Bellotti v. Baird. 1979. 443 U.S. 622.Google Scholar

Cahn, N. 2003. “Perfect Substitutes or the Real Thing?” Duke Law Journal 52: 1077–1166.Google Scholar

Commonwealth v. Addicks. SC Pa. 1815. 2 Serg. & Pawle 174.Google Scholar

Dolgin, J. 1996. “Why Has the Best-Interest Standard Survived?: The Historic and Social Context.” Children’s Legal Rights Journal 16: 2–10.Google Scholar

Gordon, M. 1987. “‘Baby M’: New Questions about Biology and Destiny.” Ms. Magazine, 25–28.Google Scholar

Hofman, D. L. 2009. “‘Mama’s Baby, Daddy’s Maybe’: A State-by-State Survey of Surrogacy Laws and Their Disparate Gender Impact.” William Mitchell Law Review 35: 449–468.Google Scholar

In re Baby. (Ct of Appeals Tenn. 2013), slip opin., available at 2013 West Law 245039, appeal granted, 2013 Tenn. LEXIS 470 (S.C. Tenn. May 7, 2013).Google Scholar

In re Gault. 1967. 387 U.S. 1.Google Scholar

Johnson v. Calvert, No. X-633190, (Cal. App. Dep’t Super. Ct. Oct. 22, 1990), aff’d sub nom., Anna J. v. Mark C., 286 Cal. Rptr. 369 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991), aff’d 851 P.2d 776 (Cal. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 206 (1993).Google Scholar

Marvin v. Marvin, (Cal. 1976). 557 P.2d 106.Google Scholar

Matter of Baby M., 217 N.J. Super. 313, 525 A.2d 1128 (1987), aff’d in part and rev’d in part, 109 N.J. 396, 537 A.2d 1227 (1988).Google Scholar

Mintz, S. and Kellogg, S.. 1988. Domestic Revolutions: A Social History of American Family Life. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Morone v. Morone. (N.Y. 1980) 413 N.E.2d 1154.Google Scholar

Nationwide Drive for Children’s Rights. 1977. “U.S. News & World Report.” In The Children’s Rights Movement, ed. Gross, B. and Gross, R., 206–213. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Nelson, W. E. 1996. “Patriarchy or Equality: Family Values or Individuality.” St. John’s Law Review 70: 435–537.Google Scholar

Parham v. J.R., 1979. 442 U.S. 584.Google Scholar

Postman, N. 1994. The Disappearance of Childhood. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Roberts, D. 1997. “Spiritual and Menial Housework.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 9: 51–80.Google Scholar

Rosecky v. Schissel. 2013. 833 N.W.2d 634.Google Scholar

Rothenberg, K. 1990. “Gestational Surrogacy and the Health Care Provider: Put Part of the ‘IVF Genie’ Back into the Bottle.” Law, Medicine and Health Care 18: 345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Scherer v. Scherer. (Ga. 1982). 292 S.E.2d 662.Google Scholar

Schneider, D. M. 1968. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District. 1969. 393 U.S. 503.Google Scholar

Troxel v. Granville. 2000. 530 U.S. 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

