Book contents
- Thomas Aquinas on War and Peace
- Thomas Aquinas on War and Peace
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations and References for Works Frequently Cited
- Introduction
- Part I Just War in a Typology of the Virtues
- Part II Selected Topics
- Bibliography of Secondary Sources
- Index
- References
Bibliography of Secondary Sources
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2016
Book contents
- Thomas Aquinas on War and Peace
- Thomas Aquinas on War and Peace
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations and References for Works Frequently Cited
- Introduction
- Part I Just War in a Typology of the Virtues
- Part II Selected Topics
- Bibliography of Secondary Sources
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Thomas Aquinas on War and Peace , pp. 283 - 290Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Bibliography of Secondary Sources
Adler, Mortimer. How to Think about War and Peace. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1944.Google Scholar
Alonso, Vincentius M., El principio del doble efecto en los comentadores de Santo Tomás de Aquino. Diss. Rome, 1937.Google Scholar
Araujo, Robert J. and Lucal, John A.. Papal Diplomacy and the Quest for Peace: The Vatican and International Organizations from the Early Years to the League of Nations. Naples, FL: Sapientia Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Araujo, Robert J. and Lucal, John A.. Papal Diplomacy and the Quest for Peace: The United Nations from Pius XII to Paul VI. Philadelphia: St. Joseph’s University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Arquillière, Henri-Xavier. L’augustinisme politique: Essai sur la formation des théories politiques du Moyen Âge. Paris: Vrin, 2006 [1933].Google Scholar
Bachrach, David S. Religion and the Conduct of War c. 300–1215. Woodbridge, UK: The Boydell Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Bainton, Roland H. Christian Attitudes toward War and Peace. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1990 [1960].Google Scholar
Beestermöller, Gerhard. Thomas von Aquin und der gerechte Krieg. Cologne: J.P. Bachem, 1990.Google Scholar
Beestermöller, Gerhard and Lucal, John A.. “Thomas Aquinas and Humanitarian Intervention,” in H-G Justenhoven and W. A. Barbieri, eds. From Just War to Modern Peace Ethics. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012, pp. 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belmans, Théo G. “Le paradoxe de la conscience erronée d’Abelard à Karl Rahner.” Revue thomiste 90, no. 4 (1990): 570–586.Google Scholar
Bloch, Marc. Feudal Society. 2 vols. Manyon (trans.), L. A.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1962.Google Scholar
Blötzer, Joseph. “Inquisition,” in The Catholic Encyclopedia, vol. 8. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1910.Google Scholar
Boyle, Joseph. “Praeter Intentionem in Aquinas.” The Thomist 42, no. 4 (1978): 649–665.Google Scholar
Boyle, Joseph. “The Necessity of Right Intent for Justifiably Waging War,” in Just War, Authority, Tradition and Practice,” Lang, A. F., Jr., O’Driscoll, Cian, and Williams, John, eds. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2013 pp. 181–196.Google Scholar
Boyle, Leonard. “The Setting of the Summa Theologiae of St. Thomas–Revisited,” in The Ethics of Thomas Aquinas, Pope, Stephen J., ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Brown, Warren C. Violence in Medieval Europe. Harlow, Scotland: Pearson Education, 2011.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian. International Law and the Use of Force by States. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Brundage, James A. The Crusades, Holy War, and Canon Law. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Variorum, 1991.Google Scholar
Brunner, Otto. Land and Lordship: Structures of Governance in Medieval Austria. Kaminsky, Howard and Melton, James Van Horn (trans.). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen, and Keohane, Robert O.. “Preventive Use of Force: A Cosmopolitan Institutional Proposal.” Ethics & International Affairs 18, no. 1 (2004): 1–22.Google Scholar
Calvez, Jean-Yves. “‘Guerre juste’ et pacifisme chrétien,” Entre Violence et Paix: La Voix des Religions. Edited by Calvez, Jean-Yves. Paris: Editions Facultés Jesuites de Paris, 2005.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, T. A. Double-Effect Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, David S. Popes, Cardinals, and War: the Military Church in Renaissance and Early Modern Europe. London: I. B. Tauris, 2006.Google Scholar
Chenu, M. D. Toward Understanding St. Thomas. Landry, A. M. and Hughes, D. (trans.). Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1964.Google Scholar
