Part 1 - The Public Health Toolkit
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2023
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Essential Public HealthTheory and Practice, pp. 11 - 202Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
References
Roland, M. and Coulter, A., Hospital Referrals, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Last, J. M., The iceberg: Completing the clinical picture in general practice. The Lancet 2, 1963, 28–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, J. S., A taxonomy of social need. In McLachlan, G. (ed.), Problems and Progress in Medical Care: Essays on Current Research, 7th series, London, Oxford University Press, 1972, pp. 71–82.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, The First Ten Years of the World Health Organization, Geneva, WHO, 1958.Google Scholar
Stevens, A., Raftery, J., Mant, J. and Simpson, S.. Health Care Needs Assessment: The Epidemiologically Based Needs Assessment Reviews, Oxford, Radcliffe Medical Press, 2004, vols. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, A., Wright, J. and Cave, B., Assessing health needs. In Kawachi, I., Lang, I. and Ricciardi, W. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Public Health Practice, 4th ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2020, ch. 1.4, pp. 42–53.Google Scholar
Dahlgren, G. and Whitehead, N., Policies and Strategies to Promote Social Equity in Health, Stockholm, Institute of Futures Studies, 1991.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, C. and Chadwick, K., Summary: Health Needs Assessment at a Glance, London, National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence, 2005. Available at: https://ihub.scot/media/1841/health_needs_assessment_a_practical_guide.pdf.Google Scholar
Annett, H. and Rifkin, S., Guidelines for Rapid Participatory Appraisal to Assess Community Health Needs: A Focus on Health Improvements for Low Income Urban and Rural Areas, Geneva, World Health Organization, 1995.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. and Cave, B., Assessing health impacts. In Kawachi, I., Lang, I. and Ricciardi, W. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Public Health Practice, 4th ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2020, ch. 1.5, pp. 54–65.Google Scholar
Jarman, J., Rozenblum, S., Falkenbach, M. et al., Role of scientific advice in covid-19 policy, British Medical Journal 378, 2022, e070572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Why population growth matters for sustainable development, United Nations, 2022. Available at: www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/undesa_pd_2022_policy_brief_population_growth.pdfGoogle Scholar
Eayres, D., Commonly used public health statistics and their confidence intervals, Association of Public Health Observatories, March 2008, reprinted April 2010.Google Scholar
UN Institute of Migration, World Migration Report 2022, 2022. Available at: https://worldmigrationreport.iom.int/wmr-2022-interactive/Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics, Population and migration, 2022. Available at: www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigrationGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD), 11th Revision, 2022. Available at: www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseasesGoogle Scholar
SNOMED International, 5-Step briefing (SNOMED CT), 2022. Available at: www.snomed.org/snomed-ct/five-step-briefingGoogle Scholar
Office for National Statistics, Life expectancies. Available at: www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/lifeexpectanciesGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization, GHE: Life expectancy and Healthy life expectancy. Available at: www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/indicator-groups/indicator-group-details/GHO/life-expectancy-and-healthy-life-expectancyGoogle Scholar
MacKillop, E. and Sheard, S., Quantifying life: Understanding the history of Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs), Social Science & Medicine 211, 2018, 359–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porta, M., A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 6th ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NHS Digital, Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), 2022 [updated 6 June 2022]. Available at: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/data-tools-and-services/data-services/hospital-episode-statisticsGoogle Scholar
Department of Health, A Simple Guide to Payment by Results, Leeds, Department of Health, 2012.Google Scholar
NHS England, Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) guidance for 2023/24. Available at: www.england.nhs.uk/gp/investment/gp-contract/quality-on-outcomes-framework-qof-changes/Google Scholar
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, GBD Compare: United Kingdom. Available at: www.healthdata.org/united-kingdomGoogle Scholar
Royal College of General Practitioners, RCGP Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC). Available at: www.rcgp.org.uk/clinical-and-research/our-programmes/research-and-surveillance-centreGoogle Scholar
NHS Digital, General Practice Extraction Service (GPES). Available at: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/general-practice-extraction-serviceGoogle Scholar
Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Available at: https://cprd.com/Google Scholar