United States v. Green. (Cir. Ct, D. R.I. 1824). 3 Mason 482.Google Scholar

van Zyl, L. and van Niekerk, A.. 2000. “Interpretations, Perspectives and Intentions in Surrogate Motherhood.” Journal of Medical Ethics 26: 404–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Abbasi-Shavazi, J. M., McDonald, P and Hosseini-Chavoshi, M. 2008. “Modernization or Cultural Maintenance: The Practice of Consanguineous Marriage in Iran.” Journal of Biosocial Science 40(6): 911–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Al-Torki, S. 1980. “Milk Kinship in Arabic Society: An Unexplored Problem in the Ethnography of Marriage.” Ethnology 19(2): 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arda, B. 2007. “The Importance of Secularism in Medical Ethics: The Turkish Example.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 14(Suppl. 1): 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bargach, J. 2002. Orphans of Islam: Family, Abandonment and Secret Adoption in Morocco. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Baykal, B., Korkmaz, C, Ceyhan, S. T, Goktolga, U and Baser, I. 2008. “Opinions of Infertile Turkish Women on Gamete Donation and Gestational Surrogacy.” Fertility and Sterility 89: 817–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. 1997. “Pioneering Procreation: Israel’s First Test-Tube Baby.” Science As Culture 6: 525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. 2004. “‘Cheaper Than a Newcomer’: On the Political Economy of IVF in Israel.” The Sociology of Health and Illness 26(7): 897–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., Carmeli, Y. S and Cohen, R. 2000. “‘Our First IVF Baby’: Israel’s and Canada’s Press Coverage of Procreative Technology.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 20(7): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., Carmeli, Y. S and Yavetz, H. 2000. “Secrecy among Israeli Recipients of Donor Insemination.” Politics and the Life Sciences 19(1): 69–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., Diamand, Y and Abu Yaman, M. 2014. “On Fatherhood in a Conflict Zone: Gaza Fathers and Their Children’s Cancer Treatments.” In Globalized Fatherhood, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C, Chavkin, Wendy and Navarro, Jose-Alberto, 243–263. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Boivin, J., Bunting, I, Collins, J. A and Nygren, K. G. 2007. “International Estimates of Infertility Prevalence and Treatment-Seeking: Potential Need and Demand for Infertility Medical Care.” Human Reproduction 22: 1506–1512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carmeli, Y. S. and Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. 2000. “Ritualizing the ‘Natural Family’: Secrecy in Israeli Donor Insemination.” Science As Culture 9(3): 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carmeli, Y. S., Birenbaum-Carmeli, D, Madgar, I and Weissenberg, R. 2001. “Donor Insemination in Israel: Recipients’ Choices of Donors.” The Journal of Reproductive Medicine 46(8): 757–763.Google Scholar

Charrad, M. 2001. States and Women’s Rights: The Making of Postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, M. 2006. “Shi’ite Perspectives on Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies.” ISIM Newsletter 17: 26–27.Google Scholar

Clarke, M. 2009. Islam and New Kinship: Reproductive Technology and the Shariah in Lebanon. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Collins, J. A. 2002. “An International Survey of the Health Economics of IVF and ICSI.” Human Reproductive Update 8: 265–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

De Geyter, C. 2018. “More Than 8 Million Babies Born from IVF since the World’s First in 1978.” European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Press Release. www.eshre.eu/ESHRE2018/Media/ESHRE-2018-Press-releases/De-Geyter.aspx, accessed October 26, 2018.Google Scholar

Eberstadt, N. and Shah, A. 2012. “Fertility Decline in the Muslim World.” Policy Review 173: 29–44.Google Scholar

Farber, A. R. 2014. Surrogacy and Fatherhood among Homosexual Couples in Israel. MA Thesis, University of Haifa.Google Scholar

Farhi, J. and Ben Haroush, A.. 2011. “Distribution of Causes of Infertility in Patients Attending Primary Fertility Clinics in Israel.” Israel Medical Association Journal 13(1): 51–54.Google ScholarPubMed

Franklin, S. B. 2012. “Five Million Miracle Babies Later.” In Reproductive Technologies As Global Form: Ethnographies of Knowledge, Practices, and Transnational Encounters, ed. Knecht, Michi, Klotz, Maren and Beck, Stefan, 27–60. Berlin: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar

Garmaroudi Naef, S. 2012. “Gestational Surrogacy in Iran: Uterine Kinship in Shia Thought and Practice.” In Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C and Tremayne, Soraya, 157–193. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Gnoth, C., Maxrath, B, Skonieczny, T, Friol, K, Godehardt, C and Tigges, J. 2011. “Final ART Success Rates: A 10 Years Survey.” Human Reproduction 26(8): 2239–2246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gürtin, Z. B. 2011. “Banning Reproductive Travel? Turkey’s ART Legislation and Third-Party Assisted Reproduction.” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 23: 555–565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gürtin, Z. B. 2012. “Assisted Reproduction in Secular Turkey: Regulation, Rhetoric, and the Role of Religion.” In Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C and Tremayne, Soraya, 285–311. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Gürtin, Z. B. 2014. “Assumed, Promised, Forbidden: Infertility, IVF and Fatherhood in Turkey.” In Globalized Fatherhood, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C, Chavkin, Wendy and Navarro, Jose-Alberto, 223–242. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Gürtin, Zeynep, Inhorn, Marcia C. and Tremayne, Soraya. 2015. “Islam and Assisted Reproduction in the Middle East: Comparing ‘Secular’ Turkey, Shia Iran, and the Sunni Arab World.” In The Changing World Religion Map: Sacred Places, Identities, Practices and Politics, ed. Brunn, Stanley D., 3137–3153. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haeri, S. 1989. Law of Desire: Temporary Marriage in Shi’i Iran. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar

Hashiloni-Dolev, Y., Hirsh-Yechzkel, G, Boyko, V, Wainstock, T, Schiff, E and Lerner-Geva, L. 2010. “Attitudes toward Sex Selection: A Survey among Potential Users in Israel.” Prenatal Diagnosis 30(11): 1019–1025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Inhorn, M. C. 1996. Infertility and Patriarchy: The Cultural Politics of Gender and Family Life in Egypt. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Inhorn, M. C. 2003. Local Babies, Global Science: Gender, Religion, and In Vitro Fertilization in Egypt. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Inhorn, M. C. 2006. “Making Muslim Babies: IVF and Gamete Donation in Sunni and Shi’a Islam.” Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 30(4): 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inhorn, M. C. 2012. The New Arab Man: Emergent Masculinities, Technologies, and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Inhorn, M. C. 2014. “New Arab Fatherhood: Emergent Masculinities, Male Infertility, and Assisted Reproduction.” In Globalized Fatherhood, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C, Chavkin, Wendy and Navarro, Jose-Alberto, 243–263. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Inhorn, M. C. 2015. Cosmopolitan Conceptions: IVF Sojourns in Global Dubai. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Inhorn, M. C. 2018. “Fertility, Demography, and Masculinities in Arab Families: From 1950 to 2015 and Beyond.” In Arab Family Studies: Critical Reviews, ed. Joseph, Suad, 449–466. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inhorn, M. C. and Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. 2008. “Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Culture Change.” Annual Review of Anthropology 37: 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inhorn, M. C., Kobeissi, L, Nassar, Z, Lakkis, D and Fakih, M. H. 2009. “Consanguinity and Family Clustering of Male Infertility in Lebanon.” Fertility and Sterility 91(4): 1104–1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Inhorn, M. C. and Patrizio, P. 2015. “Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Gender, Reproductive Technologies, and Global Movements in the 21st Century.” Human Reproduction Update 21(4): 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inhorn, M. C., Patrizio, P and Serour, G. I. 2010. “Third-party Reproductive Assistance around the Mediterranean: Comparing Sunni Egypt, Catholic Italy and Multisectarian Lebanon.” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 21(7): 848–853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Inhorn, M. C. and Tremayne, S., eds. 2012. Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Isikoglu, M., Senol, Y., Berkkanoglu, M, Ozgur, K, Donmez, L and Stones-Abbasi, A. 2006. “Public Opinion Regarding Oocyte Donation in Turkey: First Data from a Secular Population among the Islamic World.” Human Reproduction 21: 318–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Israel Ministry of Health. 2013. “In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Treatments: Absolute Numbers, Percentages, Rates.” www.health.gov.il/PublicationsFiles/IVF1986_2012.pdf, accessed October 22, 2018.Google Scholar

Jones, H. W., Cooke, I, Kempers, R, Brinsden, P and Saunders, D. 2010. “International Federation of Fertility Societies: Surveillance 2010.” www.iffs-reproduction.org/documents/IFFS_Surveillance_2010.pdf, accessed October 26, 2018.Google Scholar

Kahn, S. M. 2000. Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception in Israel. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Khatib-Chahidi, J. 1982. “Sexual Prohibitions, Shared Space and Fictive Marriages.” In Women and Space: Ground Rules and Social Maps, ed. Ardener, S., 112–134. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Khatib-Chahidi, J. 1992. “Milk Kinship in Shi’ite Islamic Iran.” In The Anthropology of Breastfeeding: Natural Law or Social Construct, ed. Maher, Vanessa, 109–132. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Kilic, S., Ucar, M, Yaren, H, Gulec, M, Atac, A, Demirel, F, Karabulut, C and Demirel, O. 2009. “Determination of the Attitudes of Turkish Infertile Women towards Surrogacy and Oocyte Donation.” Pakistan Journal of Medical Science 25: 36–40.Google Scholar

Mascarenhas, M. N., Flaxman, S. R, Boerma, T, Vanderpoel, S and Stevens, G. A. 2012. “National, Regional, and Global Trends in Infertility Prevalence since 1990: A Systematic Analysis of 277 Health Surveys.” PLOS Medicine 9: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moosa, E. 2003. “Human Cloning in Muslim Ethics.” Voices across Boundaries (Fall): 23–26.Google Scholar

