Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T10:50:58.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2018

Tyler R. Wittman
Affiliation:
The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Aquinas, Thomas. In XIII libros Physicorum Aristotelis expositio. Edited by Maggiolo, M.. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1954.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on Aristotle's De Anima. Translated by Kenelm Foster and Sylvester Humphries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics. Translated by John P. Rowan. Notre Dame: Dumb Ox Books, 1995.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on Aristotle's Nichomachean Ethics, 2 vols. Translated by C. I. Litzinger. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1964.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on Aristotle's Physics. Translated by Richard J. Blackwell, Richard J. Spath, and W. Edmund Thirlkel. Revised edition with introduction by Vernon J. Burke and foreword by Ralph McInerny. Notre Dame: Dumb Ox Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on Aristotle's Posterior Analytics. Translated by Jean T. Oesterle. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on the Book of Causes. Translated by Vincent A. Guagliardo, Charles R. Hess, and Richard C. Taylor. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on the Gospel of Matthew. In Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, vols. 33–34. Translated by Jeremy Holmes and Beth Mortensen. Edited by The Aquinas Institute. Lander: The Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine, 2013.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on the Gospel of St. John, 3 vols. Translated by Fabian R. Larcher and James A. Weisheipl. Introduction and Notes by Daniel Keating and Matthew Levering. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on the Letters of Saint Paul to the Corinthians. In Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, vol. 38. Translated by Fabian R. Larcher, Beth Mortensen, and Daniel Keating. Edited by Mortensen, John and Alarcón, Enrique. Lander: The Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine, 2012.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on the Letters of Saint Paul to the Galatians and Ephesians. In Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, vol. 39. Translated by Fabian R. Larcher, and Matthew Lamb. Edited by Mortensen, John and Alarcón, Enrique. Lander: The Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine, 2012.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on the Letter of Saint Paul to the Hebrews. In Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, vol. 41. Translated by Fabian R. Larcher. Edited by Mortensen, John and Alarcón, Enrique. Lander: The Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine, 2012.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on the Letters of Saint Paul to the Philippians, Colossians, Thessalonians, Timothy, Titus, and Philemon. In Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, vol. 40. Translated by Fabian R. Larcher. Edited by Mortensen, John and Alarcón, Enrique. Lander: The Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine, 2012.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on the Letter of Saint Paul to the Romans. In Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, vol. 37. Translated by Fabian R. Larcher. Edited by Mortensen, John and Alarcón, Enrique. Lander: The Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine, 2012.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Compendium of Theology. Translated by Richard J. Regan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. De potentia Dei. Edited by Pession, P. M.. In Quaestiones disputatae, vol. 2. Edited by Spiazi, R.. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1965.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. De veritate. In Sancti Thomae de Aquino opera Omnia, vol. 22. Leonine Edition. Rome: Editori di San Tommaso, 1975–76.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. The Disputed Questions onTruth, 3 vols. Translated by R. Schmidt. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1954.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In duodecem libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis expositio. Edited by Pera, Ceslai. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1950.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Exposition of Aristotle's Treatise On the Heavens. Translated by Fabian R. Larcher and Pierre H. Conway. Columbus: College of St. Mary of the Springs, 1964.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In librum beati Dionysii de divinis expositio. Edited by Pera, Ceslai. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1950.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. On Creation [Quaestiones Disputatae de Potentia Dei, Q. 3]. Translated with introduction by Susan C. Selner-Wright. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. On the Power of God, 3 vols. Translated by the English Dominican Province. London: Burns, Oates, and Washbourne, 1932–4.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In Psalmos Davidis expositio. In Sancti Thomae Aquinatis opera Omnia, vol. 14. Parma: Typis Petri Fiaccadori, 1963.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quodlibetal Questions 1 and 2. Translated by Sandra Edwards. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1983.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Scriptum super libros Sententiarum magistri Petri Lombardi episcopi Parisiensis, vols. 1–2. Edited by Mandonnet, P.. Paris: Lethielleux, 1929, vols. 3–4. Edited by Moos, M.. Paris: P. Lethielleux, 1933–47.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Sententia libri De Anima. Edited by Pirotta, A. M.. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1959.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Sententia libri Ethicorum. In Sancti Thomae de Aquino opera Omnia, vol. 47/1–2. Edited by Gauthier, R.-A.. Rome: Ad Sanctae Sabinae, 1969.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa contra Gentiles, 4 vols. Translated by A. Pegis, J. Anderson, V. J. Burke, and C. J. O'Neil. Garden City: Doubleday, 1955–6.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae. Edited and translated by Thomas Gilby, et al. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964–81. Reprinted by Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. Translated by the English Dominican Province. New York: Benziger Brothers, 1947.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Super Evangelium S. Joannis Lectura. Edited by Cai, R.. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1952.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Thomas Aquinas: The Academic Sermons. Translated by Mark-Robin Hoogland. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Thomas Aquinas: Selected Writings. Translated by Ralph McInerny. London: Penguin Books, 1998.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Barth, Karl. Anselm: Fides quaerens intellectum. Anselm's Proof of the Existence of God in the Context of his Theological Scheme. Translated by Ian W. Robertson. London: SCM Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics, vols. I–IV. Edited by Bromiley, Geoffrey W. and Torrance, Thomas F.. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley et al. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1956–75.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Credo. Eugene: Wipf & Stock, 2005.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Credo: Die Hauptprobleme der Dogmatik, dargestellt im Anschluss an das Apostolische Glaubensbekenntnis. München: TVZ, 1935.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Die kirchliche Dogmatik, vols. I–IV. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 1980.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. The Epistle to the Romans, 6th edn. Translated by Edwyn C. Hoskins. London: Oxford University Press, 1933.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Erklärungen des Epheser- und des Jakobusbriefes 1919–1929. Edited by Bohnet, Jörg-Michael. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 2009.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Erklärung des Johannesevangeliums. Edited by Fürst, Walther. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 1999.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Evangelical Theology: An Introduction. Translated by Foley Grover. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1963.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. “Fate and Idea in Theology.” In The Way of Theology in Karl Barth: Essays and Comments. Translated by George Hunsinger. Edited by Rumscheidt, H. Martin. Allison Park: Pickwick, 1986.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Gespräche 1964–1968. Edited by Busch, Eberhard. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 1996.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. The Göttingen Dogmatics: Instruction in the Christian Religion. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. The Humanity of God. Translated by Thomas Weiser and John Newton Thomas. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Karl Barth's Table Talk. Edited by Godsey, John D.. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1963.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. The Knowledge of God and the Service of God According to the Teaching of the Reformation. Translated by J. L. M. Hare and Ian Henderson. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1938.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. The Theology of John Calvin. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Vorträge und kleinere Arbeiten 1925–1930. Edited by Schmidt, Hermann. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 1994.Google Scholar
Acar, Rahim. Talking about God and Talking about Creation: Avicenna's and Thomas Aquinas’ Positions. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Adams, Nicholas. Eclipse of Grace: Divine and Human Action in Hegel. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert Merrihew. “Theories of Actuality.” In The Possible and the Actual: Readings in the Metaphysics of Modality. Edited by Loux, Michael J., 190209. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Aertsen, Jan A. Medieval Philosophy and the Transcendentals: The Case of Thomas Aquinas. Leiden: Brill, 1996.Google Scholar
Alsted, Johan-Heinrich. Metaphysica, Tribus Libris Tractata. Herbornae Nassoviorum, 1613.Google Scholar
Anatolios, Khaled. Retrieving Nicaea: The Development and Meaning of Trinitarian Doctrine. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2011.Google Scholar
Anderson, James F. “Creation as a Relation.” New Scholasticism 24 (1950): 263–83.Google Scholar
Anselm, , Monologion and Proslogion. In Anselm of Canterbury: The Major Works. Edited by Davies, Brian and Evans, G. R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by H. Rackham. Loeb Classical Library 73. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1926.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . On the Heavens. Translated by W. K. C. Guthrie. Loeb Classical Library 338. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1939.Google Scholar
Asbill, Brian D. The Freedom of God for Us: Karl Barth's Doctrine of Divine Aseity. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar
Asselt, Willem J. van, Bac, J. Martin, and Velde, Roelf T. te, eds. Reformed Thought on Freedom: The Concept of Free Choice in Early Modern Reformed Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2010.Google Scholar
Augustine of Hippo. De civitate Dei. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 47–48. Edited by Dombart, B. and Kalb, A.. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 1955.Google Scholar
Augustine of Hippo. De trinitate libri XV. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 50. Edited by Mountain, W. J. and Glorie, F.. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 1968. Reprinted 2001.Google Scholar
Augustine of Hippo. The Trinity (de Trinitate). Translated by Edmund Hill. Hyde Park: New City Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Ayres, Lewis. Nicaea and Its Legacy: An Approach to Fourth-Century Trinitarian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Balthasar, Hans Urs von. The Glory of the Lord: A Theological Aesthetics, vol. 4, The Realm of Metaphysics in Antiquity. Edited by Riches, John. Translated by Brian McNeil, et al. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1989.Google Scholar
Balthasar, Hans Urs von. The Theology of Karl Barth: Exposition and Interpretation. Translated by Edward T. Oakes. San Francisco: Ignatius, 1992.Google Scholar
Barnes, Corey L.Aristotle in the Summa Theologiae's Christology.” In Aristotle in Aquinas’ Theology. Edited by Emery, Gilles and Levering, Matthew, 186204. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Barnes, Corey L.Ordered to the Good: Final Causality and Analogical Predication in Thomas Aquinas.” Modern Theology 30.4 (2014): 433–53.Google Scholar
Barnes, Michel René.Oeconomia.” In Encyclopedia of Early Christianity. Edited by Ferguson, Everett, McHugh, Michael P., and Norris, Frederick W., vol. 2: L–Z, 825–7. New York: Garland, 1997.Google Scholar
Barnes, Michel René. The Power of God: Dynamis in Gregory of Nyssa's Trinitarian Theology. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Barnett, William T. “Actualism and Beauty: Karl Barth's Insistence on the Auch in his Account of Divine Beauty.” Scottish Journal of Theology 66.3 (2013): 299318.Google Scholar
Basil of Caesarea, Against Eunomius. Translated by Mark DelCogliano and Andrew Radde-Gallwitz. In The Fathers of the Church, vol. 122. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Bauerschmidt, Frederick Christian. Thomas Aquinas: Faith, Reason, and Following Christ. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bavinck, Herman. Reformed Dogmatics, vol. 2, God and Creation. Edited by Bolt, John. Translated by John Vriend. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2004.Google Scholar
Behr, John. The Nicene Faith: True God of True God. The Formation of Christian Theology, vol. 2, part 1. Crestwood: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Beintker, Michael. “… alles Andere als ein Parergon: Fides quaerens intellectum.” In Karl Barth in Deutschland (1921–1935). Edited by Beintker, Michael, Link, Christian, and Trowitzsch, Michael, 99120. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 2005.Google Scholar
Beintker, Michael. “Analogy.” In The Westminster Handbook to Karl Barth. Edited by Burnett, Richard, 36. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2013.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick. Hegel. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Bengel, Johann Albrecht. Gnomon of the New Testament. Edited by Bengel, M. Ernest and Steudel, J. C. F.. Translated by James Bryce, 3 vols. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1860.Google Scholar
Blankenhorn, Bernard. “The Good as Self-Diffusive in Thomas Aquinas.” Angelicum 79 (2002): 803–37.Google Scholar
Blankenhorn, Bernard. “The Place of Romans 6 in Aquinas's Doctrine of Sacramental Causality: A Balance of History and Metaphysics.” In Ressourcement Thomism: Sacred Doctrine, the Sacraments, and the Moral Life. Edited by Hütter, Reinhard and Levering, Matthew, 136–49. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Bonino, Serge-Thomas. “La simplicité de Dieu.” In Istituto San Tommaso: Studi 1996. Edited by Lorenz, Dietrich, 117–51. Rome: Pontificia Università San Tommaso, 1997.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Olivier. “Libertas indifferentiae: Figures de la liberté d'indifférence au Moyen Age.” In Mots médiévaux offerts à Ruedi Imbach. Edited by Atucha, A., et al., 405–18. Porto, Turnhout: Brepols Publisher, 2011.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Brouwer, Rinse H. Reeling. Karl Barth and Post-Reformation Orthodoxy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar
Brown, Robert F.Schelling and Dorner on Divine Immutability.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 53.2 (1985): 237–49.Google Scholar
Buckley, Michael J. Motion and Motion's God: Thematic Variations in Aristotle, Cicero, Newton, and Hegel. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Burrell, David B. Karl Barth: His Life from Letters and Autobiographical Texts. Translated by John Bowden. London: SCM Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Burrell, David B. Aquinas: God and Action. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979.Google Scholar
Burrell, David B. Faith and Freedom: An Interfaith Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Eberhard. The Great Passion: An Introduction to Karl Barth's Theology. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar
Chavannes, Henry. The Analogy between God and the World in St. Thomas Aquinas and Karl Barth. Translated by William Lumley. New York: Vantage Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Coakley, Sarah. God, Sexuality and the Self: An Essay ‘On the Trinity’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Coffey, Brian. “The Notion of Order According to St. Thomas Aquinas.” The Modern Schoolman 27.1 (1949): 118.Google Scholar
Collins, Paul M. Trinitarian Theology, West and East: Karl Barth, the Cappadocian Fathers and John Zizioulas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Cremer, Hermann. Biblico-Theological Lexicon of New Testament Greek. Translated by William Urwick. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1895.Google Scholar
Cremer, Hermann. The Christian Doctrine of the Divine Attributes. Edited by Burkhardt, Helmut. Translated by Robert B. Price. Eugene: Pickwick, 2016.Google Scholar
Cross, Richard. Duns Scotus on God. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar
Couenhoven, Jesse. “Karl Barth's Conception(s) of Human and Divine Freedom(s).” In Commanding Grace: Studies in Karl Barth's Ethics. Edited by Migliore, Daniel L., 239–55. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J. Ockham and Ockhamism: Studies in the Dissemination and Impact of His Thought. Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, vol. 99. Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar
Cuddeback, Matthew. “Light and Form in St. Thomas Aquinas's Metaphysics of the Knower.” PhD dissertation, The Catholic University of America, 1998.Google Scholar
Cuddeback, Matthew. “Thomas Aquinas on Divine Illumination and the Authority of the First Truth.” Nova et Vetera (English Edition) 7.3 (2009): 579602.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Mary Kathleen. What Is Theological Exegesis? Interpretation and Use of Scripture in Barth's Doctrine of Election. Valley Forge: Trinity Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Daferth, Ingolf U. Becoming Present: An Inquiry into the Christian Sense of the Presence of God. Leuven, Paris, Dudley: Peeters, 2006.Google Scholar
Daferth, Ingolf U.Possibile absolutum: The Theological Discovery of the Ontological Priority of the Possible.” In Rethinking the Medieval Legacy for Contemporary Theology. Edited by Min, Anselm K., 91129. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2014.Google Scholar
de Finance, Joseph. Être et agir dans la philosophie de saint Thomas, 3rd edn. Rome: Université Grégorienne, 1965.Google Scholar
Dempsey, Michael T., ed. Trinity and Election in Contemporary Theology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar
Desmond, William. Hegel's God: A Counterfeit Double? Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003.Google Scholar
Dewan, Lawrence. Form and Being: Studies in Thomistic Metaphysics. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Dewan, Lawrence. “St. Thomas and the Causality of God's Goodness.” Laval théologique et philosophique 34.3 (1978): 291304.Google Scholar
Dodds, Michael J.Ultimacy and Intimacy: Aquinas on the Relation between God and the World.” In Ordo Sapientiae et Amoris: Hommage au Professeur Jean-Pierre Torrell, O. P. Edited by de Oliveira, Carlos-Josephat Pinto, 211–27. Fribourg: Editions Universitaires, 1993.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Philip J.Saint Thomas and the Ultimate Purpose of Creation.” Theological Studies 2 (1941): 5383.Google Scholar
Doolan, Gregory. “Aquinas on Creation: Transitive or Immanent Act?” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Dorner, Isaak A. Divine Immutability: A Critical Reconsideration. Translated by Robert R. Williams and Claude T. Welch. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1994.Google Scholar
Dorner, Isaak A. System of Christian Doctrine, vol. 1. Translated by Alfred Cave and J. S. Banks. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1888.Google Scholar
Dorner, Isaak A. System der christlichen Glaubenslehre, vol. 1, Grundlegung oder Apologetik. Berlin: Wilhelm Hertz, 1879.Google Scholar
Drozdek, Adam. Greek Philosophers as Theologians: The Divine Arche. Burlington: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar
Drury, John L. The Resurrected God: Karl Barth's Trinitarian Theology of Easter. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2014.Google Scholar
Duby, Steven J. Divine Simplicity: A Dogmatic Account. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar
Dümpelmann, Leo. Kreation als ontisch-ontologisches Verhältnis: Zur Metaphysik der Schöpfungstheologie des Thomas von Aquin. München: Verlag Karl Alber, 1969.Google Scholar
Durand, Emmanuel. “Comment pratiquer la théologie trinitaire en pélerin? Béatitude et Trinité selon Richard de Saint-Victor et Thomas d'Aquin.” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 92.2 (2008): 209–23.Google Scholar
Elders, Leo J. The Metaphysics of Being of St. Thomas Aquinas in a Historical Perspective. Leiden: Brill, 1993.Google Scholar
Emery, Gilles. “‘Ad aliquid’: La relation chez Thomas d'Aquin.” In Saint Thomas d'Aquin. Edited by Humbrecht, Theirry-Dominique, 113–35. Paris: Cerf, 2010.Google Scholar
Emery, Gilles. “Essentialism or Personalism in the Treatise on God in St. Thomas Aquinas?The Thomist 64 (2000): 521–63.Google Scholar
Emery, Gilles. “La Père et l’œuvre trinitaire de creation selon le Commentaire des Sentences de S. Thomas d'Aquin.” In Ordo sapientiae et amoris: Hommage au Professeur Jean-Pierre Torrell OP à l'occasion de son 65e anniversaire. Edited by de Oliveira, Carlos-Josaphat Pinto, 85117. Fribourg: Editions universitaires, 1993.Google Scholar
Emery, Gilles. “The Personal Mode of Trinitarian Action in St. Thomas Aquinas.” The Thomist 69 (2005): 3177.Google Scholar
Emery, Gilles. “La relation de création.” Nova et Vetera (French Edition) 88.1 (2013): 943.Google Scholar
Emery, Gilles. La Trinité créatrice: Trinité et creation dans les commentaries aux Sentences de Thomas d'Aquin et de ses précurseurs Albert le Grand et Bonaventure. Paris: Vrin, 1995.Google Scholar
Emery, Gilles. The Trinitarian Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas. Translated by Francesca Aran Murphy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Emery, Gilles. “Trinity and Creation.” In The Theology of Thomas Aquinas. Edited by van Nieuwenhove, Rik and Wawrykow, Joseph, 5876. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Emery, Gilles. Trinity in Aquinas. Ypsilanti: Sapientia Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Emery, Gilles. Trinity, Church, and the Human Person: Thomistic Essays. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. The Science of Knowledge. Edited and translated by Peter Heathand John Lachs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Fischbach, Franck. L'être et l'acte. Enquête sur les fondements de l'ontologie moderne de l'agir. Paris: Vrin, 2002.Google Scholar
Frei, Hans. Types of Christian Theology. Edited by Hunsinger, George and Placher, William. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Friedman, Russell L. Medieval Trinitarian Thought from Aquinas to Ockham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Funkenstein, Amos. Theology and the Scientific Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Gersh, Stephen. From Iamblichus to Eriugena: An Investigation of the Prehistory and Evolution of the Pseudo-Dionysian Tradition. Leiden: Brill, 1978.Google Scholar
Gibson, David. Reading the Decree: Exegesis, Election and Christology in Calvin and Barth. London: T&T Clark, 2009.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne. Being and Some Philosophers, 2nd edn. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1952.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne. Thomism: The Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas. Translated by Laurence K. Shook and Armand Maurer. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2002.Google Scholar
Gockel, Matthias. Barth and Schleiermacher on the Doctrine of Election: A Systematic-Theological Comparison. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Goebel, Hans Theodor. Vom freien Wählen Gottes und des Menschen: Interpretationsübungen zur ‘Analogie’ nach Karl Barths Lehre von der Erwählung und Bedenken ihrer Folgen für die Kirchliche Dogmatik. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1990.Google Scholar
Goetzmann, J.οὶκονομία.” In New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology and Exegesis. Edited by Brown, Colin, vol. 2, 253–6. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1986.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert P. “בוֹט.” In New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology and Exegesis. Edited by VanGemeren, Willem A.. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1998.Google Scholar
Goris, Harm. “Theology and Theory of the Word in Aquinas: Understanding Augustine by Innovating Aristotle.” In Aquinas the Augustinian. Edited by Dauphinais, Michael, David, Barry, and Levering, Matthew, 100–44. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Grant, Sara. Toward an Alternative Theology: Confessions of a Non-Dualist Christian. Edited by Malkovsky, Bradley. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Paul J. Intellectual Appetite: A Theological Grammar. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Griswold, Daniel. Triune Eternality: God's Relationship to Time in the Theology of Karl Barth. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2015.Google Scholar
Gunton, Colin. Becoming and Being: The Doctrine of God in Charles Hartshorne and Karl Barth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Hauerwas, Stanley. With the Grain of the Universe: The Church's Witness and Natural Theology. Grand Rapids: Brazos Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Häring, Theodor. The Christian Faith: A System of Dogmatics, vol. 1. Translated by John Dickie and George Ferries. New York: Hodder and Stoughton, 1913.Google Scholar
Härle, Wilfried. Outline of Christian Doctrine: An Evangelical Dogmatics. Translated by Ruth Yale. Co-translated and edited by Nicholas Sagovsky. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2015.Google Scholar
Härle, Wilfried. Sein und Gnade: die Ontologie in Karl Barths kirchlicher Dogmatik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1975.Google Scholar
Hector, Kevin W.Immutability, Necessity and Triunity: Towards a Resolution of the Trinity and Election Controversy.” Scottish Journal of Theology 65.1 (2012): 6481.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg W. F. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Edited by Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg W. F. Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline. Part I: Science of Logic. Edited and translated by Klaus Brinkmann and Daniel O. Dahlstrom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg W. F. Philosophy of Mind: Part Three of the Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830). Translated by William Wallace. Together with the Zusätze in Boumann's Text (1854). Translated by A. V. Miller and revised by Michael J. Inwood. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg W. F. The Science of Logic. Translated by George di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Henninger, Mark G. Relations: Medieval Theories 1250–1325. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Herms, Eilert. “Gottes Wirklichkeit.” In Marburger Jahrbuch Theologie I: Vom Handeln Gottes. Edited by Härle, Wilfried and Preul, Reiner, 82101. Marburg: N. G. Elwert Verlag, 1987.Google Scholar
Holmes, Christopher R. J. The Lord Is Good: Seeking the God of the Psalter. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2018.Google Scholar
Houlgate, Stephen. The Opening of Hegel's Logic: From Being to Infinity. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Hunsinger, George. Disruptive Grace: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar
Hunsinger, George. How to Read Karl Barth: The Shape of His Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hunsinger, George. “Karl Barth's Christology: Its Basic Chalcedonian Character.” In The Cambridge Companion to Karl Barth. Edited by Webster, John, 127–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hunsinger, George. Reading Barth with Charity: A Hermeneutical Proposal. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2015.Google Scholar
Inglis, John. “Emanation in Historical Context: Aquinas and the Dominican Response to the Cathars.” Dionysius 17 (1999): 95128.Google Scholar
Inwood, Michael. A Hegel Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar
James, William. A Pluralistic Universe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. Alpha and Omega: A Study in the Theology of Karl Barth. Eugene: Wipf & Stock, 2002.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. Knowledge of Things Hoped For: Sense for Theological Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W.Once More the Logos Asarkos.” International Journal of Systematic Theology 13.2 (2011): 130–3.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert W. Systematic Theology, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997–9.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith L. Karl Barth and the Analogia Entis. London: T&T Clark, 2010.Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. God's Being Is in Becoming: The Trinitarian Being of God in the Theology of Karl Barth. Translated by John Webster. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001.Google Scholar
Jüngel, Eberhard. “The World as Possibility and Actuality: The Ontology of the Doctrine of Justification.” In Theological Essays, 95123. Translated by John B. Webster. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1989.Google Scholar
Kerr, Fergus. After Aquinas: Versions of Thomism. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.Google Scholar
Kossel, Clifford G.Principles of St Thomas’ Distinction between the Esse and Ratio of Relation: Part I.” The Modern Schoolman 24.1 (1946): 1936.Google Scholar
Kossel, Clifford G.Principles of St Thomas’ Distinction between the Esse and Ratio of Relation: Part II.” The Modern Schoolman 24.2 (1947): 93107.Google Scholar
Kossel, Clifford G.St Thomas's Theory of the Causes of Relation.” The Modern Schoolman 25.3 (1948): 151–72.Google Scholar
Krempel, A. La doctrine de la relation chez Saint Thomas: Exposé historique et systématique. Paris: Vrin, 1952.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman. “A General Problem of Creation: Why Would God Create Anything at All?.” In Being and Goodness: The Concept of the Good in Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology. Edited by MacDonald, Scott, 208–28. New York: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Kosman, Aryeh. Virtues of Thought: Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Ku, John Baptist. God the Father in the Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas. New York: Peter Lang, 2013.Google Scholar
Lacoste, Jean-Yves. La Phénoménalité de Dieu: Neuf etudes. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 2008.Google Scholar
Lacoste, Jean-Yves. “The Appearing and the Irreducible.” Translated by Christina M. Gschwandtner from La Phénoménalité de Dieu, 55–85. In Words of Life: New Theological Turns in French Phenomenology. Edited by Benson, Bruce Ellis and Wirzba, Norman, 4267. New York: Fordham University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Lafont, Ghislain. Structures et méthode dans la “Somme théologique” de saint Thomas d'Aquin. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1996. First published 1961 by Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
Laporte, Jean-Marc. “Beatitude in the Structure of AquinasSumma: Is Ia26 a Stray Question?.” Toronto Journal of Theology 18.1 (2002): 143–52.Google Scholar
Lee, Sang Eun. Karl Barth und Isaak August Dorner: eine Untersuchung zu Barths Rezeption der Theologie Dorners. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2014.Google Scholar
Levering, Matthew. Paul in the Summa Theologiae. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. “God and Philosophy.” In The Postmodern God: A Theological Reader. Edited by Ward, Graham. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, George A. The Nature of Doctrine: Religion and Theology in a Postliberal Age. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Lonergan, Bernard. Verbum: Word and Idea in Aquinas. Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan 2. Edited by Crowe, Frederick E. and Doran, Robert M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Joest, Wilfried. Dogmatik I. Die Wirklichkeit Gottes, 5th edn. Edited by Lüpke, Johannes von. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2010.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. “Apophatic Theology's Cataphatic Dependencies.” The Thomist 62 (1998): 519–31.Google Scholar
Jones, Joe R.God: Triune in Essence and Actuality.” Encounter 59.1–2 (1998): 275–91.Google Scholar
Jones, Paul Dafydd. The Humanity of Christ: Christology in Karl Barth's Church Dogmatics. London: T&T Clark, 2008.Google Scholar
Marga, Amy. Karl Barth's Dialogue with Catholicism in Göttingen and Münster: Its Significance for His Doctrine of God. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010.Google Scholar
McCormack, Bruce L.The Actuality of God: Karl Barth in Conversation with Open Theism.” In Engaging the Doctrine of God: Contemporary Protestant Perspectives. Edited by McCormack, Bruce, 185242. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2008.Google Scholar
McCormack, Bruce L.The Doctrine of the Trinity after Barth: An Attempt to Reconstruct Barth's Doctrine in Light of His Later Christology.” In Trinitarian Theology after Barth. Edited by Habets, Myk and Tolliday, Phillip, 87118. Cambridge: James Clarke & Co, 2012.Google Scholar
McCormack, Bruce L. Karl Barth's Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology: Its Genesis and Development 1909–1936. Oxford: Clarendon, 1995.Google Scholar
McCormack, Bruce L. Orthodox and Modern: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2008.Google Scholar
McCormack, Bruce L., and White, Thomas Joseph, eds. Thomas Aquinas and Karl Barth: An Unofficial Catholic-Protestant Dialogue. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2013.Google Scholar
McKenny, Gerald. The Analogy of Grace: Karl Barth's Moral Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Merriell, D. Juvenal. To the Image of the Trinity: A Study in the Development of Aquinas's Teaching. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1990.Google Scholar
Milbank, John. Beyond Secular Order: The Representation of Being and the Representation of the People. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.Google Scholar
Moreland, Anna Bonta. Known by Nature: Thomas Aquinas on Natural Knowledge of God. New York: Crossroad, 2010.Google Scholar
Morris, Thomas V.On God and Mann: A View of Divine Simplicity.” Religious Studies 21 (1985): 299318.Google Scholar
Muller, Earl. “Real Relations and the Divine: Issues in Thomas's Understanding of God's Relation to the World.” Theological Studies 56.4 (1995): 673–95.Google Scholar
Muller, Richard A. Divine Will and Human Choice: Freedom, Contingency, and Necessity in Early Modern Reformed Thought. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2017.Google Scholar
Muller, Richard A. Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics: The Rise and Development of Reformed Orthodoxy, ca. 1520 to ca. 1725, 4 vols. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2003.Google Scholar
Mullins, R. T. The End of the Timeless God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Neder, Adam. Participation in Christ: An Entry into Karl Barth's Church Dogmatics. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2009.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin G.The Tradition of Mediaeval Nominalism.” In Studies in Medieval Philosophy. Edited by Wippel, John F., 201–17. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Oakes, Kenneth. Karl Barth on Theology and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
O'Callaghan, John P.Imago Dei: A Test Case for St. Thomas's Augustinianism.” In Aquinas the Augustinian. Edited by Dauphinais, Michael, David, Barry, and Levering, Matthew, 100–44. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Oliver, Simon. Philosophy, God and Motion. Abingdon: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Fran. Pseudo-Dionysius and the Metaphysics of Aquinas. Leiden: Brill, 1992.Google Scholar
Owens, Joseph. An Elementary Christian Metaphysics. Milwaukee: The Bruce Publishing Company, 1963.Google Scholar
Pannenberg, Wolfhart. “Die Subjectivität Gottes und die Trinitätslehre. Ein Beitrag zur Beziehen zwischen Karl Barth und der Philosophie Hegels.” In Grundfragen systematischer Theologie. Gesammelte Aufsätze, vol. 2. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1980.Google Scholar
Pannenberg, Wolfhart. Systematic Theology, vol. 1. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1991.Google Scholar
Park, Seung-Chan. Die Rezeption der mittelalterlichen Sprachphilosophie in der Theologie des Thomas von Aquin. Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Analogie. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar
Penner, Sydney. “Suárez on the Reduction of Categorical Relations.” Philosophers’ Imprint 13.2 (2013): 124.Google Scholar
Perrier, Emmanuel. La fécondité en Dieu: La puissance notionelle dans la Trinité selon saint Thomas d'Aquin. Paris: Parole et Silence, 2009.Google Scholar
Pickard, Stephen. “Barth on Divine Simplicity: Some Implications for Life in a Complex World.” In Karl Barth: A Future for Postmodern Theology? Edited by Thompson, Geoff and Mostert, Christiaan, 210–23. Adelaide: Australian Theological Forum, 2000.Google Scholar
Pieper, Josef. The Silence of St. Thomas: Three Essays. Translated by John Murray and Daniel O'Connor. South Bend: St. Augustine's Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Pinckaers, Servais. “Le rôle de la fin dans l'action morale selon saint Thomas.” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 45 (1961): 393421.Google Scholar
Polanus, Amandus. Syntagma theologiae Christianae. Hanoviae, 1615.Google Scholar
Price, Robert. Letters of the Divine Word: The Perfections of God in Karl Barth's Church Dogmatics. London: T&T Clark, 2011.Google Scholar
Pryzwara, Erich. Analogia Entis: Metaphysics: Original Structure and Universal Rhythm. Translated by John R. Betz and David Bentley Hart. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2014.Google Scholar
Quenstedt, Johannes Andreas. Theologia didactico-polemica. Wittenburg: Quenstedt & Schumacher, 1685.Google Scholar
Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew. Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and the Transformation of Divine Simplicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Rahner, Karl. Geist in Welt. Munich: Kösel-Verlag, 1957.Google Scholar
Redlon, Reginald A.St. Thomas and the Freedom of the Creative Act.” Franciscan Studies 20 (1960): 118.Google Scholar
Ritschl, Albrecht. Die christliche Lehre von der Rechtfertigung und Versöhnung, vol. 3, Die positiv Entwickelung die Lehre, 3rd edn. Bonn: Adolph Marcus, 1888.Google Scholar
Ritschl, Albrecht. The Christian Doctrine of Justification and Reconciliation: The Positive Development of the Doctrine. Edited by Mackintosh, H. R. and Macaulay, A. B.. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1900.Google Scholar
Rocca, Gregory P. Speaking the Incomprehensible God: Thomas Aquinas on the Interplay of Positive and Negative Theology. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Rogers, Eugene F. Thomas Aquinas and Karl Barth: Sacred Doctrine and the Natural Knowledge of God. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Rosemann, Philipp W. Omne agens agit sibi simile: A “Repetition” of Scholastic Metaphysics. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Rosemann, Philipp W. Omne ens est aliquid: Introduction à la lecture du ‘système’ philosophique de saint Thomas d'Aquin. Louvain-Paris: Éditions Peeters, 1996.Google Scholar
Rosier, Irène. “Signes et sacraments. Thomas d'Aquin et la grammaire spéculative.” Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques 74 (1990): 392436.Google Scholar
Roy, Louis. “A Note on Barth and Aquinas.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 66.1 (1992): 8992.Google Scholar
Saner, Andrea D.Too Much to Grasp”: Exodus 3:13–15 and the Reality of God. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2015.Google Scholar
Schmitz, Kenneth. The Gift: Creation. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Schmitz, Kenneth. The Texture of Being: Essays in First Philosophy. Edited by O'Herron, Paul. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Schoot, Henk J. M. Christ the ‘Name’ of God: Thomas Aquinas on Naming Christ. Leuven: Peeters, 1993.Google Scholar
Schwöbel, Christoph. God: Action and Revelation. Kampen: Kok Pharos, 1992.Google Scholar
Scotus, John Duns. Contingency and Freedom: Lectura I 39. Translated by Antonie Vos Jaczn et al. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1994.Google Scholar
Secada, Jorge. “Suárez on the Ontology of Relations.” In Interpreting Suárez: Critical Essays. Edited by Schwartz, Daniel, 6288. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Selner-Wright, Susan C.Thomas Aquinas on the Acts of Creation and Procreation.” National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 3 (2003): 707–16.Google Scholar
Shields, Daniel. “On Ultimate Ends: Aquinas's Thesis that Loving God Is Better than Knowing Him.” The Thomist 78 (2014): 581607.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, Robert. The God of Faith and Reason: Foundations of Christian Theology. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1982; Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, Robert. Pictures, Quotations, and Distinctions: Fourteen Essays in Phenomenology. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Sonderegger, Katherine. “Barth and the Divine Perfections.” Scottish Journal of Theology 67.4 (2014): 450–63.Google Scholar
Sonderegger, Katherine. “Divine Justice and Justification.” Zeitschrift für dialektisch Theologie, Supplement Series 6 (2014): 164–76.Google Scholar
Sonderegger, Katherine. “On Style in Karl Barth.” Scottish Journal of Theology 45.1 (1992): 6584.Google Scholar
Sonderegger, Katherine. Systematic Theology, vol. 1, The Doctrine of God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Soulen, R. Kendall. The Divine Name(s) and the Holy Trinity, vol. 1, Distinguishing the Voices. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Štefan, Jan. “Gottes Vollkommenheiten nach KD II/1.” In Karl Barth im europäischen Zeitgeschehen (1935–1950). Edited by Beintker, Michael, Link, Christian, and Trowitzsch, Michael, 83108. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 2010.Google Scholar
Stoltzfus, Philip. Theology as Performance: Music, Aesthetics, and God in Western Thought. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2006.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco. Disputationes Metaphysicae. In Opera Omnia, vol. 26. Paris: L. Vivès, 1877. Reprinted by Hildesheim: G. Olms, 1965.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco. On Real Relation (Disputatio Metaphysica XLVII). Translated by John P. Doyle. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Swain, Scott R.On Divine Naming.” In Aquinas among the Protestants. Edited by Svensson, Manfred and VanDrunen, David, 207–27. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2018.Google Scholar
Swain, Scott R. The God of the Gospel: Robert Jenson's Trinitarian Theology. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2013.Google Scholar
Sylwanowicz, Michael. Contingent Causality and the Foundation of Duns Scotus’ Metaphysics. Leiden: Brill, 1996.Google Scholar
Polyander, Johannes, Rivetus, Andreas, Walaeus, Antonius, and Thysius, Antonius. Synopsis Purioris Theologiæ: Synopsis of a Purer Theology – Latin Text and English Translation, vol. 1. Edited by Velde, Dolf te and Ferwerda, Rein. Translated by Riemer A. Faber. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Tanner, Kathryn. God and Creation in Christian Theology: Tyranny or Empowerment? New York: Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Tertullian, . De idololatria: Critical Text, Translation and Commentary. Edited and translated by Waszink, J. H. and van Winden, J. C. M.. Leiden: Brill, 1987.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Gottfried. Christi Person und Werk: Darstellung der evangelisch-lutherischen Dogmatik vom Mittelpunkte der Christologie aus. In Die Voraussetzungen der Christologie und die Person des Mittlers, vol. 1. Erlangen: Verlag von Theodor Blasing, 1856.Google Scholar
Toit, Andrie du. “Die kirche als doxologische Gemeinschaft im Römerbrief.” In Focusing on Paul: Persuasion and Theological Design in Romans and Galatians. Edited by Breytenbach, Cilliers and du Toit, David S., 297307. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2007.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, Torstein Theodor. Activity and Participation in Late Antique and Early Christian Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Tomarchio, John. “Aquinas's Division of Being According to Modes of Existing.” The Review of Metaphysics 54.3 (2001): 585613.Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre. Christ and Spirituality in St. Thomas Aquinas. Translated by Bernhard Blankenhorn. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre. Recherches thomasiennes: Études revues et augmentées. Paris: Vrin, 2000.Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre. Saint Thomas Aquinas, vol. 2, Spiritual Master. Translated by Robert Royal. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Tseng, Shao Kai. Karl Barth's Infralapsarian Theology: Origins and Development 1920–1953. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2016.Google Scholar
Turretin, Francis. Insitutio theologicae elencticae, 3 vols. New York: Robert Carter, 1847.Google Scholar
Turretin, Francis. Institutes of Elenctic Theology, 3 vols. Translated by George Musgrave Giger. Edited by Dennison, James T., Jr. Phillipsburg: Presbyterian & Reformed, 1992.Google Scholar
van Driel, Edwin Christian. Incarnation Anyway: Arguments for a Supralapsarian Christology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Vanhoozer, Kevin J. Remythologizing Theology: Divine Action, Passion, and Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Velde, Rudi A. te. Aquinas on God: The ‘Divine Science’ of the Summa Theologiae. Farnham: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Velde, Rudi A. te. “God and the Language of Participation.” In Divine Transcendence and Immanence in the Work of Thomas Aquinas. Edited by Goris, Harm, Rikhof, Herwi, and Schoot, Henk, 1936. Leuven: Peeters, 2009.Google Scholar
Velde, Rudi A. te. Participation and Substantiality in Thomas Aquinas. Leiden: Brill, 1995.Google Scholar
Wallace, Robert M. Hegel's Philosophy of Reality, Freedom, and God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Walshe, Sebastian. “Beata Trinitas: The Beatitude of God as Prelude to the Trinitarian Processions.” The Thomist 76 (2012): 189209.Google Scholar
Watson, Gordon. The Trinity and Creation in Karl Barth. Adelaide: ATF Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Watson, Gordon. “Karl Barth and St. Anselm's Theological Programme.” Scottish Journal of Theology 30.1 (1977): 3145.Google Scholar
Webster, John B. Barth's Earlier Theology: Four Studies. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar
Webster, John B. Barth's Ethics of Reconciliation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Webster, John B. Barth's Moral Theology: Human Action in Barth's Thought. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar
Webster, John B. The Domain of the Word: Scripture and Theological Reason. London: T&T Clark, 2012.Google Scholar
Webster, John B. God without Measure, 2 vols. London: Bloomsbury, 2016.Google Scholar
Webster, John B. Holiness. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003.Google Scholar
Weigel, Peter. Aquinas on Simplicity: An Investigation into the Foundations of his Philosophical Theology. Oxford: Peter Lang, 2008.Google Scholar
Welker, Michael. “Barth und Hegel: zur Erkenntnis eines methodisches Verfahrens bei Barth.” Evangelishe Theologie 43 (1983): 307–28.Google Scholar
Westerholm, Martin. The Ordering of the Christian Mind: Karl Barth and Theological Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Wilhelmsen, Frederick D.Creation as a Relation in Saint Thomas Aquinas.” The Modern Schoolman 56 (1979): 107–33.Google Scholar
Williams, A. N. The Architecture of Theology: Structure, System, and Ratio. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Williams, Robert R. Hegel's Ethics of Recognition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Williams, Rowan. “What Does Love Know? St Thomas on the Trinity.” New Blackfriars 82 (2001): 260–71.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas II. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas: From Finite Being to Uncreated Being. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Wittman, Tyler R.Facticity and Faithfulness: Divine Simplicity in Barth's Christology.” Pro Ecclesia 26.4 (2017): 415–34.Google Scholar
Wittman, Tyler R.‘Not a God of Confusion but of Peace’: Aquinas and the Meaning of Divine Simplicity.” Modern Theology 32.2 (2016): 151–69.Google Scholar
Wittman, Tyler R.On the Unity of the Trinity's External Works: Archaeology and Grammar.” International Journal of Systematic Theology 20.3 (2018): 359–80.Google Scholar
Whidden, David L. Christ the Light: The Theology of Light and Illumination in Thomas Aquinas. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Wollebius, Johannes. Compendium theologiae Christianae. London: T. Longman, 1709.Google Scholar
Wood, Donald. “Maker of Heaven and Earth.” International Journal of Systematic Theology 14.4 (2012): 381–95.Google Scholar
Zachhuber, Johannes. Theology as a Science in Nineteenth-Century Germany: From F. C. Baur to Ernst Treoltsch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Tyler R. Wittman
  • Book: God and Creation in the Theology of Thomas Aquinas and Karl Barth
  • Online publication: 05 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108556927.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Tyler R. Wittman
  • Book: God and Creation in the Theology of Thomas Aquinas and Karl Barth
  • Online publication: 05 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108556927.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Tyler R. Wittman
  • Book: God and Creation in the Theology of Thomas Aquinas and Karl Barth
  • Online publication: 05 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108556927.008
Available formats
×