Abizadeh, Arash. ‘On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem.’ American Political Science Review 106 no. 4 (2012): 867–882.Google Scholar

Abraham, Itty. ‘Bandung and State Formation in Post-Colonial Asia,’ in Tan, See Seng and Acharya, Amitav (eds.) Bandung Revisited: The Legacy of the 1955 Asian-African Conference for International Order. Singapore: National University Press, 2008, 48–68.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav. ‘Studying the Bandung Conference from a Global IR Perspective.’ Australian Journal of International Affairs 70 no. 4 (2016): 342–357.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry. The Making of Global International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Acton, Lord. ‘Nationality,’ in Figgis, John Neville (ed.) The History of Freedom and Other Essays. London: MacMillan, 1907, 270–300.Google Scholar

Adalet, Begüm. ‘Infrastructures of Decolonization: Scales of Worldmaking in the Writings of Frantz Fanon.’ Political Theory 50 no. 1 (2022): 5–31.Google Scholar

Adas, Michael. ‘Contested Hegemony: The Great War and the Afro-Asian Assault on the Civilizing Mission Ideology.’ Journal of World History 15 no. 1 (2004): 31–63.Google Scholar

Adelman, Jeremy. ‘An Age of Imperial Revolutions.’ The American Historical Review 113 no. 2 (2008): 319–340.Google Scholar

Adelman, Jeremy. ‘Iberian Passages: Continuity and Change in the South Atlantic,’ in Armitage, David and Subrahmanyam, Sanjay (eds.) The Age of Revolutions in Global Context, c. 1760–1840. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, 59–64.Google Scholar

Adelman, Jeremy. Sovereignty and Revolution in the Iberian Atlantic. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Adelman, Jeremy. ‘Empires, Nations, and Revolutions.’ Journal of the History of Ideas 79 no. 1 (2018): 73–88.Google Scholar

Alexandrowicz, Charles Henry. ‘The Theory of Recognition In Fieri.’ British Yearbook of International Law 34 (1958): 176–198.Google Scholar

Alighieri, Dante. Monarchy, edited by Shaw, Prue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Almond, Gabriel A. ‘Comparative Political Systems.’ Journal of Politics 18 no. 3 (1956): 391–409.Google Scholar

Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1983.Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony. ‘Francisco De Vitoria and the Colonial Origins of International Law.’ Social & Legal Studies 5, no. 3 (1996): 321–336.Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony. ‘Bandung and the Origins of Third World Sovereignty,’ in Eslava, Luis, Fakhri, Michael, and Nesiah, Vasuki (eds.) Bandung, Global History, and International Law. Critical Pasts and Pending Futures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, 535–551.Google Scholar

Anon. Discourses upon the Modern Affairs of Europe. London, 1680.Google Scholar

Apter, David E. ‘Political Religion in the New Nations,’ in Geertz, Clifford (ed.) Old Societies and New States: The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa. New York: The Free Press, 1963, 57–104.Google Scholar

Apter, David E. The Politics of Modernization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Armitage, David. The Ideological Origins of the British Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Armitage, David. The Declaration of Independence. A Global History. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Armitage, David. ‘The Elephant and the Whale: Empires of Land and Sea.’ Journal for Maritime Research 9, no. 1 (2007): 23–36.Google Scholar

Armitage, David. ‘Globalizing Jeremy Bentham.’ History of Political Thought 32 no. 1 (2011): 63–82.Google Scholar

Armitage, David. Foundations of Modern International Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Armitage, David. Civil Wars. A History in Ideas. New York. Knopf, 2016.Google Scholar

Armitage, David et al. ‘Interchange: Nationalism and Internationalism in the Era of the Civil War.’ Journal of American History 98 no. 2 (2011): 455–489.Google Scholar

Armitage, David and Subrahmanyam, Sanjay (eds.) The Age of Revolutions in Global Context, c. 1760–1840. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar

Aron, Raymond. Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 2009.Google Scholar

Arusha Declaration and TANU’s Policy on Socialism and Self Reliance. Dar es Salaam: Publicity Section, Tanganyika African National Union, 1967.Google Scholar

Asian-African conference of Bandung, Final Communiqué. April 24, 1955.Google Scholar

d’Aubery, Antoine. Justes Pretentions du Roi sur l’Empire. Paris: Antione Bertier, 1667.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis. ‘Of Empire,’ in Bacon, Francis (ed.). Essays, Civil and Moral, Vol. II, Part I. New York: P. F. Collier & Son, 1909–1914.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis. ‘Of the True Greatness of Kingdoms and Estates,’ in Bacon, Francis (ed.), Essays, Civil and Moral, Vol. II, Part I. New York: P. F. Collier & Son, 1909–1914.Google Scholar

Baji, Tomohito. ‘Zionist Internationalism? Alfred Zimmern’s Post-racial Commonwealth.’ Modern Intellectual History 13 no. 3 (2016): 623–651.Google Scholar

Barkawi, Tarak. Soldiers of Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Barkawi, Tarak and Laffey, Mark. ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International relations.’ Millennium 31 no. 1 (2002): 109–127.Google Scholar

Barkin, J. Samuel and Cronin, Bruce, ‘The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations.’ International Organization 48 no. 1 (1994): 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barreto, José Manuel. ‘Cerberus: Rethinking Grotius and the Westphalian System,’ in Koskenniemi, Martti, Rech, Walter, and Jiménez Fonseca, Manuel (eds.), International Law and Empire: Historical Explorations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 149–175.Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. The Critique of the State. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. ‘Globalizing the Democratic Community.’ Ethics & Global Politics 1 no. 4 (2008): 159–174.Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. Visions of World Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. ‘The Social Construction of Globality.’ International Political Sociology 4 no. 3 (2010): 219–235.Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. Sovereignty as Symbolic Form. London & New York: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. ‘Acabando con el Imperio: Lusotropicalismo como ideología imperial.’ Relaciones Internacionales 30 (2015): 11–26.Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. ‘Recognition: A Short History.’ Ethics & International Affairs 30 no. 3 (2016): 303–321.Google Scholar

Baumgart, Winfried. ‘German Imperialism in Historical Perspective,’ in Knoll, Arthur J. and Gann, Lewis H. (eds.) Germans in the Tropics: Essays in German Colonial History. New York: Greenwood, 1987, 151–164.Google Scholar

Bayly, Christopher A. The Birth of the Modern World 1780–1914. Global Connections and Comparisons. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar

Bayly, Christopher A. Recovering Liberties: Indian thought in the Age of Liberalism and Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Bayly, Christopher A. and Biagini, Eugenio F.. Giuseppe Mazzini and the Globalization of Democratic Nationalism 1830–1920. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Bayly, Martin J. ‘Lineages of Indian International Relations: The Indian Council on World Affairs, The League of Nations, and the pedagogy of internationalism.’ International History Review 44 no. 4 (2022): 819–835.Google Scholar

Beaulac, Stéphane. ‘Emer de Vattel and the Externalization of Sovereignty.’ Journal of the History of International Law 5 no. 2 (2003): 237–292.Google Scholar

Beaulac, Stéphane. The Power of Language in the Making of International Law: The word sovereignty in Bodin and Vattel and the Myth of Westphalia. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2004.Google Scholar

Becker Lorca, Arnulf, ‘Universal International Law: Nineteenth-Century Histories of Imposition and Appropriation.’ Harvard International Law Journal 51 no. 2 (2010): 475–552.Google Scholar

Becker Lorca, Arnulf. Mestizo International Law. A Global Intellectual History 1842–1933. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Bell, David A. The Cult of the Nation in France: Inventing Nationalism, 1680–1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Bell, Duncan. The Idea of Greater Britain: Empire and the Future of World Order, 1860–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Bell, Duncan. ‘John Stuart Mill on Colonies.’ Political Theory 38, no. 1 (2010): 34–64.Google Scholar

Bell, Duncan. ‘Making and Taking Worlds,’ in Moyn, Samuel and Sartori, Andrew (eds.) Global Intellectual History. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013, 254–279.Google Scholar

Bell, Duncan. (ed.) Victorian Visions of Global Order: Empire and International Relations in Nineteenth-century Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Bell, Philip W. ‘Colonialism as a Problem in American Foreign Policy.’ World Politics 5 no. 1 (1952): 86–109.Google Scholar

Belmessous, Saliha. (ed.) Native Claims. Indigenous Law against Empire, 1500–1920. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Belmessous, Saliha. (ed.) Empire by Treaty: Negotiating European Expansion, 1600–1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Benner, Erica. ‘Nationalism: Intellectual Origins,’ in Breuilly, John (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of the History of Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, 37–55.Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907.Google Scholar

Benton, Lauren. Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Benton, Lauren. ‘From International Law to Imperial Constitutions: The Problem of Quasi-sovereignty, 1870–1900.’ Law and History Review 26 no. 3 (2008): 595–619.Google Scholar

Benton, Lauren. A Search for Sovereignty: Law and geography in European Empires, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Benton, Lauren. ‘Possessing Empire. Iberian claims and interpolity law,’ in Belmessous, Saliha (ed.) Native Claims: Indigenous Law against Empire, 1500–1920. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, 19–40.Google Scholar

