Book contents
- Antiochus and Peripatetic Ethics
- Cambridge Classical Studies
- Antiochus and Peripatetic Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Antiochus in Rome and Old Academic History of Philosophy
- Part II The Ethics of the Old Academy
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- GENERAL Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 February 2019
Book contents
- Antiochus and Peripatetic Ethics
- Cambridge Classical Studies
- Antiochus and Peripatetic Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Antiochus in Rome and Old Academic History of Philosophy
- Part II The Ethics of the Old Academy
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- GENERAL Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Antiochus and Peripatetic Ethics , pp. 209 - 221Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Primary Sources
Bruns, I. (ed.) (1887). Alexandri Aphrodisiensis praeter Commentaria, Scripta Minora: De Anima liber cum mantissa. Academiae Litterarum Regiae Borussicae, vol. 2, parts 1–2. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G., and Sedley, D. (eds) (1995). Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, vol. 3. Florence, 227–562.Google Scholar
Balme, D.M. (ed. and transl.) (1991). History of Animals. Books VII-X. Aristotle Vol. XI. Loeb Classical Library 439. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (ed.) (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation. 2 vols. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D.S., and Johnson, M.R. (eds and transl.) (2016). [Aristotle] Protrepticus or Exhortation to Philosophy. (Draft accessed from www.protrepticus.info (November 2016))Google Scholar
Rowe, C. (transl.) (2002). Nicomachean Ethics. Introduction and Commentary by S. Broadie. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susemihl, F. (ed.) ([1935]1969). Oeconomica and magna moralia. Trans. G.C. Armstrong. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (transl.) (2002). Cicero on the Emotions. Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4. Chicago/London.Google Scholar
Griffin, M.T., and Atkins, E.M. (eds) (1991). Cicero, . On Duties. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gigon, O. and Straume-Zimmermann, L. (1988). Über die Ziele des menschlichen Handelns. Munich/Zurich.Google Scholar
Keyes, C.W. (transl.) (1928). De Re Publica. De Legibus. Cicero Vol. XVI. Loeb Classical Library 213. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Madvig, N. (1876 3). M. Tulli Ciceronis De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum. Libri Quinque. Hauniae (Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Powell, J.G.F. (ed. and transl.) (1990). On Friendship and The Dream of Scipio. Warminster, UK.Google Scholar
Powell, J.G.F. (ed.) (2006). De Re Publica. De Legibus. Cato Maior De Senectute. Laelius De Amicitia. Oxford Classical Text. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rackham, H.(transl.) ([1914] 1931 2). Cicero, De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum. Cicero Vol. XVII. Loeb Classical Library 40. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rackham, H. ([1933] 1951). De Natura Deorum. Academica. Cicero Vol. XIX. The Loeb Classical Library 268. Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Rackham, H.(1942). On the Orator Book 3. On Fate. Stoic Paradoxes. Divisions of Oratory. Cicero Vol. IV. Loeb Classical Library 349. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Reid, J.S. (1883). M. Tulli Ciceronis De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum. Libri Quinque, vol. 3. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L.D. (ed.) (1998). De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum. Libri Quinque. Oxford Classical Texts. Oxford.Google Scholar