Nahman, Michal. 2006. “Materializing Israeliness: Difference and Mixture in Transnational Ova Donation.” Science As Culture 15(3): 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nahman, Michal. 2011. “Reverse Traffic: Intersecting Inequalities in Human Egg Donation.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 23(5): 626–633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nahman, Michal. 2013. Extractions: An Ethnography of Reproductive Tourism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nyboe Andersen, A., Goossens, V, Gianaroli, L, Felberbaum, R, de Mouzon, J and Nygren, K. G. 2007. “Assisted Reproductive Technology in Europe, 2003: Results Generated from European Registers by ESHRE.” Human Reproduction 22(6): 1513–1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Presidency of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Turkey. 2006. “The Assessment of New Applications Discussed by Contemporary Medicine such as IVF and Stem Cell according to the Religion of Islam.” Presidency of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Turkey, Ankara. www.diyanet.gov.tr/turkish/dy/KurulDetay.aspx?ID=1162, accessed October 26, 2018.Google Scholar

Schenker, J. G. 2003. “Legal Aspects of ART Practice in Israel.” Journal of Assisted Reproduction Genetics 20(7): 250–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sella, T., Chodick, G., Luenfeld, E. and Shalev, V.. 2011. “Further Evidence on the High Prevalence of Male Factor Infertility Diagnosis in Israel.” The Israel Medical Association Journal 13(6): 386.Google ScholarPubMed

Serour, G. I. 2008. “Islamic Perspectives in Human Reproduction.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 17(Suppl. 3): 34–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Singerman, D. 2007. The Economic Imperatives of Marriage: Emerging Practices and Identities among Youth in the Middle East. Working Paper 6. Washington DC/Dubai: Wolfensohn Centre for Development and Dubai School of Government.Google Scholar

Sonbol, A. el A. 1995. “Adoption in Islamic Society: A Historical Survey.” In Children in the Muslim Middle East, ed. Warnock, Fernea Elizabeth, 45–67. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teman, E. 2010. Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Tremayne, S. 2006. “Not All Muslims Are Luddites.” Anthropology Today 22(93): 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tremayne, S. 2009. “Law, Ethics, and Donor Technologies in Shia Iran.” In Assisting Reproduction, Testing Genes: Global Encounters with New Biotechnologies, ed. Birenbaum-Carmeli, Daphna and Inhorn, Marcia C, 144–163. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Tremayne, S. 2012. “The ‘Down Side’ of Gamete Donation: Challenging ‘Happy Family’ Rhetoric in Iran.” In Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C and Tremayne, Soraya, 130–156. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Tremayne, S. 2015. “Whither Kinship? Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Relatedness in the Islamic Republic of Iran.” In Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the Third Phase: Global Encounters and Emerging Moral Worlds, ed. Hampshire, Kate and Simpson, Bob, 69–82. New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tremayne, S. and Inhorn, M. C. 2012. “Introduction: Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies.” In Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C and Tremayne, Soraya, 1–21. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

United Nations. 2013. World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

Urman, B. and Yakin, K. 2010. “New Turkish Legislation on Assisted Reproductive Techniques and Centres: A Step in the Right Direction?” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 21: 729–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

White, J. B. 2002. Islamist Mobilization in Turkey: A Study in Vernacular Politics. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

White, J. B. 2014. Muslim Nationalism and the New Turks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, E. 1990. “Is Women’s Labor a Commodity?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 19(1): 71–92.Google ScholarPubMed

Anderson, E. 2000. “Why Commercial Surrogate Motherhood Unethically Commodifies Women and Children: Reply to McLachlan and Swales.” Health Care Analysis 8(1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berend, Z. 2010. “Surrogate Losses: Understandings of Pregnancy Loss and Assisted Reproduction among Surrogate Mothers.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 24(2): 240–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berend, Z. 2012. “The Romance of Surrogacy.” Sociological Forum 27(4): 913–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berend, Z. 2016. The Online World of Surrogacy. New York/London: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. 2009. “The Politics of ‘The Natural Family’ in Israel: State Policy and Kinship Ideologies.” Social Science and Medicine 69: 1018–1024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Danna, D. 2015. Contract Children: Questioning Surrogacy. Stuttgart: ibidem-Verlag/ibidem Press.Google Scholar

Dolgin, J. L. 1990. “Status and Contract in Surrogate Motherhood: An Illumination of the Surrogacy Debate.” Buffalo Law Review 38(2): 515–550.Google ScholarPubMed

Donath, O. 2010. “Pro-Natalism and Its ‘Cracks’: Narratives of Reproduction and Childfree Lifestyles in Israel [in Hebrew].” Israeli Sociology 11(2): 417–439.Google Scholar

