Book contents
- Anti-Constitutional Populism
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Anti-Constitutional Populism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Anti-Constitutional Populism
- I Populisms
- II Courts
- Chapter 5 Populism, Constitutional Democracy, and High Courts – Lessons from the Venezuelan Case
- Chapter 6 When Bolsonaro and the Judges Go Shopping – How Brazil’s Legal Elites Opened the Door for Bolsonaro’s Bad Populism
- Chapter 7 Disarming the Guardians – the Transformation of the Hungarian Constitutional Court After 2010
- III Anti-Constitutionalism After Post-Communism
- IV Eu Responses
- V Concluding Reflections
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- References
Chapter 7 - Disarming the Guardians – the Transformation of the Hungarian Constitutional Court After 2010
from II - Courts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 March 2022
Book contents
- Anti-Constitutional Populism
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Anti-Constitutional Populism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Anti-Constitutional Populism
- I Populisms
- II Courts
- Chapter 5 Populism, Constitutional Democracy, and High Courts – Lessons from the Venezuelan Case
- Chapter 6 When Bolsonaro and the Judges Go Shopping – How Brazil’s Legal Elites Opened the Door for Bolsonaro’s Bad Populism
- Chapter 7 Disarming the Guardians – the Transformation of the Hungarian Constitutional Court After 2010
- III Anti-Constitutionalism After Post-Communism
- IV Eu Responses
- V Concluding Reflections
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- References
Summary
As a result of the democratic transitions at the end of the 1980s, constitutional courts became crucial institutions in the constitutional systems of Central and Eastern Europe. As Wojciech Sadurski emphasises, while the effectiveness of these tribunals varies, they have made a strong mark on the process of constitutional transition.1 In the next decades, constitutional courts themselves, or their doctrinal supporters and commentators, did not have to defend their position in terms of its legitimacy in a democracy; such legitimacy was assumed rather than contested and debated.2 However, there have been cases of constitutional courts in the region under political attack from the other branches of government, especially from the executive, and ‘so it must be observed that the exalted position of the constitutional courts within domestic political systems is never particularly stable’.3
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Anti-Constitutional Populism , pp. 254 - 294Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Arato, Andrew, Post Sovereign Constitution Making: Learning and Legitimacy (Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar
Bárd, Petra, ‘To Leave or Not to Leave? Viktor Orbán’s War against George Soros and the CEU Dilemma’ Reconnect Europe (14 February 2019) reconnect-europe.eu/blog/bard-orban-ceudilemma/Google Scholar
Bibó, I, Válogatott tanulmányok 1935–1979. IV. köt. [Selected essays Volume 4] (Magvető Kiadó, 1990), 164Google Scholar
Boda, Zsolt and Medve-Bálint, Gergő, ‘A rendőrségbe vetett bizalom tényezői’ [Features of confidence in the police] in Boda, Zsolt (ed) Bizalom és közpolitika Jobban működnek-e az intézmények, ha bíznak bennük? [Confidence and public policy. Do the institutions work better if there is trust in them?] (Argumentum–MTA TK Politikatudományi Intézet, 2015)Google Scholar
Bodnár, Eszter, ‘Gedanken über die Einführung der öffentlichen Verhandlung am ungarischen Verfassungsgericht’ [Thoughts about the introduction of a public hearing at the Hungarian Constitutional Court] (2017) 1 Osteuroparecht 65Google Scholar
Bodnár, Eszter, Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina and Pozsár-Szentmiklósy, Zoltán, ‘Hungary: The State of Liberal Democracy’ in Albert, Richard, David, Landau, Pietro, Faraguna and Šimon, Drugda (eds) 2017 Global Review of Constitutional Law (Boston: ICONnect-Clough Center, 2018) 129Google Scholar
Csilla, Mihalicz, ‘Interjú Sólyom Lászlóval, az alkotmánybíróság volt elnökével’ [Interview with László Sólyom, former President of the Constitutional Court] (1998) 10 Budapesti Könyvszemle 435Google Scholar
Csink, Lóránt and Fröhlich, Johanna, ‘Történeti alkotmány és kontinuitás az új alaptörvényben’ [Historic constitution and continuity in the new Fundamental Law] (2012) 1 Közjogi Szemle 9Google Scholar