The Health Improvement Network, THIN. Available at: www.the-health-improvement-network.com/Google Scholar
NCRAS, The National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service [updated August 2022]. Available at: www.ncin.org.uk/homeGoogle Scholar
Mayer, A. and Stockdale, M., Developing standard tools for data linkage: February 2021. Available at: www.ons.gov.uk/methodology/methodologicalpublications/generalmethodology/onsworkingpaperseries/developingstandardtoolsfordatalinkagefebruary2021Google Scholar
Office for Health Improvement & Disparities, Fingertips: Public health data. Available at: https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/Google Scholar
NHS Digital, National Child Measurement Programme, 2021 [updated 26 April 2021]. Available at: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/national-child-measurement-programme/Google Scholar
Sport England, Active Lives Online, 2022. Available at: https://activelives.sportengland.org/Google Scholar
Gov.uk, National Diet and Nutrition Survey, 2016 [updated 22 September 2021]. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/collections/national-diet-and-nutrition-surveyGoogle Scholar
Dymond-Green, N., How can we calculate levels of deprivation or poverty in the UK? (part 1) [Blog], UK Data Service, 2020 [updated 24 June 2020]. Available at: https://blog.ukdataservice.ac.uk/deprived-or-live-in-poverty-1/Google Scholar
Further Reading
Davies, H. T. O. and Crombie, I. K., What are confidence intervals and p-values? Hayward Communications 3(1), 2009, 1–8. Available at: www.bandolier.org.uk/painres/download/whatis/What_are_Conf_Inter.pdf.Google Scholar
Deeks, J., Swots corner: What is an odds ratio? Bandolier 25, March 1996. Available at: www.bandolier.org.uk/band25/b25-6.html.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, D. E. and Stolley, P. D., Foundations in Epidemiology, New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Last, J. M., A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 4th ed., New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Motulsky, H., Intuitive Biostatistics: A Nonmathematical Guide to Statistical Thinking, 4th ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Spiegelhalter, D., The Art of Statistics: Learning from Data, London, Pelican Books, 2019.Google Scholar
References
Hennekens, C. and Burling, J., Epidemiology in Medicine, Boston, MA, Little, Brown and Company, 1987.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Assessing Interactions Among Social, Behavioral, and Genetic Factors in Health, Genes, Behavior, and the Social Environment: Moving beyond the Nature/Nurture Debate, Washington, DC, National Academic Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Doll, R. and Hill, A. B., The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits: A preliminary report, British Medical Journal 228, 1954, 1451–5.Google Scholar
Doll, R. and Peto, R., Mortality in relation to smoking: 20 years’ observations on male British doctors, British Medical Journal 273, 1976, 1525–36.Google Scholar
Vessey, M. P. and Doll, R., Investigation of relation between use of oral contraceptives and thromboembolic disease, British Medical Journal 1968, 2, 199–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrie, J. E., Martikainen, P., Shipley, M. J. and Marmot, M. G., Self-reported economic difficulties and coronary events in men: Evidence from the Whitehall II study, International Journal of Epidemiology 34(3), 2005, 640–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group, The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, New England Journal of Medicine 329(14), 1993, 977–86.Google Scholar
Altman, D. G., Practical Statistics for Medical Research, London, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1991.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, B. R. and Sterne, J. A. C., Essential Medical Statistics, 2nd ed., Oxford, Blackwell Science, 2003.Google Scholar
Hill, A. B., The environment and disease: Association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 58, 1965, 295–300. Available at: www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/hill.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandenbroucke, J. P. and Pardoel, V. P., An autopsy of epidemiologic methods: The case of ‘poppers’ in the early epidemic of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), American Journal of Epidemiology 129(3), 1989, 455–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, P., Bain, C. and Pirozzo, S., Essential Epidemiology. An Introduction for Students and Health Professionals, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
References
Smith, R., Where is the wisdom … ? British Medical Journal 303(6806), 1991, 798–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michaud, G., McGowan, J. L., van der Jagt, R. et al., Are therapeutic decisions supported by evidence from health care research? Archives of Internal Medicine 158(15), 1998, 1665–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A. et al., Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t, British Medical Journal 312, 1996, 71–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, J., A brief history of evidence-based policy, Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Science 678(1), 2017, 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiCenso, A., Guyatt, G. and Ciliska, D., Evidence-Based Nursing: A Guide to Clinical Practice, St. Louis, MO, Mosby, 2005.Google Scholar
