Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Applied Psychological Ethics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Applied Psychological Ethics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Section I Ethical Issues in Specific Settings and Challenging Populations
- Section II Ethical Issues in Working with Diverse Populations
- Section III Legal, Research, and Organizational Issues
- 21 Major Legal Cases That Have Influenced Mental Health Ethics
- 22 Ethical Considerations in Forensic Evaluations in Family Court
- 23 Ethical Issues in Online Research
- 24 Ethical Issues in International Research
- 25 Clinical Supervision for Multicultural and Professional Competence
- 26 Disciplinary Supervision: Ethical Challenges for Supervisors
- 27 Ethical Issues in Psychological Consultation
- Section IV Emerging Ethical Issues in Professional Practice and Next Steps
- Index
- References
21 - Major Legal Cases That Have Influenced Mental Health Ethics
from Section III - Legal, Research, and Organizational Issues
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 February 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Applied Psychological Ethics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Applied Psychological Ethics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Section I Ethical Issues in Specific Settings and Challenging Populations
- Section II Ethical Issues in Working with Diverse Populations
- Section III Legal, Research, and Organizational Issues
- 21 Major Legal Cases That Have Influenced Mental Health Ethics
- 22 Ethical Considerations in Forensic Evaluations in Family Court
- 23 Ethical Issues in Online Research
- 24 Ethical Issues in International Research
- 25 Clinical Supervision for Multicultural and Professional Competence
- 26 Disciplinary Supervision: Ethical Challenges for Supervisors
- 27 Ethical Issues in Psychological Consultation
- Section IV Emerging Ethical Issues in Professional Practice and Next Steps
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Applied Psychological Ethics , pp. 429 - 451Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
American Psychological Association (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdfGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, G. A. H., Rosenwald, L., Overcast, T., & Feldman, S. B. (1995). Law and mental health professionals: Washington. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Benjamin, G. A. H., Kent, L., & Sirikantraporn, S. (2009). Duty to protect statutes. In Werth, J. L., Welfel, E. R., & Benjamin, G. A. H. (Eds.), The duty to protect: Ethical, legal, and professional responsibilities of mental health professionals (pp. 9–28). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Benjamin, G. A. H., Luini, C., & Younggren, J.N. (2013). The duty to record: Ethical, legal, and professional considerations. Retrieved from www.apadivisions.org/division-31/publications/index.aspxGoogle Scholar
Caudill, O. B. & Kaplan, A. I. (2005). Protecting privacy and confidentiality. In Bucky, S. F., Callan, J. E., & Stricker, G. (Eds.), Ethical and legal issues for mental health professionals: A comprehensive handbook of principles and standards (pp. 117–134). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Maltreatment and Trauma Press/The Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Children’s Bureau (2014). Definitions of child abuse and neglect. Child Welfare Information Gateway. Retrieved from www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/resource/child-maltreatment-2014Google Scholar
Cross, T. P., Mathews, B., Tonmyr, L., Scott, D., & Quimet, C. (2012). Child welfare policy and practice on children’s exposure to domestic violence. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36, 210–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, C. B. & Orlandky, M. (2008). Informed consent to psychotherapy: Protecting the dignity and respecting the autonomy of patients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64, 576–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glosoff, H. L., Herlihy, S. B., Herlihy, B., & Spence, E. B. (1997). Privileged communication in the psychologist client relationship. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 573–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Camilleri, J. A. (2004). Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the violence risk appraisal guide to nonforensic patients). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1063–1074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalichman, S. C. (1999). Mandated reporting of suspected child abuse: Ethics, law, and policy (2nd edn.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1201–1231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
L. A. R. v. Marie Rose Ludwig, 821 P.2d 291.Google Scholar
Monahan, J. (2006). Tarasoff at thirty: How developments in science and policy shape the common law. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 75, 497–521.Google Scholar
Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Appelbaum, P., et al. (2000). Developing a clinically useful actuarial tool for assessing violence risk. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 312–319. [See Iterative Classification Tree at http://bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/reprint/176/4/312]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Silver, E., et al. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mosher, P. W. & Swire, P. P. (2002). The ethical and legal implications of Jaffee v Redmond and the HIPAA medical privacy rule for psychotherapy and general psychiatry. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 25, 575–584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pabian, Y., Welfel, E. R., & Beebe, R. S. (2009). Psychologists’ knowledge of their state laws pertaining to Tarasoff-type situations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 8–14.Google Scholar
Pope, K. S., Simpson, M. H., & Weiner, N. F. (1978). Malpractice in outpatient psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 32, 593–602.Google Scholar
Scott, C. L. & Resnick, P. J. (2006). Violence risk assessment in persons with mental illness. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 598–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelman, E. A. & Lazoritz, S. (2005). The Mary Ellen Wilson child abuse case and the beginning of children’s rights in 19th century America. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.Google Scholar
Stark, E. (2005). Nicholson V. Williams revisited: When good people do bad things. Denver Law Review, 82, 691.Google Scholar
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 13 Cal.3d 117, 529 P.2d 553 (1974).Google Scholar
Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California. 551 P.2d 334 (1976).Google Scholar
Waitzkin, H. (1984). Doctor–patient communication: Clinical implications of social scientific research. JAMA, 252, 2441–2446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walcott, D. M., Cerundolo, P., & Beck, J. C. (2001). Current analysis of the Tarasoff duty: An evolution towards the limitation of the duty to protect. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 325–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weithorn, L. A. (2001). Protecting children from exposure to domestic violence: The use and abuse of child maltreatment. Hastings Law Journal, 53, 1–156.Google Scholar
Welfel, E. R., Werth, J. L., & Benjamin, G. A. H. (2012). Clients who threaten others or themselves. In Knapp, S., Gottlieb, M. M., & VandeCreek, L. (Eds.), APA handbook of ethics in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 377–400). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar