Adhar, R. ‘Is Secularism Neutral?’ (2013) 26:3 Ratio Juris 404.Google Scholar

Adhar, R. and Leigh, I. Religious Freedom in the Liberal State, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Alegre, S. ‘Regulating around Freedom in the “Forum Internum”’ (2021) 21 ERA Forum 591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alegre, S. ‘Saving Our Souls in the Digital Age’, Techonomy (3 February 2021), available at: www.techonomy.com/saving-our-souls-in-the-digital-age/.Google Scholar

Aletras, N., Tsarapatsanis, D., Preot¸iuc-Pietro, D., and Lampos, V. ‘Predicting Judicial Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A Natural Language Processing perspective’ (2016) 2 PeerJ Computer Science e93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexy, R. A Theory of Constitutional Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Andreescu, G. and Andreescu, L. ‘The European Court of Human Rights’ Lautsi Decision: Context, Contents, Consequences’ (2010) 26 Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 47.Google Scholar

Ankersmit, F. R. Aesthetic Politics: Political Philosophy beyond Fact and Value. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Ankersmit, F. R. History and Tropology: The Rise and Fall of Metaphor. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arai-Takahashi, Y. ‘Proportionality’ in Shelton, D. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Ardelean, B. ‘Liberty: The Forum Internum of Faith and Belief’ (2013) 9:5 European Journal of Science and Theology 23.Google Scholar

Arnwine, S. E. and Gonenç, L. ‘Religious Information on Identity Cards: A Turkish Debate’ (2007–2008) 23 Journal of Law and Religion 579.Google Scholar

Bacquet, S. ‘Religious Symbols and the Making of Contemporary Religious Identities’ in Sandberg, R. (ed.), Religion and Legal Pluralism. Farnham: Ashgate 2015.Google Scholar

Battjes, H. ‘In Search of a Fair Balance: The Absolute Character of the Prohibition of Refoulement under Article 3 ECHR Reassessed’ (2009) 22:3 Leiden Journal of International Law 583.Google Scholar

Bell, M. ‘Leaving Religion at the Door? The European Court of Justice and Religious Symbols in the Workplace’ (2017) 17:4 Human Rights Law Review 784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berry, S. ‘A “Good Faith” Interpretation of the Right to Manifest Religion? The Diverging Approaches of the European Court of Human Rights and the UN Human Rights Committee’ (2017) 37:4 Legal Studies 672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bielefeldt, H. ‘Freedom of Religion or Belief – A Human Right under Pressure’ (2012) 1:1 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 15.Google Scholar

Bielefeldt, H. ‘Misperceptions of Freedom of Religion or Belief’ (2013) 35 Human Rights Quarterly 33.Google Scholar

Bielefeldt, H., Ghanea, N. and Wiener, M. Freedom of Religion or Belief: An International Law Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Bielefeldt, H. and Wiener, M. Religious Freedom under Scrutiny. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleiberg, B. ‘Unveiling the Real Issue: Evaluating the European Court of Human Rights’ Decision to Enforce the Turkish Headscarf Ban in Leyla Sahin v. Turkey’ (2005) 91 Cornell Law Review 129.Google Scholar

Body-Gendrot, S. ‘France Upside Down over a Head Scarf?’ (2007) 68:3 Sociology of Religion 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bosset, P. ‘Mainstreaming Religious Diversity in a Secular and Egalitarian State: The Road(s) Not Taken in Leyla S¸ahin v. Turkey’ in Brems, E. (ed.), Diversity and European Human Rights: Rewriting the Judgments of the ECHR. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Bossuyt, M. Guide to the “Travaux Préparatoires” of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Dordrecht/Boston/Hingham: Springer, 1987.Google Scholar

Bratza, N. ‘The “Precious Asset”: Freedom of Religion under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2012) 14:2 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 256.Google Scholar

Brito, J. ‘Conscientious Objection’ in Lindholm, T. Durham Jr, W. C., Tahzib-Lie, B. G., Sewell, E. A. and Larsen, L. (eds.), Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar

Brownsword, R. ‘Regulating Brain Imaging: Questions of Privacy, Informed Consent and Human Dignity’ in Richmond, S. D., Rees, G. and Edwards, S. J. L. (eds.), I Know What You’re Thinking: Brain Imagining and Mental Privacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Bublitz, J. C. ‘My Mind Is Mine!? Cognitive Liberty as a Legal Concept’ in Hildt, E. and Franke, A. G. (eds.), Cognitive Enhancement: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013.Google Scholar

