Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T11:33:07.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Social psychological aspects of bilinguality: intercultural communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2009

Josiane F. Hamers
Affiliation:
Université Laval, Québec
Michel H. A. Blanc
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access

Summary

Whereas in Chapter 8 we focused on the effects of a bilingual experience on social psychological mechanisms relevant to language behaviour, in the present chapter we discuss the result of the interplay of these mechanisms with language behaviour in situations of interpersonal interaction. In order to understand interpersonal communication in an intercultural context one has to understand how meaning is negotiated when the interlocutors are members of different ethnolinguistic groups; how language interacts with processes of social-cognition mediation; and thus how language may become a salient dimension of this interaction (Gudykunst, 1986). In intercultural communication people interact with one another both as individuals and as members of different social groups; social encounters are thus determined by interpersonal as well as by intergroup factors (Tajfel & Turner, 1979), and can be analysed along these two dimensions (Stephenson, 1981).

When two members from different cultural and ethnolinguistic groups communicate with one another, social categorisation occurs in such a way that people have a tendency to exaggerate differences on critical dimensions between categories and minimise differences within a social category (Tajfel, 1981). Social, cultural or ethnolinguistic groups are perceived as more distinct from each other if they differ on a large number of distinctive features, such as language, race characteristics, religion and social status (as, for example, in an encounter between an Anglo-Celt and an Indian from South India) than if they differ on one or two characteristics only (as would be the case in an encounter between a Briton and an Anglo-Celtic Australian). Furthermore, social categorisation produces ingroup bias which is based on ethnocentrism, that is, on the perception of one's own ethnic group as being superior to an outgroup.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×