Schäublin, C., Bächli, A., and Graeser, A . (1995). Akademische Abhandlungen. Lucullus. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D.R. (ed. and transl.) (1999). Letters to Atticus. 4 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Straume-Zimmermann, L., Broemser, F. and Gigon, O. (1990). Hortensius. Lucullus. Academici Libri. Munich/Zurich.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W.W. (ed.) (2017). Arius Didymus on Peripatetic Ethics, Household Management and Politics. Critical Edition and Translation by Georgia Tsouni. Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities. Vol. 20. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorandi, T. (ed.) (2013). Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 50. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hicks, R.D. (transl.) (1925). Lives of Eminent Philosophers, vols. 1–2. Loeb Classical Library 184. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hard, R. (transl.) (2014). Discourses, Fragments, Handbook. With an Introduction and Notes by Christopher Gill. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G., and Long, A.A. (eds and transl.) (1992). Elementa moralia. Corpus dei Papiri filosofici Greci e Latini, vol. 1.1.2. Florence.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. (2009). Elements of Ethics, Fragments and Excerpts. David Konstan (transl.). Writings from the Greco-Roman World 28. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T., (ed. and transl.) (1991). Storia dei Filosofi. Platone e l’ Academia (PHerc. 1021 e 164). Naples.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. (1976). On Stoic Self-Contradictions. Against the Stoics on Common Conceptions. Loeb Classical Library 470. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (ed.) (1976). Polemonis Academici Fragmenta. Rendiconti dell’Accademia di Archeologia Lettere e Belle Arti di Napoli 51, 91–144.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (ed. and transl.) (2005). Against the Logicians. (Against the Professors Book 7). Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bury, R.G. (transl.) (1935). Against the Logicians (Against the Professors Book 7). Sextus Empiricus Vol. II. Loeb Classical Library 291. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bury, R.G. (transl.) (1936). Against the Physicists. Against the Ethicists. Sextus Empiricus Vol. III. Loeb Classical Library 311. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Meineke, A. (ed.) (1860–1864). Ioannis Stobaei Eclogarum Physicarum et Ethicarum Libri Duo. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Einerson, B. and Link, G.K. (transl.) (1976–90). De Causis Plantarum. 3 vols. Loeb Classical Library 475. London.Google Scholar
Hort, A. (1916). Historia Plantarum (Enquiry into Plants). 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library 70 Cambridge, MA, and London.Google Scholar
Huby, P. (1999). Theophrastus of Eresus. Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. Commentary volume 4: Psychology. Leiden.Google Scholar
Huby, P. (2007). Theophrastus of Eresus. Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. Commentary volume 2: Logic. Leiden.Google Scholar
Sharples, R.W. (1998). Theophrastus of Eresus. Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. Commentary volume 3.1: Physics. Leiden.Google Scholar
Parente, M. I., and Dorandi, T. (eds) (2012). Testimonianze e Frammenti. 2nd edn Pisa.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Bruns, I. (ed.) (1887). Alexandri Aphrodisiensis praeter Commentaria, Scripta Minora: De Anima liber cum mantissa. Academiae Litterarum Regiae Borussicae, vol. 2, parts 1–2. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G., and Sedley, D. (eds) (1995). Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, vol. 3. Florence, 227–562.Google Scholar
Balme, D.M. (ed. and transl.) (1991). History of Animals. Books VII-X. Aristotle Vol. XI. Loeb Classical Library 439. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (ed.) (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation. 2 vols. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D.S., and Johnson, M.R. (eds and transl.) (2016). [Aristotle] Protrepticus or Exhortation to Philosophy. (Draft accessed from www.protrepticus.info (November 2016))Google Scholar
Rowe, C. (transl.) (2002). Nicomachean Ethics. Introduction and Commentary by S. Broadie. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susemihl, F. (ed.) ([1935]1969). Oeconomica and magna moralia. Trans. G.C. Armstrong. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (transl.) (2002). Cicero on the Emotions. Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4. Chicago/London.Google Scholar
Griffin, M.T., and Atkins, E.M. (eds) (1991). Cicero, . On Duties. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gigon, O. and Straume-Zimmermann, L. (1988). Über die Ziele des menschlichen Handelns. Munich/Zurich.Google Scholar
Keyes, C.W. (transl.) (1928). De Re Publica. De Legibus. Cicero Vol. XVI. Loeb Classical Library 213. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Madvig, N. (1876 3). M. Tulli Ciceronis De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum. Libri Quinque. Hauniae (Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Powell, J.G.F. (ed. and transl.) (1990). On Friendship and The Dream of Scipio. Warminster, UK.Google Scholar
Powell, J.G.F. (ed.) (2006). De Re Publica. De Legibus. Cato Maior De Senectute. Laelius De Amicitia. Oxford Classical Text. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rackham, H.(transl.) ([1914] 1931 2). Cicero, De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum. Cicero Vol. XVII. Loeb Classical Library 40. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rackham, H. ([1933] 1951). De Natura Deorum. Academica. Cicero Vol. XIX. The Loeb Classical Library 268. Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Rackham, H.(1942). On the Orator Book 3. On Fate. Stoic Paradoxes. Divisions of Oratory. Cicero Vol. IV. Loeb Classical Library 349. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Reid, J.S. (1883). M. Tulli Ciceronis De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum. Libri Quinque, vol. 3. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L.D. (ed.) (1998). De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum. Libri Quinque. Oxford Classical Texts. Oxford.Google Scholar
Schäublin, C., Bächli, A., and Graeser, A . (1995). Akademische Abhandlungen. Lucullus. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D.R. (ed. and transl.) (1999). Letters to Atticus. 4 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Straume-Zimmermann, L., Broemser, F. and Gigon, O. (1990). Hortensius. Lucullus. Academici Libri. Munich/Zurich.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W.W. (ed.) (2017). Arius Didymus on Peripatetic Ethics, Household Management and Politics. Critical Edition and Translation by Georgia Tsouni. Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities. Vol. 20. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorandi, T. (ed.) (2013). Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 50. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hicks, R.D. (transl.) (1925). Lives of Eminent Philosophers, vols. 1–2. Loeb Classical Library 184. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hard, R. (transl.) (2014). Discourses, Fragments, Handbook. With an Introduction and Notes by Christopher Gill. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G., and Long, A.A. (eds and transl.) (1992). Elementa moralia. Corpus dei Papiri filosofici Greci e Latini, vol. 1.1.2. Florence.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. (2009). Elements of Ethics, Fragments and Excerpts. David Konstan (transl.). Writings from the Greco-Roman World 28. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T., (ed. and transl.) (1991). Storia dei Filosofi. Platone e l’ Academia (PHerc. 1021 e 164). Naples.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. (1976). On Stoic Self-Contradictions. Against the Stoics on Common Conceptions. Loeb Classical Library 470. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (ed.) (1976). Polemonis Academici Fragmenta. Rendiconti dell’Accademia di Archeologia Lettere e Belle Arti di Napoli 51, 91–144.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (ed. and transl.) (2005). Against the Logicians. (Against the Professors Book 7). Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bury, R.G. (transl.) (1935). Against the Logicians (Against the Professors Book 7). Sextus Empiricus Vol. II. Loeb Classical Library 291. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bury, R.G. (transl.) (1936). Against the Physicists. Against the Ethicists. Sextus Empiricus Vol. III. Loeb Classical Library 311. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Meineke, A. (ed.) (1860–1864). Ioannis Stobaei Eclogarum Physicarum et Ethicarum Libri Duo. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Einerson, B. and Link, G.K. (transl.) (1976–90). De Causis Plantarum. 3 vols. Loeb Classical Library 475. London.Google Scholar
Hort, A. (1916). Historia Plantarum (Enquiry into Plants). 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library 70 Cambridge, MA, and London.Google Scholar
Huby, P. (1999). Theophrastus of Eresus. Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. Commentary volume 4: Psychology. Leiden.Google Scholar
Huby, P. (2007). Theophrastus of Eresus. Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. Commentary volume 2: Logic. Leiden.Google Scholar
