We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Aletras, N., Tsarapatsanis, D., Preot¸iuc-Pietro, D., and Lampos, V.‘Predicting Judicial Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A Natural Language Processing perspective’ (2016) 2PeerJ Computer Sciencee93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R.A Theory of Constitutional Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Andreescu, G. and Andreescu, L.‘The European Court of Human Rights’ Lautsi Decision: Context, Contents, Consequences’ (2010) 26Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies47.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, F. R.Aesthetic Politics: Political Philosophy beyond Fact and Value. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, F. R.History and Tropology: The Rise and Fall of Metaphor. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arai-Takahashi, Y. ‘Proportionality’ in Shelton, D. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Ardelean, B.‘Liberty: The Forum Internum of Faith and Belief’ (2013) 9:5European Journal of Science and Theology23.Google Scholar
Arnwine, S. E. and Gonenç, L.‘Religious Information on Identity Cards: A Turkish Debate’ (2007–2008) 23Journal of Law and Religion579.Google Scholar
Bacquet, S. ‘Religious Symbols and the Making of Contemporary Religious Identities’ in Sandberg, R. (ed.), Religion and Legal Pluralism. Farnham: Ashgate2015.Google Scholar
Battjes, H.‘In Search of a Fair Balance: The Absolute Character of the Prohibition of Refoulement under Article 3 ECHR Reassessed’ (2009) 22:3Leiden Journal of International Law583.Google Scholar
Bell, M.‘Leaving Religion at the Door? The European Court of Justice and Religious Symbols in the Workplace’ (2017) 17:4Human Rights Law Review784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, S.‘A “Good Faith” Interpretation of the Right to Manifest Religion? The Diverging Approaches of the European Court of Human Rights and the UN Human Rights Committee’ (2017) 37:4Legal Studies672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielefeldt, H.‘Freedom of Religion or Belief – A Human Right under Pressure’ (2012) 1:1Oxford Journal of Law and Religion15.Google Scholar
Bielefeldt, H.‘Misperceptions of Freedom of Religion or Belief’ (2013) 35Human Rights Quarterly33.Google Scholar
Bielefeldt, H., Ghanea, N. and Wiener, M.Freedom of Religion or Belief: An International Law Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Bielefeldt, H. and Wiener, M.Religious Freedom under Scrutiny. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleiberg, B.‘Unveiling the Real Issue: Evaluating the European Court of Human Rights’ Decision to Enforce the Turkish Headscarf Ban in Leyla Sahin v. Turkey’ (2005) 91Cornell Law Review129.Google Scholar
Body-Gendrot, S.‘France Upside Down over a Head Scarf?’ (2007) 68:3Sociology of Religion289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosset, P. ‘Mainstreaming Religious Diversity in a Secular and Egalitarian State: The Road(s) Not Taken in Leyla S¸ahin v. Turkey’ in Brems, E. (ed.), Diversity and European Human Rights: Rewriting the Judgments of the ECHR. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Bossuyt, M.Guide to the “Travaux Préparatoires” of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Dordrecht/Boston/Hingham: Springer, 1987.Google Scholar
Bratza, N.‘The “Precious Asset”: Freedom of Religion under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2012) 14:2Ecclesiastical Law Journal256.Google Scholar
Brito, J. ‘Conscientious Objection’ in Lindholm, T.Durham Jr, W. C., Tahzib-Lie, B. G., Sewell, E. A. and Larsen, L. (eds.), Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar
Brownsword, R. ‘Regulating Brain Imaging: Questions of Privacy, Informed Consent and Human Dignity’ in Richmond, S. D., Rees, G. and Edwards, S. J. L. (eds.), I Know What You’re Thinking: Brain Imagining and Mental Privacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Bublitz, J. C. ‘My Mind Is Mine!? Cognitive Liberty as a Legal Concept’ in Hildt, E. and Franke, A. G. (eds.), Cognitive Enhancement: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013.Google Scholar
Canon, A.‘Canon Law and Moral Theology’ (1962) 22Jurist319.Google Scholar
Canon Law Society of America. Code of Canon Law, Latin-English Edition, New English Translation. Washington, DC: Canon Law Society of America, 1999.Google Scholar