Dezső, Márta, ‘Hungary’ in Alen, André, Haljan, David (eds) International Encyclopedia for Constitutional Law (Kluwer Law International, 2010)Google Scholar
Drinóczi, Tímea, ‘Hungarian Abuse of Constitutional Emergency Regimes – Also in the Light of the COVID-19 Crisis’ (MTA Law Working Paper 2020/13, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 30 April 2020)Google Scholar
Dupré, Catherine, Importing the Law in Post-communist Transitions: The Hungarian Constitutional Court and the Right to Human Dignity (Hart Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar
Fröhlich, Johanna, ‘Az Abtv. 26. § (2) bekezdése szerinti, közvetlenül a jogszabályok ellen benyújtható alkotmányjogi panaszok befogadhatósága’ [The admissibility of the constitutional complaints directly submitted against legal acts according to Constitutional Court Act § 26 (1)] (2013) 1 Alkotmánybírósági Szemle 90Google Scholar
Fröhlich, Johanna, ‘Az Alkotmánybíróság és a Kúria alkotmányértelmezése. Az Alaptörvény R) és 28. cikkei’ in Az Alaptörvény érvényesülése a bírói gyakorlatban III. Alkotmányjogi panasz - a hatáskörrel kapcsolatos kérdések [The constitutional interpretation of the Constitutional Court and the Kuria. Article R and 28] (Alkotmánybíróság - Kúria - HVG Orac, 2019)Google Scholar
Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina, ‘A bírói döntések ellen benyújtott alkotmányjogi panaszok befogadhatósága I. – Az Abtv. 26. § (1) bekezdése’ [The admissibility of constitutional complaints against judicial decisions, Part I – Constitutional Court Act § 26 (1)] (2013) 1 Alkotmánybírósági Szemle 82Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor, ‘The Hungarian Approach to Constitutional Review: The End of Activism? The First Decade of the Hungarian Constitutional Court’ in Sadurski, Wojciech (ed) Constitutional Justice East and West (Kluwer Law International, 2002)Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor, ‘In memoriam magyar alkotmánybíráskodás: A pártos Alkotmánybíróság első éve’ [In memoriam Hungarian constitutional review: The first ten years of the partial Constitutional Court] (2014) 1–2 Fundamentum 36Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor, ‘The Invalid Anti-Migrant Referendum in Hungary’ Verfassungsblog (4 October 2016) verfassungsblog.de/hungarys-anti-european-immigration-laws/Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor, ‘Abuse of Constitutional Identity. The Hungarian Constitutional Court on Interpretation of Article E) (2) of the Fundamental Law’ (2018) 43 Review of Central and East European Law 23Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor, and Scheppele, Kim Lane, ‘Don’t Be Fooled by Autocrats! Why Hungary’s Emergency Violates Rule of Law’ Verfassungsblog (22 April 2020) verfassungsblog.de/dont-be-fooled-by-autocrats/Google Scholar
Jakab, András, ‘A bírói jogértelmezés az Alaptörvény tükrében’ [Judicial interpretation in the mirror of the Fundamental Law] (2011) 4 Jogesetek Magyarázata 86Google Scholar
Kazai, Viktor Z, ‘No One Has the Right to be Homeless …’ Verfassungsblog (13 June 2019) verfassungsblog.de/no-one-has-the-right-to-be-homeless/Google Scholar
Kelemen, Katalin, ‘The Hungarian Constitutional Court enters the dialogue on national constitutional identity’ Diritti Comparati (30 March 2017) diritticomparati.it/the-hungarian-constitutional-court-enters-the-dialogue-on-national-constitutional-identity/Google Scholar
Kéri, Veronika and Pozsár-Szentmiklósy, Zoltán, ‘Az Alkotmánybíróság határozata az Alaptörvény E) cikkének értelmezéséről. Az alapjogi fenntartás, a szuverenitásvédelem és az alkotmányos identitás dilemmái’ [The decision of the Constitutional Court on the interpretation of Article E of the Fundamental Law. The fundamental right restriction, the protection of sovereignty and the dilemma of constitutional identity] (2017) 1–2 Jogesetek Magyarázata 5Google Scholar
Klein, Claude and Sajó, András, ‘Constitution-Making: Process and Substance’ in Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, András (eds) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Paczolay, Péter, ‘The Transformation of Constitutional Court in Hungary’ in Szente, Zoltán, Mandák, Fanni, and Fejes, Zsuzsanna (eds) Challenges and pitfalls in the recent Hungarian constitutional development (L’Harmattan, 2015)Google Scholar
Pozsár-Szentmiklósy, Zoltán, ‘A Kúria végzése a betelepítési kvótáról szóló népszavazási kérdésről: Országgyűlési hatáskör az európai jog homályában’ [The decision of the Kúria on the referendum question about the immigration quota: The competence of the Parliament in the obscurity of the European law] (2016) 1–2 Jogesetek Magyarázata 77Google Scholar
Prendergast, David, ‘The Judicial Role in Protecting Democracy from Populism’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 245Google Scholar
Rixer, Ádám, ‘A történeti alkotmány lehetséges jelentéstartalmai’ [The possible meaning of the historic constitution] (2011) 3 Jogelméleti Szemle jesz.ajk.elte.hu/rixer47.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rozsnyai, Krisztina, ‘Änderungen im System des Verwaltungsrechtsschutzes in Ungarn’ [Changes in the administrative law review system in Hungary] (2013) 9 Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 335Google Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech, Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe (Springer, 2nd ed, 2014)Google Scholar
Sajó, András, ‘Reading the Invisible Constitution: Judicial Review in Hungary’ (1995) 2 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 253Google Scholar
Smuk, Péter, ‘Nemzetfogalom és történelmi narratíva az Alaptörvényben’ [The term nation and historic narrative in the Fundamental Law] in Kecskés, Gábor, (ed) Doktori Műhelytanulmányok 2013 (Győr: Széchenyi István Egyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Doktori Iskola, 2013) 259Google Scholar
Sólyom, László, Az alkotmánybíráskodás kezdetei Magyarországon [The beginnings of the constitutional adjudication in Hungary] (Budapest, Osiris, 2001)Google Scholar
Sólyom, László, ‘Előszó. Az alkotmányos kultúra szerepe’ [Foreword: The role of the constitutional culture] in Jakab, András, Az új Alaptörvény keletkezése és gyakorlati következményei (HVG-ORAC, 2011)Google Scholar
Sólyom, László, ‘The Rise and Decline of Constitutional Culture in Hungary’ in Bogdandy, Armin von, Sonnevend, Pál (eds), Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area (Hart Publishing, 2015)Google Scholar
Sólyom, László and Brunner, Georg (eds), Constitutional Judiciary in a New Democracy: The Hungarian Constitutional Court (University of Michigan Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Somody, Bernadette and Vissy, Beatrix, ‘Citizen’s Role in Constitutional Adjudication in Hungary: From the Actio Popularis to the Constitutional Complaint’ (2012) 53 Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eötvös Nominatae - Sectio Iuridica 95Google Scholar
Sonnevend, Pál, Jakab, András, and Csink, Lóránt, ‘The Constitution as an Instrument of Everyday Party Politics: The Basic Law of Hungary’ in Bogdandy, Armin von and Sonnevend, Pál (eds) Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area (Hart Publishing, 2015)Google Scholar
Szente, Zoltán, ‘A 2020. március 11-én kihirdetett veszélyhelyzet alkotmányossági problémái’ [The constitutional problems of the state of emergency announced on 11 March 2020] (MTA Law Working Paper 2020/9, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 10 April 2020)Google Scholar
Szente, Zoltán, ‘A historizáló alkotmányozás problémái − a történeti alkotmány és a Szent Korona az új Alaptörvényben’ [The problems of history-looking constitution-making] (2011) 3 Közjogi Szemle 1Google Scholar
Szente, Zoltán, ‘The Political Orientation of the Members of the Hungarian Constitutional Court between 2010 and 2014’ (2016) 1 Constitutional Studies 123Google Scholar
Szily, László, ‘Orbán azzal kezdi az új vicces videóját, hogy háromszor is megalázza a totálisan kikészült Patyi Andrást’ (2018) [Orban starts his first funny video by humiliating three times the totally snapped András Patyi] 444.hu/2018/04/13/orban-azzal-kezdi-az-uj-vicces-videojat-hogy-haromszor-is-megalazza-a-totalisan-kikeszult-patyi-andrastGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark and Bugarič, Bojan, ‘Populism and Constitutionalism: An Essay on Definitions and Their Implications’ (21 April 2020) nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42660123Google Scholar
Vincze, Attila, ‘Wrestling with Constitutionalism: The Supermajority and the Hungarian Constitutional Court’ (2014) 8 Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law 86Google Scholar
Vincze, Attila, Csuhány, Péter, Sonnevend, Pál and Jakab, András, ‘32/A. § [Az Alkotmánybíróság]’ in Jakab, András, Az Alkotmány kommentárja (Századvég Kiadó, 2009)Google Scholar
Vörös, Imre, ‘A történeti alkotmány az Alkotmánybíróság gyakorlatában’ [The historic constitution in the practice of the Constitutional Court] (2016) 4 Közjogi Szemle 44Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by