Sharples, R.W. (1998). Theophrastus of Eresus. Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. Commentary volume 3.1: Physics. Leiden.Google Scholar
Parente, M. I., and Dorandi, T. (eds) (2012). Testimonianze e Frammenti. 2nd edn Pisa.Google Scholar
Algra, K. (1997). ‘Chrysippus, Carneades, Cicero: The Ethical divisiones in Cicero’s Lucullus’ in Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J. (eds), Assent and Argument. Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books Leiden, 107–39.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (2007). ‘Carneades’ Classification of Ethical Theories’ in Ioppolo, A.I. and Sedley, D.N. (eds), Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers. Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155–86 B.C. Tenth Symposium Hellenisticum. Naples, 189–223.Google Scholar
Arnim von, H. (1926). Arius Didymus’ Abriß der Peripatetischen Ethik. Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Philosophisch-historische Klasse, Sitzungsberichte Bd. 204. 3. Abhandlung. Wien.Google Scholar
Balsdon, J.P.V.D. (1960). ‘Auctoritas, Dignitas, Otium’. The Classical Quarterly 10.1: 43–50.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1985). ‘Cicero’s De Fato and a Greek Source’ in Brunschwig, J., Imbert, C. and Roger, A. (eds) Histoire et Structure. À la memoire de Victor Goldschmidt. Paris, 229–39.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1989). ‘Antiochus of Ascalon’ in Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds), Philosophia Togata I. Oxford, 51–96.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997). ‘Roman Aristotle’ in Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds), Philosophia Togata II. Oxford, 1–69.Google Scholar
Barney, R. (2008). ‘Aristotle’s Argument for a Human Function’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34: 293–322.Google Scholar
Bees, R. (2004). Die Oikeiosislehre der Stoa I. Rekonstruktion ihres Inhalts. Würzburg.Google Scholar
Bénatouil, T. (2009). ‘Θεωρία et vie contemplative du stoicisme au platonisme’ in Bonazzi, M. and Opsomer, J. (eds), The Origins of the Platonic System. Platonism of the Early Empire and its Philosophical Context. Leuven, 1–20.Google Scholar
Blank, D. (2007). ‘The Life of Antiochus of Ascalon in Philodemus’ History of the Academy and a Tale of Two Letters’. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Epigraphik 162: 87–93.Google Scholar
Blank, D. (2012). ‘Varro and Antiochus’ in Sedley, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus Cambridge, 250–89.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2009). ‘Antiochus’ Ethics and the Subordination of Stoicism’ in Bonazzi, M. and Opsomer, J. (eds), The Origins of the Platonic System. Platonism of the Early Empire and Its Philosophical Context. Leuven, 33–54.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2012). ‘Antiochus and Platonism’ in Sedley, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge, 307–33.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G.R. (2001). Post-Hellenistic Philosophy. A Study of Its Development from the Stoics to Origen. Oxford.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G.R. (2012). ‘Antiochus’ Metaphysics’ in Sedley, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge, 220–36.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G.R. (2014). ‘Unity and the Good: Platonists Against οἰκείωσις’ in Collette-Dučić, B. and Delcomminette, S. (eds), Unité et origine des vertus dans la philosophie anciennes. Brussels, 297–320.Google Scholar
Brink, C.O. (1956). ‘Οἰκείωσις and οἰκειότης. Theophrastus and Zeno on Nature in Moral Theory’. Phronesis 1.2: 123–45.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2012). ‘Antiochus’ Epistemology’ in Sedley, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge, 104–30.Google Scholar
Brunner, Á. (2010). Totas Paginas Commovere? Cicero’s Presentation of Stoic Ethics in De Finibus Book III. PhD thesis. Central European University, Budapest.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1986). ‘The Cradle Argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism’ in Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds), The Norms of Nature. Studies in Hellenistic Ethics. Cambridge, 113–44.Google Scholar