Clark, Patrick M. Perfection in Death: The Christological Dimension of Courage in Aquinas. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. Messy Moralism: The Challenge of Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. Morality and Political Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Cole, Darrell. “Thomas Aquinas on Virtuous Warfare.” Journal of Religious Ethics 27, no. 1 (1999): 57–80.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall. Violence. A Micro-sociological Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congar, Yves M.-J., “Le traité de la force dans la Somme Théologique de S. Thomas d’Aquin,” Angelicum 51 (1974): 331–348.Google Scholar
Coste, René. Le problème du droit de guerre dans la pensée de Pie XII. Paris: Aubier, 1962.Google Scholar
Daguet, François. Du politique chez Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 2015.Google Scholar
Delos, J. T. “Sociologie de la guerre moderne et la théorie de la juste guerre,” in Guerre et paix. Lyon: Chronique Sociale de France, 1953, pp. 201–224.Google Scholar
Dewan, Lawrence O. P. “Thomas Aquinas, Gerard Bradley, and the Death Penalty: Some Observations.” Gregorianum 82 (2001): 149–165.Google Scholar
DeYoung, Rebecca Konyndyk. “Power Made Perfect in Weakness: Aquinas’s Transformation of the Virtue of Courage.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11, no. 2 (2003): 147–180.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram. War, Aggression and Self-Defense, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 [1988].Google Scholar
Dipert, Randall R. “Preemptive War and the Epistemological Dimension of the Morality of War.” Journal of Military Ethics 5, no. 1 (2006): 32–54.Google Scholar
Dondaine, Antoine (ed.). Un traité Neo-Manichéen du XIIIe Siècle: Le Liber de Duobus Principiis, Suivi d’un fragment de ritual cathare. Rome: Instituto Storico Domenicano, 1939.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Ludwik. “Guillaume de Rennes et les origines de la science du droit de la guerre” in Mélanges en l’honneur de Gilbert Gidel. Paris: Librairie Sirey, 1961, pp. 215–227.Google Scholar
Eppstein, John. The Catholic Tradition of the Law of Nations. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1935.Google Scholar
Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Claire. “Targeted Killing as Preemptive Action,” in Targeted Killings, Finkelstein, Claire, Ohlin, Jens D., and Altman, Andrew, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 156–182.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kevin L. Acts amid Precepts: The Aristotelian Logical Structure of Thomas Aquinas’s Moral Theology. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 2001.Google Scholar
Follesdal, Andreas. “The Sort of Nationalism and Patriotism that Europe Needs,” in Ethics, Nationalism, and Just War: Medieval and Contemporary Perspectives, Reichberg, Gregory M. and Syse, Henrik, eds. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2007, pp. 267–289.Google Scholar
Fotion, Nicholas. “Military Tactics and Strategy: In the Moral Realm,” in Moral Obligation and the Military. Washington, DC, National Defense University Press Publications, 1986, pp. 5–19.Google Scholar
Galtung, Johan. “Violence, Peace, and Peace Research.” Journal of Peace Research 6, no. 3 (1969): 167–191.Google Scholar
George, Robert P. “Natural Law and International Order,” in International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives, Mapel, David R. and Nardin, Terry, eds. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998, pp. 54–69.Google Scholar
Guggenheim, Paul. Lehrbuch des Völkerrechts. Basel: Verlag für Recht und Gesellschaft, 1949.Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter. Grotius et la doctrine de la guerre juste. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1983.Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter. “Sur un passage obscur de Grotius.” The Legal History Review 51, no. 3 (1983): 295–315.Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter. “Le droit de la guerre et la paix de Grotius.” Archives de philosophie de droit 32 (1987): 47–58.Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter. “La place de Francisco de Vitoria parmi les fondateurs du droit international,” in Actualité de la pensée juridique de Francisco de Vitoria, Truyol, A. y Serra et al., eds. Brussels: Bruylant, 1988, pp. 27–80.Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter. “Just War and Regular War in Sixteenth Century Spanish Doctrine.” International Revue of the Red Cross 290 (September–October 1992): 434–445.Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter. “Droits subjectifs et système juridique chez Grotius,” in Politique, droit, et théologie chez Bodin, Grotius, et Hobbes, Foisneau, Luc, ed. Paris: Éditions Kimé, 1997, pp. 73–130.Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter. “Kant et la tradition du droit de gens,” in L’Année 1795. Kant: Essai sur la paix, Laberge, Pierre, Lafrance, Guy, and Dumas, Denis, eds. Paris: Vrin, 1997, pp. 122–139.Google Scholar
