Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:40:31.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Performance and International Organisations’ Borders

The Case of the World Trade Organization

from Part V - Interactions Within and Across Regimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2017

Manfred Elsig
Affiliation:
World Trade Institute, Universität Bern, Switzerland
Bernard Hoekman
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence
Joost Pauwelyn
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Assessing the World Trade Organization
Fit for Purpose?
, pp. 376 - 403
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Frederick M. 2000. ‘Distributed Governance at the WTO-WIPO: An Evolving Model for Open-Architecture Integrated Governance’. Journal of International Economic Law 3(1): 6381.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth, Keohane, Robert, Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. ‘The Concept of Legalization’. International Organization 54(3): 401419.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth, Snidal, Duncan, Genschel, Philipp and Zangl, Bernhard (eds.). 2014. International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod and Dupont, Cédric. 1999. ‘Goods, Games and Institutions’. International Political Science Review 20(4): 393409.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod and Dupont, Cédric. 2002. ‘Goods, Games, and Institutions: A Reply’. International Political Science Review 23(4): 402410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod and Dupont, Cédric. 2003. ‘Comment on “Common Goods, Matrix Games and Institutional Response”’. European Journal of International Relations 9(3): 475478.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. ‘The Politics of International Regime Complexity’. Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 1324.Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E. 2001. ‘How Not to Link: Institutional Conundrums of an Expanded Trade Regime’. Widener Law Symposium Journal 7: 120.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2008. ‘The Globalization of Health and Safety Standards: Delegation of Regulatory Authority in the SPS Agreement of the 1994 Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization’. Law and Contemporary Problems 71: 218255.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2009. ‘The Politics of Food Safety in the Age of Global Trade: The Codex Alimentarius Commission in the SPS-Agreement of the WTO’. RWJF Scholars in Health Policy Research Program.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve. 2002. ‘Triangulating the World Trade Organization’. American Journal of International Law 96(1): 2855.Google Scholar
Cosbey, Aaron. 2000. ‘A Forced Evolution? The Codex Alimentarius Commission, Scientific Uncertainty and the Precautionary Principle’. IISD Paper, Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Dawson, Richard. 1995. ‘The Role of the Codex Alimentarius Commission in Setting Food Standards and the SPS Agreement Implementation’. Food Control 6(5): 261265.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel. 2007. All Politics Is Global. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey. 2001. ‘The WTO in Transition: Of Constituents, Competence and Coherence’. George Washington International Law Review 33: 9791013.Google Scholar
Elsig, Manfred. 2010a. ‘European Union Trade Policy after Enlargement: Larger Crowds, Shifting Priorities and Informal Decision-Making’. Journal of European Public Policy 17(6): 781798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsig, Manfred. 2010b. ‘The World Trade Organization at Work: Performance in a Member-Driven Milieu’. Review of International Organizations 5(3): 345363.Google Scholar
Elsig, Manfred. 2011. ‘Principal-Agent Theory and the World Trade Organization: Complex Agency and “Missing Delegation”’. European Journal of International Relations 17(3): 495517.Google Scholar
Elsig, Manfred. 2015. ‘Orchestration on a Tight Leash: State Oversight of the WTO’. In International Organizations as Orchestrators, edited by Abbott, Kenneth, Genschel, Philipp, Snidal, Duncan and Zangl, Bernhad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6587.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary and Starr, Harvey. 2003. Necessary Conditions. Theory, Methodology, and Applications. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2000. ‘Introduction: Legalization and World Politics’. International Organization 54(3): 401419.Google Scholar
Graber, Christoph B. 2006. ‘The New UNESCO Convention on Cultural Diversity: A Counterbalance to the WTO’. Journal of International Economic Law 9(3): 553574.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew. 2004. ‘Global Governance and the WTO’. Harvard International Law Journal 45: 303351.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst. 1980. ‘Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes’. World Politics 32(2): 357405.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter. 1992. ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’. International Organization 46(1): 135.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Darren and Jacoby, Wade. 2006. ‘How Agents Matter’. In Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, edited by Hawkins, Darren, Lake, David, Nielson, Daniel and Tierney, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 197228.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Darren, Lake, David, Nielson, Daniel and Tierney, Michael (eds.). 2006. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Clair. 2006. ‘Power, Linkage and Accommodation: The WTO as an International Actor and Its Influence on Other Actors and Regimes’. Berkeley Journal of International Law 24(1): 79128.Google Scholar