Hazelton, L. 1977. Israeli Women: The Reality behind the Myths. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Ivry, T. 2010. Embodying Culture: Pregnancy in Japan and Israel. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Ketchum, S. A. 1992. “Selling Babies and Selling Bodies.” In Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics, ed. Holmes, H. B and Purdy, L. M, 284–294. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Lambek, M. 2013. “Kinship, Modernity, and the Immodern.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, S and Cannell, F, 241–260. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar

Lauritzen, P. 1993. Pursuing Parenthood: Ethical Issues in Assisted Reproduction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Lystra, K. 1989. Searching the Heart: Women, Men, and Romantic Love in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Markens, S. 2007. Surrogate Motherhood and the Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Rao, R. 2003. “Surrogacy Law in the United States: The Outcome of Ambivalence.” In Surrogate Motherhood: International Perspectives, ed. Cook, R, Sclater, S. D and Kaganas, F, 23–35. Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart Press.Google Scholar

Rothman, B. K. 2000. Recreating Motherhood. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Scheper-Hughes, N. 1992. Death without Weeping: The Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, D. M. 1968. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.Google Scholar

Schneider, D. M. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strathern, M. 1992. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Teman, E. 2008. “The Social Construction of Surrogacy Research: An Anthropological Critique of the Psychosocial Scholarship on Surrogate Motherhood.” Social Science and Medicine 67(7): 1104–1112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Teman, E. 2010a. Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Teman, E. 2010b. “The Last Outpost of the Nuclear Family: A Cultural Critique of Israeli Surrogacy Policy.” In Kin, Gene, Community: Reproductive Technology among Jewish Israelis, ed. Birenbaum-Carmeli, D and Carmeli, Y, 107–126. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Zelizer, V. 2000. “The Purchase of Intimacy.” Law & Social Inquiry 25(3): 817–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashley’s Mom and Dad. 2007, updated 2012. “The Ashley Treatment, Towards a Better Quality of Life for Pillow Angels.” www.pillowangel.org, accessed June 1, 2015.Google Scholar

Battles, Heather and Manderson, Lenore. 2008. “The Ashley Treatment: Furthering the Anthropology of/on Disability.” Medical Anthropology 27(3): 219–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buchbinder, Mara and Timmermans, Stefan. 2011. “Medical Technologies and the Dream of the Perfect Newborn.” Medical Anthropology 30(1): 56–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burne, Brian and Breaux, Becky. May 2013. “Power Wheelchairs: Young Children.” EP Magazine, 32–34.Google Scholar

Calculator, Stephen and Black, Tibbany. 2009. “Validation of an Inventory of Best Practices in the Provision of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Services to Students with Severe Disabilities in General Education Classrooms.” American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 18: 329–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dvorsky, G. 2006. “Helping Families Care for the Helpless.” http://sentientdevelopments.blogspot.com/2006/11helping-families-care-for-helpless_06.html, accessed June 26, 2007.Google Scholar

Gammeltoft, Tine. 2008. “Childhood Disability and Parental Moral Responsibility in Northern Vietnam: Towards Ethnographies of Intercorporeality.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 14(4): 826–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gammeltoft, Tine. 2014. Haunting Images: A Cultural Account of Selective Reproduction in Vietnam. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, N. January 2007. “Pillow Angel Ethics.” Time Magazine Online. http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1574851,00.html, accessed April 4, 2007.Google ScholarPubMed

Gibson, Barbara. 2006. “Disability, Connectivity and Transgressing the Autonomous Body.” Journal of Medical Humanities 27: 187–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gibson, Barbara, Carnevale, Franco and King, Gillian. 2012. “This Is My Way: Reimagining Disability, In/dependence and Interconnectedness of Persons and Assistive Technologies.” Disability and Rehabilitation 34(2): 1894–1899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gibson, Barbara and Teachman, Gail. 2012. “Critical Approaches in Physical Therapy Research: Investigating the Symbolic Value of Walking.” Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 28(6): 474–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gibson, B. P., Teachman, G, Wright, V, Fehlings, D, Young, N. I and McKeever, P. 2011. “Children’s and Parent’s Beliefs Regarding the Value of Walking: Rehabilitation Implications for Children with Cerebral Palsy.” Child Care, Health and Development 38(1): 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gimp Parade. 2007. The Ransom Notes Campaign. http://thegimpparade.blogspot.com/2007/12/ransom-notes-campaign.html, accessed December 24, 2007.Google Scholar