Benton, Lauren. ‘Beyond Anachronism: Histories of International Law and Global Legal Politics.’ Journal of the History of International Law 21 no. 1 (2019): 7–40.Google Scholar

Benton, Lauren and Clulow, Adam. ‘Empire and Protection: Making Interpolity Law in the Early Modern World.’ Journal of Global History 12 no. 1 (2017): 74–92.Google Scholar

Benton, Lauren and Straumann, Benjamin. ‘Acquiring Empire by Law: From Roman Doctrine to Early Modern European Practice.’ Law & History Review 28 no. 1 (2010): 1–38.Google Scholar

Benton, Lauren and Ford, Lisa. Rage for Order: The British Empire and the Origins of International Law 1800–1850. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Benton, Lauren and Ross, Richard J.. (eds.) Legal Pluralism and Empires, 1500–1850. New York: New York University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Benton, Lauren, Clulow, Adam, and Attwood, Bain (eds.) Protection and Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Berger, Stefan. ‘Building the Nation among Visions of German Empire,’ in Berger, Stefan and Miller, Alexei (eds.) Nationalizing Empires. Budapest: Central European University Press, 2015, 247–308.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. ‘Nationalism: Past Neglect and Present Power,’ in Hardy, H. (ed.) Against the Current. Essays in the History of Ideas. New York: Viking Press, 1980, 333–355.Google Scholar

Berman, Nathaniel. ‘Sovereignty in Abeyance: Self-determination and International Law.’ Wisconsin International Law Journal 7 (1988): 51–105.Google Scholar

Bernard, Mountague. On the Principle of Non-Intervention. A Lecture Delivered in the Hall of All Souls College. Oxford & London: J. H. Parker, 1860.Google Scholar

von Bernstorff, Jochen and Dann, Philipp (eds.) The Battle for International Law: South-North Perspectives on the Decolonization Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Béthune, Maximilien de. Duc de Sully. Grand Design of Henry IV, from Memoirs of Maximilian de Béthune duc de Sully. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1921.Google Scholar

Beverley, Eric Lewis. ‘Introduction: Rethinking Sovereignty, Colonial Empires, and Nation-States in South Asia and Beyond.’ Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 40 no. 3 (2020): 407–420.Google Scholar

Bew, John. Realpolitik: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Bhabha, Homi K. ‘Introduction: Narrating the Nation,’ in Bhabha, Homi K. (ed.) Nation and Narration. London & New York. Routledge, 1990, 1–7.Google Scholar

Blachford, Kevin. ‘Revisiting the Expansion Thesis: International Society and the Role of the Dutch East India Company as a Merchant Empire.’ European Journal of International Relations 26 no. 4 (2020): 1230–1248.Google Scholar

Blackburn, Robin. ‘Haiti, Slavery, and the Age of the Democratic Revolution.’ The William and Mary Quarterly 63 no. 4 (2006): 643–674.Google Scholar

Blaufarb, Rafe. ‘The Western Question: The Geopolitics of Latin American Independence.’ American Historical Review 112 no. 3 (2007): 742–763.Google Scholar

Blay, Kwaw Nyameke. ‘Self-determination versus Territorial Integrity in Decolonization.’ New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 18 (1985): 441–472.Google Scholar

Bluntschli, Johann Kaspar. The Theory of the State. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1885.Google Scholar

Bodin, Jean. Six Bookes of a Commonwealth. trans. by Knolles. London: G. Bishop, 1606.Google Scholar

Bodin, Jean. Method for the Easy Comprehension of History. trans. by Beatrice Reynolds. New York: Columbia University Press, 1945.Google Scholar

Bonnot, Gabriel, de Mably, Abbé. The Principles of Negotiations: or, An Introduction to The Public Law of Europe Founded on Treaties. London: James Rivington and James Fletcher, 1758.Google Scholar

Bosbach, Franz. ‘The European Debate on Universal Monarchy,’ in Armitage, David (ed.) Theories of Empire 1450–1800. Farnham: Ashgate, 1998.Google Scholar

Botella-Ordinas, Eva. ‘Exempt from Time and from Its Fatal Change’: Spanish Imperial Ideology, 1450–1700.’ Renaissance Studies 26 no. 4 (2012): 580–604.Google Scholar

Bowden, Brett. ‘The Colonial Origins of International Law: European Expansion and the Classical Standard of Civilization.’ Journal of the History of International Law 7 no. 1, (2005): 1–23.Google Scholar

Branch, Jordan. The Cartographic State: Maps, Territory, and the Origins of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Braun, Harald E. Juan de Mariana and Early Modern Spanish Political Thought. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar

Brett, Annabel S. Liberty, Right and Nature: Individual Rights in Later Scholastic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, 165–204.Google Scholar

Brett, Annabel S. Changes of State: Nature and the Limits of the City in Early Modern Natural Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Brett, Annabel S. ‘The Space of Politics and the Space of War in Hugo Grotius’s De iure belli ac pacis.’ Global Intellectual History 1 no. 1 (2018): 33–60.Google Scholar

Brett, Annabel S. ‘The Subject of Sovereignty: Law, Politics and Moral Reasoning in Hugo Grotius.’ Modern Intellectual History 17 no. 3 (2020): 619–645.Google Scholar

Breuilly, John. ‘Modern Empires and Nation-States.’ Thesis Eleven 139 no. 1 (2017): 11–29.Google Scholar

Brooke, Christopher. ‘Eighteenth-century Carthage,’ in Kapossy, Béla, Nakhimovsky, Isaac and Whatmore, Richard (eds.) Commerce and Peace in the Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, 110–124.Google Scholar

Brown, Judith M. ‘Nehru-the Dilemmas of a Colonial Inheritance,’ in Dülffer, Jost and Frey, Marc (eds.) Elites and Decolonization in the Twentieth Century. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, 177–194.Google Scholar

Brown, Matthew (ed.) Informal Empire in Latin America: Culture, Commerce and Capital. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008.Google Scholar

Brown, Wendy. Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian. ‘An Essay in the History of the Principle of Self-determination,’ in Alexandrowicz, C. H. (ed.) Studies in the History of the Law of Nations. Dordrecht: Springer, 1970, 90–99.Google Scholar

Buck-Morss, Susan. Hegel, Haiti, and Universal History. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Budd, Malcolm. ‘Wittgenstein on Seeing Aspects.’ Mind 96 no. 381 (1987): 1–17.Google Scholar

Bukovansky, Mlada. Legitimacy and Power Politics: The American and French Revolutions in International Political Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan, 1977.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley. ‘The Emergence of a Universal International Society,’ in Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.) The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984, 117–126.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam, ‘Introduction,’ in Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds) The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Burbank, Jane and Cooper, Frederick. Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Burke, Anthony et al. ‘Planet Politics: A manifesto from the End of IR.’ Millennium 44 no. 3 (2016): 499–523.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. Letters on a Regicide Peace, Select Works of Edmund Burke, Vol. 3. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1874–1878.Google Scholar

Burnard, Trevor. ‘Empire Matters? The Historiography of Imperialism in Early America, 1492–1830.’ History of European Ideas 33 no. 1 (2007): 87–107.Google Scholar

Bushnell, David (ed.) El Libertador: Writings of Simon Bolívar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity, and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Byrne, Jeffrey James. Mecca of Revolution: Algeria, Decolonization, and Third World Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Cabral, Amílcar. ‘National Liberation and Culture.’ Transitions 45 (1974): 12–17.Google Scholar

Cabral, Amílcar. Unity and Struggle: Speeches and Writings of Amílcar Cabral. trans. by Michael Wolfers. London and New York: Monthly Review Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Campanella, Tommaso. A Discourse Touching the Spanish Monarchy. London: Philemon Stephens, 1654.Google Scholar

Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge. ‘Racial, Religious, and Civic Creole Identity in Colonial Spanish America.’ American Literary History 17 no. 3 (2005): 420–437.Google Scholar

Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge. Nature, Empire, and Nation: Explorations of the History of Science in the Iberian World. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Cardoso Reis, Bruno. ‘Portugal and the UN: A Rogue State Resisting the Norm of Decolonization (1956–1974).’ Portuguese Studies 29 no. 2 (2013): 251–276.Google Scholar

Carrington, Charles E. ‘Decolonization: The Last Stages.’ International Affairs 38 no. 1 (1962): 29–40.Google Scholar

de Carvalho, Benjamin, Leira, Halvard, and Hobson, John M.. ‘The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths that Your Teachers Still Tell You about 1648 and 1919.’ Millennium 39 no. 3 (2011): 735–758.Google Scholar

Castelo, Cláudia. O Modo Português de Estar no Mundo: O lusotropicalismo e a ideologia colonial portuguesa, 1933–1961. Porto: Edições Afrontamento, 1998.Google Scholar

Castro-Klarén, Sara. ‘Framing Pan-Americanism: Simon Bolivar’s Findings.’ New Centennial Review 3 no. 1 (2003): 25–53.Google Scholar