Chaib, S. O. ‘Religious Accommodation in the Workplace: Improving the Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Alidadi, K., Foblets, M.-C. and Vrielink, J. (eds.), A Test of Faith? Religious Diversity and Accommodation in the European Workplace. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar
Cismas, I.Religious Actors in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Council of Europe, Collected Edition of the ‘Travaux Préparatoires’ of the European Convention on Human Rights, 8 volumes. The Hague/Boston/London/Dordrecht/Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1975.Google Scholar
Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights, ‘Guide on Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights: Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion’ (updated 31 December 2021) available at: www.echr.coe.int/documents/guide_art_9_eng.pdf.Google Scholar
Cumper, P. and Lewis, T.‘ “Taking Religion Seriously”? Human Rights and Hijab in Europe – Some Problems of Adjudication’ (2008) 24Journal of Law and Religion599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danchin, P. G.‘Islam and the Secular Nomos of the ECtHR’ (2011) 32:4Michigan Journal of International Law663.Google Scholar
Danchin, P. G.‘Of Prophets and Proselytes: Freedom of Religion and the Conflict of Rights in International Law’ (2008) 49:2Harvard International Law Journal249.Google Scholar
Danchin, P. G. ‘The Modern Architecture of Religious Freedom as a Fundamental Right’ in Mancini, S. (ed.), Constitutions and Religion: Research Handbook in Comparative Constitutional Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.Google Scholar
Danchin, P. G. and Blond, L.‘Unlawful Religion? Modern Secular Power and the Legal Reasoning in the JFS case’ (2014) 29Maryland Journal of International Law419.Google Scholar
Danchin, P. G. and Forman, L. ‘The Evolving Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Protection of Religious Minorities’ in Danchin, P. G. and Cole, E. A. (eds.), Protecting the Human Rights of Religious Minorities in Eastern Europe. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Davis, K.‘The Veil That Covered France’s Eye: The Right to Freedom of Religion and Equal Treatment in Immigration and Naturalization Proceedings’ (2010) 10Nevada Law Journal732.Google Scholar
De Londras, F. and Dzehtsiarou, K.Great Debates on the European Convention on Human Rights. London: Palgrave, 2018.Google Scholar
Dingemans, J., Yeginsu, C., Cross, T. and Masood, H.The Protections for Religious Rights: Law and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Doe, N.Law and Religion in Europe: A Comparative Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, A. ‘Advancing Debate about Religion or Belief, Equality and Human Rights: Grounds for Optimism?’ (2013) 2:1Oxford Journal of Law and Religion50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DurhamJr, W. C. ‘Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief through Religious Association Laws’ in Lindholm, T., Durham Jr, W. C., Tahzib-Lie, B. G., Sewell, E. A. and Larsen, L. (eds.), Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar
Durham Jr, W. C. and Evans, C. ‘Freedom of Religion and Religion-State Relations’ in Tushnet, M., Fleiner, T. and Saunders, C. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law. London/New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Dzehtsiarou, K. and Greene, A.‘Legitimacy and the Future of the European Court of Human Rights: Critical Perspectives from Academia and Practitioners’ (2011) 12:10German Law Journal1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot-Williams, G.‘Protection of the Right to Manifest Religion or Belief Under the European Convention on Human Rights in SAS v. France’ (2016) 5:2Journal of Law and Religion344.Google Scholar
Elver, H.The Headscarf Controversy: Secularism and Freedom of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press2014.Google Scholar
Evans, C.Freedom of Religion under the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Evans, C.‘Individual and Group Religious Freedom in the European Court of Human Rights: Cracks in the Intellectual Architecture’ (2010) 26:1Journal of Law and Religion321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. ‘Introduction’ in Cane, P., Evans, C. and Robinson, Z. (eds.), Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Evans, C.‘The Islamic Scarf in the European Court of Human Rights’ (2006) 7Melbourne Journal of International Law52.Google Scholar
