Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-b9rrs Total loading time: 0.826 Render date: 2022-11-29T22:30:23.764Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

7 - Embodied Relationality Beyond “Nature” vs “Nurture”: Materializing Absent Kinships in Japanese Child Welfare

from Part II - The (Non)Biological Basis of Relatedness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2019

Sandra Bamford
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bamford, Sandra. 2009. “‘Family Trees’ among the Kamea of Papua New Guinea: A Non-Genealogical Approach to Imagining Relatedness.” In Kinship and Beyond: The Genealogical Model Reconsidered, ed. Bamford, Sandra and Leach, James, 159174. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen. 2010. “Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/continuities, Spacetime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come.Derrida Today 3(2): 240268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowlby, John. 1951. Maternal Care and Mental Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google ScholarPubMed
Bowlby, John. 1982 [1969]. Attachment and Loss, I. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Browne, Kevin. 2009. The Risk of Harm to Young Children in Institutional Care. London: Save the Children.Google Scholar
Browne, Kevin, Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., Johnson, R. and Ostergren, M.. 2006. “Overuse of Institutional Care for Children in Europe.British Medical Journal 332: 485487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, Janet. 2004. After Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Children’s Views and Voices (CVV) and Masako Nagase. 2015. Shyakaiteki yōgo no tōjishya shien gaido bukku [A guidebook for the support of child welfare tōjishya]. Osaka: Children’s Views and Voices.
Counts, Dorothy Ayers and Counts, David. 1983. “Father’s Water Equals Mother’s Milk: The Conception of Parentage in Kaliai, West New Britain.Mankind 14(1): 4656.Google Scholar
Csordas, Thomas J. 1990. “Embodiment As a Paradigm for Anthropology.Ethos 18(1): 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenreich, Barbara and McIntosh, Janet. 9 June 1997. “The New Creationism: Biology Under Attack.The Nation.Google Scholar
Fisher, Sebern F. 2014. Neurofeedback in the Treatment of Developmental Trauma: Calming the Fear-Driven Brain. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Gaskins, Suzanne. 2013. “The Puzzle of Attachment: Unscrambling Maturational and Cultural Contributions to the Development of Early Emotional Bonds.” In Attachment Reconsidered: Cultural Perspectives on a Western Theory, ed. Quinn, Naomi and Mageo, Jeannette Marie, 3364. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfarb, Kathryn. 2013. “Japan.” In Child Protection and Child Welfare: A Global Appraisal of Cultures, Policy and Practice, ed. Welbourne, Penelope and Dixon, John, 144169. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, Kathryn. 2015. “Developmental Logics: Brain Science, Child Welfare, and the Ethics of Engagement in Japan.Social Science & Medicine 143: 271278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfarb, Kathryn. 2016a. “‘Coming to Look Alike’: Materializing Affinity in Japanese Foster and Adoptive Care.Social Analysis 60(2): 4764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfarb, Kathryn. 2016b. “‘Self-Responsibility’ and the Politics of Chance: Theorizing the Experience of Japanese Child Welfare.Japanese Studies 36(2): 173189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfarb, Kathryn. 2018. “Beyond Blood Ties: Intimate Kinships in Japanese Foster and Adoptive Care.” In Intimate Japan, ed. Alexy, A. and Cook, E., 181198. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, Kathryn and Schuster, Caroline. 2016. “Editor’s Introduction: (De)materializing Kinship: Holding Together Mutuality and Difference.Social Analysis 60(2): 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Roger. 2000. Children of the Japanese State: The Changing Role of Child Protection Institutions in Contemporary Japan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1977. Ever since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Graves, Joseph L. 2015. “Great Is Their Sin: Biological Determinism in the Age of Genomics.The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 661(1): 2450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1996. “The Looping Effects of Human Kinds.” In Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Approach, ed. Sperber, D., Premack, D. and Premack, A. J., 351383. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, P. and Habu, T.. 2006. Adoption in Japan: Comparing Policies for Children in Need. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, Joy. 1986. Becoming Japanese: The World of the Pre-School Child. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hertz, Robert. 1973 [1909]. “The Pre-eminence of the Right Hand.” In Right and Left: Essays on Dual Symbolic Classification. Translated by Rodney Needham and Claudia Needham, ed. Needham, Rodney, 331. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hinata Bokko. 2009. Shisetsu de sodatta kodomotachi no ibasyo “Hinata Bokko” to shyakaiteki yōgo [A place to belong for children who were raised in institutional care: Hinata Bokko and social protective care]. Tokyo: Akashi shyoten.
Howell, Signe. 2006. The Kinning of Foreigners: Transnational Adoption in a Global Perspective. New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 1990. “An Anthropologist Looks at Biology.Man 25(2): 208229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 2004. “Beyond Biology and Culture: The Meaning of Evolution in a Relational World.Social Anthropology 12(2): 209221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 2013. “Prospect.” In Biosocial Becomings: Integrating Social and Biological Anthropology, ed. Ingold, Tim and Palsson, Gisli, 121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Japanese Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect (JaSPCAN). 2010. Nihon kodomo gyakutai boshi gakkai [Japanese Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect]. Materials distributed at 16th annual meeting, Nov. 27–28, 2010.
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2004. “The Idiom of Co-Production.” In States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, ed. Jasanoff, S., 112. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 2010. The Mirage of a Space between Nature and Nurture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Michael Maher. 2012. “Who Cares? Exploring the Disparity in Contemporary Japanese Rates of Tertiary Education Progression between Children from Child Welfare Institutions and the General Population.” Master’s Thesis, University of Oxford.
Kitanaka, Junko. 2011. Depression in Japan: Psychiatric Cures for a Society in Distress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Nancy. 2006. “If ‘Race’ Is the Answer, What Is the Question? On ‘Race,’ Racism, and Health: A Social Epidemiologist’s Perspective.http://raceandgenomics.ssrc.org/Krieger/, accessed October 28, 2016.Google Scholar
Levy, Terry M. and Orlans, Michael. 2014. Attachment, Trauma, and Healing: Understanding and Treating Attachment Disorder in Children, Families and Adults. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Leinaweaver, Jessaca. 2008. The Circulation of Children: Kinship, Adoption, and Morality in Andean Peru. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lock, Margaret. 1993. Encounters with Aging: Mythologies of Menopause in Japan and North America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lock, Margaret. 2001. “The Tempering of Medical Anthropology: Troubling Natural Categories.Medical Anthropology Quarterly 15(4): 478492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lock, Margaret. 2015. “Comprehending the Body in the Era of the Epigenome.Current Anthropology 56(2): 151177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lock, Margaret and Nguyen, Vinh-Kim. 2010. An Anthropology of Biomedicine. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Susan and Silverman, Sydel. 2005. “Introduction.” In Complexities: Beyond Nature and Nurture, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Silverman, Sydel, 120. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1973. “Techniques of the Body.Economy and Society 2(1): 7088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare (MHLW). 2014. Shyakaiteki yōgo no genjyō ni tsuite [Present conditions in social protective care]. March. (Japanese). www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kodomo/syakaiteki_yougo/dl/yougo_genjou_01.pdf, accessed August 13, 2015.
Müller-Wille, Staffan and Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2012. A Cultural History of Heredity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, Rodney. 1960. “The Left Hand of the Mugwe: An Analytical Note on the Structure of Meru Symbolism.Africa 30(1): 2033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niewöhner, Jörg. 2011. “Epigenetics: Embedded Bodies and the Molecularisation of Biography and Milieu.BioSocieties 6(3): 279298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortner, Sherry B. 1972. “Is Female to Male As Nature Is to Culture?Feminist Studies 1(2): 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyama, S. 2000. The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, Naomi and Mageo, Jeannette Marie. 2013. “Attachment and Culture: An Introduction.” In Attachment Reconsidered: Cultural Perspectives on a Western Theory, ed. Quinn, Naomi and Mageo, Jeannette Marie, 332. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Jennifer. 2002. “Blood Talks: Eugenic Modernity and the Creation of New Japanese.History and Anthropology 13(3): 191216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, Steven. 1998. Lifelines: Biology beyond Determinism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. and the English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) study team. (1998). Developmental Catch-up, and Deficit, Following Adoption after Severe Global Early Privation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 39(4): 465476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahlins, Marshall D. 2011. “What Kinship Is,” Parts I and II. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 17: 219, 227242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall D. 2013. What Kinship Is – and Is Not. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, David. 1968. American Kinship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stasch, Rupert. 2009. Society of Others: Kinship and Mourning in a West Papuan Place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuzaki, Tetsuo. 2011. “Minpō kaisei to higyakutaiji no shyakaiteki yōgo: Jidō fukushi no shiten kara” [“Revisions to the civil code and social care for abused children: from a child welfare perspective”]. Hōritsu Jihō 83(7): 7277.Google Scholar
Tsuzaki, Tsuzaki. 2009. Kono Kuni no Kodomotachi: Yōhogo Jidō Shyakai-teki Yōgo no Nihon-teki Kōchiku; Otona no Kitoku Keneki to Kodomo no Fukushi [This country’s children: constructing social care for children in need of care; the vested interests of adults and children’s welfare]. Tokyo: Nihon Kajyo Syuppan.Google Scholar
Vorria, P., Papaligoura, Z., Sarafidou, J., Kopakaki, M., Dunn, J., van Ijzendoorn, M. H. and Kontopoulou, A.. 2006. “The Development of Adopted Children after Institutional Care: A Follow-Up Study.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 47(12): 12461253.Google ScholarPubMed
Weismantel, Mary. 1995. “Making Kin: Kinship Theory and Zumbagua Adoptions.American Ethnologist 22(4): 685709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, Kath. 1991. Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Elizabeth. 2004. Psychosomatic: Feminism and the Neurological Body. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanagisako, Sylvia and Collier, Jane. 1987. “Toward a Unified Analysis of Gender and Kinship.” In Gender and Kinship: Essays Toward a Unified Analysis, ed. Yanagisako, Sylvia and Collier, Jane, 1450. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Zeanah, Charles H., Smyke, Anna T., Koga, Sebastian F. and Carlson, Elizabeth. 2005. “Attachment in Institutionalized and Community Children in Romania.Child Development 76(5): 10151028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×