Cavallar, George. ‘Vitoria, Grotius, Pufendorf, Wolff and Vattel: Accomplices of European Colonialism and Exploitation or True Cosmopolitans?’ Journal of the History of International Law 10 no. 2 (2008): 181–209.Google Scholar

Cello, Lorenzo. ‘The Legitimacy of International Interventions in Vattel’s The Law of Nations.’ Global Intellectual History 2 no. 2 (2018): 105–123.Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. ‘Planetary Crises and the Difficulty of Being Modern.’ Millennium 46 no. 3 (2018): 259–282.Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Chambers, Sarah C. and Charles Chasteen, John (eds.) Latin American Independence: An Anthology of Sources. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2010.Google Scholar

Chandler, David. ‘The Transvaluation of Critique in the Anthropocene.’ Global Society 33 no. 1 (2019): 26–44.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, Partha. Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, Partha. The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Chiong Rivero, Horacio. The Rise of Pseudo-Historical Fiction: Fray Antonio de Guevara’s Novelizations. New York: Peter Lang, 2004.Google Scholar

Chowdhury, Arjun. The Myth of International Order. Why Weak States Persist and Alternatives to the State Fade Away. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Christian, David. ‘World History in Context.’ Journal of World History 14 no. 3 (2003): 437–458.Google Scholar

Christian, David. ‘The Return of Universal History.’ History and Theory 49 no. 4 (2010): 6–27.Google Scholar

Clark, Ian. International Legitimacy and World Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Clark, Martin. ‘A Conceptual History of Recognition in British International Legal Thought.’ British Yearbook of International Law 87 no. 1 (2017): 18–97.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean L. Globalization and Sovereignty: Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy, and Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Collier, Simon. ‘Nationality, Nationalism, and Supranationalism in the Writings of Simón Bolívar.’ Hispanic American Historical Review 63 no. 1 (1983): 37–64.Google Scholar

Collins, Michael. ‘Decolonisation and the “federal moment”.’ Diplomacy & Statecraft 24 no. 1 (2013): 21–40.Google Scholar

Collins, Michael. Empire, Nationalism, and the Postcolonial World: Rabindranath Tagore’s Writings on History, Politics and Society. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Condorcet, Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat, Marquis de. Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind: Tenth Epoch. trans. by Keith Michael Baker. Daedalus 133 no. 3, (2004): 65–82.Google Scholar

Connolly, William E. Facing the Planetary: Entangled humanism and the Politics of Swarming. Durham: Duke University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Constant, Benjamin. Political Writings, edited by Fontana, Biancamaria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Cooper, Frederick. ‘Alternatives to Empire: France and Africa after World War II,’ in Howland, Douglas and White, Luise (eds.) The State of Sovereignty: Territories, Laws, Populations. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008, 94–123.Google Scholar

Cooper, Frederick. ‘Alternatives to Nationalism in French Africa, 1945–1960,’ in Dülffer, Jost and Frey, Marc (eds.) Elites and Decolonization in the Twentieth Century. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, 110–137.Google Scholar

Cooper, Frederick. Citizenship between Empire and Nation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Corry, Olaf and Stevenson, Hayley. ‘IR and the Earth: Societal Multiplicity and Planetary Singularity,’ in Corry, Olaf and Stevenson, Hayley (eds.) Traditions and Trends in Global Environmental Politics. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017, 1–25.Google Scholar

Costa Lopez, Julia, De Carvalho, Benjamin, Andrew Latham, , Zarakol, Ayşe, Bartelson, Jens, and Holm, Minda. ‘In the Beginning There Was No Word (for it): Terms, Concepts, and Early Sovereignty.’ International Studies Review 20 no. 3 (2018): 489–519.Google Scholar

Coupland, Reginald. The Study of the British Commonwealth. An Inaugural Lecture Delivered before the University of Oxford. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1921.Google Scholar

Craven, Matthew. ‘Statehood, Self-determination, and Recognition,’ in Evans, Malcolm D. (ed.) International Law. Oxford: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, 203–251.Google Scholar

Crawford, James. The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Croxton, Derek. ‘The Peace of Westphalia of 1648 and the Origins of Sovereignty.’ The International History Review 21 no. 3 (1999): 569–591.Google Scholar

Croxton, Derek. Westphalia: The Last Christian Peace. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2013.Google Scholar

Crutzen, Paul J. ‘Geology of Mankind.’ Nature 415 p. 23 (2002): 17–18.Google Scholar

Crutzen, Paul J. and Stoermer, Eugene F.. ‘The ‘Anthropocene.’ IGBP Newsletter 41, (Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, 2000), 17–18.Google Scholar

Dahm, Bernhard. Sukarno and the Struggle for Indonesian Independence. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Dandelet, Thomas James. The Renaissance of Empire in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Davenant, Charles. An Essay upon Universal Monarchy: Written in the year 1701 soon after Lewis the Fourteenth had settled his grandson Philip de Bourbon upon the throne of Spain. London: James, John and Paul Knapton, 1734.Google Scholar

Defoe, Daniel. The Interests of the Several Princes and States of Europe consider’d, with respect to the succession of the crown of Spain, and the titles of the several pretenders thereto examin’d. London, 1698.Google Scholar

Delanty, Gerard and Mota, Aurea. ‘Governing the Anthropocene: Agency, Governance, Knowledge.’ European Journal of Social Theory 20 no. 1 (2017): 9–38.Google Scholar

Deutsch, Karl W. Nationalism and Social Communication: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Nationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Devetak, Richard. ‘Law of Nations as Reason of State: Diplomacy and the Balance of Power in Vattel’s Law of Nations.’ Parergon 28 no. 2 (2011): 105–128.Google Scholar

Devetak, Richard. ‘The Fear of Universal Monarchy’: Balance of Power as an Ordering Practice of Liberty.’ Proceedings of the British Academy 190 (2013): 121–137.Google Scholar

Dia, Mamadou. The African Nations and World Solidarity, trans. by Mercer Cook. New York: Praeger, 1961.Google Scholar

de Donno, Fabrizio. ‘The Gandhian Mazzini: Democratic Nationalism, Self-Rule, and Non-Violence.’ in Bayly, Christopher A. and Biagini, Eugenio F. (eds.). Giuseppe Mazzini and the Globalization of Democratic Nationalism 1830–1920. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 374–398.Google Scholar

Doyle, Michael. Empires. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Dubois, Laurent. Avengers of the New World: The Story of the Haitian Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Dunn, John. ‘Why We Need a Global History of Political Thought,’ in Kapossy, Béla (ed.) Markets, Morals, Politics: Jealousy of Trade and the History of Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018, 285–309.Google Scholar

Dwyer, Philip. ‘Napoleon and the Universal Monarchy.’ History 95 no. 319 (2010): 293–307.Google Scholar

Eagleton, Clyde. ‘Excesses of Self-determination.’ Foreign Affairs 31 no. 4 (1953): 592–604.Google Scholar

Eagleton, Clyde. ‘Self-determination in the United Nations.’ American Journal of International Law 47 no. 1 (1953): 88–93.Google Scholar

Eckert, Andreas. ‘Julius Nyerere, Tanzanian Elites, and the Project of African Socialism,’ in Dülffer, Jost and Frey, Marc (eds.) Elites and Decolonization in the Twentieth Century. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, 216–240.Google Scholar

Egyptian Delegation, Collection of Official Correspondence from November 11, 1918 to July 14, 1919. Paris, 1919.Google Scholar

Egyptian Delegation, The Egyptian National Claims. A Memorandum Presented to the Peace Conference by the Egyptian Delegation Charged with the Defence of Egyptian Independence. Paris, 1919.Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, Shmul N. The Political Systems of Empires. New York: The Free Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Elden, Stuart. The Birth of Territory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Elliott, John H. ‘A Europe of Composite Monarchies.’ Past & Present 137 (1992): 48–71.Google Scholar

Emerson, Rupert. From Empire to Nation: The Rise to Self-Assertion of Asian and African Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Epstein, Charlotte. Birth of the State: The Place of the Body in Crafting Modern Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Eslava, Luis, Fakhri, Michael, and Nesiah, Vasuki (eds.) Bandung, Global History, and International Law: Critical Pasts and Pending Futures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Eslava, Luis, Fakhri, Michael, and Nesiah, Vasuki. ‘The Spirit of Bandung,’ in Eslava, Luis, Fakhri, Michael, and Nesiah, Vasuki (eds.) Bandung, Global History, and International Law: Critical Pasts and Pending Futures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, 3–32.Google Scholar

Evans, Neil. “A World Empire, Sea Girt’: The British Empire, State, and Nations, 1780–1914,’ in Berger, Stefan and Miller, Alexei (eds.) Nationalizing Empires. Budapest: Central European University Press, 2015, 31–97.Google Scholar

Fabry, Mikulas. Recognizing States: International Society and the Establishment of New States since 1776. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Fagan, Madeleine. ‘Security in the Anthropocene: Environment, Ecology, Escape.’ European Journal of International Relations 23 no. 2 (2017): 292–314.Google Scholar

Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. trans. by Constance Farrington. New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1963.Google Scholar

