Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-gblv7 Total loading time: 0.717 Render date: 2022-05-23T13:26:22.083Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

9 - “Why Are There Big Squares and Little Squares?”

How Questions Reveal Children’s Understanding of a Domain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2020

Lucas Payne Butler
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Samuel Ronfard
Affiliation:
University of Toronto Mississauga
Kathleen H. Corriveau
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access

Summary

Children struggle to identify the defining properties of shapes through elementary school (Satlow & Newcombe, 1998). Perhaps preschoolers struggle to learn these properties because they have little conception of what constitutes relevant shape knowledge or how to go about acquiring it. We outline empirical support for the idea that children’s questions show us not only what a child knows in a given domain, but how that child is approaching the act of knowledge acquisition itself. In this way, studying children’s questions provides information that cannot be gleaned from studies which simply test children’s domain–specific knowledge. To illustrate this point, we examine existing research into children’s questions about animals, to show how this idea applies in relation to an extensive body of research on children’s questioning behavior. Second, we review our own study of children’s questions about shapes, to see how preschoolers’ approach to knowledge acquisition differs in a domain composed of pure nominal kinds rather than natural kinds. Our results suggest that, in contrast to the animal domain, three–year–olds demonstrate very little awareness of relevant information in the shape domain. We conclude by considering why this might be the case and suggesting some ways it could be rectified.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Questioning Child
Insights from Psychology and Education
, pp. 164 - 182
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berlyne, D. E. and Frommer, D. (1966). Some determinants of the incidence and content of children’s questions. Child Development, 37, 177–89. https://doi.org/10.2307/1126438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, F. A., Pungello, E. P., Miller-Johnson, S., Burchinal, M., and Ramey, C. T. (2001). The development of cognitive and academic abilities: Growth curves from an early childhood educational experiment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 231–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012–1649.37.2.231CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, K., Lapidow, E., Austin, J., Shafto, P., and Bonawitz, E. (2018). Preschoolers are more likely to direct questions to adults than to other children (or selves) during spontaneous conversational acts. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/tj42CrossRef
Chouinard, M. M., Harris, P. L., and Maratsos, M. P. (2007). Children’s questions: A mechanism for cognitive development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 72, i129.Google ScholarPubMed
Condry, K. F., and Spelke, E. S. (2008). The development of language and abstract concepts: The case of natural number. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 2238. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0096–3445.137.1.22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corriveau, K. H., and Kurkul, K. E. (2014). “Why does rain fall?”: Children prefer to learn form an informant who uses noncircular explanations. Child Development, 85, 1827–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12240Google Scholar
Cross, C. T., Woods, T. A., and Schweingruber, H. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Dolgin, K. G., and Behrend, D. A. (1984). Children’s knowledge about animates and inanimates. Child Development, 55, 1646–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, K., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Newcombe, N., and Golinkoff, R.M. (2013) Taking shape: Supporting preschoolers’ acquisition of geometric knowledge. Child Development, 17, 1872–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12091Google Scholar
Fouquet, N., Megalakaki, O., and Labrell, F. (2017). Children’s understanding of animal, plant, and artifact properties between 3 and 6 years. Infant and Child Development, 26, 113. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, B. N., Gelman, S. A., and Wellman, H. M. (2009). Preschoolers’ search for explanatory information within adult–child conversation. Child Development, 80, 1592–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–8624.2009.01356.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frazier, B. N., Gelman, S. A., and Wellman, H. M. (2016). Young children prefer and remember satisfying explanations. Journal of Cognition and Development, 17, 718–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, S. A., and Markman, E. M. (1986). Young children’s inductions from natural kinds: The role of categories and appearances. Child Development, 58, 1532–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130693Google Scholar
Greif, L. M., Kemler Nelson, D. G., Keil, F. C., and Gutierrez, F. (2006). What do children want to know about animals and artifacts? Psychological Science, 16, 455–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9280.2006.01727.xGoogle Scholar
Hornung, C., Schiltz, C., Brunner, M., and Martin, R. (2014). Predicting first-grade mathematics achievement: The contributions of domain-general cognitive abilities, nonverbal number sense, and early number competence. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00272CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and conceptual development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kelemen, D. (1999a). The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition, 70, 241–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00010–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelemen, D. (1999b). Why are rocks pointy? Children’s preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1440–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012–1649.35.6.1440CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemler Nelson, D., Chan, E. L., and Holt, M. B. (2004). When children ask, “What is it?” what do they want to know about artifacts? Psychological Science, 15, 384–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956–7976.2004.00689.xGoogle Scholar
Levine, S. C., Ratliff, K. R., Huttenlocher, J., and Cannon, J. (2012). Early puzzle play: A predictor of preschoolers’ spatial transformation skill. Developmental Psychology, 48, 530–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025913CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcon, R. (2002). Moving up the grades: Relationships between preschool model and later school success. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 4, 517–30.Google Scholar
Mix, K. S., and Cheng, Y. L. (2012). The relation between space and math: developmental and educational implications. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 42, 197243. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0–12-394388–0.00006–XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (2010). Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
Newcombe, N. S., and Frick, A. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: Why, what, and how. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4, 102–11, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2010.01089.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D., and Galda, L. (1990). Children’s play, language, and early literacy. Topics in Language Disorders, 10, 7688. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363–199006000–00008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnick, I., Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R., and Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2016). Geometric toys in the attic? A corpus analysis of early exposure to geometric shapes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 358–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.01.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satlow, E., and Newcombe, N. S. (1998). When is a triangle not a triangle? Young children’s developing concepts of geometric shape. Cognitive Development, 13, 547–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0885-2014(98)90006–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, M., Day, R. H., and Cohen, L. B. (1979). Visual shape perception in early infancy. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 4, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., et al. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 193, 352402. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdine, B. N., Irwin, C. M., Golinkoff, R. M., and Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2014). Contributions of executive function and spatial skills to preschool mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 3751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.02.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verdine, B. N., Lucca, K. R., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., and Newcombe, N. S. (2016). The shape of things: The origin of young children’s knowledge of names and properties of geometric forms. Journal of Cognitive Development, 17, 142–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2015.1016610Google ScholarPubMed
Verdine, B. N., Zimmermann, L., Foster, L., et al. (2019). Effects of geometric toy design on parent-child interactions and spatial language. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 46, 126–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.03.015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L.(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., and Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, D. S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., and Golinkoff, R. M. (2013). Guided play: Where curricular goals meet a playful pedagogy. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7, 104–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×