion partner (Lightowlers et al., Reference Lightowlers, Lawrence, Gauci, Young, Ralston, Maas and Health1996). The EG95 vaccine was initially produced in microbial cultures from bacterial components expressed in soluble form and affinity purified (Lightowlers et al., Reference Lightowlers, Lawrence, Gauci, Young, Ralston, Maas and Health1996, Reference Lightowlers, Jensen, Fernandez, Iriarte, Woollard, Gauci, Jenkins and Heath1999). Much of the antigen is present in E. coli, after induction of recombinant protein, in an insoluble form as bacterial inclusion bodies. A commercial process was developed for use of the insoluble antigen as vaccine (Heath et al., Reference Heath, Jensen and Lightowlers2003). Subsequently, Gauci et al. (Reference Gauci, Jenkins and Lightowlers2011) found that truncation of the original EG95 cDNA, so as to remove short hydrophobic stretches from both the amino- and carboxy-terminal regions of the protein (referred to as EG95NC−), greatly enhanced the productivity of the soluble component of the E. coli-expressed antigen without affecting its protective efficacy. The truncated EG95 antigen was expressed at a level representing approximately 50% of the total soluble bacterial protein. The potential use of EG95NC− as a bacterin vaccine comprising total soluble protein from lysates of E. coli expressing the protein was investigated.
Materials and methods
The GST fusion of EG95NC− (hereafter referred to as EG95NC−) and GST were expressed in E. coli BB4 strain, affinity purified using glutathione sepharose and quantified for protein content according to the methods described by Gauci et al. (Reference Gauci, Jenkins and Lightowlers2011). EG95NC− total soluble protein was prepared from induced bacterial cultures by removal of culture medium using centrifugation at 500 g, followed by sonication in phosphate-buffered saline. The bacterial lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 40 000 g, 4°C for 15 min and the soluble protein preparation was filter sterilized through a 0.2 μm syringe filter. The protein concentration was determined (Gauci et al., Reference Gauci, Jenkins and Lightowlers2011) and the composition of the preparation was estimated as the percentage of EG95NC− in the total soluble protein sample using sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and scanning densitometry (Gauci et al., Reference Gauci, Jenkins and Lightowlers2011).
A vaccination and challenge trial was undertaken in 30 merino-cross lambs, 4–5 months of age of mixed sex, which were randomly allocated to 3 groups of 10 animals. The trial received Animal Ethics approval from the Australian National University Animal Ethics Committee (F.BTZ.23.08). Each group of vaccinated animals received 2 subcutaneous immunizations 4 weeks apart in the neck with vaccines comprising 1 mg Quil A adjuvant (Brenntag Biosector A/D, Denmark) together with either 50 μg affinity purified EG95NC− protein or the same quantity of EG95NC− as part of the total soluble E. coli protein (bacterin). The control group received no vaccination. Two weeks after the second vaccinations, each lamb was given an intraruminal infection with 1000 eggs of E. granulosus all derived from the same batch of viable eggs. These eggs were sourced from a naturally infected wild dog obtained from the Local Lands Services of New South Wales, Feral Animal Control Officer through the normal course of the Officer's work. Approximately 1 year after the challenge infection, the animals were humanely euthanized by captive-bolt pistol and the liver and lungs sliced by hand at approximately 3–4 mm intervals to identify E. granulosus cysts. Any lesions of unclear origin were examined by histology to confirm the presence of E. granulosus. Hydatid cyst viability was determined by excision of the cyst and observation of fluid, protoscoleces or germinal membrane within.
Results
The relative proportion of EG95NC− in total soluble bacterial protein extract used for vaccination was estimated to be 58% (Fig. 1). Scanning densitometry SDS-PAGE analysis of samples removed at regular intervals from an E. coli culture expressing EG95NC− showed an increase in the proportion of soluble recombinant protein (relative to E. coli proteins) over time, with EG95NC− being the predominant protein present (Fig. 1).
The number of viable E. granulosus cysts in individual sheep vaccinated with the antigen obtained from E. coli expressing EG95NC−, and control sheep are shown in Table 1. One animal in the control group died due to causes unrelated to the experimental procedures. Both affinity purified EG95NC− and non-purified EG95NC− (consisting of total soluble bacterial proteins) induced high levels of protection (94.6 and 97.9%, respectively) in comparison to controls, with no significant difference between the 2 EG95NC−groups (Mann–Whitney U test). All control animals developed large numbers of viable cysts following the challenge infection, ranging from 195 to 503 cysts per animal.
Sheep in test groups were immunized with purified EG95NC− (EG95NC− affinity pure) or crude E. coli extract containing EG95NC− (EG95NC− total soluble protein). Cysts present in all animals were macroscopically similar.
Discussion
The EG95 vaccine produced as either affinity purified antigen, or as total soluble protein from E. coli, induced very high levels of protection against a challenge infection with E. granulosus. The presence of contaminating bacterial proteins (up to ~50%) did not affect the ability of the EG95NC− antigen to protect vaccinated sheep against E. granulosus infection. Heath et al. (Reference Heath, Jensen and Lightowlers2003) found that the antigen was also protective as solubilized bacterial inclusion bodies, although the relative purity of EG95 in relation to other bacterial proteins was not indicated. The improved productivity and simplicity of preparation of the EG95 vaccine as a bacterin, comprising total soluble proteins, provides a simple and effective method for producing the vaccine. Based on the bacterial fermentation conditions used here, 1 litre of bacterial culture expressing EG95NC− would produce more than 7000 doses of vaccine. We note that the fermentation conditions had not been optimized and it is likely that an even greater level of antigen productivity would be likely with optimized conditions.
Vaccines comprising whole inactivated E. coli bacteria or bacterins are not unusual in the animal health industries (Cox et al., Reference Cox, Melkebeek, Devriendt, Goddeeris, Vanrompay and Morabito2014); examples include Onderstepoort Biological Products E. coli Vaccine for Sheep and Cattle, Elanco's Scour Bos and Zoetis LitterGuard. Hence, use of a bacterin derived from an E. coli strain expressing a defined recombinant antigen does not represent an entirely novel vaccine modality. In the vaccine experiment described here, detailed clinical and injection site studies were not undertaken, however, the animals vaccinated with the bacterin had no overt clinical symptoms post vaccination and were not observed to have injection site reactions different to those given the affinity purified EG95 antigen.
Many of the regions where cystic echinococcosis is highly endemic are in relatively poor, developing countries (Deplazes et al., Reference Deplazes, Rinaldi, Alvarez Rojas, Torgerson, Harandi, Romig, Antolova, Schurer, Lahmar, Cringoli, Magambo, Thompson and Jenkins2017), emphasizing the need to minimize vaccination costs. Widespread implementation of vaccination against E. granulosus in livestock has the potential to reduce the incidence of human cystic echinococcosis in endemic areas. Our demonstration here of a simple, comparatively inexpensive method for producing the EG95 vaccine may facilitate the vaccine's production in more countries where cystic echinococcosis is highly endemic, contributing to the parasite's control and a reduction in human infections.
Author's contributions
ML and CG conceived and designed the study. All authors undertook the study and wrote the article.
Financial support
This work was supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (grant number 3502799).
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Ethical standards
All work with animals was undertaken using procedures consistent with the Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. The work was approved by the Australian National University Animal Ethics Committee (F.BTZ.23.08).