Over a quarter of a century ago, Roy Campbell issued a plea that historians of Scotland should pay less attention to the Highlands. He said that a certain ‘crucial matter’ – ‘the relations of landowner and tenant in the Lowlands in the [nineteenth] century’ – should instead take centre stage.

Here I utter a parallel request: that Scottish historians should pay more attention to the Northern Isles of Scotland than they have been in the habit of doing. There is, for instance, not a single reference to Shetland or Orkney in Tom Devine's The Scottish Nation 1700–2000 (2000). The reason for this neglect must be a view by historians, but not archaeologists or sociologists, that the affairs of the small-scale northern societies are insignificant. It would be a difficult argument to sustain.

Sometimes the historians blunder about in the history of the north. The late Rosalind Mitchison, writing in 1983, summarised what she thought happened in Orkney and Shetland in the first half of the seventeenth century. Bishop James Law, she said,

It's a dramatic account. I hope to show, by looking closely at an episode around 1640, that it is over-simple and wrong.

* * *

Bishop Law moved from Orkney to Glasgow in 1615. He was succeeded in the north by George Graham, who had been bishop of Dunblane since 1603. Graham had become foster-parent to two lads from Scone, Patrik Smyth and Andro Smyth, sons of a Perthshire laird, and he took them to Orkney. Patrik married the bishop's daughter and became a prominent Orkney laird; Andro, my key figure, made a career with his neat, fluent handwriting, and married a daughter of Harie Aitken, the commissary, another key figure in the new establishment in the islands.