Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T19:09:06.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2017

Lynn Hankinson Nelson
Lynn Hankinson Nelson
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Biology and Feminism
A Philosophical Introduction
 , pp. 241 - 252
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altmann, J. 1974. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods, Behaviour 49.Google Scholar
Altmann, J. 1980. Baboon Mothers and Infants. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1990. The Liberal Art of Science: Agenda for Action: The Report of the Project of Liberal Education and the Sciences. Washington, DC: AAAS.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. 2004. Uses of value judgments in science: A general argument with lessons from a case study of feminist research on divorce. In Hypatia Special Issue: Feminist Science Studies, eds. Nelson, L. H. and Wylie, A.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. 2015. Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2015 edition), ed. Zalta, Edward N., URL: http://plato.standford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/feminism-epistemology/.Google Scholar
Araji, S. 2000. Review essay – A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion, Alaska Justice Forum 17(2): 2–3.Google Scholar
Barash, D. 1979. The Whisperings Within. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J., eds., 1992. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila, Heredity 2: 349–368.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. 2003. Modules, brain parts, and evolutionary psychology. In Evolutionary Psychology: Alternative Approaches, eds. Scher, S. J. and Rauscher, F.. New York: Springer: 211–227.Google Scholar
Beer, G. 2009. Darwin’s Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 3rd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benbow, C. P. and Stanley, J. C.. 1983. Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: more facts, Science 222: 1029–1031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Biology & Gender Study Group. 1988. The importance of feminist critique for contemporary cell biology, Hypatia 3: 61–76.Google Scholar
Blecher, S. and Erickson, R.. 2007. Genetics of sexual development: a new paradigm, Am J Med Genet Part A 143: 3054–3068. Wiley Library Online.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleier, R. 1984. Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Theories on Women. New York and Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bluhm, R., Jacobson, A. J., and Maibom, H. L., eds. 2012. Neurofeminism: Essays at the Intersection of Feminist Theory and Cognitive Science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bronson, F. H. and Desjardins, C.. 1976. Steroid hormones and aggressive behavior in mammals. In The Physiology of Aggression, ed. Moyer, K.. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Buffery, A. and Gray, J.. 1972. Sex differences in the development of spatial and linguistic skills. In Gender Differences, Their Ontogeny and Significance, eds. Ounsted, C. and Taylor, M. E.. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. 1999. Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. and Malamuth, N., eds. 1996. Sex, Power, Conflict: Evolutionary and Feminist Perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. and Schmitt, D. P. 1993. Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating, Psychological Review 100(2): 204–232.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. and Schmitt, D. P. 2011. Evolutionary psychology and feminism, Sex Roles 64(9): 768–787.Google Scholar
Chargaff, E. 1976. Letter to the editors, Science 192: 1448–1449.Google Scholar
Chi, J. G., Dooling, E. C., and Gilles, F. H.. 1977. Gyral development of the human brain, Annals of Neurology 1: 86–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, J. 1994. The meaning of menstruation in the elimination of abnormal embryos, Human Reproduction 9(7): 1204–1207.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J., 1992. Cognitive adaptations for social exchange, in The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, eds. Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J.. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Costanzo, N. S., Bennett, N. C., et al. 2009. Spatial learning and memory in African mole-rats: the role of sociality and sex, Physiology and Behavior 96(1): 128–134.Google Scholar
Creager, A. N., Lunbeck, E., and Schiebinger, L., eds. 2001. Feminism in Twentieth-Century Science, Technology, and Medicine, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, N. S., Minto, C. L., Laio, L. M., Woodhouse, C. R. J., and Creighton, S. M.. 2004. Genital sensation after feminizing genitoplasty for congenital adrenal hyperplasia: a pilot study, BJU International 93(1): 135–138.Google Scholar
Daly, M. and Wilson, M.. 2005. The “Cinderella effect” is no fairy tale, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 507–508.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray. Reprinted Wildside Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1860. Letter to Asa Gray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray, Albermarle Street.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1978. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1989. The Selfish Gene, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Diamond, N. C., Dowling, G. A., and Johnson, R. E.. 1981. Morphological cerebral cortical asymmetry in male and female rats, Experimental Neurology 71: 261–268.Google Scholar
DeVore, I. and Washburn, S. L.. 1963. Baboon ecology and human evolution. In African Ecology and Human Evolution, eds. Howell, F. C. and Bourliere, F.. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton Press.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. 1997. Bonobo: The Forgotten Ape. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doane, W. W., ed. 1976.(cartoons by Abbott, B. K.), Sexisms Satirized. Society for Developmental Biology.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. 1973. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution, American Biology Teacher 35: 125–129.Google Scholar
Douglass, H. 2010. Engagement for progress: Applied philosophy of science in context, Synthese 177(3).Google Scholar
Douglass, H. 2011. Domestic violence research: Valuing stories. In Qualitative Criminology: Stories from the Field, eds. Bartels, L. and Richards, K.. Leichardt: Australia Hawkins Press, 129–139.Google Scholar
Duhem, P. 1914/1954. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton University Press, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Dukelow, W. R. 1999. Reflections on a century of primatology, American Journal of Primatology 49(2): 129–132.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. 1988. Primate Social Systems. Sydney, Australia: Croom Helm Ltd.Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, B. and English, D.. 2005. For Her Own Good: Two Centuries of the Experts’ Advice to Women, 2nd ed. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Ehrhardt, A., Evers, K., and Money, J.. 1968. Influence of androgen and some aspects of sexually dimorphic behavior in women with the late-treated adrenogenital syndrome, Johns Hopkins Medical Journal, 123: 115–122.Google Scholar
