In her ethnographic survey conducted in Aligarh city in the mid-1980s, the anthropologist Elisabeth Mann noted:

Mann was quick to remind the reader that tensions remained rife between Aligarh's Muslim elites and non-elites. However, she also recognised that external pressures—the constant suspicion of their loyalty since partition and, increasingly in the 1980s, the sharp rise of Hindu communalism—reinforced a sense of collective identity among co-religionists. In this context, she suggested that invoking Islam could serve as a ‘refuge for the persecuted’. What this chapter will argue is that it could also serve as a language of contestation and empowerment in a context perceived as increasingly hostile.

The 1980s saw a resurgence of communal tensions in India, fed by the development of identity politics. Following the Congress’ crushing defeat in 1977, political competition intensified at the centre, boosting opposition parties that spoke the language of caste or religion to mobilise their constituencies. Although these evolutions were already under way by the 1960s, it was mostly after the emergency that they became prominent at the national level, leading to a shift in norms from national unity to group-based interests in the mainstream political discourse. Other domestic and transnational evolutions accentuated communal tensions. Within India, reports of Muslims’ demographic growth enhanced a sense of insecurity among some sections of the Hindu population. So too did the rise of Islamic fundamentalism, particularly in neighbouring Pakistan under Zia-ul-Haq. The boom of Gulf economies added to these tensions as part of the Hindu population feared that oil money may fund mass conversions to Islam and ‘give to Islamism in India a new glow of self-confidence in one sudden sweep’. These evolutions fed into the ‘vulnerability syndrome’ of the majority population that boosted the rise of the Hindu right.