Choudry, N. K., Fletcher, R. H. and Soumerai, S. B., Systematic review: The relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care, Annals of Internal Medicine 142(4), 2005, 260–73.Google Scholar
Ramsey, P. G., Carline, J. D., Inui, T. S. et al., Changes over time in the knowledge base of practicing internists, Journal of the American Medical Association 266(8), 1991, 1103–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Easterbrook, P. J., Berlin, J. A., Gopalan, R. and Matthews, D. R., Publication bias in clinical research, The Lancet 337(8746), 1991, 867–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickersin, K., The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence, Journal of the American Medical Association 263(10), 1990, 1385–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, SIGN 50: A guideline developer’s handbook, Annex B. Edinburgh, SIGN. Available at: www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign50_2011.pdfGoogle Scholar
OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group, The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Available at: www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidenceGoogle Scholar
Pope, C. and Mays, N. (eds.), Qualitative Research in Health Care, 3rd ed., Oxford, Blackwell Publishing/BMJ Books, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, CASP checklists. Available at: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/Google Scholar
Sackett, D. L., Strauss, S. E., Richardson, W. S. et al., Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practise and Teach EBM, 2nd ed., Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 2000.Google Scholar
Antman, E. M., Lau, J., Kupelnick, B. et al., A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts, Journal of the American Medical Association 268(2), 1992, 240–8.Google ScholarPubMed
University of York, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Getting evidence into practice, Effective Health Care Bulletin 5, 1999. Available at: www.york.ac.uk/media/crd/ehc51.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ernst, E., A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 54(6), 2000, 577–82.Google Scholar
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), Public perception of herbal medicines, Drug Safety Update, March 2009. Available at: www.mhra.gov.uk/Safetyinformation/DrugSafetyUpdate/CON088122Google Scholar
Doran, T., Fullwood, C., Gravelle, H. et al., Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom, New England Journal of Medicine 355(4), 2006, 375–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roski, J., Jeddeloh, R., An, L. et al., The impact of financial incentives and a patient registry on preventive care quality: Increasing provider adherence to evidence-based smoking cessation practice guidelines, Preventative Medicine 36(3), 2003, 291–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlton, B. G. and Miles, A., The rise and fall of EBM, Quarterly Journal of Medicine 91(5), 1998, 371–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popay, J. and Williams, G., Qualitative research and evidence-based healthcare, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 91(Suppl. 35), 1998, 32–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Editorial. Evidence-based medicine: How Covid can drive positive change, Nature, 12 May 2021.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, T. and Maskrey, N., Evidence based medicine: A movement in crisis? British Medical Journal 348, 2014, g3725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Djulbegovic, B. and Guyatt, G., Progress in evidence-based medicine: A quarter century on, The Lancet 390, 2017, 415–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Straus, S. E. and McAlister, F. A., Evidence-based medicine: A commentary on common criticisms, Canadian Medical Association Journal 163(7), 2000, 837–41.Google ScholarPubMed
References
Drummond, M. F., Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Department of Health, Overview of Programme Budgeting Costing Methodology. 2011. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/212911/Overview-of-the-Programme-Budgeting-Calculation-Methodology.pdfGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Clinical Excellence, Technology appraisal guidance. Available at: www.nice.org.uk/about/what-we-do/our-programmes/nice-guidance/nice-technology-appraisal-guidanceGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, J., Zarkin, G. A., Bray, J. W. et al., Revisiting the cost-effectiveness of the COMBINE study for alcohol dependent patients: The patient perspective, Medical Care 48(4), 2010, 306–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Public Health England, Guidance: Screening and brief advice for alcohol and tobacco use in inpatient settings, 2019. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/preventing-ill-health-commissioning-for-quality-and-innovation/guidance-and-information-on-the-preventing-ill-health-cquin-and-wider-cquin-scheme#why-you-should-screen-and-give-brief-advice-for-alcohol-and-tobacco-useGoogle Scholar