Gunther, D. F. and Diekema, D. S. 2006. “Attenuating Growth in Children with Profound Developmental Disability: A New Approach to an Old Dilemma.” Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 160(10): 1013–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halfon, Neal, Houtrow, Amy, Larson, Kandyce and Newacheck, Paul. 2012. “The Changing Landscape of Disability in Childhood.” The Future of Children 22(1): 13–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hockenberry, John. 2007. “Ashley X: Straight on til Mourning.” Posted on The Gimp Parade, February 23, 2007. http://thegimpparade.blogspot.com/2007/02/Saturday-slumgullion-29.html, accessed June 29, 2007.Google Scholar

Ivry, Tsipy. 2009. “The Ultrasonic Picture Show and the Politics of Threatened Life.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 23(3): 189–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ivry, Tsipy, Teman, Elly and Frumkin, Ayala. 2011. “God-sent Ordeals and Their Discontents: Ultra-orthodox Jewish Women Negotiate Prenatal Testing.” Social Science & Medicine 72: 1527–1533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kasnitz, Devva and Block, Pamela. 2012. “Participation, Time, Effort, and Speech Disability Justice.” In Politics of Occupation-Centered Practice: Reflections on Occupational Engagement across Cultures, ed. Pollard, Nick and Sakellariou, Dikaios, 197–216. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keene, Ellin. 2014. “All the Time They Need.” Educational Leadership 72(3): 64–71.Google Scholar

Kent-Walsh, Jennifer and McNaughton, David. 2005. “Communication Partner Instruction on AAC: Present Practices and Future Directions.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 21(3): 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Amie and Fahsl, Allison. 2012. “Supporting Social Competence in Children Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication.” Teaching Exceptional Children 45(1): 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landsman, Gail. 2003. “Emplotting Children’s Lives: Developmental Delay vs Disability.” Social Science & Medicine 56: 1947–1960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Landsman, Gail. 2009. Reconstructing Motherhood and Disability in the Age of Perfect Babies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Liptap, Amanda. http://peek3d.com/category/testimonial, accessed April 4, 2015.Google Scholar

Mankoff, Jennifer, Hayes, Gillian and Kasnitz, Devva. 2010. “Disability Studies As a Source of Critical Inquiry for the Field of Assistive Technology.” Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility 2010: 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuire, Mark. 2011. “They’re the Ultimate Teammates.” Albany Times Union. www.timesunion.com/sports/article/They-re-the-ultimate-teammates-1412561.php, accessed June 9, 2011.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, Janice. 2014. “Digital Imagery and Child Embodiment in Paediatric Genetics: Sources and Relationships of Meaning.” Sociology 48(2): 216–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLauglin, Janice and Clavering, Emma. 2012. “Visualising Difference, Similarity and Belonging in Paediatric Genetics.” Sociology of Health Illness 34(3): 459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNaughton, David, Rackensperger, Tracy, Wood, Elizabeth Bender, Carole Krezman, Michael Williams and Janice, Light. 2008. “‘A Child Needs to Be Given a Chance to Succeed’: Parents of Individuals Who Use AAC Describe the Benefits and Challenges of Learning AAC Technologies.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 24(1): 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mathis, Hilary, Sutherland, Dean and McAuliffe, Megan. 2011. “The Effect of Pause Time upon the Communicative Interactions of Young People Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication.” International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 13(5): 411–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mirza, Mansha, Magasi, Susan and Hammel, Joy. 2016. “Soul Searching Occupations: Critical Reflections on Occupational Therapy’s Commitment to Social Justice, Disability Rights, and Participation.” In Occupying Disability: Critical Approaches to Community, Justice, and Decolonizing Disability, ed. Block, Pamela, Kasnitz, Devva, Nishida, Akemi and Pollard, Nick, 159–174. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paterson, Kevin. 2012. “It’s About Time! Understanding the Experience of Speech Impairment.” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, ed. Watson, Nick, Roulstone, Alan and Thomas, Carol, 165–177. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Phelan, Sharon, Wright, Virginia and Gibson, Barbara. 2014. “Representations of Disability and Normality in Rehabilitation Technology Promotional Materials.” Disability and Rehabilitation 36(24): 2072–2079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pilkington, Ed. 15 Mar. 2012. “The Ashley Treatment: ‘Her Life Is As Good As We Can Possibly Make It.’” The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/society/2012/mar/15/ashley-treatment-email-exchange, accessed June 1, 2015.Google Scholar

Rapp, Rayna and Ginsburg, Faye. 2011. “Reverberations: Disability and the New Kinship Imaginary.” Anthropological Quarterly 86(2): 379–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Singer, Peter. 26 Jan. 2007. “A Convenient Truth” [Op-Ed]. The New York Times.Google Scholar