Catana, L. (2008). The Historiographical Concept ‘System of Philosophy’. Its Origin, Nature, Influence and Legitimacy. Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History 165. Leiden.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2013). ‘Platonist Approaches to Aristotle: From Antiochus of Ascalon to Eudorus of Alexandria (and Beyond)’ in Schofield, M. (ed.) Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC. Cambridge, 28–52.Google Scholar
Couissin, P. (1983). ‘The Stoicism of the New Academy’ in Burnyeat, M. (ed.), The Skeptical Tradition. Berkeley, 31–63 (English Translation of the 1929 article of P. Couissin ‘Le Stoicisme de la Nouvelle Académie’ in Revue d’histoire de la philosophie 3: 241–76).Google Scholar
Cole, E. B. (1992). ‘Theophrastus and Aristotle on Animal Intelligence’, in Fortenbaugh, W. and Gutas, D. (eds), Theophrastus, His Psychological, Doxographical and Scientific Writings. RUSCH 5, 43–62.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (1995). ‘Eudaimonism and the Appeal to Nature in the Morality of Happiness: Comments on J. Annas, The Morality of Happiness’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55.3: 587–98.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (2013) ‘Cicero and the Intellectual Milieu of the Late Republic’ in Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge, 9–24.Google Scholar
Crawford, M.H. (1978). ‘Greek Intellectuals and the Roman Aristocracy in the First Century B.C.’ in Garnsey, P.D.A and Whittaker, C.R. (eds), Imperialism in the Ancient World. Cambridge, 193–207.Google Scholar
De Ruiter, S.T. (1931). ‘De vocis quae est φιλανθρωπία significatione atque usu’. Mnemosyne 59.3: 271–306.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (2003). The Heirs of Plato. A Study of the Old Academy (347–274 BC). Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirlmeier, F. (1937). Die Oikeiosis-Lehre Theophrasts. Philologus Supp. Bd. 30.1: 1–100.Google Scholar
Donini, P. (1988) ‘The History of the Concept of Eclecticism’ in Dillon, J. and Long, A.A. (eds), The Question of ‘Eclecticism’. Studies in Later Greek Philosophy. Berkeley, 15–33.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1986). ‘Discovering the Good: Oikeiōsis and kathēkonta in Stoic Ethics’ in Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds), The Norms of Nature. Cambridge, 145–83.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. (2012). Aristotelianism in the First Century BCE. Xenarchus of Seleucia. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (2007). ‘Les Philosophes grecs a Rome (155–86 av. J.C.)’ in Ioppolo, A.M. and Sedley, D. (eds), Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers. Tenth Symposium Hellenisticum. Naples, 19–46.Google Scholar
Fladerer, L. (1996). Antiochos von Askalon. Hellenist und Humanist. Grazer Beiträge. Supplementband VII. Graz.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1999). ‘Epilogue’ in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge, 771–97.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. (2004). ‘Platonism in Aristotle’s Ethics’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 27: 217–98.Google Scholar
Gigon, O. (1988). ‘The Peripatos in Cicero’s De Finibus’ in Fortenbaugh, W. and Sharples, R.W. (eds), Theophrastean Studies. RUSCH 3, 259–71.Google Scholar
Gigon, O. (1989). ‘Theophrast in Cicero’s De Finibus’ in Fortenbaugh, W. and Steinmetz, P. (eds), Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos RUSCH 4, 159–85.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2007). Paideia Romana. Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society. Supplementary Volume 30. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2016). ‘Antiochus’ Theory of Oikeiōsis’ in Annas, J. and Betegh, G. (eds), Cicero’s De Finibus. Philosophical Approaches. Cambridge, 221–47.Google Scholar
Giusta, M. (1990). ‘Antioco di Ascalona e Carneade nel libro v del De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum di Cicerone’. Elenchos 11: 29–49.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (2002). Book review of Fladerer, L.: Antiochos von Askalon. Hellenist und Humanist (Graz, 1996) in Gnomon 74: 289–95.Google Scholar