Evans, M. D. ‘“And Should the First Be Last?”’ (2014) Brigham Young University Law Review531.Google Scholar
Evans, M. D. ‘Freedom of Religion and the European Convention on Human Rights: Approaches, Trends and Tensions’ in Cane, P., Evans, C. and Robinson, Z. (eds.), Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Evans, M. D.‘From Cartoons to Crucifixes: Current Controversies Concerning the Freedom of Religion and the Freedom of Expression before the European Court of Human Rights’ (2010) 26:1Journal of Law and Religion345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. D. ‘Historical Analysis to the Freedom of Religion and Belief as a Technique for Resolving Conflict’ in Lindholm, T., Durham Jr, W. C., Tahzib-Lie, B. G., Sewell, E. A. and Larsen, L. (eds.), Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar
Evans, M. D. ‘Human Rights, Religious Liberty and the Universality Debate’ in O’Dair, R. and Lewis, A. (eds.), Law and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Evans, M. D.‘Lautsi v. Italy: An Initial Appraisal’ (2011) 6Religion and Human Rights237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. D.‘Law and Religion in a Secular World: A European Perspective’ (2012) 14:3Ecclesiastical Law Journal355.Google Scholar
Evans, M. D.Manual on the Wearing of Religious Symbols in Public Areas. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2009.Google Scholar
Evans, M. D.Religious Liberty and International Law in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Evans, M. D.‘The Freedom of Religion or Belief and the Freedom of Expression’ (2009) 4:2Religion and Human Rights197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. D. ‘The Freedom of Religion or Belief in the ECHR since Kokkinakis or “Quoting Kokkinakis”’ in Temperman, J., Gunn, T. J. and Evans, M. D. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and Freedom of Religion or Belief: The 25 Years Since Kokkinakis. Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijohff, 2019.Google Scholar
Evans, M. and Petkoff, P.‘A Separation of Convenience? The Concept of Neutrality in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2008) 36Religion, State and Society205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, S. ‘State and Church in Italy’ in Robbers, G. (ed.), State and Church in the European Union, 2nd ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2005.Google Scholar
Ferrari, S.‘State-Supported Display of Religious Symbols in the Public Space’ (2013) 52Catholic Legal Studies7.Google Scholar
Fokas, E.‘Directions in Religious Pluralism in Europe: Mobilizations in the Shadow of the European Court of Human Rights Religious Freedom Jurisprudence’ (2015) 4:1Oxford Journal of Law and Religion54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmann, W.‘Perspectives on Religious Freedom from the Vantage Point of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2000) Brigham Young University Law Review829.Google Scholar
Fumurescu, F.Compromise: A Political and Philosophical History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fumurescu, F. ‘The Role of Political and Self Representation in Compromise’ in Rostbøll, C. F. and Scavenius, T. (eds.), Compromise and Disagreement in Contemporary Political Theory. London/New York: Routledge,2017.Google Scholar
Gerards, J.‘How to Improve the Necessity Test of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2013) 11:2International Journal of Constitutional Law466.Google Scholar
Gewirth, A. ‘Are There Any Absolute Rights?’ in Waldron, J. (ed.), Theories of Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Ghanea, N. ‘Apostasy and Freedom to Change Religion or Belief’ in Lindholm, T., Durham Jr, W. C., Tahzib-Lie, B. G., Sewell, E. A. and Larsen, L. (eds.), Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar
Gilbert, H.‘The Slow Development of the Right to Conscientious Objection to Military Service under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2001) European Human Rights Law Review554.Google Scholar
Glendon, M. A.A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: Random House Trade Paperbacks, 2002.Google Scholar
