Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-nlvjk Total loading time: 0.659 Render date: 2022-05-22T20:55:54.074Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

3 - The Interest Group Top Tier

Lobbying Hierarchy and Inequality in American Politics

from Part I - Anxieties of Power, Influence, and Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2019

Frances E. Lee
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Nolan McCarty
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Americans are concerned about both inequalities in political influence between the rich and poor and the dominant role of interest groups and lobbyists in Washington. Yet even among interest groups, there is vast inequality in the capacity to lobby. As the interest group population has expanded, an increasingly stable interest group “top tier” has emerged with vastly more resources. Groups in this top tier have remained at the top, even as other groups move in and out. Although resources do not guarantee influence, being at the top of the lobbying hierarchy likely enables organizations to better compete for scarce attention. We illustrate these patterns using a new data set of all 37,706 organizations reporting lobbying between 1998 and 2012. We show that an increasingly persistent top tier of 100 organizations spends roughly a third of all lobbying expenditures, hires a third of all lobbyists, and shows remarkable breadth of issue interest. The results may help resolve conflict between prior findings that the highest-spending interest groups usually get what they want, but no particular resource advantage or advocacy tactic consistently buys policy outcomes

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2010. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David C., and Leech, Beth L.. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan. 2015. The Politics of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Lowery, David, and Gray, Virginia. 2009. “Federal Policy Activity and the Mobilization of State Lobbying Organizations.” Political Research Quarterly 62(3): 552567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Leech, Beth L.. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and Political Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Leech, Beth L.. 2001. “Issue Niches and Policy Bandwagons: Patterns of Interest Group Involvement in National Politics.” Journal of Politics 63(4): 11911213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Larsen-Price, H.A., Leech, B.L., and Rutledge, P. 2011. “Congressional and Presidential Effects on the Demand for Lobbying.” Political Research Quarterly 64(1): 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey. 1989. The Interest Group Society. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Drutman, Lee. 2015. The Business of America Is Lobbying. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esterling, Kevin. 2004. “Buying Expertise: Campaign Contributions and Attention to Policy Analysis in Congressional Committees,” American Political Science Review 101(1): 93109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. Lawrence. 2002. “How Senators Decide: An Exploration.” In Oppenheimer, Bruce I. (ed.), U.S. Senate Exceptionalism. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Galbraith, John Kenneth. 1952. American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence & Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin, and Page, Benjamin I.. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 564581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1996. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, Matt. 2012. The Not-So-Special Interests: Interest Groups, Public Representation, and American Governance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Grossmann, Matt. 2014. Artists of the Possible: Governing Networks in American Policy Change Since 1945. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, Matt. 2005. “The Dynamics of a Disturbance: New and Established Interests in Technology Policy Debates.” Knowledge, Technology, & Policy 18(3): 95113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics. New York: Simon & Shuster.Google Scholar
Hall, Richard L., and Deardorff, Alan V.. 2006. “Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy.” American Political Science Review 100(1): 6984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaney, Michael T. 2004. “Outside the Issue Niche: The Multidimensionality of Interest Group Identity.” American Politics Research 32(6): 611651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaney, Michael T. 2014. “Multiplex Networks and Interest Group Influence Reputation: An Exponential Random Graph Model.” Social Networks 36(1): 6681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hojnacki, Marie, Marchetti, Kathleen M., Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffry M., Kimball, David C., and Leech, Beth L.. 2015. “Assessing Business Advantage in Washington Lobbying.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 4(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan D. 2001. Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Karpf, David. 2012. The MoveOn Effect: The Unexpected Transformation of American Political Advocacy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kersh, Rogan. 2007. “The Well-Informed Lobbyist: Information and Interest Group Lobbying.” In Cigler, Allan J. and Loomis, Burdett A. (eds.), Interest Group Politics, 7th ed. Washington: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Kimball, David C., Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Leech, Beth L., and Summary, Bryce. 2012. “Who Cares about the Lobbying Agenda?Interest Groups & Advocacy 1(1): 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1989. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. Boston: Little, Brown.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPira, Timothy M. 2014. “Lobbying After 9/11: Policy Regime Emergence and Interest Group Mobilization,” Policy Studies Journal 42(2): 226251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPira, Timothy M. 2015. “Lobbying in the Shadows: How Private Interests Hide from Public Scrutiny, and Why That Matters,” Interest Group Politics, 9th Ed., Eds. Cigler, Allan J., Loomis, Burdett A., and Nownes, Anthony. Washington: CQ Press.Google Scholar
LaPira, Timothy M., Thomas, Herschel F III, and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 2014. “The Two Worlds of Lobbying: Washington Lobbyists in the Core and on the Periphery.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 3(3): 219245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Beth L., Baumgartner, Frank R., LaPira, Timothy M., and Semanko, Nicholas A.. 2005. “Drawing Lobbyists to Washington: Government Activity and the Demand for Advocacy.” Political Research Quarterly 58(1): 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, David. 2007. “Why Do Organized Interests Lobby? A Multi-Goal, Multi-Context Theory of Lobbying,” Polity 39: 2954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Donald R., and Stimson, James A.. 1975. Yeas and Nays: Normal Decision-Making in the US House of Representatives. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 2000. America’s Congress: Actions in the Public Sphere, James Madison through Newt Gingrich. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2008. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Miler, Kristina C. 2010. Constituency Representation in Congress: The View from Capitol Hill. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., Bartels, Larry M., and Seawright, Jason. 2013. “Democracy and the Policy Preferences of Wealthy Americans.” Perspectives on Politics 11(1). 5173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauch, Jonathan. 1995. Demosclerosis: The Silent Killer of American Government. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert. H. 1984. “Interest Representation: The Dominance of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 78(1): 6476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, Robert. H. 1990. “The Paradox of Interest Groups in Washington—More Groups, Less Clout.” In The New American Political System, 2nd ed., King, Anthony S. (ed.). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry E.. 2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Tierney, John T.. 1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1956. “Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment.” Psychological Review 63(2): 129138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teles, Steven M. 2013. “Kludgeocracy in America.” National Affairs 1(17): 97114.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteman, David. 1995. Communication in Congress: Members, Staff, and the Search for Information. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Wright, John R. 1996. Interest Groups and Congress: Lobbying, Contributions, and Influence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
1
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×