Görgemanns, H. (1983). ‘Oikeiosis in Arius Didymus’ in Fortenbaugh, W. (ed.), On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics: The Work of Arius Didymus, RUSCH 1, 165–89Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1989). ‘Cicero und die “Schule des Aristoteles”’ in W.W. Fortenbaugh and P. Steinmetz (eds), Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos, RUSCH 4, 246–63.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1990). ‘Antiochos von Askalon über die Alten und über die Stoa. Beobachtungen zu Cicero, Academici posteriores I 24-43’ in Steinmetz, P. (ed.), Beiträge zur hellenistischen Literatur und ihrer Rezeption in Rom. Stuttgart, 123–39.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1994). ‘Älterer Pyrrhonismus, Jüngere Akademie, Antiochus aus Askalon’ in Flashar, H. (ed.), Überweg. Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie. Die Philosophie der Antike, Bd. 4: Die Hellenistische Philosophie. Basel, 717–989.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1998). ‘Theophrastus, the Academy, Antiochus and Cicero. A Response to John Glucker and an Appendix’ in van Ophuijsen, J. M. and van Raalte, M. (eds), Theophrastus. Reappraising the Sources. RUSCH 8, 317–29.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (2011). ‘Cicero De finibus bonorum et malorum Buch 5. Beobachtungen zur Quelle und zum Aufbau’. Elenchos 32: 329–54.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H.B. (1987). ‘Aristotelian Philosophy in the Roman World from the Time of Cicero to the End of the Second Century AD’. ANRW 36.2, 1079–1174.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (1989). ‘Philosophy, Politics and Politicians at Rome’ in Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds), Philosophia Togata I. Oxford, 1–37.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. (1983). ‘The Diaeretic Method and the Purpose of Arius’ Doxography’ in Fortenbaugh, W. (ed.), On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics. The Work of Arius Didymus, RUSCH 1, 15–37.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. (2007). ‘Critolaus and Late Hellenistic Peripatetic Philosophy’ in Ioppolo, A.M. and Sedley, D. (eds), Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers. Tenth Symposium Hellenisticum. Naples, 49–101.Google Scholar
Hatzimichali, M. (2011). Potamo of Alexandria and the Emergence of Eclecticism in Late Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hatzimichali, M. (2012). ‘Antiochus’ Biography’ in Sedley, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge, 9–30.Google Scholar
Hatzimichali, M. (2013). ‘The Texts of Plato and Aristotle in the First Century BC’ in Schofield, M. (ed.), Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC. Cambridge, 1–27.Google Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1882).Untersuchungen zu Cicero’s Philosophischen Schriften,Vol. 2. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Huby, P. (1983). ‘Peripatetic Definitions of Happiness’ in Fortenbaugh, W. (ed.), On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics. The Work of Arius Didymus. RUSCH 1, 121–34.Google Scholar
Huby, P. (1985). ‘Theophrastus in the Aristotelian Corpus, with Particular Reference to Biological Problems’ in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things. Pittsburgh/Bristol, 313–25.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D.S., and Johnson, M.R. (2005). ‘Authenticating Aristotle’s Protrepticus’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy.29: 193–259.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1984). ‘Hierocles: Theory and Argument in the Second Century AD’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2: 151–84.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2012). ‘Antiochus on Physics’ in Sedley, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge, 188–219.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2016). ‘A Later and (Nonstandard) Aristotelian Account of Moral Motivation’ in Vasiliou, I. (ed.), Moral Motivation: A History. Oxford, 65–86.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. (2012). ‘Antiochus, Aristotle and the Stoics on Degrees of Happiness’ in Sedley, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge, 151–72.Google Scholar
Joly, R. (1956). Le thème philosophique des genres de vie dans l’ Antiquité Classique. Académie Royale de Belgique. Classe des lettres et des sciences morales et politiques. Mémoirs, Ser. II, Tome LI. Brussels.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. (1983). ‘Arius as a Doxographer’ in Fortenbaugh, W. (ed.), On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics. The Work of Arius Didymus. RUSCH 1, 3–13.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G. (2006). Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Klein, J. (2016). ‘The Stoic Argument from oikeiōsis’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 50: 143–200.Google Scholar
Lee, C-U. (2002). Oikeiosis. Stoische Ethik in naturphilosophischer Perspektive. Freiburg/München.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2012). ‘Other Followers of Antiochus’ in Sedley, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge, 290–306.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. (1983). ‘Arius Didymus and the exposition of Stoic Ethics’ in Fortenbaugh, W.W. (ed.), On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics. The Work of Arius Didymus, RUSCH 1, 41–65.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. (1988). ‘Socrates in Hellenistic Philosophy’. Classical Quarterly 38.1: 150–71.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. (1993). ‘Hierocles on Oikeiōsis and Self-Perception’ in Boudouris, K.J. (ed.), Hellenistic Philosophy 1. Athens, 93–104.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. (1995). ‘Cicero’s Plato and Aristotle’ in Powell, J.G.F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher. Twelve Papers. Oxford, 37–61.Google Scholar
Lueder, A. (1940). Die philosophische Persönlichkeit des Antiochos von Askalon. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Lynch, J. P. (1972). Aristotle’s School. A Study of a Greek Educational Institution. Berkeley.Google Scholar
McCabe, M.M. (2005). ‘Extend or Identify: Two Stoic Accounts of Altruism’ in Salles, R. (ed.), Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought. Oxford, 413–43.Google Scholar
Mette, H.J. (1984). ‘Zwei Akademiker heute: Krantor von Soloi und Arkesilaos von Pitane’. Lustrum 26: 7–93.Google Scholar
Mette, H.J. (1985). ‘Weitere Akademiker heute: Von Lakydes bis zu Kleitomachos’. Lustrum 27: 53–148.Google Scholar
Moraux, P. (1973). Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias Bd. I. Berlin.Google Scholar
Moss, J. (2012). Aristotle on the Apparent Good: Perception, Phantasia, Thought, and Desire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Müller, R. (1968). ‘Βίος Θεωρητικὀς bei Antiochos von Askalon und Cicero’, Helicon 8: 222–37.Google Scholar
Pembroke, S.G. (1971). ‘Oikeiōsis’ in Long, A.A. (ed.), Problems in Stoicism. London, 114–49.Google Scholar
Polito, R. (2012). ‘Antiochus and the Academy’ in Sedley, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge, 31–54.Google Scholar
Powell, J.G.F. (1995). ‘Cicero’s Translation from Greek’ in Powell, J.G.F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher. Twelve Papers. Oxford, 273–30.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2007). ‘Ein Blick in den Stollen von Skepsis: vier Kapitel zur frühen Überlieferung des Corpus Aristotelicum’. Philologus 151: 51–77.Google Scholar
Raalte, M. van (1988). ‘The Idea of the Cosmos as an Organic Whole in Theophrastus’ Metaphysics’ in Fortenbaugh, W. and Sharples, R.W. (eds), Theophrastean Studies. RUSCH 3, 189–215.Google Scholar
Regenbogen, O. (1940). ‘Theophrastos’ in Kroll, W. and Mittelhaus, K. (eds) Paulys Real-encyclopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft, Supp. VII. Stuttgart, cols. 1354–1562.Google Scholar
Runia, D.T. (1989). ‘Aristotle and Theophrastus Conjoined in the Writings of Cicero’ in Fortenbaugh, W. and Steinmetz, P. (eds), Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos. RUSCH 4, 23–38.Google Scholar
Russell, D. (2010). ‘Virtue and Happiness in the Lyceum and Beyond’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 38: 143–85.Google Scholar
Sandbach, F.H. (1985). ‘Aristotle and the Stoics’. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, Supplementary Vol. 10. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schmitz, P. (2014). Cato Peripateticus-Stoische und Peripatetische Ethik im Dialog. Berlin/Boston.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1995). ‘Two Stoic Approaches to Justice’ in Laks, A. and Schofield, M. (eds), Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, 191–212.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2008). ‘Ciceronian Dialogue’ in Goldhill, S. (ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge, 63–84.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2012a). ‘Antiochus on Social Virtue’ in Sedley, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge, 173–87.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2012b). ‘The Neutralizing Argument: Carneades, Antiochus, Cicero’ in Sedley, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge, 237–49.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2013). ‘Writing Philosophy’ in Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge, 73–87.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1989). ‘Philosophical Allegiance in the Greco-Roman World’ in Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds), Philosophia Togata I. Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford, 97–119.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1992). ‘Sextus Empiricus and the Atomist Criteria of Truth’. Elenchos 13: 19–56.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1997). ‘Plato’s auctoritas and the Rebirth of the Commentary Tradition’ in Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds), Philosophia Togata II. Plato and Aristotle at Rome Oxford, 110–29.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1999). ‘The Ideal of Godlikeness’ in Fine, G. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Philosophy. Plato Vol. 2 Ethics, Politics, Religion, and the Soul. Oxford, 309–28.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2002). ‘The Origins of Stoic God’ in Frede, D. and Laks, A. (eds), Traditions of Theology. Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath. Leiden, 41–83.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2003). ‘Philodemus and the Decentralisation of Philosophy’. Cronache Ercolanesi 33: 31–41.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2012a). ‘Antiochus as Historian of Philosophy’ in Sedley, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge, 80–103.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2012b). ‘A Guide to the Testimonies for Antiochus’ in Sedley, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge, 334–46.Google Scholar
Sharples, R.W. (2010). Peripatetic Philosophy 200 BC to AD 200. An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge Source Books in Post-Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1993). Animal Minds and Human Morals. The Origins of the Western Debate. London.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1983). ‘The Role of oikeiosis in Stoic Ethics’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1: 145–67.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1991). ‘Following Nature: A Study in Stoic Ethics’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 9: 1–73.Google Scholar
Szaif, J. (2012). Gut des Menschen. Untersuchungen zur Problematik und Entwicklung der Glücksethik bei Aristoteles und in der Tradition des Peripatos. Berlin/Boston.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (1985). Scepticism or Platonism? The Philosophy of the Fourth Academy. Cambridge Classical Studies. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (1987). ‘Peripatetic and Stoic Epistemology in Boethus and Antiochus’. Apeiron 20.1: 17–37.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (2007). ‘Antiochus: A New Beginning?’ in Sharples, R.W. and Sorabji, R. (eds), Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC-200 AD, vol. 2. London, 317–32.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (2013). Review of Sedley, David (ed.): The Philosophy of Antiochus, (Cambridge: 2012) Sehepunkte 13.3 [15.03.2013], URL: http://www.sehepunkte.de/2013/03/21482.html (accessed on 21 March 2016).Google Scholar
Tsouni, G. (2012). ‘Antiochus on Contemplation and the Happy Life’ in Sedley, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge, 131–50.Google Scholar
Tsouni, G. (2016). ‘Peripatetic Ethics in the First Century BC: The Summary of Didymus’ in Falcon, A. (ed.), The Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity. Leiden, 120–37.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. (2005). ‘The Mysterious Aristotelian Olive’. Science in Context 18.1: 69–91.Google Scholar
White, S. (1994). ‘Natural Virtue and Perfect Virtue in Aristotle’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 8: 135–68.Google Scholar
White, S. (2004). ‘Lyco and Hieronymus on the Good Life’ in Fortenbaugh, W. W. and White, S.A. (eds), Lyco of Troas and Hieronymus of Rhodes. Text, Translation and Discussion. RUSCH 12, 389–409.Google Scholar
Wright, M.R. (1995). ‘Cicero on Self-Love and Love of Humanity in De Finibus 3’ in Powell, J.G.F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher. Twelve Papers. Oxford, 171–95.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (1856–1868). Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung. Tübingen.Google Scholar