Johnsen, A. R., Bentham in a box: Technology assessment and health care allocation, Law, Medicine and Health Care 14(3–4), 1986, 172–4.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T. L. and Childress, J. F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 3rd ed., New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Daniels, N., Accountability for reasonableness: Establishing a fair process for priority setting is easier than agreeing on principles, British Medical Journal 321(7272), 2000, 1300–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R. and Maybin, J., Thinking about rationing, King’s Fund, 2012. Available at: www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/thinking-about-rationingGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization, Ethics and COVID-19. Available at: www.who.int/teams/health-ethics-governance/diseases/covid-19Google Scholar
References
Institute of Medicine (IOM), Committee on Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Swinglehurst, D., Emmerich, N. and Quilligan, S., Rethinking ‘quality’ in health care, Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 19(2), 2014, 65–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steel, N., Thresholds for taking antihypertensive drugs in different professional and lay groups: Questionnaire survey, British Medical Journal 320(7247), 2000, 1446–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coulter, A., What do patients and the public want from primary care? British Medical Journal 331(7526), 2005, 1199–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batalden, P., Getting more from health care: Quality improvement must acknowledge patient coproduction, British Medical Journal 362, 2018, k3617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization, Quality of Care, Geneva, WHO, 14 October 2022. Available at: www.who.int/health-topics/quality-of-careGoogle Scholar
Last, J. M., A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 4th ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Donabedian, A., Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring, Vol. 1: The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment, Ann Arbor, MI, Health Administration Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E., What is value in health care? New England Journal of Medicine 363, 2010, 2477–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NHS Digital, About the Compendium of Population Health Indicators. Available at: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/ci-hub/compendium-indicatorsGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Health Care Quality and Outcomes Indicators. Available at: www.oecd.org/health/Google Scholar
Steel, N., Bachmann, M., Maisey, S. et al., Self reported receipt of care consistent with 32 quality indicators: National population survey of adults aged 50 or more in England, British Medical Journal 337, 2008, a957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tudor-Hart, J., Commentary: Three decades of the inverse care law [comment], British Medical Journal 320(7226), 2000, 18–19.Google ScholarPubMed
Wennberg, J. E., Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: Implications for academic medical centres, British Medical Journal 325(7370), 2002, 961–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrank, W., Rogstad, T. and Parekh, N., Waste in the US health care system: Estimated costs and potential for savings, Journal of the American Medical Association 322(15), 2019, 1501–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Brownlee, S. and Korenstein, D., Better understanding the downsides of low value healthcare could reduce harm, British Medical Journal 372, 2021, n117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treadwell, J. and McCartney, M., Overdiagnosis and overtreatment: Generalists – it’s time for a grassroots revolution, British Journal of General Practice 66(644), 2016, 116–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogan, H., Zipfell, R., Neuburger, J. et al., Avoidability of hospital deaths and association with hospital-wide mortality ratios: Retrospective case record review and regression analysis, British Medical Journal 351, 2015, h3239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Committee on Quality of Health Care in America (IoM), To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System, Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Dyer, C., NHS compensation scheme is ‘not fit for purpose’ and needs radical overhaul, say MPs, British Medical Journal 377, 2022, o1085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Independent review of maternity services at Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, March 2022. Available at: www.ockendenmaternityreview.org.uk/Google Scholar
Sutherland, K. and Leatherman, S., Does certification improve medical standards? British Medical Journal 333(7565), 2006, 439–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brook, R. H., Chassin, M. R., Fink, A. et al., A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2(1), 1986, 53–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, B., Regehr, G. and Wright, J. G., Delphi as a method to establish consensus for diagnostic criteria, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 56(12), 2003, 1150–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NHS Employers and the General Practitioners Committee, Quality and Outcomes Framework guidance for GMS contract 2021/22. Delivering investment in general practice, London, NHS Employers, 2021.Google Scholar
Department of Health, An Organisation with a Memory, London, The Stationery Office, 2000.Google Scholar