Goering, J.‘The Internal Forum and the Literature of Penance and Confession’ (2004) 59Traditio175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, J. ‘The Internal Forum and the Literature of Penance and Confession’ in Hartmann, W. and Pennington, K. (eds.), The History of Medieval Canon Law in the Classical Period 1140–1234. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Gomien, D.Short Guide to the European Convention on Human Rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1991.Google Scholar
Greer, S.‘Is the Prohibition against Torture, Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment Really “Absolute” in International Human Rights Law?’ (2015) 15Human Rights Law Review101.Google Scholar
Greer, S.The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, T. J.‘Book Review: Taylor P, Freedom of Religion: UN and European Human Rights Law and Practice’ (2008) 23:2Journal of Law and Religion101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, T. J.‘Fearful Symbols: The Islamic Headscarf and the European Court of Human Rights in Sahin v. Turkey’ (2008–2009) 3Droit et Religions339.Google Scholar
Gunn, T. J. ‘The “Principle of Secularism” and the European Court of Human Rights: A Shell Game’ in Temperman, J., Gunn, T. J. and Evans, M. D. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and Freedom of Religion or Belief: The 25 Years Since Kokkinakis. Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2019.Google Scholar
Gunn, T. J. ‘Religious Symbols in Public Schools: The Islamic Headscarf and the European Court of Human Rights Decision in Sahin v. Turkey’ in Kirkham, D. M., DurhamJr, W. C. and Torfs, R. (eds.), Islam, Europe and Emerging Legal Issues. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar
Gunn, T. J. ‘Religious Symbols and Religious Expression in the Public Square’ in Davis, D. H. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Church and State in the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Gürsel, E.‘The Distinction between the Freedom of Religion and the Right to Manifest Religion: A Legal Medium to Regulate Subjectivities’ (2013) 22Social and Legal Studies377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbo, T.The Function of Proportionality Analysis in European Law. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, L.‘Selective Conscientious Objection and International Human Rights’ (2002) 36Israel Law Review145.Google Scholar
Harris, D., O’Boyle, M., Bates, E. and Buckley, C.Harris O’Boyle and Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatzis, N.‘Neutrality, Proselytism and Religious Minorities at the European Court of Human Rights and the US Supreme Court’ (2009) 49Harvard International Law Journal120.Google Scholar
Henrard, K.‘How the European Court of Human Rights’ Concern Regarding European Consensus Tempers Effective Protection of Freedom of Religion’ (2015) 4Oxford Journal of Law and Religion398.Google Scholar
Hill, D. and Whistler, D.‘Religious Symbols and the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2013) 171Law and Justice52.Google Scholar
Hill, D. and Whistler, D.The Right to Wear Religious Symbols. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
Hosen, N. and Mohr, R.Law and Religion in Public Life: The Contemporary Debate. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Howard, E.Law and the Wearing of Religious Symbols: European Bans of the Wearing of Religious Symbols in Education. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Hunter-Henin, M.‘Living Together in an Age of Religious Diversity: Lessons from Baby Loup and SAS’ (2015) 4:1Oxford Journal of Law and Religion94.Google Scholar
Juss, S. S.‘Kokkinakis and Freedom of Conscience Rights in Europe’ (1996) 1Journal of Civil Liberties246.Google Scholar
Kamal, J.‘Justified Interference with Religious Freedom: The European Court of Human Rights and the Need for Mediating Doctrine under Article 9(2)’ (2007–2008) 46Columbia Journal of Transnational Law667.Google Scholar
Kenny, C. G. ‘Public Space, Private Face: Veiling as a Challenge for Legal Reasoning’ in Sandberg, R. (ed.), Religion and Legal Pluralism. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar
Kiviorg, M.‘Religious Autonomy in the ECHR’ (2009) IVDerecho y Religion131.Google Scholar
Klatt, M. and Meister, M.‘Proportionality – a Benefit to Human Rights? Remarks on the I·CON Controversy’ (2012) 10: 3International Journal of Constitutional Law687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klatt, M. and Meister, M.The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krapf, T. M. ‘Lost Opportunities and Missed Targets’ in Evans, M., Petkoff, P. and Rivers, J. (eds.), Changing Nature of Religious Rights in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Krishnaswami, A.Study of Discrimination in the Matter of Religious Rights and Practices. New York: United Nations Publications, 1960.Google Scholar
