Skip to main content Accessibility help
×

Peer review

How to peer review journal articles

Cambridge University Press has created a guide to give a practical introduction to conducting effective peer reviews, especially for those who are new to the process.

Peer review is an integral component of publishing the best quality research. Its purpose is to:

  1. Increase trust in the validity and integrity of published research.
  2. Help editors assess which submissions are relevant, reliable and high quality.
  3. Provide suggestions for improving articles that go through review, raising the general quality of published research.

A guide to peer reviewing journal articles, is the title of the guide. And an image shows colour block figures of people on a pile of journals.
A guide to peer reviewing journal articles

File Size: 1 MB

File Type: PDF

A guide to peer reviewing journal articles, is the title of the guide. And an image shows colour block figures of people on a pile of journals.
A guide to peer reviewing journal articles

File Size: 1 MB

File Type: PDF

A guide to peer reviewing journal articles, is the title of the guide. And an image shows colour block figures of people on a pile of journals.
A guide to peer reviewing journal articles

File Size: 1 MB

File Type: PDF

A guide to peer reviewing journal articles, is the title of the guide. And an image shows colour block figures of people on a pile of journals.
A guide to peer reviewing journal articles

File Size: 1 MB

File Type: PDF


Note: While the information here is generally applicable to all journals with standard peer review practices, it's important to ensure that you take into account any specific instructions given by the particular journal you are reviewing for.

Interested in becoming a Cambridge reviewer?

If you're interested in reviewing for Cambridge journals, contact the relevant journal's editorial office or email authorhub@cambridge.org .

Why peer review?

  1. Learning more about the editorial process.
  2. Keeping up to date with novel research in your field.
  3. Having an opportunity to demonstrate your expertise in a field and fulfilling your professional responsibility to support others in developing their research.
  4. Being acknowledged and credited for your work. Some journals are also experimenting with providing direct incentives to reviewers, such as discounts on article processing charges and access to content. Services such as Publons also provide ways to track, verify and showcase peer review activities.

Anonymity in the peer review process


Single-anonymous peer review: The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author.

Double-anonymous peer review: Neither author nor reviewers know each other’s identity.

Triple-anonymous peer review: The identities of the author, reviewers, and editor are all hidden.

Non-anonymous peer review (also known as open peer review): Identities of authors and reviewers are known and reviews may be published alongside the paper.

Post-publication peer review: Reviews are written and published after the article appears. These reviews are usually open and published alongside the article.

Some Cambridge journals are participating in a trial of the peer review terminology  developed by the STM Association and therefore may use different terminology to describe their peer review processes.