Horst, Ulrich and de Mottoni, Barbara Faes, “Die Zwangstaufe jüdischer Kinder im Urteil scholastischer Theologen.” Münchener Theologische Zeitschrift 40 (1989): 173–199.Google Scholar
Houser, R. E. “The Virtue of Courage (IIa IIae, qq. 123–140),” in The Ethics of Aquinas, Pope, Stephen J., ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002, pp. 304–320.Google Scholar
Hutchins, Robert M. St. Thomas and the World State. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Janssen, Dieter. “Preventive Defense and Forcible Regime Change: A Normative Assessment.” Journal of Military Ethics 3, no. 2 (2004): 105–128.Google Scholar
Jeismann, Karl-Ernst. Das Problem des Präventivkrieges im Europäischen Staatensystem mit besonderem Blick auf die Bismarckzeit. Freiburg/München: Karl Alber, 1957.Google Scholar
Johnson, James T. “Toward Reconstrcting the Ius ad Bellum.” The Monist 57, no. 4 (1973): 463.Google Scholar
Johnson, James T. “Aquinas and Luther on War and Peace.” Journal of Religious Ethics 31, no. 1 (2003): 3–20.Google Scholar
Johnson, James T. “The Right to Use Armed Force: Sovereignty, Responsibility, and the Common Good,” in Just War: Authority, Tradition, and Practice, Lang, Anthony. F., Jr., O’Driscoll, Cian, and Williams, John, eds. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2013, pp. 19–34.Google Scholar
Journet, Charles. La jurisdiction de l’Eglise sur la cité. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1931.Google Scholar
Journet, Charles. L’Église du Verbe Incarné, Vol. 1. La hiérarchie apostolique. Oeuvres complètes, Vol. 1. Fribourg, Switzerland: Éditions Saint-Augustin, 1998[1941]; English translation: Church of the Word Incarnate, Vol. 1, The Apostolic Hierarchy, A. H. C. Downes, trans. London and New York: Sheed and Ward, 1954.Google Scholar
Journet, Charles. “La guerre et la paix selon l’enseignement de S. S. Pie XII.” Nova et Vetera 27 (1952): 15–31.Google Scholar
Juergensmeyer, Mark. Terror in the Mind of God. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Kalshoven, Frits. “The Soldier and His Golf Clubs,” in Reflections on the Law of War: Collected Essays. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007, pp. 359–375.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Whitley R. P. “Self-Defense, Imminence, and the Battered Woman.” New Criminal Law Review 10, no. 3 (2007): 342–370.Google Scholar
Keen, Maurice. The Laws of War in the Late Middle Ages. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965.Google Scholar
Kempshall, M. S. The Common Good in Late Medieval Political Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Keys, Mary. Aristotle, Aquinas, and the Promise of the Common Good. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert. “Origin of the Twin Terms Ius ad Bellum/Ius in Bello.” International Review of the Red Cross 320 (1997): 553–562.Google Scholar
Kotzsch, Lothar. The Concept of War in Contemporary History and International Law. Geneva: Librairie E. Droz, 1956.Google Scholar
Kunz, Josef L. “Bellum Iustum and Bellum Legale.” The American Journal of International Law 45, no. 3 (1951): 528–534.Google Scholar
Labourdette, Michel O.P. La prudence. IIa-IIae, qq. 47–56. Cours de théologie morale. Toulouse: Dominican Studium (private printing): 1959–1960.Google Scholar
Labourdette, Michel O.P. Force et temperance. IIa-IIae, qq. 123–170. Cours de théologie morale. Toulouse: Dominican Studium (private printing), 1961–1962.Google Scholar
Labourdette, Michel O.P. Les actes humains, Ia-IIae, qq. 6–48. Cours de théologie morale. Toulouse: Dominican Studium (private printing), 1962.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch. “The Limits of the Operation of the Law of War.” British Year Book of International Law 13 (1953): 206–243.Google Scholar
Lepora, Chiara and Goodin, Robert E.. On Complicity and Compromise. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Long, Steven A. “A Brief Disquisition Regarding the Nature of the Object of the Moral Act according to St. Thomas Aquinas.” The Thomist 67, no. 1 (2003): 45–71.Google Scholar
Manent, Pierre. “L’Église entre l’humanité réelle et l’humanité rêvée,” in The Global Quest for Tranquillitas Ordinis, Pacem in Terris, Fifty Years Later, Glendon, Mary A., Hittinger, Russell, and Sorondo, Marcelo Sánchez, eds. Vatican City: The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, 2013, pp. 109–118.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques. The Person and the Common Good, Fitzgerald, J. J., trans. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques. “The End of Machiavellianism,” in The Range of Reason. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1952, pp. 134–164.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques. An Introduction to the Basic Problems of Moral Philosophy. Albany: Magi Books, 1990.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques. Freedom in the Modern World. Collected Works of Jacques Maritian, Vol. 11. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Mastnak, Tomaž. Crusading Peace: Christendom, the Muslim World, and Western Political Order. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Matthews, Gareth. “Saint Thomas and the Principle of Double Effect,” in Aquinas’s Moral Theory, MacDonald, Scott and Stump, Eleonore, eds. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1995, pp. 63–78.Google Scholar
Mayeur, Jean-Marie. “Les catholiques français et la paix du début du XXe siècle à la veille de la Deuxième Guerre mondiale,” in Les Internationales et le problème de la guerre au XXe siècle. Actes du colloque de Rome (22–24 novembre 1984). Rome: Ecole Française de Rome, 1987, pp. 151–164.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. “Just Cause for War.” Ethics and International Affairs 19, no. 3 (2005): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. “The Morality of War and the Law of War,” in David Rodin and Henry Shue, eds., Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 19–43.Google Scholar
Meyrowitz, Henri. Le principe de l’égalité des belligérants devant le droit de la guerre. Paris: Pedone, 1970.Google Scholar
Miller, Richard B. “Aquinas and the Presumption against Killing and War.” Journal of Religion 82, no. 2 (2002): 173–204.Google Scholar
Miner, Robert. Thomas Aquinas on the Passions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Solesmes, Moines de (eds.). Les Enseignements Pontificaux: La Paix Internationale, Vol. 1. La guerre moderne. Tournai: Desclée & Cie, 1956.Google Scholar
Jörn, Müller “In War and Peace: The Virtue of Courage in the Writings of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas,” in Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, 1200–1500, István P. Bejczy, ed. Leiden: Brill, 2008, pp. 77–100.Google Scholar
Morkevicius, Valerie. “A Just Peace Critique of Just War,” Nova et Vetera (English edition) 10, no. 4 (2012): 1115–1140.Google Scholar
Morkevicius, Valerie. “Tin Men: Ethics, Cybernetics and the Importance of Soul.” Journal of Military Ethics 13, no. 1 (2014): 3–19.Google Scholar
Murphy, James Bernard. “Suárez, Aquinas, and the Just War: Self-Defense or Punishment,” in From Just War Ethics to Modern Peace Ethics, Heinz-Gerhard Justenhoven and William A. Barbieri, Jr., eds., pp. 175–196.Google Scholar
Neff, Stephen C. War and the Law of Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Ostwald, Martin. “Peace and War in Plato and Aristotle.” Scripta Classica Israelica 15 (1996): 102–118.Google Scholar
Parsons, Graham. “Public War and the Moral Equality of Combatants.” Journal of Military Ethics 11, no. 4 (2012): 299–317.Google Scholar
Parsons, Graham. “What Is the Classical Theory of Just Cause? A Response to Reichberg.” Journal of Military Ethics 12, no. 4 (2013): 257–299.Google Scholar
Pilsner, Joseph. The Specification of Human Actions in St. Thomas Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Pink, Thomas. “The Interpretation of Dignitatis Humanae: A Reply to Martin Rhonheimer.” Nova et Vetera (English edition) 11, no. 1 (2013): 79–123.Google Scholar
Post, Gaines. “Two Notes on Nationalism in the Middle Ages.” Traditio 9 (1953): 281–320.Google Scholar
Quinn, Warren S. “Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 18, no. 4 (1989): 334–351.Google Scholar
Reichberg, Gregory M. “Beyond Privation: Moral Evil in Aquinas’s De Malo.” Review of Metaphysics 55, no. 4 (2002): 731–764.Google Scholar
Reichberg, Gregory M. “Historiography of Just War Theory,” in Oxford Handbook of the Ethics of War, Frowe, Helen and Lazar, Seth, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, published online 2015. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199943418.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199943418-e-18.Google Scholar
Reichberg, Gregory M. “The Intellectual Virtues (Ia-IIae, qq. 57–58),” in The Ethics of Aquinas, Pope, Stephen J., ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002, pp. 131–147.Google Scholar
Reichberg, Gregory M. “The Moral Equality of Combatants – A Doctrine in Classical Just War Theory? Response to Graham Parsons.” Journal of Military Ethics. 12, no. 2 (2013): 181–194.Google Scholar
Reichberg, Gregory M. “Jacques Maritain, L’Espagne, and guerre sainte.” Revue thomiste 115, no. 2 (2015): 215–233.Google Scholar
Reichberg, Gregory M. “Jacques Maritain – Christian Theorist of Nonviolence and Just War,” Journal of Military Ethics 15 (2016), forthcoming.Google Scholar
Reichberg, Gregory M., and Syse, Henrik. “Humanitarian Intervention: A Case of Offensive Force?” Security Dialogue 33, no. 3 (2002): 220–233.Google Scholar
Reichberg, Gregory M. “The Idea of Double Effect – in War and Business,” in Responsibility in World Business: Managing Harmful Side-Effects of Corporate Activity, Lene Bomann-Larsen and Oddny Wiggen, eds. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2004, pp. 17–38.Google Scholar
Reichberg, Gregory M. Religion, War, and Ethics: A Sourcebook of Textual Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Reichberg, Gregory M., Syse, Henrik, and Begby, Endre. The Ethics of War: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.Google Scholar
Remec, Peter P. The Position of the Individual in International Law according to Grotius and Vattel. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960.Google Scholar
Rodin, David and Shue, Henry. Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Rojas, Jose. “St. Thomas’s Treatise on Self-defense Revisited,” in Thomistica (Recherches de theólogie ancienne et médiévale, Supplementa, Vol. 1), E. Manning, ed. Leuven: Peeters, 1995, pp. 89–123.Google Scholar
Russell, Frederick H. The Just War in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Ius Publicum Europaeum, Ulmen, G. L., trans. New York: Telos Press 2003.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Daniel. “Probabalism, Just War and Sovereign Supremacy in the Work of Gabriel Vázquez.” History of Political Thought 34, no. 2 (2013): 178–194.Google Scholar
Simon, Yves R. Philosophy of Democratic Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Simon, Yves R. “The Ultimate Practical Judgment,” in Practical Knowledge. New York: Fordham University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Simpson, Peter L. P. “Transcending Justice: Pope John Paul II and Just War.” Journal of Religious Ethics 39, no. 2 (2011): 286–298.Google Scholar
Solages, Bruno De. La théologie de la guerre juste: Gènese et orientation. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1946.Google Scholar
Sousa-Lara, Duarte. “Per Se and Praeter Intentionem in Aquinas. Josephinum Journal of Theology 18, no. 2 (2011): 418–453.Google Scholar
Stahn, Carsten. “‘Ius ad bellum’, Ius in bello’ ... ‘Ius post bellum’? – Rethinking the Conception of the Law of Armed Force.” European Journal of International Law 17, no. 5 (2006): 921–943.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth R. Border Diplomacy: The Caroline and McLeod Affairs in Anglo- American-Canadian Relations. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Stoyanov, Yuri. The Other God: Dualist Religions from Antiquity to the Cathar Heresy. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Straw, Carole. “‘A Very Special Death’; Christian Martyrdom in its Classical Context,” in Sacrificing the Self, Cormack, Margaret, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 39–57.Google Scholar
Sturzo, Luigi. The International Community and the Right of War. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1929.Google Scholar
Synan, Edward A. “St. Thomas Aquinas and the Profession of Arms.” Medieval Studies 50, no. 1 (1988): 404–437.Google Scholar
Syse, Henrik. “The Moral Equality of Combatants,” in Ashgate Research Companion to Military Ethics, Johnson, James Turner and Patterson, Eric D., eds. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2015, pp. 259–270.Google Scholar
Tadros, Victor. “Punitive War,” in How We Fight, Frowe, Helen and Lang, Gerald, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 18–37.Google Scholar
Tapie, Matthew A. “‘For He is Our Peace’: Thomas Aquinas on Christ as Cause of the Peace of the City of Saints,” Journal of Moral Theology 5, no. 1 (2016): 114–132.Google Scholar
Thivet, Delphine. Une pensée hétérodoxe de la guerre: De Hobbes à Clausewitz. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2010.Google Scholar
Titus, Craig S. Resilience and the Virtue of Fortitude: Aquinas in Dialogue with the Pyschosocial Sciences. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre, , O. P. Initiation à saint Thomas d’Aquin: Sa personne et son oeuvre. 3rd ed. Fribourg, Switzerland: Academic Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Villey, Michel. Questions de saint Thomas sur le droit et la politique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1987.Google Scholar
Walters, LeRoy B. Jr. Five Classic Just War Theories: A Study in the Thought of Thomas Aquinas, Vitoria, Suarez, Gentili, and Grotius. Diss., New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1971.Google Scholar