Kritzer, H. M.The Justice Broker: Lawyers and Ordinary Litigation. Oxford: Oxford University Press1999.Google Scholar
Ladeur, K.-H. and Augsberg, I.‘The Myth of the Neutral State and the Individualization of Religion: The Relationship between State and Religion in the Face of Fundamentalism’ (2007) 8German Law Journal143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laegaard, S.‘Burqua Ban, Freedom of Religion and “Living Together”’ (2015) 16:3Human Rights Review203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlaude, S.‘Indoctrination, Secularism, Religious Liberty and the ECHR’ (2006) 55International and Comparative Law Quarterly929.Google Scholar
Leigh, I.‘New Trends in Religious Liberty and the European Court of Human Rights’ (2010) 13:3Ecclesiastical Law Journal266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, I ‘Objective, Critical and Pluralistic? Religious Education and Human Rights in the European Public Sphere’ in Zucca, L. and Ungureanu, C. (eds.), Law and State and Religion in the New Europe: Debates and Dilemmas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Lerner, N. ‘The Nature and Minimum Standards of Freedom of Religion or Belief’ in Lindholm, T., Durham Jr, W. C., Tahzib-Lie, B. G., Sewell, E. A. and Larsen, L. (eds.), Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar
Letsas, G. ‘Is There a Right Not to Be Offended in One’s Religious Beliefs?’ in Zucca, L. and Ungureanu, C. (eds.), Law, State and Religion in the New Europe: Debates and Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. T.An Elementary Latin Dictionary. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1890.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. ‘At the Deep End of the Pool: Religious Offence, Debate Speech and the Margin of Appreciation before the European Court of Human Rights’ in Temperman, J. and Koltay, A. (eds.), Blasphemy and Freedom of Expression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Lewis, T.‘What Not to Wear: Religious Rights, the European Court and the Margin of Appreciation’ (2007) 56International and Comparative Law Quarterly395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligthart, S.‘Freedom of Thought in Europe: Do Advances in “Brain-Reading” Technology Call for Revision?’ (2020) 7:1Journal of Law the Biosciences1–27.Google Scholar
Ligthart, S., Douglas, T., Bublitz, C. and Meynen, G.‘The Future of Neuroethics and the Relevance of the Law’ (2019) 10:3AJOB Neuroscience120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ligthart, S., Kooijmans, T. and Gerben, M.‘“Brain-Reading” in Criminal Justice and Forensic Psychiatry: Towards an Integrative Legal-Ethical Approach’ in Ligthart, S., van Toor, D., Kooijmans, T. and Douglas, T. (eds), Neurolaw: Advances in Neuroscience, Justice and Security. London: Palgrave, 2021.Google Scholar
Lindkvist, L.Religious Freedom and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liskofsky, S. ‘The UN Declaration on the Elimination of Religious Intolerance and Discrimination: Historical and Legal Perspectives’ in Wood, J. E. (ed.), Religion and the State: Essays in Honour of Leo Pfeffer. Waco: Baylor University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Little, D.‘Does the Human Rights to Freedom of Conscience, Religion and Belief Have Special Status?’ (2001) Brigham Young University Law Review603.Google Scholar
Little, D., Sachedina, A. and Kelsay, J. ‘Human Rights and the World’s Religions: Christianity, Islam and Religious Liberty’ in Bloom, I., Martin, J. P. and Proudfoot, W. L. (eds.), Religious Diversity and Human Rights. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Makinen, V. and Pihlajamaki, H.‘The Individualization of Crime in Medieval Canon Law’ (2004) 65:4Journal of the History of Ideas525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, H. C. (ed.), The Challenge of Human Rights: Charles Malik and the Universal Declaration. Oxford: Charles Malik Foundation, 2000.Google Scholar
Martínez-Torrón, J.‘Freedom of Religion in the European Convention on Human Rights under the Influence of Different European Traditions’ (2012) 17Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences329.Google Scholar
Martínez-Torrón, , J. ‘Religious Pluralism: The Case of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Requejo, F. and Ungureanu, C. (eds.), Democracy, Law and Religious Pluralism in Europe: Secularism and Post-Secularism. Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Martínez-Torrón, J. ‘The European Court of Human Rights and Religion’ in O’Dair, R. and Lewis, A. (eds.), Law and Religion: Current Legal Issues 2001, Volume 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Martínez-Torrón, J.‘The (Un)protection of Individual Religious Identity in the Strasbourg Case Law’ (2012) 1:2Oxford Journal of Law and Religion363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez-Torron, J. and Navarro-Valls, R.‘The Protection of Religious Freedom in the System of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1998) 3Helsinki Monitor25.Google Scholar
Mavronicola, N.‘What Is an ‘Absolute Right’? Deciphering Absoluteness in the Context of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2012) 12:4Human Rights Law Review723.Google Scholar
Mawhinney, A. ‘Coercion, Oaths and Conscience: Conceptual Confusion in the Right to Freedom of Religion or Belief’ in Cramner, F., Hill, M., Kenny, C. and Sandberg, R. (eds.), The Confluence of Law and Religion: interdisciplinary Reflections on the Work of Norman Doe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
McCrea, R. ‘Religion, Law and State in Contemporary Europe: Key Trends and Dilemmas’ in Foblets, M.-C., Alidadi, K. and Yanasmayan, Z. (eds.), Belief, Law and Politics: What Future for a Secular Europe?Aldershot: Ashgate, 2014.Google Scholar
McGoldrick, D.‘Religion in the European Public Square and in European Public Life: Crucifixes in the Classroom?’ (2011) 11:3Human Rights Law Review451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIvor, M.‘Carnal Exhibitions: Material Religion and the European Court of Human Rights’ (2015) 17:1Ecclesiastical Law Journal3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerson, D. ‘Why Religion Belongs in the Private Sphere, Not the Public Square’ in Cane, P., Evans, C. and Robinson, Z. (eds.), Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Müller, W. P.‘The Internal Forum of the Later Middle Ages: A Modern Myth?’ (2015) 33:4Law and History Review887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, J.Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion: A Guide to the Implementation of Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights, 2nd ed. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2012.Google Scholar
Murray, A.‘Confession before 1215’ (1993) 3Transactions of the Royal Historical Society51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieuwenhuis, A.‘European Court of Human Rights: State and Religion, Schools and Scarves. An Analysis of the Margin of Appreciation as Used in the Case of Leyla Sahin’ (2005) 1:3European Constitutional Law Review495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieuwenhuis, A.‘State and Religion, a Multidimensional Relationship: Some Comparative Law Remarks’ (2012) 10:1International Journal of Constitutional Law153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M.UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary, 2nd ed. Kehl/Arlington: NP Engel Verlag, 2005.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. and Vospernik, T. ‘Permissible Restrictions on Freedom of Religion or Belief’ in Lindholm, T., Durham Jr, W. C., Tahzib-Lie, B. G., Sewell, E. A. and Larsen, L. (eds.), Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar
Özenç, B. ‘The Religion Box on Identity Cards as a Means to Understand the Turkish Type of Secularism’ in Çinar, O. H. and Yildirim, M. (eds.), Freedom of Religion and Belief in Turkey. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014.Google Scholar
Parker, T.‘The Freedom to Manifest Religious Beliefs: An Analysis of the Necessity Clauses of the ICCPR and the ECHR’ (2006) 17:1Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law91.Google Scholar
Peroni, L.‘Deconstructing “Legal” Religion in Strasbourg’ (2014) 3:2Oxford Journal of Law and Religion235.Google Scholar
Peters, E.1917 Pio-Benedictine Code of Canon Law: In English Translation with Extensive Scholarly Apparatus. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Petkoff, P. ‘Forum Internum and Forum Externum in Canon Law and Public International Law with Particular Reference to the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2012) 7:3Religion and Human Rights183.Google Scholar
