Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T07:20:45.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Institutional Comparative Statics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2013

James A. Robinson
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Ragnar Torvik
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Daron Acemoglu
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Manuel Arellano
Affiliation:
Centro de Estudios Monetarios y Financieros (CEMFI), Madrid
Eddie Dekel
Affiliation:
Northwestern University and Tel Aviv University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

What is the impact of productive natural resources on national income? The conventional wisdom in U.S. and British economic history is that natural resources are good for prosperity, even crucial (Wright 1990; Wrigley 2004; Allen 2008). In fact, the greater natural resources available to Great Britain and Western Europe is arguably one of the key reasons for their divergence from China in the early modern period (Pomeranz 2000).

Although compelling because natural resources seem to raise income in a mechanical way, this view faces some striking empirical puzzles. The first set concerns the “Dutch Disease” and the impact of natural-gas discoveries on the competitiveness of manufacturing in the Netherlands. The second set suggests a more general negative correlation between economic growth and the importance of natural resources in the economy (Sachs and Warner 1995). Since then, such findings have expanded into a whole literature on the “resource curse,” replete with detailed case studies as well as econometric results. Indeed, Sachs and Warner (2001, pp. 828, 837) argued:

What the studies based on the post-war experience have argued is that the curse of natural resources is a demonstrable empirical fact, even after controlling for trends in commodity prices…. Almost without exception, the resource-abundant countries have stagnated in economic growth since the early 1970s, inspiring the term “curse of natural resources.” Empirical studies have shown that this curse is a reasonably solid fact.

Type
Chapter
Information
Advances in Economics and Econometrics
Tenth World Congress
, pp. 97 - 134
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×