Canon, A. ‘Canon Law and Moral Theology’ (1962) 22 Jurist 319.Google Scholar

Canon Law Society of America. Code of Canon Law, Latin-English Edition, New English Translation. Washington, DC: Canon Law Society of America, 1999.Google Scholar

Carroll, O. ‘Hundreds of Russian Jehovah’s Witnesses Apply for Asylum in Finland’, Independent (22 August 2018), available at: www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/jehovahs-witness-russia-finland-asylum-seekers-religion-a8503326.html.Google Scholar

Chaib, S. O. ‘Religious Accommodation in the Workplace: Improving the Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Alidadi, K., Foblets, M.-C. and Vrielink, J. (eds.), A Test of Faith? Religious Diversity and Accommodation in the European Workplace. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar

Cismas, I. Religious Actors in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Council of Europe, Collected Edition of the ‘Travaux Préparatoires’ of the European Convention on Human Rights, 8 volumes. The Hague/Boston/London/Dordrecht/Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1975.Google Scholar

Council of Europe, ‘Copenhagen Declaration on the Reform of the European Convention on Human Rights System’ (13 April 2018), available at: https://rm.coe.int/copenhagen-declaration/16807b915c.Google Scholar

Council of Europe, ‘Draft Copenhagen Declaration’ (5 February 2018), available at: www.menneskeret.dk/sites/menneskeret.dk/files/media/dokumenter/nyheder/draft_copenhagen_declaration_05.02.18.pdf.Google Scholar

Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights, ‘Guide on Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights: Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion’ (updated 31 December 2021) available at: www.echr.coe.int/documents/guide_art_9_eng.pdf.Google Scholar

Cumper, P. and Lewis, T. ‘ “Taking Religion Seriously”? Human Rights and Hijab in Europe – Some Problems of Adjudication’ (2008) 24 Journal of Law and Religion 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danchin, P. G. ‘Islam and the Secular Nomos of the ECtHR’ (2011) 32:4 Michigan Journal of International Law 663.Google Scholar

Danchin, P. G. ‘Of Prophets and Proselytes: Freedom of Religion and the Conflict of Rights in International Law’ (2008) 49:2 Harvard International Law Journal 249.Google Scholar

Danchin, P. G. ‘The Modern Architecture of Religious Freedom as a Fundamental Right’ in Mancini, S. (ed.), Constitutions and Religion: Research Handbook in Comparative Constitutional Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.Google Scholar

Danchin, P. G. and Blond, L. ‘Unlawful Religion? Modern Secular Power and the Legal Reasoning in the JFS case’ (2014) 29 Maryland Journal of International Law 419.Google Scholar

Danchin, P. G. and Forman, L. ‘The Evolving Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Protection of Religious Minorities’ in Danchin, P. G. and Cole, E. A. (eds.), Protecting the Human Rights of Religious Minorities in Eastern Europe. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Davis, K. ‘The Veil That Covered France’s Eye: The Right to Freedom of Religion and Equal Treatment in Immigration and Naturalization Proceedings’ (2010) 10 Nevada Law Journal 732.Google Scholar

De Londras, F. and Dzehtsiarou, K. Great Debates on the European Convention on Human Rights. London: Palgrave, 2018.Google Scholar

Dingemans, J., Yeginsu, C., Cross, T. and Masood, H. The Protections for Religious Rights: Law and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Doe, N. Law and Religion in Europe: A Comparative Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donald, A. ‘Advancing Debate about Religion or Belief, Equality and Human Rights: Grounds for Optimism?’ (2013) 2:1 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DurhamJr, W. C. ‘Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief through Religious Association Laws’ in Lindholm, T., Durham Jr, W. C., Tahzib-Lie, B. G., Sewell, E. A. and Larsen, L. (eds.), Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar

Durham Jr, W. C. and Evans, C. ‘Freedom of Religion and Religion-State Relations’ in Tushnet, M., Fleiner, T. and Saunders, C. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law. London/New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, K. and Greene, A. ‘Legitimacy and the Future of the European Court of Human Rights: Critical Perspectives from Academia and Practitioners’ (2011) 12:10 German Law Journal 1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliot-Williams, G. ‘Protection of the Right to Manifest Religion or Belief Under the European Convention on Human Rights in SAS v. France’ (2016) 5:2 Journal of Law and Religion 344.Google Scholar

Elver, H. The Headscarf Controversy: Secularism and Freedom of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights, ‘High Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights: Brighton Declaration’ (2012), available at: www.echr.coe.int/Documents/2012_Brighton_FinalDeclaration_ENG.pdf.Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights, ‘Opinion on the Draft Copenhagen Declaration’ (19 February 2018), available at: www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Opinion_draft_Declaration_Copenhague%20ENG.pdf.Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights, ‘Pilot Judgments’ (January 2019), available at: www.echr.coe.int/Documents/FS_Pilot_judgments_ENG.pdf.Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights, ‘The Pilot-Judgment Procedure’ (2009), available at: www.echr.coe.int/documents/pilot_judgment_procedure_eng.pdf.Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights, ‘Webcasts of Hearings: SAS v. France (no 43835/11)’ (27 November 2013), available at: www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=hearings&w=4383511_27112013&language=en&c=&py=2013.Google Scholar

Evans, C. Freedom of Religion under the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Evans, C. ‘Individual and Group Religious Freedom in the European Court of Human Rights: Cracks in the Intellectual Architecture’ (2010) 26:1 Journal of Law and Religion 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, C. ‘Introduction’ in Cane, P., Evans, C. and Robinson, Z. (eds.), Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Evans, C. ‘The Islamic Scarf in the European Court of Human Rights’ (2006) 7 Melbourne Journal of International Law 52.Google Scholar

Evans, M. D. ‘“And Should the First Be Last?”’ (2014) Brigham Young University Law Review 531.Google Scholar

Evans, M. D. ‘Freedom of Religion and the European Convention on Human Rights: Approaches, Trends and Tensions’ in Cane, P., Evans, C. and Robinson, Z. (eds.), Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Evans, M. D. ‘From Cartoons to Crucifixes: Current Controversies Concerning the Freedom of Religion and the Freedom of Expression before the European Court of Human Rights’ (2010) 26:1 Journal of Law and Religion 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, M. D. ‘Historical Analysis to the Freedom of Religion and Belief as a Technique for Resolving Conflict’ in Lindholm, T., Durham Jr, W. C., Tahzib-Lie, B. G., Sewell, E. A. and Larsen, L. (eds.), Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar

Evans, M. D. ‘Human Rights, Religious Liberty and the Universality Debate’ in O’Dair, R. and Lewis, A. (eds.), Law and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Evans, M. D. ‘Lautsi v. Italy: An Initial Appraisal’ (2011) 6 Religion and Human Rights 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, M. D. ‘Law and Religion in a Secular World: A European Perspective’ (2012) 14:3 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 355.Google Scholar

Evans, M. D. Manual on the Wearing of Religious Symbols in Public Areas. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2009.Google Scholar

Evans, M. D. Religious Liberty and International Law in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Evans, M. D. ‘The Freedom of Religion or Belief and the Freedom of Expression’ (2009) 4:2 Religion and Human Rights 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, M. D. ‘The Freedom of Religion or Belief in the ECHR since Kokkinakis or “Quoting Kokkinakis”’ in Temperman, J., Gunn, T. J. and Evans, M. D. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and Freedom of Religion or Belief: The 25 Years Since Kokkinakis. Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijohff, 2019.Google Scholar

Evans, M. and Petkoff, P. ‘A Separation of Convenience? The Concept of Neutrality in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2008) 36 Religion, State and Society 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrari, S. ‘State and Church in Italy’ in Robbers, G. (ed.), State and Church in the European Union, 2nd ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2005.Google Scholar

Ferrari, S. ‘State-Supported Display of Religious Symbols in the Public Space’ (2013) 52 Catholic Legal Studies 7.Google Scholar

Fokas, E. ‘Directions in Religious Pluralism in Europe: Mobilizations in the Shadow of the European Court of Human Rights Religious Freedom Jurisprudence’ (2015) 4:1 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forum 18, ‘Russia’, Forum 18 News Service (2022), available at: www.forum18.org/archive.php?country=10.Google Scholar

Fuhrmann, W. ‘Perspectives on Religious Freedom from the Vantage Point of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2000) Brigham Young University Law Review 829.Google Scholar

Fumurescu, F. Compromise: A Political and Philosophical History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fumurescu, F. ‘The Role of Political and Self Representation in Compromise’ in Rostbøll, C. F. and Scavenius, T. (eds.), Compromise and Disagreement in Contemporary Political Theory. London/New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar

Gerards, J. ‘How to Improve the Necessity Test of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2013) 11:2 International Journal of Constitutional Law 466.Google Scholar

Gerosa, L. Canon Law. Münster: LIT, 2002.Google Scholar

Gewirth, A. ‘Are There Any Absolute Rights?’ in Waldron, J. (ed.), Theories of Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Ghanea, N. ‘Apostasy and Freedom to Change Religion or Belief’ in Lindholm, T., Durham Jr, W. C., Tahzib-Lie, B. G., Sewell, E. A. and Larsen, L. (eds.), Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar

Gilbert, H. ‘The Slow Development of the Right to Conscientious Objection to Military Service under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2001) European Human Rights Law Review 554.Google Scholar

Glendon, M. A. A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: Random House Trade Paperbacks, 2002.Google Scholar

Goering, J. ‘The Internal Forum and the Literature of Penance and Confession’ (2004) 59 Traditio 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goering, J. ‘The Internal Forum and the Literature of Penance and Confession’ in Hartmann, W. and Pennington, K. (eds.), The History of Medieval Canon Law in the Classical Period 1140–1234. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Gomien, D. Short Guide to the European Convention on Human Rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1991.Google Scholar

Greer, S. ‘Is the Prohibition against Torture, Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment Really “Absolute” in International Human Rights Law?’ (2015) 15 Human Rights Law Review 101.Google Scholar

Greer, S. The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunn, T. J. ‘Book Review: Taylor P, Freedom of Religion: UN and European Human Rights Law and Practice’ (2008) 23:2 Journal of Law and Religion 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunn, T. J. ‘Fearful Symbols: The Islamic Headscarf and the European Court of Human Rights in Sahin v. Turkey’ (2008–2009) 3 Droit et Religions 339.Google Scholar

Gunn, T. J. ‘The “Principle of Secularism” and the European Court of Human Rights: A Shell Game’ in Temperman, J., Gunn, T. J. and Evans, M. D. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and Freedom of Religion or Belief: The 25 Years Since Kokkinakis. Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2019.Google Scholar

Gunn, T. J. ‘Religious Symbols in Public Schools: The Islamic Headscarf and the European Court of Human Rights Decision in Sahin v. Turkey’ in Kirkham, D. M., DurhamJr, W. C. and Torfs, R. (eds.), Islam, Europe and Emerging Legal Issues. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar

Gunn, T. J. ‘Religious Symbols and Religious Expression in the Public Square’ in Davis, D. H. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Church and State in the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Gürsel, E. ‘The Distinction between the Freedom of Religion and the Right to Manifest Religion: A Legal Medium to Regulate Subjectivities’ (2013) 22 Social and Legal Studies 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harbo, T. The Function of Proportionality Analysis in European Law. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammer, L. ‘Selective Conscientious Objection and International Human Rights’ (2002) 36 Israel Law Review 145.Google Scholar

Harris, D., O’Boyle, M., Bates, E. and Buckley, C. Harris O’Boyle and Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hatzis, N. ‘Neutrality, Proselytism and Religious Minorities at the European Court of Human Rights and the US Supreme Court’ (2009) 49 Harvard International Law Journal 120.Google Scholar

Henrard, K. ‘How the European Court of Human Rights’ Concern Regarding European Consensus Tempers Effective Protection of Freedom of Religion’ (2015) 4 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 398.Google Scholar

Hill, D. and Whistler, D. ‘Religious Symbols and the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2013) 171 Law and Justice 52.Google Scholar

Hill, D. and Whistler, D. The Right to Wear Religious Symbols. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar

Hosen, N. and Mohr, R. Law and Religion in Public Life: The Contemporary Debate. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

Howard, E. Law and the Wearing of Religious Symbols: European Bans of the Wearing of Religious Symbols in Education. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

Hunter-Henin, M. ‘Living Together in an Age of Religious Diversity: Lessons from Baby Loup and SAS’ (2015) 4:1 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 94.Google Scholar

Juss, S. S. ‘Kokkinakis and Freedom of Conscience Rights in Europe’ (1996) 1 Journal of Civil Liberties 246.Google Scholar

Kamal, J. ‘Justified Interference with Religious Freedom: The European Court of Human Rights and the Need for Mediating Doctrine under Article 9(2)’ (2007–2008) 46 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 667.Google Scholar

Kenny, C. G. ‘Public Space, Private Face: Veiling as a Challenge for Legal Reasoning’ in Sandberg, R. (ed.), Religion and Legal Pluralism. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar

Kiviorg, M. ‘Religious Autonomy in the ECHR’ (2009) IV Derecho y Religion 131.Google Scholar

Klatt, M. and Meister, M. ‘Proportionality – a Benefit to Human Rights? Remarks on the I·CON Controversy’ (2012) 10: 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klatt, M. and Meister, M. The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krapf, T. M. ‘Lost Opportunities and Missed Targets’ in Evans, M., Petkoff, P. and Rivers, J. (eds.), Changing Nature of Religious Rights in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Krishnaswami, A. Study of Discrimination in the Matter of Religious Rights and Practices. New York: United Nations Publications, 1960.Google Scholar

Kritzer, H. M. The Justice Broker: Lawyers and Ordinary Litigation. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999.Google Scholar

Ladeur, K.-H. and Augsberg, I. ‘The Myth of the Neutral State and the Individualization of Religion: The Relationship between State and Religion in the Face of Fundamentalism’ (2007) 8 German Law Journal 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laegaard, S. ‘Burqua Ban, Freedom of Religion and “Living Together”’ (2015) 16:3 Human Rights Review 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langlaude, S. ‘Indoctrination, Secularism, Religious Liberty and the ECHR’ (2006) 55 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 929.Google Scholar

Leigh, I. ‘New Trends in Religious Liberty and the European Court of Human Rights’ (2010) 13:3 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leigh, I ‘Objective, Critical and Pluralistic? Religious Education and Human Rights in the European Public Sphere’ in Zucca, L. and Ungureanu, C. (eds.), Law and State and Religion in the New Europe: Debates and Dilemmas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Lerner, N. ‘The Nature and Minimum Standards of Freedom of Religion or Belief’ in Lindholm, T., Durham Jr, W. C., Tahzib-Lie, B. G., Sewell, E. A. and Larsen, L. (eds.), Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar

Letsas, G. ‘Is There a Right Not to Be Offended in One’s Religious Beliefs?’ in Zucca, L. and Ungureanu, C. (eds.), Law, State and Religion in the New Europe: Debates and Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Lewis, C. T. An Elementary Latin Dictionary. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1890.Google Scholar

Lewis, T. ‘At the Deep End of the Pool: Religious Offence, Debate Speech and the Margin of Appreciation before the European Court of Human Rights’ in Temperman, J. and Koltay, A. (eds.), Blasphemy and Freedom of Expression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Lewis, T. ‘What Not to Wear: Religious Rights, the European Court and the Margin of Appreciation’ (2007) 56 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ligthart, S. ‘Freedom of Thought in Europe: Do Advances in “Brain-Reading” Technology Call for Revision?’ (2020) 7:1 Journal of Law the Biosciences 1–27.Google Scholar

Ligthart, S., Douglas, T., Bublitz, C. and Meynen, G. ‘The Future of Neuroethics and the Relevance of the Law’ (2019) 10:3 AJOB Neuroscience 120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ligthart, S., Kooijmans, T. and Gerben, M. ‘“Brain-Reading” in Criminal Justice and Forensic Psychiatry: Towards an Integrative Legal-Ethical Approach’ in Ligthart, S., van Toor, D., Kooijmans, T. and Douglas, T. (eds), Neurolaw: Advances in Neuroscience, Justice and Security. London: Palgrave, 2021.Google Scholar

Lindkvist, L. Religious Freedom and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liskofsky, S. ‘The UN Declaration on the Elimination of Religious Intolerance and Discrimination: Historical and Legal Perspectives’ in Wood, J. E. (ed.), Religion and the State: Essays in Honour of Leo Pfeffer. Waco: Baylor University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Little, D. ‘Does the Human Rights to Freedom of Conscience, Religion and Belief Have Special Status?’ (2001) Brigham Young University Law Review 603.Google Scholar

Little, D., Sachedina, A. and Kelsay, J. ‘Human Rights and the World’s Religions: Christianity, Islam and Religious Liberty’ in Bloom, I., Martin, J. P. and Proudfoot, W. L. (eds.), Religious Diversity and Human Rights. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

López-Menchero, F. ‘Proto-Indo-European Etymological Dictionary’, Indo-European Language Association (2012), available at: https://indo-european.info/indo-european-lexicon.pdf.Google Scholar

Makinen, V. and Pihlajamaki, H. ‘The Individualization of Crime in Medieval Canon Law’ (2004) 65:4 Journal of the History of Ideas 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malik, H. C. (ed.), The Challenge of Human Rights: Charles Malik and the Universal Declaration. Oxford: Charles Malik Foundation, 2000.Google Scholar

Martínez-Torrón, J. ‘Freedom of Religion in the European Convention on Human Rights under the Influence of Different European Traditions’ (2012) 17 Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences 329.Google Scholar

Martínez-Torrón, , J. ‘Religious Pluralism: The Case of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Requejo, F. and Ungureanu, C. (eds.), Democracy, Law and Religious Pluralism in Europe: Secularism and Post-Secularism. Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Martínez-Torrón, J. ‘The European Court of Human Rights and Religion’ in O’Dair, R. and Lewis, A. (eds.), Law and Religion: Current Legal Issues 2001, Volume 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Martínez-Torrón, J. ‘The (Un)protection of Individual Religious Identity in the Strasbourg Case Law’ (2012) 1:2 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martinez-Torron, J. and Navarro-Valls, R. ‘The Protection of Religious Freedom in the System of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1998) 3 Helsinki Monitor 25.Google Scholar

Mavronicola, N. ‘What Is an ‘Absolute Right’? Deciphering Absoluteness in the Context of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2012) 12:4 Human Rights Law Review 723.Google Scholar

Mawhinney, A. ‘Coercion, Oaths and Conscience: Conceptual Confusion in the Right to Freedom of Religion or Belief’ in Cramner, F., Hill, M., Kenny, C. and Sandberg, R. (eds.), The Confluence of Law and Religion: interdisciplinary Reflections on the Work of Norman Doe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

McCrea, R. ‘Religion, Law and State in Contemporary Europe: Key Trends and Dilemmas’ in Foblets, M.-C., Alidadi, K. and Yanasmayan, Z. (eds.), Belief, Law and Politics: What Future for a Secular Europe? Aldershot: Ashgate, 2014.Google Scholar

McGoldrick, D. ‘Religion in the European Public Square and in European Public Life: Crucifixes in the Classroom?’ (2011) 11:3 Human Rights Law Review 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIvor, M. ‘Carnal Exhibitions: Material Religion and the European Court of Human Rights’ (2015) 17:1 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyerson, D. ‘Why Religion Belongs in the Private Sphere, Not the Public Square’ in Cane, P., Evans, C. and Robinson, Z. (eds.), Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Moorehead, C. ‘Jehovah’s Witnesses Jailed in Greece for “Proselytising”’, Independent (27 September 1992), available at: www.independent.co.uk/news/world/jehovahs-witnesses-jailed-in-greece-for-proselytism-1554153.html.Google Scholar

Müller, W. P. ‘The Internal Forum of the Later Middle Ages: A Modern Myth?’ (2015) 33:4 Law and History Review 887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murdoch, J. Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion: A Guide to the Implementation of Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights, 2nd ed. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2012.Google Scholar

Murray, A. ‘Confession before 1215’ (1993) 3 Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nieuwenhuis, A. ‘European Court of Human Rights: State and Religion, Schools and Scarves. An Analysis of the Margin of Appreciation as Used in the Case of Leyla Sahin’ (2005) 1:3 European Constitutional Law Review 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nieuwenhuis, A. ‘State and Religion, a Multidimensional Relationship: Some Comparative Law Remarks’ (2012) 10:1 International Journal of Constitutional Law 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nowak, M. UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary, 2nd ed. Kehl/Arlington: NP Engel Verlag, 2005.Google Scholar

Nowak, M. and Vospernik, T. ‘Permissible Restrictions on Freedom of Religion or Belief’ in Lindholm, T., Durham Jr, W. C., Tahzib-Lie, B. G., Sewell, E. A. and Larsen, L. (eds.), Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar

Özenç, B. ‘The Religion Box on Identity Cards as a Means to Understand the Turkish Type of Secularism’ in Çinar, O. H. and Yildirim, M. (eds.), Freedom of Religion and Belief in Turkey. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014.Google Scholar

Paraskeva, C. ‘Human Rights Protection Begins and Ends at Home: The “Pilot Judgment Procedure” Developed by the European Court of Human Rights’ (2006), available at: www.nottingham.ac.uk/hrlc/documents/publications/hrlcommentary2007/pilotjudgmentprocedure.pdf.Google Scholar

Parker, T. ‘The Freedom to Manifest Religious Beliefs: An Analysis of the Necessity Clauses of the ICCPR and the ECHR’ (2006) 17:1 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 91.Google Scholar

Peroni, L. ‘Deconstructing “Legal” Religion in Strasbourg’ (2014) 3:2 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 235.Google Scholar

Peters, E. 1917 Pio-Benedictine Code of Canon Law: In English Translation with Extensive Scholarly Apparatus. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Petkoff, P. ‘Forum Internum and Forum Externum in Canon Law and Public International Law with Particular Reference to the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2012) 7:3 Religion and Human Rights 183.Google Scholar

Petkoff, P. ‘Legal Protection of Sacred Places as a Medieval Gloss – Towards Working “Soft Law” Guidelines under Public International Law’ (2011) 167 Law and Justice 27.Google Scholar

Petkoff, P. ‘Religious Symbols between the Forum Internum and the Forum Externum’ in Ferrari, S. and Cristofori, R. (eds.), Law and Religion in the 21st Century: Relations between States and Religious Communities. Farnham: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar

Petty, A. R. ‘Religion, Conscience and Belief in the European Court of Human Rights’ (2016) 48:4 The George Washington International Law Review 802.Google Scholar

Pirker, B. Proportionality Analysis and Models of Judicial Review. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar

Plesner, I. T. ‘Legal Limitations to Freedom of Religion or Belief in School Education’ (2005) 19 Emory International Law Review 557.Google Scholar

Power-Forde, A. ‘Freedom of Religion and “Reasonable Accommodation” in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2016) 5:3 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 575.Google Scholar

Ramshaw, A. ‘The Case for Replicable Structured Full Proportionality Analysis in All Cases Concerning Fundamental Rights’ (2019) 39:1 Legal Studies 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Relaño, E. ‘Educational Pluralism and Freedom of Religion: Recent Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2010) 32:1 British Journal of Religious Education 19.Google Scholar

Rivers, J. ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’ (2006) 65:1 Cambridge Law Journal 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rivers, J. The Law of Organized Religions: Between Establishment and Secularism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rivers, J. ‘The Presumption of Proportionality’ (2014) 77:3 Modern Law Review 409.Google Scholar

Roberts, C. K. ‘Conscientious Objection to Military Service in Turkey’ (2016) 5 European Human Rights Law Review 567.Google Scholar

Roberts, C. K. ‘Is There a Right to Be “Free From” Religion or Belief at Strasbourg?’ (2017) 19:1 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, C. K. ‘Reconceptualising the Place of the Forum Internum and Forum Externum in Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (PhD thesis, University of Bristol, 2020), available at: https://bris.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1151697318Google Scholar

Roberts, C. K. ‘Stavropoulos and Others v. Greece: The Importance of Context in the Article 9 Assessment’ (2022) PILARS CC 2, available at: https://law-school.open.ac.uk/research/clusters/pilars/case-comments.Google Scholar

Roberts, C. K. ‘The Negative Aspect of the Freedom to Manifest Religion or Belief in the Educational Context in Greece’ (2020) 9:1 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ronchi, P. ‘Crucifixes, Margin of Appreciation and Consensus: The Grand Chamber Ruling in Lautsi v. Italy’ (2011) 13:3 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rozakis, C. L. ‘The European Judge as a Comparatist’ (2005) 80 Tulane Law Review 257.Google Scholar

Sanader, T. ‘Religious Symbols and Garments in Public Places – a Theory for the Understanding of SAS v. France’ (2015) 9 Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law 186.Google Scholar

Sandberg, R. Law and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandberg, R. Religion, Law and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanderson, M. A. ‘Book Review: Evans C, Freedom of Religion under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2002) 65:1 Modern Law Review 141.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A. The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: The Travaux Préparatoires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Sihler, A. L. New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Slotte, P. ‘International Law and Freedom of Religion or Belief: Origins, Presuppositions and Structure of the Protection Framework’ in Ferrari, S. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Law and Religion. London: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar

Slotte, P. ‘The Religious and the Secular in European Human Rights Discourse’ in Klabbers, J. (ed.), Finnish Yearbook of International Law, Volume 21. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012.Google Scholar

Slotte, P. ‘What Is a Man If He Has Words but Has No Deeds? Some Remarks on the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2011) 11 Ars Disputandi 259.Google Scholar

Stahnke, T. ‘Proselytism and the Freedom to Change Religion in International Human Rights Law’ (1999) Brigham Young University Law Review 251–354.Google Scholar

Stahnke, T. ‘The Right to Engage in Religious Persuasion’ in Lindholm, T., Durham Jr, W. C., Tahzib-Lie, B. G., Sewell, E. A. and Larsen, L. (eds.), Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar

Stenlund, M. and Slotte, P. ‘Is There a Right to Hold a Delusion? Delusions as a Challenge for Human Rights Discussion’ (2003) 16:4 Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sullivan, W. F., Shakman Hurd, E., Mahmood, S. and Danchin, P. G. ‘Introduction’ in Sullivan, W. F., Shakman Hurd, E., Mahmood, S. and Danchin, P. G. (eds.), Politics of Religious Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Tahzib, B. Freedom of Religion or Belief: Ensuring Effective International Legal Protection. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, P. Freedom of Religion: UN and European Human Rights Law and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tahzib-Lie, B. ‘The European Definition of Religion or Belief’ (1998) 9 Helsinki Monitor 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Temperman, J. ‘Lautsi II: A Lesson in Burying Fundamental Children’s Rights’ (2011) 6 Religion and Human Rights 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Temperman, J. ‘Mother of God, Drive Putin Away’: On Blasphemy and Activist Art in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Temperman, J. and Koltay, A. (eds.), Blasphemy and Freedom of Expression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Temperman, J. ‘State Neutrality in Public School Education: An Analysis of the Interplay between the Neutrality Principles, the Right to Adequate Education, Children’s Right to Freedom of Religion or Belief, Parental Liberties and the Position of Teachers’ (2010) 32 Human Rights Quarterly 865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Temperman, J. The Lautsi Papers: Multidisciplinary Reflections on Religious Symbols in the Public-School Classroom. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trigg, R. Equality, Freedom and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trigg, R. ‘Religion in the Public Forum’ (2011) 13:3 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 274.Google Scholar

Tulkens, F. ‘Freedom of Religion under the European Court of Human Rights: A Precious Asset’ (2014) Brigham Young University Law Review 509.Google Scholar

Ungureanu, C. ‘Europe and Religion: An Ambivalent Nexus’ in Zucca, L. and Ungureanu, C. (eds.), Law, State and Religion in the New Europe: Debates and Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Ungureanu, C. and Vila, M. ‘The Conundrum of Pluralism and the Doctrine of the Margin of Appreciation: The Crucifix “Affair” and the Ambivalence of the ECtHR’ in Requejo, F. and Ungureanu, C. (eds.), Democracy, Law and Religious Pluralism in Europe: Secularism and Post-Secularism. Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Unknown, ‘German Jews Warned Not to Wear Kippas after Rise in Anti-Semitism’, BBC News (26 May 2019), available at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-48411735.Google Scholar

van Boven, T, ‘The United Nations Commission of Human Rights and Freedom of Religion or Belief’ in Lindholm, T., Durham Jr, W. C., Tahzib-Lie, B. G., Sewell, E. A. and Larsen, L. (eds.), Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar

Vickers, L. ‘The Relationship between Religious Diversity and Secular Models: An Equality-Based Perspective’ in Foblets, M.-C., Alidadi, K. and Yanasmayan, Z. (eds.), Belief, Law and Politics: What Future for a Secular Europe? Aldershot: Ashgate, 2014.Google Scholar

Walkate, J. A. ‘The Right of Everyone to Change His Religion or Belief: Some Observations’ (1983) 30:2 Netherlands International Law Review 146.Google Scholar

Wintermute, R. ‘Accommodating Religious Beliefs: Harm, Clothing or Symbols, and Refusals to Serve Others’ (2014) 77:2 The Modern Law Review 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witte, J. ‘Lift High the Cross? An American Perspective on Lautsi v. Italy’ (2011) 13:3 Ecclesiastical Law Journal 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yildirim, S. ‘The Search for Shared Idioms: Contesting Views of Laiklik before the Turkish Constitutional Court’ in Marranci, G. (ed.), Muslim Societies and the Challenge of Secularization: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Dordrecht/London: Springer, 2010.Google Scholar

Zucca, L. ‘Lautsi: A Commentary on the Grand Chamber Decision’ (2013) 11:1 International Journal of Constitutional Law 218.Google Scholar