Petkoff, P.‘Legal Protection of Sacred Places as a Medieval Gloss – Towards Working “Soft Law” Guidelines under Public International Law’ (2011) 167Law and Justice27.Google Scholar
Petkoff, P. ‘Religious Symbols between the Forum Internum and the Forum Externum’ in Ferrari, S. and Cristofori, R. (eds.), Law and Religion in the 21st Century: Relations between States and Religious Communities. Farnham: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
Petty, A. R.‘Religion, Conscience and Belief in the European Court of Human Rights’ (2016) 48:4The George Washington International Law Review802.Google Scholar
Pirker, B.Proportionality Analysis and Models of Judicial Review. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar
Plesner, I. T.‘Legal Limitations to Freedom of Religion or Belief in School Education’ (2005) 19Emory International Law Review557.Google Scholar
Power-Forde, A.‘Freedom of Religion and “Reasonable Accommodation” in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2016) 5:3Oxford Journal of Law and Religion575.Google Scholar
Ramshaw, A.‘The Case for Replicable Structured Full Proportionality Analysis in All Cases Concerning Fundamental Rights’ (2019) 39:1Legal Studies120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Relaño, E.‘Educational Pluralism and Freedom of Religion: Recent Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2010) 32:1British Journal of Religious Education19.Google Scholar
Rivers, J.‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’ (2006) 65:1Cambridge Law Journal174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, J.The Law of Organized Religions: Between Establishment and Secularism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, J.‘The Presumption of Proportionality’ (2014) 77:3Modern Law Review409.Google Scholar
Roberts, C. K.‘Conscientious Objection to Military Service in Turkey’ (2016) 5European Human Rights Law Review567.Google Scholar
Roberts, C. K.‘Is There a Right to Be “Free From” Religion or Belief at Strasbourg?’ (2017) 19:1Ecclesiastical Law Journal35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. K. ‘Reconceptualising the Place of the Forum Internum and Forum Externum in Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (PhD thesis, University of Bristol, 2020), available at: https://bris.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1151697318Google Scholar
Roberts, C. K. ‘The Negative Aspect of the Freedom to Manifest Religion or Belief in the Educational Context in Greece’ (2020) 9:1 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronchi, P.‘Crucifixes, Margin of Appreciation and Consensus: The Grand Chamber Ruling in Lautsi v. Italy’ (2011) 13:3Ecclesiastical Law Journal287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozakis, C. L.‘The European Judge as a Comparatist’ (2005) 80Tulane Law Review257.Google Scholar
Sanader, T.‘Religious Symbols and Garments in Public Places – a Theory for the Understanding of SAS v. France’ (2015) 9Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law186.Google Scholar
Sandberg, R.Law and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, R.Religion, Law and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, M. A.‘Book Review: Evans C, Freedom of Religion under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2002) 65:1Modern Law Review141.Google Scholar
Schabas, W. A.The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Schabas, W. A.The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: The Travaux Préparatoires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Sihler, A. L.New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Slotte, P. ‘International Law and Freedom of Religion or Belief: Origins, Presuppositions and Structure of the Protection Framework’ in Ferrari, S. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Law and Religion. London: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
Slotte, P. ‘The Religious and the Secular in European Human Rights Discourse’ in Klabbers, J. (ed.), Finnish Yearbook of International Law, Volume 21. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012.Google Scholar
Slotte, P.‘What Is a Man If He Has Words but Has No Deeds? Some Remarks on the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2011) 11Ars Disputandi259.Google Scholar