Farr, James. ‘Francis Lieber and the Interpretation of American Political Science.’ Journal of Politics 52 no. 4 (1990): 1027–1049.Google Scholar

Fasolt, Constantin. The Limits of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Fawcett, Louise. ‘Between West and Non-West: Latin American Contributions to International Thought.’ International History Review 34 no. 4 (2012): 679–704.Google Scholar

Fejzula, Merve. ‘The Cosmopolitan Historiography of Twentieth-Century Federalism.’ Historical Journal 64 no. 2 (2021): 477–500.Google Scholar

Fernández-Santamaría, José A. The State, War and Peace: Spanish Political Thought in the Renaissance 1516–1559. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Ferrand, Julie and Orain, Arnaud, ‘Abbé de Mably on Commerce, Luxury, and Classical Republicanism.’ Journal of the History of Economic Thought 39 no. 2 (2017): 199–221.Google Scholar

Fiore, Pasquale. Nouveau Droit International Public Suivant des Besoins de la Civilization Moderne, Vols. I-II. trans. by Charles Antoine. Paris: A. Durand et Pedone-Lauriel, 1885.Google Scholar

Fiore, Pasquale. International Law Codified and its Legal Sanction; or, The Legal Organization of the Society of States. New York: Baker, Voorhis, & Co, 1918.Google Scholar

Fisch, Jörg. The Right of Self-determination of Peoples: The Domestication of an Illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Andrew. Sovereignty, Property and Empire, 1500–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Andrew. ‘A Discourse Concerning the Affairs of Spain,’ in Fletcher, Andrew (ed.) Political Works. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, 84–117.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Andrew. ‘The Problem of Eurocentrism in the Thought of Francisco de Vitoria,’ in Maria Beneyto, José and Corti Varela, Justo (eds.) At the Origins of Modernity: Francisco de Vitoria and the Discovery of International Law. Cham: Springer, 2017, 77–93.Google Scholar

Forsyth, Murray. ‘The Old European States-System: Gentz versus Hauterive.’ The Historical Journal 23 no. 3 (1980): 521–538.Google Scholar

Fontana, Biancamaria. ‘The Napoleonic Empire and the Europe of Nations,’ in Pagden, Anthony (ed.) The Idea of Europe: From Antiquity to the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, 116–128.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History,’ in Bouchard, David (ed.) Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 139–164.Google Scholar

Franklin, Julian H. Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Fraser, Cary. ‘Decolonization and the Cold War,’ in Immerman, Richard H. and Goedde, Petra (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, 469–485.Google Scholar

Gaffield, Julia (ed.) The Haitian Declaration of Independence: Creation, Context, and Legacy. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Gallagher, John and Robinson, Ronald. ‘The Imperialism of Free Trade.’ Economic History Review 6 no. 1 (1953): 1–15.Google Scholar

Gaston, Sean. The Concept of the World from Kant to Derrida. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2013.Google Scholar

Geggus, David. ‘The Caribbean in the Age of Revolution,’ in Armitage, David and Subrahmanyam, Sanjay (eds.) The Age of Revolutions in Global Context, c. 1760–1840. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, 59–82.Google Scholar

van Gelderen, Martin. ‘From Domingo de Soto to Hugo Grotius: Theories of Monarchy and Civil Power in Spanish and Dutch Political thought, 1555–1609,’ in Darby, Graham (ed.) Origins and Development of the Dutch Revolt. Abingdon: Routledge, 2001, 151–170.Google Scholar

van Gelderen, Martin. ‘Universal Monarchy, the Rights of War and Peace and the Balance of Power. Europe’s Quest for Civil Order,’ in Persson, Hans-Åke and Stråth, Bo (eds.) Reflections on Europe. Defining a Political Order in Time and Space. Brussels: Peter Lang, 2007, 49–72.Google Scholar

Gellner, Ernest. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

von Gentz, Friedrich. On the State of Europe Before and After the French Revolution. London: J. Hatchard, 1802.Google Scholar

von Gentz, Friedrich. Fragments upon the Balance of Power in Europe. London: M. Peltier, 1806.Google Scholar

Gerwarth, Robert and Manela, Erez. ‘The Great War as a Global War: Imperial Conflict and the Reconfiguration of World Order, 1911–1923.’ Diplomatic History 38 no. 4 (2014): 786–800.Google Scholar

Getachew, Adom. Worldmaking after Empire: The Rise and Fall of Self-determination. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Getachew, Adom. ‘The State’s Imperial Shadows.’ Ethics & International Affairs 35 no. 4 (2021): 503–513.Google Scholar

Gandhi, Mohandas K. Hind Swaraj or Indian Home Rule. Ahmedabad: Navajivan Press, 1938.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. ‘The Integrative Revolution: Primordial Sentiments and Civil Politics in the New States,’ in Geertz, Clifford (ed.) Old Societies and New States: The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa. New York: The Free Press, 1963, 105–157.Google Scholar

Ghervas, Stella. Conquering Peace: From the Enlightenment to the European Union. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Gibbon, Edward. The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. New York: Modern Library, sa.Google Scholar

Gilman, Nils. Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Glanville, Luke. ‘The Myth of “traditional” Sovereignty.’ International Studies Quarterly 57 no. 1 (2013): 79–90.Google Scholar

Glanville, Luke. Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect: A New History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Glanville, Luke. ‘Responsibility to Perfect: Vattel’s Conception of Duties beyond Borders.’ International Studies Quarterly 61 no. 2 (2017): 385–395.Google Scholar

Go, Julian. Patterns of Empire: The British and American Empires, 1688 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Go, Julian. ‘Fanon’s Postcolonial Cosmopolitanism.’ European Journal of Social Theory 16 no. 2 (2013): 208–225.Google Scholar

Golove, David M. and Hulsebosch, Daniel J.. ‘Civilized Nation: The Early American Constitution, the Law of Nations, and the Pursuit of International Recognition.’ New York University Law Review 85 (2010): 932–1066.Google Scholar

Gong, Gerrit W. The Standard of Civilization in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Goswami, Manu. ‘Rethinking the Modular Nation Form: Toward a Sociohistorical Conception of Nationalism.’ Comparative Studies in Society and History 44 no. 4 (2002): 770–799.Google Scholar

Goswami, Manu. ‘Imaginary Futures and Colonial Internationalisms.’ American Historical Review 117 no. 5 (2012): 1461–1485.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, Stephen. Marvelous Possessions: The Wonder of the New World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Greenfeld, Liah. Nationalism: Five Roads to Modernity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Gross, Leo ‘The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948.’ American Journal of International Law 42 no. 1 (1948): 20–41.Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo. De Iure Belli ac Pacis Libri Tres, edited by Tuck, Richard. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005.Google Scholar

de Guevara, Antonio. The Diall of Princes: Compiled by the reuerende father in God, Don Anthony of Gueuara, Bysshop of Guadix. trans. by Thomas North. London, 1557.Google Scholar

Guilhot, Nicolas. ‘Imperial Realism: Post-War IR Theory and Decolonization.’ The International History Review 36 no. 4 (2014): 698–720.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. ‘Hugo Grotius and the History of Political Thought.’ Political Theory 13 no. 2 (1985): 239–265.Google Scholar

Haddock, Bruce. ‘State and Nation in Mazzini’s Political Thought.’ History of Political Thought 20 no. 2 (1999): 313–336.Google Scholar

Haddour, Azzedine. ‘Remembering Sartre,’ in Sartre, Jean-Paul (ed.) Colonialism and Neocolonialism. London & New York: Routledge, 2006, 1–16.Google Scholar

Haldén, Peter. ‘A Non-Sovereign Modernity: Attempts to Engineer Stability in the Balkans 1820–90.’ Review of International Studies 39 no. 2 (2013): 337–359.Google Scholar

Haldén, Peter. Stability without Statehood: Lessons from Europe’s History before the Sovereign State. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011.Google Scholar

Hall, John A. ‘Taking Megalomanias Seriously: Rough Notes.’ Thesis Eleven 139 no. 1 (2017): 30–45.Google Scholar

Hall, Rodney Bruce. National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Hardt, Michael and Antonio, Negri. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Harrington, Cameron. ‘The Ends of the World: International Relations and the Anthropocene.’ Millennium 44 no. 3 (2016): 478–498.Google Scholar

Harris, C. C. and Nyerere, Julius. ‘Tanganyika Today.’ International Affairs 36 no. 1 (1960): 35–47.Google Scholar

Hatta, Mohammed. Portrait of a Patriot: Selected Writings of Mohammed Hatta. The Hague: Mouton, 1972.Google Scholar

d’Hauterive Comte, Alexandre Maurice Blanc de Lanautte. State of the French Republic at the End of the Year VIII. trans. by Lewis Goldsmith. London: J. S. Jordon, 1801.Google Scholar

Havercroft, Jonathan. Captives of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Hazareesingh, Sudhir. Saint-Napoleon. Celebrations of Sovereignty in Nineteenth Century France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Headley, John M. ‘The Emperor and His Chancellor: Disputes over Empire, Administration and Pope (1519–1529),’ in Carlos V y la quiebra del humanismo político en Europa (1530–1558). Madrid: Sociedad Estatal para la Comemoración de los Centenarios de Felipe II y Carlos V, 2001, 21–35.Google Scholar

