Book contents
- Assessing the World Trade Organization: Fit for Purpose?
- Assessing the World Trade Organization
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction and Setting the Stage
- Part II New Insight from the Early Times
- Part III General Trends and Patterns in WTO Dispute Settlement
- Part IV Zooming in on Specific Debates
- 9 Twenty Years of Third-Party Participation at the WTO
- 10 Mind the Gap
- 11 The Age of Innocence
- Part V Interactions Within and Across Regimes
- Index
- References
9 - Twenty Years of Third-Party Participation at the WTO
What Have We Learned?
from Part IV - Zooming in on Specific Debates
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 May 2017
Book contents
- Assessing the World Trade Organization: Fit for Purpose?
- Assessing the World Trade Organization
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I Introduction and Setting the Stage
- Part II New Insight from the Early Times
- Part III General Trends and Patterns in WTO Dispute Settlement
- Part IV Zooming in on Specific Debates
- 9 Twenty Years of Third-Party Participation at the WTO
- 10 Mind the Gap
- 11 The Age of Innocence
- Part V Interactions Within and Across Regimes
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Assessing the World Trade OrganizationFit for Purpose?, pp. 203 - 222Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R.W. 2004. ‘Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Bilateral Opportunism and the Rules of GATT/WTO’. Journal of International Economics 63(1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P. 2005. ‘Participation in WTO Dispute Settlement: Complainants Interested Parties, and Free Riders’. World Bank Economic Review 19: 287–310.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P. 2009. Self-Enforcing Trade: Developing Countries and WTO Dispute Settlement. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2001. ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Early Settlement in GATT/WTO Disputes’. Fordham International Law Journal 24: 158–172.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2006. ‘Three’s a Crowd: Third Parties and WTO Dispute Settlement’. World Politics 58: 446–477.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L., Reinhardt, Eric and Shaffer, Gregory. 2009. ‘Does Legal Capacity Matter? Explaining Dispute Initiation and Antidumping Actions in the WTO’. World Trade Review 8: 559–577.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L. and Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2010. ‘The Politics of Judicial Economy at the World Trade Organization’. International Organization 64: 257–279.Google Scholar
Daku, Mark and Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2016. ‘Who Holds Most Influence Over WTO Jurisprudence?’ Working Paper, McGill University.Google Scholar
Davey, William J. and Porges, Amelia. 1998. ‘Comments on Performance of the System I: Consultations and Deterrence’. International Lawyer 32: 695–707.Google Scholar
Davis, Christina L. and Bermeo, Sarah Blodgett. 2009. ‘Who Files? Developing Country Participation in GATT/WTO Adjudication’. Journal of Politics 71: 1033–1049.Google Scholar
Elsig, Manfred and Stucki, Philipp. 2011. ‘Low-Income Developing Countries and WTO Litigation: Why Wake Up the Sleeping Dog?’ Review of International Political Economy 19: 292–316.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Michael, Johns, Leslie and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2010. ‘Strengthening International Courts and the Early Settlement of Disputes’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 54: 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horlick, Gary N. 1998. ‘The Consultation Phase of WTO Dispute Resolution: A Private Practitioner’s View’. International Lawyer 32: 685–693.Google Scholar
Johns, Leslie and Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2014. ‘Who Gets to Be in the Room? Manipulating Participation in WTO Disputes’. International Organization 68: 663–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, Leslie and Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2016. ‘Fear of Crowds in WTO Disputes: Why Don’t More Countries Participate?’ Journal of Politics 78 (1): 88–104.Google Scholar
Kucik, Jeffrey and Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2016. ‘Measuring the Cost of Privacy: A Look at the Distributional Effects of Private Bargaining’. British Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 861–889Google Scholar
Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2010. ‘Constraining Coercion? Legitimacy and Its Role in US Trade Policy, 1975–2000’. International Organization 64(01): 65–96.Google Scholar
Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2011. ‘Why Do Some Countries Get Better WTO Accession Terms Than Others?’ International Organization 65(4): 639–672.Google Scholar
Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2014. ‘The Politics of Precedent in International Law: A Social Network Application’. American Political Science Review 108(3): 547–564.Google Scholar
Stasavage, David. 2004. ‘Open-Door or Closed-Door? Transparency in Domestic and International Bargaining’. International Organization 58: 667–703.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H. 2002. ‘In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO’. International Organization 56: 339–374.Google Scholar