Stahnke, T.‘Proselytism and the Freedom to Change Religion in International Human Rights Law’ (1999) Brigham Young University Law Review251–354.Google Scholar
Stahnke, T. ‘The Right to Engage in Religious Persuasion’ in Lindholm, T., Durham Jr, W. C., Tahzib-Lie, B. G., Sewell, E. A. and Larsen, L. (eds.), Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar
Stenlund, M. and Slotte, P.‘Is There a Right to Hold a Delusion? Delusions as a Challenge for Human Rights Discussion’ (2003) 16:4Ethical Theory and Moral Practice829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, W. F., Shakman Hurd, E., Mahmood, S. and Danchin, P. G. ‘Introduction’ in Sullivan, W. F., Shakman Hurd, E., Mahmood, S. and Danchin, P. G. (eds.), Politics of Religious Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Tahzib, B.Freedom of Religion or Belief: Ensuring Effective International Legal Protection. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P.Freedom of Religion: UN and European Human Rights Law and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tahzib-Lie, B.‘The European Definition of Religion or Belief’ (1998) 9Helsinki Monitor17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temperman, J. ‘Lautsi II: A Lesson in Burying Fundamental Children’s Rights’ (2011) 6Religion and Human Rights279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temperman, J. ‘Mother of God, Drive Putin Away’: On Blasphemy and Activist Art in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Temperman, J. and Koltay, A. (eds.), Blasphemy and Freedom of Expression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Temperman, J.‘State Neutrality in Public School Education: An Analysis of the Interplay between the Neutrality Principles, the Right to Adequate Education, Children’s Right to Freedom of Religion or Belief, Parental Liberties and the Position of Teachers’ (2010) 32Human Rights Quarterly865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temperman, J.The Lautsi Papers: Multidisciplinary Reflections on Religious Symbols in the Public-School Classroom. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigg, R.Equality, Freedom and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigg, R.‘Religion in the Public Forum’ (2011) 13:3Ecclesiastical Law Journal274.Google Scholar
Tulkens, F.‘Freedom of Religion under the European Court of Human Rights: A Precious Asset’ (2014) Brigham Young University Law Review509.Google Scholar
Ungureanu, C. ‘Europe and Religion: An Ambivalent Nexus’ in Zucca, L. and Ungureanu, C. (eds.), Law, State and Religion in the New Europe: Debates and Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Ungureanu, C. and Vila, M.‘The Conundrum of Pluralism and the Doctrine of the Margin of Appreciation: The Crucifix “Affair” and the Ambivalence of the ECtHR’ in Requejo, F. and Ungureanu, C. (eds.), Democracy, Law and Religious Pluralism in Europe: Secularism and Post-Secularism. Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
van Boven, T, ‘The United Nations Commission of Human Rights and Freedom of Religion or Belief’ in Lindholm, T., Durham Jr, W. C., Tahzib-Lie, B. G., Sewell, E. A. and Larsen, L. (eds.), Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar
Vickers, L. ‘The Relationship between Religious Diversity and Secular Models: An Equality-Based Perspective’ in Foblets, M.-C., Alidadi, K. and Yanasmayan, Z. (eds.), Belief, Law and Politics: What Future for a Secular Europe?Aldershot: Ashgate, 2014.Google Scholar
Walkate, J. A.‘The Right of Everyone to Change His Religion or Belief: Some Observations’ (1983) 30:2Netherlands International Law Review146.Google Scholar
Wintermute, R.‘Accommodating Religious Beliefs: Harm, Clothing or Symbols, and Refusals to Serve Others’ (2014) 77:2The Modern Law Review223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte, J.‘Lift High the Cross? An American Perspective on Lautsi v. Italy’ (2011) 13:3Ecclesiastical Law Journal341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yildirim, S. ‘The Search for Shared Idioms: Contesting Views of Laiklik before the Turkish Constitutional Court’ in Marranci, G. (ed.), Muslim Societies and the Challenge of Secularization: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Dordrecht/London: Springer, 2010.Google Scholar
Zucca, L.‘Lautsi: A Commentary on the Grand Chamber Decision’ (2013) 11:1International Journal of Constitutional Law218.Google Scholar