Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T07:49:21.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Entry #1 - Independence: We Go Our Separate Ways

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

Harold H. Kelley
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
John G. Holmes
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo, Ontario
Norbert L. Kerr
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Harry T. Reis
Affiliation:
University of Rochester, New York
Caryl E. Rusbult
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Paul A. M. Van Lange
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Examples

Situations characterized by mutual independence are those in which neither individual has preferences or aversions regarding the partner's possible behaviors. For example, two students share a large apartment in which each one has a separate room for sleeping and studying. When they retire to their separate rooms, each may behave as he or she wishes without affecting the other's outcomes or being affected by what the other happens to do. Similarly, estranged partners who “go their own way” and are indifferent to one another's actions are mutually independent. Neither person's actions have any impact, for better or for worse, on the well-being of the other. If neither partner in a close relationship derives any benefits or costs from the other's reading habits, then the partners' choices of reading material illustrate mutual independence. Each partner reads what he or she wishes to read, with no implications for the partner's outcomes. (Of course, research on “social facilitation” [Zajonc & Sales, 1966] suggests that exceptions may occur when the partners' mere presence in the same room affects each other's enjoyment and effort.

Conceptual Description

The requirement for the situation of mutual independence is that each person's outcomes are affected only by that person's actions and not by what the partner does nor by what the two do as a pair. Because each person is affected by his or her actions, we may say that each person's outcomes are determined by “actor control.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×