Englum, B., Saha-Chaudhuri, P. and Shahian, D., The impact of high-risk cases on hospitals’ risk-adjusted coronary artery bypass grafting mortality rankings, Annals of Thoracic Surgery 99(3), 2015, 856–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chassin, M. R., Is health care ready for Six Sigma quality? Milbank Quarterly 76(4), 1998, 565–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pringle, M., Bradley, C. P., Carmichael, C. M. et al., Significant event auditing: A study of the feasibility and potential of case-based auditing in primary medical care, Occasional Paper (Royal College of General Practitioners) 70, 1995, i–71.Google Scholar
NHS England, Quality, service improvement and service redesign tools (QSIR), 2022. Available at: www.england.nhs.uk/sustainableimprovement/qsir-programme/qsir-tools/Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, T. and Papoutsi, C., Spreading and scaling up innovation and improvement, British Medical Journal 365, 2019, l2068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, B., Kwong, E. and Warburton, W., Quality improvement made simple: What everyone should know about health care quality improvement, London, The Health Foundation, April 2022. Available at: www.health.org.uk/publications/quality-improvement-made-simpleGoogle Scholar
Dixon-Woods, M., How to improve health care improvement, British Medical Journal 367, 2019, l5514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Taylor, F. W., The Principles of Scientific Management, New York, NY and London, Harper & Brothers, 1911.Google Scholar
Womack, J. P. and Jones, D. T., Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation, London, Simon & Schuster, 2003.Google Scholar
Hersey, P. and Blanchard, K. H., Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1982.Google Scholar
West, M. and Bailey, S., What is compassionate leadership? The King’s Fund, 2022. Available at: www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/what-is-compassionate-leadership#:~:text=Compassionate%20leadership%20involves%20a%20focus,and%20do%20their%20best%20workGoogle Scholar
George, B., Authentic Leadership: Rediscovering the Secrets to Creating Lasting Value Systems, San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass, 2004.Google Scholar
NHS Confederation, The future of systems leadership, 2014. Available at: www.nhsconfed.org/publications/future-systems-leadership-scoping-projectGoogle Scholar
NHS Leadership Academy, Healthcare Leadership Model, 2022. Available at: www.leadershipacademy.nhs.uk/resources/healthcare-leadership-model/Google Scholar
Academy of Medical Colleges and NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, Medical Leadership Competency Framework, 2010. Available at: www.leadershipacademy.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/NHSLeadership-Leadership-Framework-Medical-Leadership-Competency-Framework-3rd-ed.pdfGoogle Scholar
NHS Leadership Academy, Healthcare Leadership model 360 feedback tool. Available at: www.leadershipacademy.nhs.uk/healthcare-leadership-model/360-degree-feedback-tool-2/Google Scholar
Goleman, D., Leadership that gets results, Harvard Business Review 78(2), 2000, 78–90.Google Scholar
Scharmer, C. O., The Essentials of Theory U: Core Principles and Applications, Oakland, CA, Berrett-Koehler, 2018.Google Scholar
Berlo, D., The Process of Communication: An Introduction to Theory and Practice, New York, NY, Olt, Rinehart & Winston, 1960.Google Scholar
Herzberg, F., Work and the Nature of Man, Wenatchee, WA, World Publishing Company, 1966.Google Scholar
Bandura, A., Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychological Review 84(2), 1977, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. S. and Freedman, S., Equity theory revisited: Comments and annotated bibliography, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 9, 1976, 43–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, A. C., The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth, Hoboken, NJ, Wiley, 2018.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. and Baron, R., Behaviour in Organisations: Understanding and Managing the Human Side of Work, 2nd ed., Boston, MA, Allyn & Bacon, 1990.Google Scholar
Handy, C. B., Understanding Organizations, 3rd ed., Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1985.Google Scholar
Johnson, G., Whittington, R. and Scholes, K., Fundamentals of Strategy, London, Pearson Education, 2012.Google Scholar
Tuckman, B., Developmental sequence in small groups, Psychological Bulletin 63(6), 1965, 384–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belbin, R. M., Management Teams: Why They Succeed or Fail, New York, NY and Abingdon, UK, Routledge, 2010. See also The Nine Belbin Team Roles. Available at: www.belbin.com/about/belbin-team-rolesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, K., Defining the field at a given time, Psychological Review 50(3), 1943, 292–310. Republished in Resolving Social Conflicts & Field Theory in Social Science, Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD), PESTLE analysis factsheet, November 2010.Google Scholar
Gladwell, M., The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference, London, Abacus, 2000.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J., Loftus, E. and Jarvis, J., The art of change making, Leadership Centre, 2015. Available at: www.leadershipcentre.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/The-Art-of-Change-Making.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bridges, W. and Bridges, S., Managing Transitions: Making the Most of Change, Philadelphia, PA, Da Capo Lifelong Books, 2017.Google Scholar