State of Connecticut. 2009. “Governor Rell Signs Bill Limiting Obstetric Ultrasounds to Medically Necessary Procedures,” June 24. www.ct.gov/governorrell/cwp/view.asp?A=3675&Q=442298&pp=12&n=1, accessed June 2, 2015.Google Scholar

Timmermans, Stefan and Buchbinder, Mara. 2010. “Patients-in Waiting: Living between Sickness and Health in the Genomics Era.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 51(4): 408–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

TVNZ. 2014. “Charley Girl.” http://tvnz.co.nz/sunday-news/charley-girl-video-5974811, accessed June 1, 2015.Google Scholar

US Food and Drug Administration. 2011. “Maribel’s Story: How Eating Queso Fresco Harmed Her Unborn Baby.” www.fda.gov/Food/FoodborneIllnessContaminants/PeopleAtRisk/ucm106727.htm, accessed June 2, 2015.Google Scholar

US Food and Drug Administration. 2014. “Avoid Fetal Keepsake Images,” Heartbeat Monitors. www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm095508.htm, accessed June 2, 2015.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, Ian, Davis, Arlene, Skinner, Debra and Bailey, Donald, Jr. 2007. “A Place for Genetic Uncertainty: Parents Valuing an Unknown in the Meaning of Disease.” Social Science & Medicine 65: 1082–1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wiart, L. and Darrah, J. 2002. “Changing Philosophical Perspectives on the Management of Children with Physical Disabilities: Their Effect on the Use of Powered Mobility.” Disability and Rehabilitation 24(9): 492–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wiart, Lesley, Darrah, Johanna, Hollis, Vivien, Cook, Al and May, Laura. 2004. “Mothers’ Perceptions of Their Children’s Use of Powered Mobility.” Physical Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 24(4): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilford, Benjamin, Steven Miller, Paul, Korfiatis, Carolyn, Diekema, Douglas, Dudzinski, Denise, Goering, Sara, and the Seattle Growth Attenuation and Ethics Working Group. 2010. “Navigating Growth Attenuation in Children with Profound Disabilities: Children’s Interests, Family Decision-Making, and Community Concerns.” Hastings Center Report 40(6): 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wise, Paul. 2012. “Emerging Technologies and Their Impact on Disability.” The Future of Children 22(1): 169–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bailey, Lucy. 2001. “Gender Shows: First-Time Mothers and Embodied Selves.” Gender & Society 15(1): 110–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berend, Zsuzsa. 2010. “Surrogate Losses: Understandings of Pregnancy Loss and Assisted Reproduction among Surrogate Mothers.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 24(2): 240–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bharadwaj, Aditya. 2006. “Sacred Conceptions: Clinical Theodicies, Uncertain Science, and Technologies of Procreation in India.” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 30: 451–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birenbaum-Carmeli, Daphna. 2004. “‘Cheaper Than a Newcomer’: On the Political Economy of IVF in Israel.” Sociology of Health and Illness 26(7): 897–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corea, Gena. 1985. The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Crozier, G. K. D., Johnson, Jennifer L. and Hajzler, Christopher. 2014. “At the Intersections of Emotional and Biological Labor: Understanding Commercial Surrogacy As Social Reproduction.” International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 7(2): 45–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis-Floyd, R. 1992. Birth as an American Rite of Passage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Deomampo, Daisy. 2013. “Gendered Geographies of Reproductive Tourism.” Gender & Society 27(4): 514–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farquhar, Dion. 1996. The Other Machine: Discourse and Reproductive Technologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Franklin, Sarah. 1998. Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Franklin, Sarah. 2013. “Conception through a Looking Glass: The Paradox of IVF.” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 27(6): 747–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gammeltoft, Tine M. 2014. Haunting Images: A Cultural Account of Selective Reproduction in Vietnam. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georges, E. 1996. “Fetal Ultrasound Imaging and the Production of Authoritative Knowledge in Greece.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 10(2): 157–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Han, Sallie. 2014. Pregnancy in Practice: Expectation and Experience in the Contemporary US. London: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Inhorn, Marcia. 2003. Local Babies, Global Science: Gender, Religion and In Vitro Fertilization in Egypt. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ivry, Tsipy. 2007. “Embodied Responsibilities: Pregnancy in the Eyes of Japanese Ob-Gyns.” Sociology of Health and Illness 29(2): 251–274.Google ScholarPubMed