Headley, John M. The Emperor and His Chancellor: A Study of the Imperial Chancellery under Gattinara. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Headley, John M. Tommaso Campanella and the Transformation of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Headley, John M. ‘The Habsburg World Empire and the Revival of Ghibellinism,’ in Armitage, David (ed.) Theories of Empire 1450–1800. Farnham: Ashgate, 1998, 45–79.Google Scholar

Heater, Derek. National Self-Determination: Woodrow Wilson and His Legacy. London: Macmillan, 1994.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. The Philosophy of History. trans. by J. Sibree. Kitchener: Batoche Books, 2001.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. ‘The Origin of the Work of Art,’ in Heidegger, Martin and Krell, David Farrell (eds.) Basic Writings. New York: Harper Collins, 1993, 139–212.Google Scholar

Heiskanen, Jaakko. ‘Spectra of Sovereignty: Nationalism and International Relations,’ International Political Sociology 13 no. 3 (2019): 315–332.Google Scholar

Heiskanen, Jaakko. The Ethnos of the Earth: Nationalism, Ethnicity, and International Order. Dissertation, POLIS, University of Cambridge, 2020.Google Scholar

Herz, John. ‘Rise and Demise of the Territorial State.’ World Politics 9 no. 4 (1957): 473–493.Google Scholar

Herzog, Tamar. ‘Communities Becoming a Nation: Spain and Spanish America in the Wake of Modernity (and thereafter).’ Citizenship Studies 11 no. 2 (2007): 151–172.Google Scholar

Herzog, Tamar. Defining Nations: Immigrants and Citizens in Early Modern Spain and Spanish America. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Hill, Christopher L. ‘Conceptual Universalization in the Transnational Nineteenth Century,’ in Moyn, Samuel and Sartori, Andrew (eds.) Global Intellectual History. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013, 134–158.Google Scholar

Hinsley, Francis Harry. Power and the Pursuit of Peace: Theory and Practice in the History of Relations between States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Hinsley, Francis Harry. Nationalism and the International System. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1973.Google Scholar

Hirschi, Caspar. The Origins of Nationalism: An Alternative History from Ancient Rome to Early Modern Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, edited by Tuck, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Hobson, John M. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Hobson, John M. ‘The Twin Self-delusions of IR: Why “hierarchy” and not “anarchy” is the Core Concept of IR.’ Millennium 42 no. 3 (2014): 557–575.Google Scholar

Hobson, John M. and Sharman, Jason C.. ‘The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change.’ European Journal of International Relations 11 no. 1 (2005): 63–98.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Stanley. ‘Hedley Bull and His Contribution to International Relations.’ International Affairs 62 no. 2 (1986): 179–195.Google Scholar

Holland, Ben. ‘The Moral Person of the State: Emer de Vattel and the Foundations of International Legal Order.’ History of European Ideas 37 no. 4 (2011): 438–445.Google Scholar

Holland, Ben. The Moral Person of the State: Pufendorf, Sovereignty and Composite Polities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Hom, Stephanie Malia. ‘On the Origins of Making Italy: Massimo D’Azeglio and ‘fatta l’Italia, bisogna fare gli italiani’.’ Italian Culture 31 no. 1 (2013): 1–16.Google Scholar

Hont, István. ‘The Rich Country – Poor Country Debate in the Scottish Classical Political Economy,’ in Hont, István and Ignatieff, Michael (eds.) Wealth & Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983, 271–315.Google Scholar

Hont, István. ‘The Permanent Crisis of a Divided Mankind: “Contemporary crisis of the nation state” in Historical Perspective.’ Political Studies 42 no. 1 (1994): 166–231.Google Scholar

Hont, István. Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation State in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian. ‘Vattel’s Law of Nations: Diplomatic Casuistry for the Protestant Nation.’ Grotiana 31 no. 1 (2010): 108–140.Google Scholar

Hörnqvist, Michael. Machiavelli and Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Hörnqvist, Michael. ‘Machiavelli’s Three Desires: Florentine Republicans on Liberty, Empire, and Justice,’ in Muthu, Sankar (ed.) Empire and Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7–29.Google Scholar

Iggers, Georg G. The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of Historical Thought from Herder to the Present. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Imbruglia, Girolamo. ‘Civilisation and Colonisation: Enlightenment Theories in the Debate between Diderot and Raynal.’ History of European Ideas 41 no. 7 (2015): 858–882.Google Scholar

Isabella, Maurizio. ‘Mazzini’s Internationalism in Context: From the Cosmopolitan Patriotism of the Italian Carbonari to Mazzini’s Europe of the Nations,’ in Bayly, Christopher A. and Biagini, Eugenio F. (eds.) Giuseppe Mazzini and the Globalization of Democratic Nationalism 1830–1920. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 37–58.Google Scholar

Isabella, Maurizio. ‘The Political Thought of a New Constitutional Monarchy: Piedmont after 1848,’ in Moggach, Douglas and Stedman Jones, Gareth (eds.) The 1848 Revolutions and European Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, 383–404.Google Scholar

Jacob, Christian. The Sovereign Map. Theoretical Approaches in Cartography Throughout History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Jahn, Beate. ‘Kant, Mill, and Illiberal Legacies in International Affairs.’ International Organization 59 no. 1 (2005): 177–207.Google Scholar

Jakšić, Ivan. Selected Writings of Andrés Bello. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Jakšić, Ivan. Andrés Bello: Scholarship and nation-building in nineteenth-century Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Jansen, Jan C. and Osterhammel, Jürgen. Decolonization: A Short History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Jaume, Lucien. ‘Citizen and State under the French Revolution,’ in Skinner, Quentin and Stråth, Bo (eds.) States and Citizens: History, Theory, Prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 131–144.Google Scholar

Jennings, W. Ivor. The Approach to Self-government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1956.Google Scholar

Jones, Branwen Gruffydd. ‘Race, Culture and Liberation: African Anticolonial Thought and Practice in the Time of Decolonisation.’ The International History Review 42 no. 6 (2020): 1238–1256.Google Scholar

Jones, H. S. ‘The Idea of the National in Victorian Political Thought.’ European Journal of Political Theory 5 no. 1 (2006): 12–21.Google Scholar

Jouannet, Emmanuelle. ‘The Disappearance of the Concept of Empire. Or, the Beginning of the End of Empires in Europe from the 18th century.’ Presentation at the Conference ‘A Just Empire? Rome’s Legal Legacy and the Justification of War and Empire in International Law.’ Commemorative Conference on Alberico Gentili (1552–1608). New York University School of Law, 13–15 March 2008.Google Scholar

von Justi, Johann Heinrich Gottlob. Historische und Juristische Schriften, Vol. 1. Frankfurt & Leipzig: Garbe, 1760.Google Scholar

Kapila, Shruti. Violent Fraternity: Indian Political Thought in the Global Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Kedourie, Elie. Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.Google Scholar

Keene, Edward. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Keitner, Chimène I. ‘National Self‐Determination in Historical Perspective: The Legacy of the French Revolution for Today’s Debates.’ International Studies Review 2 no. 3 (2000): 3–26.Google Scholar

Kelly, Duncan. ‘Popular Sovereignty as State Theory in the Nineteenth Century,’ in Bourke, Richard and Skinner, Quentin (eds.) Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, 270–296.Google Scholar

Kelly, Duncan. ‘The Goal of that Pure and Noble Yearning’ Friedrich Meinecke’s Visions of 1848,’ in Moggach, Douglas and Stedman Jones, Gareth (eds.) The 1848 Revolutions and European Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, 293–321.Google Scholar

Kelly, Duncan. Politics and the Anthropocene. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2019.Google Scholar

King, Preston T. The Ideology of Order: A Comparative Analysis of Jean Bodin and Thomas Hobbes. London: Allen & Unwin, 1974.Google Scholar

Koebner, Richard. Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Koenigsberger, Helmut Georg. ‘Dominium Regale or Dominium Politicum Et Regale: Monarchies and Parliaments in Early Modern Europe,’ in Koenigsberger, Helmut G. (ed.) Politicians and Virtuosi: Essays on Early Modern History. London: Hambledon Press, 1986, 1–26.Google Scholar

Koenigsberger, Helmut Georg. ‘Composite States, Representative Institutions and the American Revolution.’ Historical Research 62 no. 148 (1989): 135–153.Google Scholar

Kohn, Hans. ‘Treitschke: National Prophet.’ The Review of Politics 7 no. 4 (1945): 418–440.Google Scholar

Kohn, Hans. The Idea of Nationalism: A Study in Its Origins and Background. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 2008.Google Scholar

Komlosy, Andrea. ‘Imperial Cohesion, Nation-Building, and Regional Integration in the Habsburg Monarchy,’ in Berger, Stefan and Miller, Alexei (eds.) Nationalizing Empires. Budapest: Central European University Press, 2015, 369–428.Google Scholar