Kim, Moonhawk. 2012. ‘Disguised Protectionism and Linkages to the GATT/WTO’. World Politics 64(3): 426475.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles and Snidal, Duncan. 2001. ‘The Rational Design of International Institutions’. International Organization 55(4): 761799.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen. 1991. ‘Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier’. World Politics 43(3): 336–66.Google Scholar
Livermore, Michael. 2006. ‘Authority and Legitimacy in Global Governance: Deliberation, Institutional Differentiation, and the Codex Alimentarius’. New York University Law Review 81: 766801.Google Scholar
Matthews, Duncan. 2002. Globalising Intellectual Property Rights. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew and Sheargold, Elizabeth. 2009. ‘GATT Art. XV: Exchange Arrangements’. In Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, Volume 5, edited by Wolfrum, Rüdiger and Stoll, Peter-Tobias. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 353365.Google Scholar
Moghadam, Valentine and Elveren, Dilek. 2008. ‘The Making of an International Convention: Culture and Free Trade in a Global Era’. Review of International Studies 34(4): 735753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielson, Daniel and Tierney, Michael. 2003. ‘Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and Wold Bank Environmental Reform’. International Organization 57(2): 241276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost. 2005. ‘The UNESCO Convention on Cultural Diversity, and the WTO: Diversity in International Law-Making?ASIL Insights 9 (35), 15 November.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost. 2010. ‘The Dog That Barked But Didn’t Bite: 15 Years of Intellectual Property Disputes at the WTO’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1(2): 389429.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A. and Wouters, Jan (eds.). 2012. Informal International Lawmaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark. 1997. ‘Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community’. International Organization 51(1): 99134.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal and Victor, David. 2004. ‘The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources’. International Organization 58(2): 277309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, Susan. 2003. Private Power, Public Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory and Pollack, Mark. 2010. ‘Hard vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements and Antagonists in International Governance’. Minnesota Law Review 94: 706799.Google Scholar
Siegel, Deborah. 2002. ‘Legal Aspects of IMF/WTO Relationship: The Fund’s Articles of the Agreement and the WTO Agreements’. American Journal of International Law 96(3): 561599.Google Scholar
Silverglade, Bruce. 2000. ‘The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: Weakening Food Safety Regulations to Facilitate Trade?Food and Drug Law Journal 55: 517524.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2000. ‘Governing the Global Economy through Government Networks’. In Role of Law in International Politics, edited by Byers, Michael. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 177205.Google Scholar
Elizabeth, Smythe. 2009. ‘In Whose Interests? Transparency and Accountability in the Global Governance of Food: Agribusiness, the Codex Alimentarius, and the World Trade Organization’. In Corporate Power in Global Agrifood Governance, edited by Clapp, Jennifer and Fuchs, Doris. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 93123.Google Scholar
Stein, Arthur. 1982. ‘Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World’. International Organization 36(2): 299324.Google Scholar
Stewart, Terence. 1999. The GATT Uruguay Round: A Negotiating History, 1986–1992. The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Van Evera, Stephen. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vaubel, Roland. 2006. ‘Principal-Agent Problems in International Organizations’. Review of International Organizations 1(2): 125138.Google Scholar
Winham, Gilbert. 2003. ‘International Regime Conflict in Trade and Environment: The Biosafety Protocol and the WTO’. World Trade Review 2(2): 131155.Google Scholar
Winickoff, David and Bushey, Douglas. 2010. ‘Science and Power in Global Food Regulation’. Science, Technology & Human Values 35(3): 356381.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. 1996. Agreement between the WTO and the IMF and the World Bank. Geneva: WT/L/194Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. 2001. Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health. Geneva: WT/MIN(01)/DEC/2.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. 2004. Doha Work Programme. Decision Adopted by the General Council on 1 August 2004. Geneva: WT/L/579.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×