Senge, P., The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation, 2nd ed., London, Random House, 2006.Google Scholar
Kotter, The 8 Steps for Leading Change. Available at: www.kotterinc.com/methodology/8-steps/Google Scholar
McKinsey & Company. Enduring ideas: The 7-S Framework. Available at: www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/enduring-ideas-the-7-s-frameworkGoogle Scholar
NIHR webinar, Your authentic leadership brand, 2021. Available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr5VS6jiQ38Google Scholar
References
World Health Organization, The Global Health Observatory. Available at: www.who.int/data/ghoGoogle Scholar
Office for National Statistics, UK Census, 2021. Available at: www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/healthinequalities/bulletins/healthstatelifeexpectanciesbyindexofmultipledeprivationimd/2018to2020Google Scholar
York Health Economics Consortium, Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions for Smoking Cessation: Final Report, York, University of York, 2007.Google Scholar
Bains, I., Choi, Y. H., Soldan, K. and Jit, M., Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of primary cytology versus human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in England, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 29(4), 2019, 669–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization, Behavioural sciences for better health. Available at: www.who.int/initiatives/behavioural-sciencesGoogle Scholar
Bonell, C., McKee, M., Fletcher, A. et al., Nudge smudge: UK government misrepresents ‘nudge’, The Lancet 377(9784), 2011, 2158–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rouyard, T., Engelen, B., Papanikitas, A. and Nakamura, R., Boosting healthier choices, British Medical Journal 376, 2022, e064225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marmot, M., Allen, J., Boyce, T. et al., Health Equity in England: The Marmot Review 10 Years on, London, Institute of Health Equity/The Health Foundation, 2020.Google Scholar
Igoe, K., Algorithmic bias in health care exacerbates social inequities – how to prevent it, 2021. Available at: www.hsph.harvard.edu/ecpe/how-to-prevent-algorithmic-bias-in-health-care/Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, E. M., Scollo, M. M. and Winstanley, M. H., Tobacco in Australia: Facts and Issues, Melbourne, Cancer Council Victoria, 2023.Google Scholar
Institute of Health Equity, Contribution of inequalities in mortality to total numbers of deaths in England in the years 2009 to 2020, 2022. Available at: www.instituteofhealthequity.org/resources-reports/contribution-of-inequalities-in-mortality-to-total-numbers-of-deaths-in-england-in-the-years-2009-to-2020Google Scholar
Marmot, M., Goldblatt, P., Allen, J. et al., Fair Society, Healthy Lives (The Marmot Review), Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England Post 2020, London, Institute for Health Equity, 2010.Google Scholar
Dahlgren, G. and Whitehead, M., Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health, Institutet för Framtidsstudier, 2007.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Bangkok Charter for Health Promotion in a Globalised World, Bangkok, WHO, 2005.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Commercial determinants of health, 2023. Available at: www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/commercial-determinants-of-healthGoogle Scholar
National Institute of Public Health, Mexico National Survey of Health and Nutrition Mid-Way 2016, Mexico, Ministry of Health Mexico, 2016.Google Scholar
Arantxa Colchero, M., Popkin, B. M., Rivera, J. A. and Ng, S. W., Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: Observational study, British Medical Journal 352, 2016, h6704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batis, C., Rivera, J. A., Popkin, B. M. and Smith Taillie, L., First-year evaluation of Mexico’s tax on nonessential energy-dense foods: An observational study, PLoS Medicine 13(7), 2016, e1002057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Workshop Report on Biodiversity and Pandemics of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany, IPBES, 2020.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. F., Velásquez, N. and Restrepo, N. J., The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views, Nature 582(7811), 2020, 230–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Office for National Statistics, Updating ethnic contrasts in deaths involving the coronavirus (COVID-19), England: 10 January 2022 to 16 February 2022. Available at: www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/articles/updatingethniccontrastsindeathsinvolvingthecoronaviruscovid19englandandwales/10january2022to16february2022Google Scholar
References
WHO Regional Office for Europe, Screening programmes: A short guide, 2020. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/330829/9789289054782-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yGoogle Scholar
Morabia, A. and Zhang, F. F., History of medical screening: From concepts to action, Postgraduate Medical Journal 80(946), 2004, 463–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, J. M. G. and Jungner, G., Principles and practice of screening for disease, Public Health Paper no. 34, Geneva, WHO, 1968.Google Scholar
International Agency for Research on Cancer, Cancer today, 2022. Available at: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/homeGoogle Scholar
