Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T17:12:27.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture in practice: how open are the OECD markets?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2010

Dimitris Diakosavvas
Affiliation:
Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development
Merlinda D. Ingco
Affiliation:
The World Bank
L. Alan Winters
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Prior to the WTO the rules that applied to agricultural primary products deviated from the general GATT rules. This resulted in a proliferation of impediments to agricultural trade by means of import bans, quotas setting the maximum level of imports, variable import levies, minimum import prices, and non-tariff measures maintained by state trading enterprises. The URAA has fundamentally changed the way agriculture was treated under the GATT. It imposed specific commitments to reduce support and protection in the areas of domestic support, market access, and export competition. It also strengthened and made more operationally effective rules and disciplines in each of these areas, including export prohibitions and restrictions. It is being implemented over a six-year period (ten years for developing countries) and began in 1995.

The market access provisions established disciplines on trade distorting practices while maintaining historical trade volumes and creating increased access opportunities in highly protected markets. Most importantly, non-tariff barriers (NTBs), such as quantitative import restrictions, variable import levies, and discretionary import licensing, were banned. These barriers were converted to ordinary tariffs (tariffication). Existing and new tariffs were bound and subject to reduction. Developed countries agreed to reduce agricultural tariffs from their base period rates by a total of 36 percent, on a simple average basis, with a minimum cut of 15 percent for each tariff. Current access commitments were put in place to ensure that there was no erosion in market access as a result of the URAA.

Type
Chapter
Information
Agriculture and the New Trade Agenda
Creating a Global Trading Environment for Development
, pp. 37 - 73
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. and Neary, P., 1996. “A New Approach to Evaluating Trade Policy,” Review of Economic Studies, 63(1), 107–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R., 1989. “Measuring Non-Tariff Trade Policies,” Working Paper, 2978, National Bureau of Economic Research, Washington, DC
Bureau, J. C., Fulponi, L., and Salvatici, L., 2000. “Comparing European Union and US Trade Liberalization Under the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture,” European Review of Agricultural Economics, 27(3), 259–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durand, M., J. Simon, and C. Webb, 1992. “Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's Indicators of International Trade and Competitiveness,” Working Paper, 120, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Economics Department, Paris
Faini, R., Melo, J., Senhadji, A., and Stanton, J., 1991. “Growth-Oriented Adjustment Programs: A Statistical Analysis,” World Development, 19(8), 957–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, P., J. Wainio, D. Whitley, and M. Bohman, 2001. “Profiles of Tariffs in Global Agricultural Markets,” Report 796, Economic Research Services, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
Greenway, D., Morgan, W., and Wright, P., 1998. “Trade Reform, Adjustment and Growth: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?,” Economic Journal, 108, 1547–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, A., 1996. “Openness and Growth,” Journal of Development Economics, 48, 419–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel, T. W., 2000. “Potential Gains from Reducing Trade Barriers in Manufacturing, Services and Agriculture,” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, July–August
Josling, T. and Tangermann, S., 1999. “Implementation of the World Trade Organization Agreement on Agriculture and Developments for the Next Round of Negotiations,” European Review of Agricultural Economics, 26(3), 371–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2001a. “The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture: an Evaluation of its Implementation in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Countries,” Paris
2001b. “Agricultural Policies in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Countries: Monitoring and Evaluation 2001,” Paris
Pritchett, L., 1996. “Measuring Outward Orientation in Least-Developed Countrys: Can It Be Done?”, Journal of Development Economics, 49, 307–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangermann, S., 2001. “Has the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture Worked Well?,” paper presented at the International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium Meeting, May 18, Washington, DC
World Trade Organization (World Trade Organization), 2000. “Tariff and Other Quotas,” background paper by the World Trade Organization Secretariat, G/AG/NG/S/7 World Trade Organization, Geneva

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×