Korean Delegation, Claim of the Korean People and Nation for Liberation from Japan and for the Reconstitution of Korea as an Independent State. Memorandum, Paris, April 1919.Google Scholar

Koselleck, Reinhart. ‘Historical Criteria of the Modern Concept of Revolution,’ in Koselleck, Reinhart (ed.) Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985, 39–54.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘Empire and International Law: The Real Spanish Contribution.’ University of Toronto Law Journal 61 no. 1 (2011): 1–36.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘Race, Hierarchy and International Law: Lorimer’s Legal Science.’ European Journal of International Law 27 no. 2 (2016): 415–429.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. To the Uttermost Parts of the Earth: Legal Imagination and International Power 1300–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D. ‘Westphalia and All That,’ in Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O. (eds.) Ideas and Foreign Policy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993, 235–264.Google Scholar

Kreijen, Gerard and Jennings, Robert Y.. State Failure, Sovereignty and Effectiveness: Legal Lessons from the Decolonization of Sub-Saharan Africa. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2004.Google Scholar

Kripp, Jacob. ‘The Creative Advance Must Be Defended: Miscegenation, Metaphysics, and Race War in Jan Smuts’s Vision of the League of Nations.’ American Political Science Review 116 no. 3 (2022): 940–953.Google Scholar

Kristensen, Peter Marcus. ‘Subject Matters: Imperialism and the Constitution of International Relations.’ Review of International Studies (2022): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210522000420Google Scholar

Kumar, Krishan. ‘Nation-States as Empires, Empires as Nation-States: Two Principles, One Practice?’ Theory and Society 39, no. 2 (2010): 119–143.Google Scholar

Kumar, Krishan. Visions of Empire: How Five Imperial Regimes Shaped the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Kumar, Krishan. Empires: A Historical and Political Sociology. Oxford: Polity Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Körner, Axel. ‘Beyond Nation States: New Perspectives on the Habsburg Empire.’ European History Quarterly 48 no. 3 (2018): 516–533.Google Scholar

Lake, David A. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Lantigua, David M. Infidels and Empires in a New World Order: Early Modern Spanish Contributions to International Legal Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

de Las Casas, Bartolomé. Brevísima Relación de la Destrucción de las Indias. Medellin: Imprenta Universidad de Antioquia, 2011.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. ‘Onus Orbis Terrarum: About a Possible Shift in the Definition of Sovereignty.’ Millennium 44 no. 3 (2016): 305–320.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climactic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Lazier, Benjamin. ‘Earthrise; or, the Globalization of the World Picture.’ American Historical Review 116 no. 3 (2011): 602–630.Google Scholar

Learoyd, Arthur. ‘Configurations of Semi-Sovereignty during the Long Nineteenth Century,’ in Bartelson, Jens, Hall, Martin and Teorell, Jan (eds.) De-Centering State Making: Comparative and International Perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018, 155–174.Google Scholar

Lemaignen, Robert, Sédar Senghor, Léopold, and Sisowath Youtévong, Prince. La Communauté Impériale Française. Paris: Éditions Alsatia, 1945.Google Scholar

Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich. The Right of Nations to Self-Determination. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1947.Google Scholar

Lestringant, Frank. Mapping the Renaissance World: The Geographical Imagination in the Age of Discovery. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Lieber, Francis. Fragments of Political Science on Nationalism and Inter-Nationalism. New York: Scribner, 1868.Google Scholar

Lieven, Dominic. ‘Dilemmas of Empire 1850–1918: Power, Territory, Identity.’ Journal of Contemporary History 34 no. 2 (1999): 163–200.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin. ‘Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.’ American Political Science Review 53 no. 1 (1959): 69–105.Google Scholar

von Lisola, Franz. The Buckler of State and Justice against the Design Manifestly Discovered of the Universal Monarchy, under the Vain Pretext of the Queen of France, Her Pretensions Translated Out of French. London: James Flesher for Richard Royson, 1667.Google Scholar

Long, David and Schmidt, Brian C. (eds.) Imperialism and Internationalism in the Discipline of International Relations. Albany: SUNY Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Long, David and Schmidt, Brian C.. ‘Introduction,’ in Long, David and Schmidt, Brian C. (eds.) Imperialism and Internationalism in the Discipline of International Relations. Albany: SUNY Press, 2005, 1–11.Google Scholar

Lorimer, James. The Institutes of the Law of Nations: A Treatise of the Jural Relations of Separate Political Communities. Edinburgh: William Blackwell and Sons, 1883.Google Scholar

Loveman, Brian. ‘U.S. Foreign Policy toward Latin America in the 19th Century,’ in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American History, edited by Beezley, William. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Lupher, David A. Romans in a New World: Classical Models in Sixteenth-Century Spanish America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Lynch, Allen. ‘Woodrow Wilson and the Principle of “National Self-Determination”: A Reconsideration.’ Review of International Studies 28 no. 2 (2002): 419–436.Google Scholar

MacDonald, Paul K. ‘Embedded Authority: A Relational Network Approach to Hierarchy in World Politics.’ Review of International Studies 44 no.1 (2018): 128–150.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, James. Substance of the speech in the House of Commons, June 15, 1824. On presenting a petition from the merchants of London for the recognition of the independent states established in the countries of America formerly subject to Spain. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green, 1824.Google Scholar

MacMillan, Ken. Sovereignty and Possession in the English New World: The Legal Foundations of Empire, 1576–1640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

MacQueen, Norrie. The Decolonization of Portuguese Africa: Metropolitan Revolution and the Dissolution of Empire. London: Longmans, 1997.Google Scholar

MacQueen, Norrie. ‘Belated Decolonization and UN Politics against the Backdrop of the Cold War.’ Journal of Cold War Studies 8 no. 4 (2006): 29–56.Google Scholar

Majumdar, Rochona. ‘Postcolonial History,’ in Tamm, Marek and Burke, Peter (eds.), Debating New Approaches to History. London: Bloomsbury, 2019, 49–64.Google Scholar

Malešević, Siniša. Grounded Nationalisms: A Sociological Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Mamdani, Mahmood. Neither Settler nor Native: The Making and Unmaking of Permanent Majorities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, Moran M. ‘The Fantasy of Congruency: The Abbé Sieyès and the ‘nation-state’ problématique revisited.’ Philosophy & Social Criticism 42 no. 3 (2016): 246–266.Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, Moran. The Nation/State Fantasy: A Psychoanalytical Genealogy of Nationalism. Houndsmills: Palgrave MacMillan, 2020.Google Scholar

de Mariana, Juan. The General History of Spain. London: Richard Sare & Thomas Bennet, 1699.Google Scholar

Markovitz, Claude. ‘Cosmopolitanism and Imperialism in Nineteenth-Century British India.’ Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development 1 no. 1 (2021): 47–58.Google Scholar

Mazower, Mark. No Enchanted Palace: The End of Empire and the Ideological Origins of the United Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Mbembe, Achille. Out of the Dark Night: Essays on Decolonization. New York: Columbia University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

McConaughey, Meghan, Musgrave, Paul, and Nexon, Daniel H.. ‘Beyond Anarchy: Logics of Political Organization, Hierarchy, and International Structure.’ International Theory 10 no. 2 (2018): 181–218.Google Scholar

Maier, Charles S. Once Within Borders: Territories of Power, Wealth and Belonging since 1500. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Malaspina, Elisabetta Fiocchi. ‘Teaching International Law during the Italian Unification: A New Discipline for a New State.’ Miscellena Historico-Iuridica 13 no. 1. (2014): 143–158.Google Scholar

Malcolm, Noel. ‘The Crescent and the City of the Sun: Islam and the Renaissance Utopia of Tommaso Campanella.’ Proceedings of the British Academy. Vol. 125. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, 71–67.Google Scholar

Mamiani della Rovere, Terenzio Count. Rights of Nations, or The New Law of European States Applied to the Affairs of Italy. trans. by Roger Acton. London: W. Jeffs, 1860.Google Scholar

Mancini, Pasquale Stanislao. Della nazionalita‘ come fondamento del diritto delle genti. Prelezione al corso di diritto internazionale e marittimo pronunziata nella Regia Universita‘ di Torino. Torino: Giappachelli, 1994.Google Scholar

Manela, Erez. ‘Asia in the Global 1919: Reimagining Territory, Identity, and Solidarity.’ The Journal of Asian Studies 78 no. 2 (2019): 409–416.Google Scholar

Manela, Erez. ‘Imagining Woodrow Wilson in Asia: Dreams of East-West Harmony and the Revolt against Empire in 1919.’ American Historical Review 111 no. 5 (2006): 1327–1351.Google Scholar

Manela, Erez. The Wilsonian Moment: Self-determination and the International Origins of Anticolonial Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Manela, Erez. ‘International Society as a Historical Subject.’ Diplomatic History 44 no. 2 (2020): 184–209.Google Scholar

Mansfield, Harvey C. ‘On the Impersonality of the Modern State: A Comment on Machiavelli’s Use of Stato.’ American Political Science Review 77 no. 4 (1983): 849–857.Google Scholar

Mantena, Karuna. ‘On Gandhi’s Critique of the State: Sources, Contexts, Conjunctures.’ Modern Intellectual History 9 no. 3 (2012): 535–563.Google Scholar

Mantena, Karuna. ‘Popular Sovereignty and Anticolonialism,’ in Bourke, Richard and Skinner, Quentin (eds.) Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, 297–319.Google Scholar

von Martens, Georg Friedrich. A Compendium of the Law of Nations Founded on the Treatises and Customs of the Modern Nations of Europe. trans. by William Cobbett. London: Cobbett and Morgan, 1802.Google Scholar

Mathisen, Ralph W. ‘Peregrini, Barbari, and Cives Romani: Concepts of Citizenship and the Legal Identity of Barbarians in the Later Roman Empire.’ American Historical Review 111 no. 4 (2006): 1011–1040.Google Scholar

Mattern, Janice Bially and Zarakol, Ayşe. ‘Hierarchies in World Politics.’ International Organization 70 no. 3 (2016): 623–654.Google Scholar

Mayall, James. Nationalism and International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Meinecke, Friedrich. Cosmopolitanism and the National State. trans. by Robert B. Kimber. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Metha, Pratap Bhanu. ‘Liberalism, Nation, and Empire,’ in Muthu, Sankar (ed.) Empire in Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 232–260.Google Scholar

Metz, Karl H. ‘The Politics of Conflict: Heinrich von Treitschke and the Idea of ‘Realpolitik’.’ History of Political Thought 3 no. 2 (1982): 269–284.Google Scholar

Mexia, Pedro. The Imperiall Historie: or the liues of the emperours, from Iulius Cæsar, the first founder of the Roman monarchy. London: Mathevv Lovvnes, 1623.Google Scholar

Michelet, Jules. The People. trans. by C. Cocks. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1846.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. Considerations on Representative Government. New York: Henry Holt & Co, 1873.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Volume XXI, edited by Robson., John M. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984.Google Scholar

Miller, John Donald Bruce. ‘The Commonwealth and World Order: The Zimmern Vision and after.’ Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 8 no. 1 (1979): 159–174.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Audra. ‘Is IR Going Extinct?’ European Journal of International Relations 23 no. 1 (2017): 3–25.Google Scholar

de Montesquieu, Charles-Louis Secondat. ‘Réflexions sur la Monarchie Universelle,’ in Œuvres Completes, Tome II, Édition Caillois, de Roger. Paris: Pléiade, 1951, 19–38.Google Scholar

Morefield, Jeanne. Covenants without Swords: Liberal Idealism and the Spirit of Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Morefield, Jeanne. Empires without Imperialism: Anglo-American Decline and the Politics of Deflection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans J. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Peace and Power. New York: Knopf, 1948/1960.Google Scholar

Moyn, Samuel and Sartori, Andrew. ‘Approaches to Global Intellectual History,’ in Moyn, Samuel and Sartori, Andrew (eds.) Global Intellectual History. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013, 3–30.Google Scholar

Mukerjee, Radhakamal. Democracies of the East: A Study in Comparative Politics. London: P. S. King & Son, 1923.Google Scholar

Muldoon, James. Empire and Order, 800–1800. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Mulich, Jeppe. ‘Empire and Violence: Continuity in the Age of Revolution,’ in Barkawi, Tarak and Lawson, George (eds.) The International Origins of Social and Political Theory. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, 2017, 181–204.Google Scholar

Muschik, Eva-Maria. ‘Managing the World: The United Nations, Decolonization, and the Strange Triumph of State Sovereignty in the 1950s and 1960s.’ Journal of Global History 13 no. 1 (2018): 121–144.Google Scholar

Muthu, Sankar. Enlightenment Against Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Muthu, Sankar. ‘Conquest, Commerce, and Cosmopolitanism in Enlightenment Political Thought,’ in Muthu, Sankar (ed.) Empire and Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 199–231.Google Scholar

Muthu, Sankar. ‘Introduction,’ in Muthu, Sankar (ed.) Empire in Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 1–6.Google Scholar

Nakhimovsky, Isaac. ‘Vattel’s Theory of the International Order: Commerce and the Balance of Power in the Law of Nations.’ History of European Ideas 33 no. 2 (2007): 157–173.Google Scholar

Nakhimovsky, Isaac. The Closed Commercial State: Perpetual Peace and Commercial Society from Rousseau to Fichte. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Nakhimovsky, Isaac. ‘The “Ignominious Fall of the European Commonwealth”: Gentz, Hauterive, and the Armed Neutrality of 1800,’ in Stapelbroek, Koen (ed.) Trade and War: The Neutrality of Commerce in the Inter-State System, Helsinki Collegium. Studies across Disciplines in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 10. 2011, 212–228.Google Scholar

Nandy, Ashis. The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self under Colonialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Nandy, Ashis. ‘History’s Forgotten Doubles.’ History and Theory 34 no. 2 (1995): 44–66.Google Scholar

Nedal, Dani K. and Nexon, Daniel H., ‘Anarchy and Authority: International Structure, the Balance of Power, and Hierarchy.’ Journal of Global Security Studies 4 no. 2 (2019): 169–189.Google Scholar

Nehru, Jawaharlal. ‘Inter-Asian Relations.’ India Quarterly 2 no. 4 (1946): 323–327.Google Scholar

Nehru, Jawaharlal. Selected Speeches Vol. 1, September 1946–May 1949. Publications Division. Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, 1949.Google Scholar

Nehru, Jawaharlal. The Discovery of India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Nexon, Daniel H. The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Nexon, Daniel H. and Neumann, Iver B.. ‘Hegemonic-order Theory: A Field-theoretic Account.’ European Journal of International Relations 24 no. 3 (2018): 662–686.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich. Twilight of the Idols. trans. by Richard Polt. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997.Google Scholar

Nkrumah, Kwame. Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism. London: Panaf, 1970.Google Scholar

Nora, Pierre. ‘Michelet, ou l’Hysterie Identitaire.’ L’Esprit Créateur 46 no. 3 (2006): 6–14.Google Scholar

Núñez Faraco, Humberto R. ‘The Entanglements of Freedom: Simón Bolívar’s Jamaica Letter and Its Socio-political Context, (1810–1819).’ Global Intellectual History 3 no. 1 (2018): 71–91.Google Scholar

Nyerere, Julius. ‘A United States of Africa.’ Journal of Modern Africa Studies 1 no. 1, 1963, 1–6.Google Scholar

Nyerere, Julius. ‘Freedom and Unity.’ Transition 14 (1964) 40–45.Google Scholar

Nyerere, Julius. Freedom and Unity: Uhuru na Umoja; a selection from writings and speeches, 1952–65. Dar es Salaam: Oxford University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Obregón, Liliana. ‘Between Civilisation and Barbarism: Creole Interventions in International Law.’ Third World Quarterly 27 no. 5 (2006): 815–832.Google Scholar

Obregón, Liliana. ‘Completing Civilization: Creole Consciousness and International Law in Nineteenth Century Latin America,’ in Orford, Anne (ed.) International Law and Its Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, 247–264.Google Scholar

Obregón, Liliana. ‘The Civilized and the Uncivilized,’ in Peters, Anne and Fassbender, Bardo (eds) The Oxford Handbook of the History of Public International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, 917–939.Google Scholar

Obregón Tarazona, Liliana. ‘Writing International Legal History: An Overview.’ Monde(s) 7 no. 1 (2015): 95–112.Google Scholar

Ochoa Espejo, Paulina. On Borders: Territories, Legitimacy, and the Rights of Place. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Ohji, Kenta. ‘Civilisation et Naissance de l’Histoire Mondiale Dans l’Historie des Deux Indes de Raynal.’ Revue de Synthèse 129 no. 1 (2008): 57–83.Google Scholar

Oliver, Kelly. Earth & World: Philosophy after the Apollo Missions. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Onuf, Peter S. and Greenwood Onuf, Nicholas. Federal Union, Modern World: The Law of Nations in an Age of Revolutions, 1776–1814. Madison: Madison House, 1993.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, Lassa. International Law: A Treatise. London & New York: Longmans, Green & Co, 1905.Google Scholar

Osiander, Andreas ‘Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth.’ International Organization 55 no. 2 (2001): 251–228.Google Scholar

Osterhammel, Jürgen. The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Paddock, Troy R. E. ‘Rethinking Friedrich Meinecke’s Historicism.’ Rethinking History 10 no. 1 (2006): 95–108.Google Scholar

Pagden, Anthony. The Fall of Natural Man: The American Indian and the Origins of Comparative Ethnology. Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Pagden, Anthony. ‘Dispossessing the Barbarian: The Language of Spanish Thomism and the Debate over the Property Rights of the American Indians.’ in Pagden, Anthony (ed.) The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987, 79–98.Google Scholar

Pagden, Anthony. ‘Instruments of Empire: Tommaso Campanella and the Universal Monarchy of Spain,’ in Pagden, Anthony (ed.) Spanish Imperialism and the Political Imagination. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990, 37–64.Google Scholar

Pagden, Anthony. European Encounters with the New World: From Renaissance to Romanticism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Pagden, Anthony. Lords of All the World. Ideologies of Empire in Spain, Britain and France c.1500–c.1800. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Pagden, Anthony. ‘Fellow Citizens and Imperial Subjects: Conquest and Sovereignty in Europe’s Overseas Empires.’ History & Theory 44 no. 4 (2005): 28–46.Google Scholar

Pagden, Anthony. Burdens of Empire: 1539 to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Paine, Thomas. Common Sense. Girard, KA.: Haldeman-Julius, sa.Google Scholar

Paine, Thomas. Letter addressed to the Abbé Raynal on the Affairs of North America, in which the mistakes in the Abbé’s account of the revolution of America are corrected and cleared up. Boston, MA.: Benjamin Edes & Sons, 1782.Google Scholar

Panizza, Diego. ‘Alberico Gentili’s De armis Romanis: The Roman Model of the Just Empire,’ in Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin (eds.) The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, 53–84.Google Scholar

Pappé, H. O. ‘Mill and Tocqueville.’ Journal of the History of Ideas 25, no. 2 (1964): 217–234.Google Scholar

Paquette, Gabriel. ‘The Intellectual Context of British Diplomatic Recognition of the South American Republics, c. 1800–1830.’ Journal of Transatlantic Studies 2 no. 1 (2004): 75–95.Google Scholar

Paquette, Gabriel. ‘The Dissolution of the Spanish Atlantic Monarchy.’ The Historical Journal 52, no. 1 (2009): 175–212.Google Scholar

Paquette, Gabriel. The European Seaborne Empires: From the Thirty Years War to the Age of Revolutions. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Parekh, Bhikhu. ‘Nehru and the National Philosophy of India.’ Economic and Political Weekly 26 no 1/2 (1991): 35–48.Google Scholar

Pattberg, Philipp and Widerberg, Oscar. ‘Theorising Global Environmental Governance: Key Findings and Future Questions.’ Millennium 43 no. 2 (2015): 684–705.Google Scholar

Pedersen, Susan. The Guardians: The League of Nations and the Crisis of Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Peltonen, Markku. ‘Politics and Science: Francis Bacon and the True Greatness of States.’ Historical Journal 35, no. 2 (1992): 279–305.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Petty, William. Political Arithmetick: or A discourse concerning the value of lands, people, buildings … As the same relates to every country in general, but more particularly to the territories of His Majesty of Great Britain, and his neighbours of Holland, Zealand, and France. London: R. Clavel, 1690.Google Scholar

Pflanze, Otto. ‘Nationalism in Europe, 1848–1871.’ The Review of Politics 28 no. 2 (1966): 129–143.Google Scholar

Pha_.m, Quỳnh N and Shilliam, Robbie. (eds.) Meanings of Bandung: Postcolonial Orders and Decolonial Visions. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016.Google Scholar

Pha_.m, Quỳnh N. and Shilliam, Robbie. ‘Reviving Bandung,’ in Pha_.m, Quỳnh N. and Shilliam, Robbie (eds.) Meanings of Bandung: Postcolonial Orders and Decolonial Visions. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016, 3–20.Google Scholar

Phillips, Andrew. War, Religion and Empire: The Transformation of International Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Phillips, Andrew and Sharman, Jason C.. International Order in Diversity: War, Trade and Rule in the Indian Ocean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Philpott, Daniel. Revolutions in Sovereignty. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Pincus, Steven. ‘The English Debate over Universal Monarchy,’ in Robertson, John. (ed.) A Union for Empire: Political thought and the British Union of 1707. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, 37–62.Google Scholar

Pincus, Steven. ‘The Making of a Great Power? Universal Monarchy, Political Economy, and the Transformation of English Political Culture.’ European Legacy 5 no. 4 (2000): 531–545.Google Scholar

Pincus, Steven. ‘Addison’s Empire: Whig Conceptions of Empire in the Early 18th Century.’ Parliamentary History 31 no. 1 (2012): 99–117.Google Scholar

Pitts, Jennifer. A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Pitts, Jennifer. ‘Political Theory of Empire and Imperialism.’ Annual Review of Political Science 13 (2010): 211–235.Google Scholar

Pitts, Jennifer. ‘Empire and Legal Universalisms in the Eighteenth Century.’ American Historical Review 117 no. 1 (2012): 92–121.Google Scholar

Pitts, Jennifer. Boundaries of the International: Law and Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Plamenatz, John. On Alien Rule and Self Government. London: Longmans, 1960.Google Scholar

Platt, Charles Malcom. ‘A Triad of Political Conceptions: State, Sovereign, Government.’ Political Science Quarterly 10 no. 2 (1895): 292–323.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. Barbarism and Religion III. The First Decline and Fall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. Barbarism and Religion IV. Barbarians, Savages and Empires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. ‘Commerce, Credit, and Sovereignty: The Nation-State as Historical Critique,’ in Kapossy, Béla. (ed.) Markets, Morals, Politics: Jealousy of Trade and the History of Political Thought. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 2018), 265–284.Google Scholar

Pollock, Sheldon. The Language of the Gods in the World of Men: Sanskrit, Culture, and Power in Premodern India. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Pons, Alain. ‘De la ‘nature commune des nations’ au Peuple romantique. Note sur Vico et Michelet.’ Romantisme 5 no. 9 (1975): 39–49.Google Scholar

Price, Roger. The French Second Empire: An Anatomy of Political Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Prott, Volker. The Politics of Self-Determination. Remaking Territories and National Identities in Europe, 1917–1923. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Prozorov, Sergei. Ontology and World Politics: Void Universalism I. London & New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Pye, Lucian W. ‘Introduction: Political Culture and Political Development,’ in Pye, Lucian W. and Verba, Sidney (eds.) Political Culture and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965, 3–26.Google Scholar

Pye, Lucian W. and Verba, Sidney (eds.) Political Culture and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Rai, Lala Lajpat. Self-Determination for India. New York: India Home Rule League of America, 1919.Google Scholar

von Ranke, Leopold. ‘The Great Powers,’ in von Laue, Theodore H. (ed.) Leopold Ranke: The Formative Years. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1950, 181–218.Google Scholar

Raynal, Abbé Guillaume-Thomas-François. A Philosophical and Political History of the Settlements and Trade of the Europeans in the East and West Indies. trans. by J. O. Justamond. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell, 1783.Google Scholar

Recchia, Stefano and Urbinati, Nadia. (eds.) A Cosmopolitanism of Nations. Giuseppe Mazzini’s Writings on Democracy, Nation Building, and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Renan, Ernest. ‘What is a Nation?’ in Eley, Geoff and Grigor Suny, Ronald (eds.) Becoming National: A Reader. Oxord: Oxford University Press, 1996, 42–55.Google Scholar

Richardson, John. The Language of Empire: Rome and the Idea of Empire from the Third Century BC to the Second Century AD. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Richardson, John. ‘The Meaning of Imperium in the Last Century BC and the First AD,’ in Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin. (eds.) The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, 21–29.Google Scholar

Robertson, John. ‘Empire and Union: Two Concepts of the Early Modern European Political Order,’ in Robertson, John (ed.) A Union for Empire. Political Thought and the British Union of 1707. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, 3–36.Google Scholar

Robertson, John. ‘Gibbon’s Roman Empire as a Universal Monarchy: The Decline and Fall and the Imperial Idea in Early Modern Europe’, in McKitterick, Rosamond and Quinault, Roland (eds.) Edward Gibbon and Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, 247–270.Google Scholar

Robertson, John. The Case for the Enlightenment. Scotland and Naples 1680–1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Robertson, William. The History of the Reign of the Emperor Charles V, with a view of the Progress of Society in Europe, from the Subversion of the Roman Empire to the Beginning of the Sixteenth Century, Vols. I & II. London: Routledge, 1857.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, Jaime E. The Independence of Spanish America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Rostow, Walt W. Politics and the Stages of Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Rothschild, Emma. ‘Language and Empire, c. 1800.’ Historical Research 78 no. 200 (2005): 208–229.Google Scholar

Rowley, David G. ‘Giuseppe Mazzini and the Democratic Logic of Nationalism.’ Nations and Nationalism 18 no. 1 (2012): 39–56.Google Scholar

Rubinelli, Lucia. Constituent Power: A History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Sabato, Hilda. ‘On Political Citizenship in Nineteenth-Century Latin America.’ The American Historical Review 106 no. 4 (2001): 1290–1315.Google Scholar

Sabato, Hilda. Republics of the New World. The Revolutionary Political Experiment in 19th-Century Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Said, Edward W. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978.Google Scholar

Saramago, José. The Elephant’s Journey. London: Vintage Books, 2010.Google Scholar

Sartre, Jean-Paul. ‘Introduction,’ in Memmi, Albert (ed.) The Colonizer and the Colonized. Boston: Beacon Press, 1967, xxi–xxxi.Google Scholar

Scarfi, Juan Pablo. ‘In the Name of the Americas: The Pan-American redefinition of the Monroe doctrine and the emerging language of American international law in the Western Hemisphere, 1898–1933.’ Diplomatic History 40 no. 2 (2016): 189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar