Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-s6l46 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T18:33:15.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Retention, Uptake, and Translocation of 14C-Glyphosate from Track-Spray Applications and Correlation to Rainfastness in Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Paul C. C. Feng ,
Joseph J. Sandbrink  and
R. Douglas Sammons
Paul C. C. Feng*
Affiliation:
Monsanto Ag Research, 700 Chesterfield Village Parkway, St. Louis, MO 63198
Joseph J. Sandbrink
Affiliation:
Monsanto Ag Research, 700 Chesterfield Village Parkway, St. Louis, MO 63198
R. Douglas Sammons
Affiliation:
Monsanto Ag Research, 700 Chesterfield Village Parkway, St. Louis, MO 63198
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: paul.feng@monsanto.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three commercial formulations of glyphosate were spiked with 14C-glyphosate and applied via a spray nozzle to velvetleaf plants. The use of 14C-glyphosate as a marker caused minimal alteration to formulation properties, and the use of spray application simulated field practices. Formulation retention, calculated based on maximum plant-leaf area, showed that only 27 to 33% of the available area retained the spray. The small differences in retention among the formulations suggest that they contribute little to differences in efficacy. Following spray application, plants were harvested at various times to measure the levels of glyphosate uptake into the plant and translocation into roots. Significant differences were observed among the formulations in the rate of glyphosate uptake. The most efficient formulation absorbed about one third of the dose by 24 hr after treatment. Root translocation of glyphosate was approximately proportional to uptake and accounted for less than one third of the absorbed dose. The relationship between uptake and rainfastness was examined in greenhouse studies with simulated rainfall at various times after glyphosate application. A direct correlation was observed between rainfastness with the speed and quantity of glyphosate uptake.

Keywords

GlyphosateN-(phosphonomethyl)glycine. VelvetleafAbutilon theophrasti Medik# ABUTHUptaketranslocationretentiontrack sprayglyphosate formulationsDAT, days after treatmentGI, growth inhibitionHAT, hours after treatment

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 127 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Ambach, R. M. and Ashford, R. 1982. Effects of variations in drop makeup on the phytotoxicity of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 30: 221–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1987. Effects of application variables on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Technol. 1: 14–17.Google Scholar
Casely, J. C. and Coupland, D. 1985. Environmental and plant factors affecting glyphosate uptake, movement and activity. In Grossbard, E. and Atkinson, D., eds. The Herbicide Glyphosate. London, England: Butterworth and Co. pp. 92–123.Google Scholar
Cranmer, J. R. and Linscott, D. L. 1990. Droplet makeup and the effect on phytotoxicity of glyphosate in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 38: 406–410.Google Scholar
Denis, M. H. and Delrot, S. 1997. Effects of salt and surfactants on foliar uptake and long distance transport of glyphosate. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 35: 291–301.Google Scholar
De Ruiter, H., Uffing, A.J.M., Meinen, E., and Prins, A. 1990. Influence of surfactants and plant species on leaf retention of spray solutions. Weed Sci. 38: 567–572.Google Scholar
De Ruiter, H., Uffing, A.J.M., and Meinen, E. 1996. Influence of surfactants and ammonium sulfate on glyphosate phytotoxicity to quackgrass (Elytigia repens). Weed Technol. 10: 803–808.Google Scholar
Duke, S. O. 1988. Glyphosate. In Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp. 2–70.Google Scholar
Feng, P.C.C., Ryerse, J. S., and Sammons, R. D. 1998. Correlation of leaf damage with uptake and translocation of glyphosate in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Technol. 12: 300–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskin, R. E. and Holloway, P. J. 1992. Some physicochemical factors influencing foliar uptake enhancement of glyphosate mono(isopropylammonium) by polyoxyethelene surfactants. Pestic. Sci. 34: 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, D. R., Tucci, M. A., and Servaites, J. C. 1987. Glyphosate effects on carbon assimilation and gas exchange in sugar beet leaves. Plant Physiol. 85: 365–369.Google Scholar
Geiger, D. R. and Bestman, H. D. 1990. Self-limitation of herbicide mobility by phytotoxic action. Weed Sci. 38: 324–329.Google Scholar
Gougler, J. A. and Geiger, D. R. 1984. Carbon partitioning and herbicide translocation in glyphosate treated sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 32: 546–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkwood, R. C. and McKay, I. 1994. Accumulation and elimination of herbicides in selected crop and weed species. Pestic. Sci. 42: 241–249.Google Scholar
Liu, S.H., Campbell, R. A., Studens, J. A., and Wagner, R. G. 1996. Absorption and translocation of glyphosate in Aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) as influenced by droplet size, droplet number, and herbicide concentration. Weed Sci. 44: 482–488.Google Scholar
Majek, B. A. 1980. The effect of environmental factors on quackgrass [Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.] growth and glyphosate penetration and translocation. . Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Riechers, D.E., Wax, L. M., Liebl, R. A., and Bush, D. R. 1994. Surfactant-increased glyphosate uptake into plasma membrane vesicles isolated from common lambsquarters leaves. Plant Physiol. 105: 1419–1425.Google Scholar