Ivry, Tsipy. 2010a. Embodying Culture: Pregnancy in Japan and Israel. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Ivry, Tsipy. 2010b. “Kosher Medicine and Medicalized Halacha: An Exploration of Triadic Relations among Israeli Rabbis, Doctors, and Infertility Patients.” American Ethnologist 37(4): 662–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ivry, Tsipy. 2015. “The Pregnancy Manifesto: Notes on How to Extract Reproduction from the Petri Dish.” Medical Anthropology 34(3): 274–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kahn, Susan Martha. 2000. Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception in Israel. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Klein, Renate. 1992. The Ultimate Colonisation: Reproductive and Genetic Engineering. Dublin: Attic Press.Google Scholar

Longhurst, Robyn. 2001. “Breaking Corporeal Boundaries: Pregnant Bodies in Public Places.” In Contested Bodies, ed. Holliday, R. and Hassard, J., 81–94. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mitchell, L. M. 2001. Baby’s First Picture: Ultrasound and the Politics of Fetal Subjects. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, L. M. 1990. “The Medicalization of Anthropology: A Critical Perspective on the Critical-Clinical Debate.” Social Science and Medicine 30: 945–950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pande, Amrita. 2009. “It May Be Her Eggs but It Is My Blood: Surrogates and Everyday Forms of Kinship in India.” Qualitative Sociology 32(4): 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pande, Amrita. 2010. “Commercial Surrogacy in India: Manufacturing the Perfect Mother Worker.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 35(4): 969–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollack Petchesky, Rosalind. 1987. “Fetal Images: The Power of Visual Culture in the Politics of Reproduction.” Feminist Studies 13(2): 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ragoné, Helena. 1994. Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Ragoné, Helena. 1999. “Surrogate Motherhood, Gamete Donation, and Constructions of Altruism.” In Transformative Motherhood: On Giving and Getting in a Consumer Culture, ed. Layne, L. L., 65–88. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Rapp, Rayna. 1999. Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Raymond, Janice G. 1993. Women As Wombs : Reproductive Technologies and the Battle over Women’s Freedom. San Francisco, CA: HarperSanFrancisco.Google Scholar

Roberts, Elizabeth F. S. 1998a. “Examining Surrogacy Discourses: Between Feminine Power and Exploitation.” In Small Wars: The Cultural Politics of Childhood, ed. Scheper-Hughes, N. and Sargent, C. F., 93–110. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, Elizabeth F. S. 1998b. “Native Narratives of Connectedness: Surrogate Motherhood and Technology.” In Cyborg Babies: From Techno-Sex to Techno-Tots, ed. Dumit, J. and Davis-Floyd, R., 193–211. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Roberts, Elizabeth F. S. 2012. God’s Laboratory: Assisted Reproduction in the Andes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothman, Barbara Katz. 1986. The Tentative Pregnancy: Prenatal Diagnosis and the Future of Motherhood. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Rothman, Barbara Katz. 1993. The Tentative Pregnancy: How Amniocentesis Changes the Experience of Motherhood. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Rothman, Barbara Katz. 2000. Recreating Motherhood. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Rowland, Robyn. 1992. Living Laboratories: Woman and Reproductive Technologies. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar

Rudrappa, Sharmila. 2009. “Working India’s Reproduction Assembly Line: Surrogacy and Reproductive Rights?” Western Humanities Review 66(3): 77–102.Google Scholar

Rudrappa, Sharmila. 2012. “India’s Reproductive Assembly Line.” Contexts 11(2): 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sered, Susan Starr. 2000. What Makes Women Sick?: Maternity, Modesty and Militarism in Israeli Society. Hanover, NH: Brandeis University Press.Google Scholar

Strathern, Marilyn. 1992. Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, Janelle S. 2008. The Public Life of the Fetal Sonogram: Technology, Consumption, and the Politics of Reproduction. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Teman, Elly. 2008. “The Red String: The Cultural History of a Jewish Folk Symbol.” In Jewishness: Expression, Identity, and Representation, ed. Bronner, S. J., 29–57. Oxford: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.Google Scholar

Teman, Elly. 2009. “Embodying Surrogate Motherhood: Pregnancy As a Dyadic Body Project.” Body & Society 15(3): 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teman, Elly. 2010. Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, Charis. 2005. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vora, Kalindi. 2012. “Limits of ‘Labor’: Accounting for Affect and the Biological in Transnational Surrogacy and Service Work.” South Atlantic Quarterly 111(2): 681–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vora, Kalindi. 2013. “Potential, Risk, and Return in Transnational Indian Gestational Surrogacy.” Current Anthropology 54(7): s97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar