Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T08:59:55.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: The Local-Global Life of Indicators: Law, Power, and Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

By
Kevin E. Davis ,
Benedict Kingsbury  and
Sally Engle Merry
Edited by
Sally Engle Merry ,
Kevin E. Davis  and
Benedict Kingsbury
Kevin E. Davis
Affiliation:
New York University
Benedict Kingsbury
Affiliation:
New York University
Sally Engle Merry
Affiliation:
New York University
Sally Engle Merry
Affiliation:
New York University
Kevin E. Davis
Affiliation:
New York University
Benedict Kingsbury
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

This book is about the quiet exercise of power through indicators. With the turn to evidence-based governance, reliance on statistical data along with its synthesis into the kinds of scales, ranks, and composite indexes we refer to as indicators has become essential for policy formation and political decision making. The use of indicators in governance has expanded from economic and sector-specific quantitative data to measurement of almost every phenomenon. This book focuses on indicators of governance itself, specifically governance through law: indicators purporting to measure practices or perceptions of good governance, rule of law, corruption, regulatory quality, and related matters.

This volume presents nine original case studies that investigate how leading indicators of legal governance produced with global or transnational scope or aims are created, disseminated, and used, and with what effects. The indicators studied include Freedom House's Freedom in the World indicator, the Global Reporting Initiative's structure for measuring and reporting on corporate social responsibility, the World Justice Project's measurement of the rule of law, the Doing Business index of the International Finance Corporation of the World Bank, the World Bank–supported Worldwide Governance Indicators, the World Bank's Country Performance Institutional Assessment (CPIA), the Transparency International Corruption (Perceptions) index, and several indicators (including some of these) used by the U.S. Millennium Challenge Corporation in determining which countries are eligible to receive certain US aid funds.

The underlying theoretical framework of this volume is the linkage between knowledge and power. Indicators are both a form of knowledge and a technology for governance. Like other forms of knowledge, indicators influence governance when they form the basis for political decision making, public awareness, and the terms in which problems are conceptualized and solutions imagined. Conversely, the kinds of information embodied in indicators, the forms in which they are produced and disseminated, and how they function as knowledge are all influenced by governance practices.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Quiet Power of Indicators
Measuring Governance, Corruption, and Rule of Law
 , pp. 1 - 24
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asdal, Kristin, Brenna, Brita and Moser, Ingunn (eds.) 2007. Technoscience: The Politics of Interventions. Oslo: Oslo Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel, and Mo, Yingchuan. 2013. “Harmony in the World 2013: The Ideal and the Reality.” Social Indicators Research.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Paul, and Theron, Jan. 2009. “Costing, Comparing and Competing: The World Bank's Doing Business Survey and the Benchmarking of Labour Regulation.” In Corder, Hugh (ed.), Global Administrative Law: Innovation and Development,204–234. Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
Bhuta, Nehal. 2012. “Governmentalizing Sovereignty: Indexes of State Fragility and the Calculability of Political Order.” In Davis, Kevin, Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle (eds.), Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Classification and Rankings,132–162. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bhuta, Nehal. 2015. “Measuring Stateness, Ranking Political Orders: Indexes of State Fragility and State Failure.” In Cooley, Alexander and Snyder, Jack (eds.), Ranking the World: Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Star, Susan Leigh. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bukovansky, Mlada. 2015. “Corruption Rankings: Constructing and Contesting the Global Anti-Corruption Agenda.” In Cooley, Alexander and Snyder, Jack (eds.), Ranking the World: Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buthe, Tim. 2012. “Beyond Supply and Demand: A Political-Economic Conceptual Model.” In Davis, Kevin, Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle (eds.), Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Classification and Rankings,29–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooley, Alexander, and Snyder, Jack. 2015. Ranking the World: Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Kevin E. 2004. “What Can the Rule of Law Variable Tell Us about Rule of Law Reforms?” Michigan Journal of International Law 26: 141–161.Google Scholar
Davis, Kevin E. 2014. “Legal Indicators: The Power of Quantitative Measures of Law.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10: 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Kevin E., and Kruse, Michael B.. 2007. “Taking the Measure of Law: The Case of the Doing Business Project.” Law and Social Inquiry 32(4): 1095–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Kevin, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle. 2012. “Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance.” Law and Society Review 46(1): 71–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Kevin, Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle (eds.), 2012. Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Classification and Rankings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desrosières, Alain. 1998. The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. Translated by Naish, Camille. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Desrosières, Alain. 2008. L'Argument statistique. Pour une sociologie historique de la quantification (tome I) et Gouverner par les nombres (tome II). Paris:Presses de l'école des Mines,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform the Latin American State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson, and Stevens, Mitchell L.. 1998. “Commensuration as a Social Process.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 313–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson, and Stevens, Mitchell L.. 2008. “A Sociology of Quantification.” European Journal of Sociology XLIX(3): 401–436.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980a. “Truth and Power.” In Gordon, Colin (ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, 109–126. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980b. “Two Lectures.” In Gordon, Colin (ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, 78–108New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1991. “Governmentality.” In Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller (eds.), Peter, The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, 87–105Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Frydman, Benôit, and van Waeyenberge, Arnaud (eds.). 2014. Gouverner par les standards et les indicateurs: De Hume aux rankings. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terrence C. 2012. “Legal Yardsticks: International Financial Institutions as Diagnosticians and Designers of the Laws of Nations.” In Davis, Kevin, Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Merry, Sally Engle (eds.), Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Classification and Rankings,180–217. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terrence C., and Shaffer, Gregory (eds.). 2015. Transnational Legal Orders. Cambridge Series in Law and Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart and Mastruzzi, Massimo. 1990. “The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Kelley, Judith, and Simmons, Beth. 2015. “Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations.” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, Stewart, Richard B., and Kirsch, N.. 2005. “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law.” Law and Contemporary Problems 68(3–4): 15–61, http://www.iilj.org/GAL/documents/TheEmergenceofGlobalAdministrativeLaw.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kipnis, Andrew B. 2008. “Audit cultures: Neoliberal governmentality, socialist legacy, or technologies of governing?” American Ethnologist 35(2): 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampland, Martha. 2010. “False Numbers as Formalizing Practices.” Social Studies of Science 40(2010): 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampland, Martha, and Star, Susan Leigh (eds.). 2009. Standards and Their Stories: How Quantifying, Classifying, and Formalizing Practices Shape Everyday Life. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2011. “Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights, and Global Governance.” In Partridge, Damani, Welker, Marina, and Hardin, Rebecca (eds.), Corporate Lives: New Perspectives on the Social Life of the Corporate Form. Wenner-Gren Symposium Series. Current Anthropology, 52, Supplementary Issue 3: S83–S95.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2014. “Global Legal Pluralism and the Temporality of Soft Law.” Special Issue on Temporalities of Law, Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 46(1): 108–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle, and Coutin, Susan. 2014. “Technologies of Truth in the Anthropology of Conflict.” Co-authored with Susan Coutin. American Ethnologist 41(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poovey, Mary. 1998. A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Power, Michael. 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Garavito, César. 2011. “Beyond the Courtroom: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Socio-Economic Rights in Latin America.” Texas Law Review 89: 669.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. 1999. Predicaments of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosga, AnnJanette, and Satterthwaite, Margaret L.. 2009. “The Trust in Indicators: Measuring Human Rights.” Berkeley Journal of International Law 27(2): 253–315.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn (ed.). 2000. Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symposium 2011. “Indices and Indicators of Justice, Governance, and the Rule of Law: An Overview.” In Botero, Juan Carlos, Nelson, Robert L., and Pratt, Christine (eds.), Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 3: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsygankov, Andrei. 2015. “The Securitization of Democracy: The Politics of Special Interests and the Freedom House Ratings of Russia.” European Security 31(1): 77–100.
Valverde, Mariana. 1998. Diseases of the Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×