UK Health Security Agency, Newborn bloodspot screening: Programme overview, 2018. Available at: www.gov.uk/guidance/newborn-blood-spot-screening-programme-overviewGoogle Scholar
Office for National Statistics, Drug use, alcohol and smoking: Smoking, drinking and drug taking in Great Britain and associated deaths and illnesses, 2020. Available at: www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/drugusealcoholandsmokingGoogle Scholar
von Wagner, C., Good, A., Wright, D. et al., Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation in the first round of the national screening programme in England, British Journal of Cancer 101(Suppl. 2), 2009, S60–S63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapple, A., Ziebland, S., Hewitson, P. and McPherson, A., What affects the uptake of screening for bowel cancer using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt): A qualitative study, Social Science & Medicine 66(12), 2008, 2425–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, C., Douglas, A., Williams, L. et al., Are there ethnic and religious variations in uptake of bowel cancer screening? A retrospective cohort study among 1.7 million people in Scotland, British Medical Journal Open 10(10), 2020, 1–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Szczepura, A., Price, C. and Gumber, A., Breast and bowel cancer screening uptake patterns over 15 years for UK south Asian ethnic minority populations, corrected for differences in socio-demographic characteristics, BMC Public Health 8(1), 2008, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, H. A., Buxton, M. J., Day, N. E. et al., The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: A randomised controlled trial, The Lancet 360(9345), 2002, 1531–9.Google Scholar
Meecham, L., Jacomelli, J., Davis, M. et al., Outcomes in men from the NHS abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme with a large aneurysm referred for intervention, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 61(2), 2021, 192–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Orgnization, WHO position paper on mammography screening, Geneva, WHO, 2014.Google Scholar
Mandal, R. and Basu, P., Cancer screening and early diagnosis in low and middle income countries: Current situation and future perspectives, Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 61(12), 2018, 1505–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cancer Research UK, Overdiagnosis: when finding cancer can do more harm than good, 2018. Available at: https://news.cancerresearchuk.org/2018/03/06/overdiagnosis-when-finding-cancer-can-do-more-harm-than-good/Google Scholar
UK Health Security Agency, Breast screening: Helping women decide, 2013. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/breast-screening-helping-women-decideGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. G. K., Naik, G., Ahmed, H. et al., Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UK National Screening Committee. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/uk-national-screening-committeeGoogle Scholar
References
Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network, Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) Demographics 1950–2019, Seattle, WA, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), 2020.Google Scholar
Shepard, D. S.., Walsh, J. A., Kleinau, E. et al., Setting priorities for the Children’s Vaccine Initiative: A cost-effectiveness approach, Vaccine 13(8), 1995, 707–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnitzler, L., Janssen, L., Evers, S. et al., The broader societal impacts of COVID-19 and the growing importance of capturing these in health economic analyses, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 37(1), 2021, e43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartlett, J. G., Moon, N., Chang, T. W. et al., Role of Clostridium difficile in antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis, Gastroenterology 75(5), 1978, 778–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators, Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis, The Lancet 399(10325), 2022, 629–55.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Organisation for Animal Health, Taking a multisectoral, one health approach: A tripartite guide to addressing zoonotic diseases in countries, 2019.Google Scholar
European Centre for Disease Control, Chlamydia infection: Annual Epidemiological Report for 2019, Surveillance Report, 2020. Available at: www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/chlamydia-annual-epidemiological-report-2019.pdfGoogle Scholar
REG 174 Information for UK healthcare professionals. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1098074/Spikexax_bivalent_Original_Omicron_Information_for_Healthcare_Professionals__Regulation_174_.pdfGoogle Scholar
Karzon, D. T., Smallpox vaccination: The end of an era, Acta Medica Scandinavica 197(S576), 1975, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UN General Assembly, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 21 October 2015, A/RES/70/1. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publicationGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization, Risk reduction and emergency preparedness: WHO six year strategy for the health-sector and community capacity development, Geneva, WHO, 2007, p. 8. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43736Google Scholar
UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Disaster. Available at: www.undrr.org/terminology/disasterGoogle Scholar