Ehrhardt, A. and Meyer-Bahlburg, H.. 1981. Effects of prenatal sex hormones on gender related behavior, Science 211: 1312–1318.Google Scholar
Eicher, E. and Washburn, L.. 1986. Genetic control of primary sex determination in mice, Annual Review of Genetics 20: 327–360.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, A. 1985. Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fedigan, L. M. 1982. Primate Paradigm: Sex Roles and Social Bonds. Eden Press.Google Scholar
Fedigan, L. M. Primate Paradigm: Sex Roles and Social Bonds. 2nd ed., with new introduction. University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Fedigan, L. M. 1986. The changing role of women in models of human evolution, Annual Review of Anthropology 15: 25>–66.Google Scholar
Fedigan, L. M. 2001. The paradox of feminist primatology: The goddess discipline? In Creager, et al. 2001: 46–72.Google Scholar
Fehr, C. 2001. Pluralism and sex: More than a pragmatic issue, Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 68(3):237–250.Google Scholar
Fehr, C. 2011. Feminist philosophy of biology, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/feminist-philosophy-biology/.Google Scholar
Fehr, C and Plaisance, K. S. 2010. Socially relevant philosophy of science: An introduction, Synthese, 177 (3): 301Google Scholar
Feng, J., Spence, I., and Pratt, J.. 2007. Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition, Psychological Science 18: 850–855.Google Scholar
Floody, O. R. and Pfaff, D. W.. 1974. Steroid hormones and aggressive behavior: approaches to the study of hormone sensitive brain mechanisms for behavior, Aggression 52:149–185.Google Scholar
Gastaud, F., Bouvattier, C., Duranteau, L., Brauner, R., Thieaud, E., Kutten, F., and Bougneres, P.. 2007. Impaired sexual and reproductive outcomes in women with classical forms of congenital adrenal Hyperplasia, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 92(4): 1391–1396.Google Scholar
Gaulin, S. and McBurney, D.. 2000. Psychology: An Evolutionary Approach. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Geary, M. 1995. An analysis of the Women’s Health Movement and its impact on the delivery of health care within the United States, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing Vol. 20 No. 11: 24–31.Google Scholar
Geschwind, N. and Behan, P.. 1982. Left-handedness: association with immune disease, migraine, and developmental learning disorder, Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences 79: 5097–5100.Google Scholar
Geschwind, N. and Behan, P.. 1984. Laterality, hormones, and immunity. In Cerebral Dominance: The Biological Foundations, eds. Geschwind, N. and Galaburda, A. M.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, S. F. 1988. Cellular politics. In American Development of Biology, eds. Rainger, R., Benson, K. R., and Maienschein, J.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, S. F. 1994. Postscript to the Importance of Feminist Critique to Cell Biology (Biology and Gender Study Group 1988).Google Scholar
Gilbert, S. F. 2014. Developmental Biology, 10th ed. Sulnderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Gilbert, S. F. and Rader, K. A.. 2001. Revisiting women, gender, and feminism in developmental biology. In Creager, et al, 2001: 73–97.Google Scholar
Glashow, S. 1987. Quoted in “Does ideology stop at the laboratory door: A debate on science and the real world” in The New York Times, Oct. 22, 1989.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 1973. The Inevitability of Patriarchy. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Goodall, J. 1965. Chimpanzees of the gombe stream reserve. In Primate Behavior Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes, ed. DeVore, I.. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Gorski, R., Gordon, J. H., Shryne, J. E., and Southan, A. M.. 1978. Evidence for a morphological sex difference within the medial preoptic area of the rat brain, Brain Research 148: 333–346.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1980. Sociobiology and the theory of natural selection, American Association for the Advancement of Science Symposia 35, 257–69.Google Scholar
Gould, S. and Lewontin, R., 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences, 205(1161): 581–598.Google Scholar
Gowaty, P. A., ed. 1997. Feminism and Evolutionary Theory: Boundaries, Intersections, and Frontiers.. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Gowaty, P. A., ed. 2003. Sexual natures: How feminism changed evolutionary biology, Signs 28:3. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Guyton, A. C. 1984. Physiology of the Human Body. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders College Publishing.Google Scholar
Haack, S. 1993. Epistemological reflections of an old feminist, Reason Papers 18(Fall 1993): 31–43.Google Scholar
Hall, G. S. 1905. Adolescence Vol. II. New York: D. Appleton, 588.Google Scholar
Hanson, N. R. 1958. Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 1984. Primatology is politics by other means, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science AssociationGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, S. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. 1966. Philosophy of Natural Science. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. 1977. The Langurs of Abu: Female and Male Strategies of Reproduction. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. 1984. Introduction to Female Primates: Studies by Women Primatologists, ed. Small, M. F.. Liss, Alan R.. In Small 1984: 103–109.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. 1986. Empathy, polyandry, and the myth of the coy female. In Feminist Approaches to Science, Bleier, R., ed. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. 1999. The Woman That Never Evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. 2009. Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Human Understanding. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hubbard, R. 1983. Have only men evolved? in Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, eds. Harding, S. and Hintikka, M.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1739. A Treatise on Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects, London: Printed for John Noon, at the White-Hart, near Mercer’s-Chapel, in Cheapside.Google Scholar
Jolly, A. 1984. The puzzle of female feeding priority. In Female Primates: Studies by Women Primatologists, Small, M.F., ed. New York: Alan R. Liss.Google Scholar
Jordan-Young, R. 2010. Brainstorm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan-Young, R. and Rumiati, R. I.. 2012. Hardwired for sexism? Approaches to sex/gender in neuroscience. In Neurofeminism: Issues at the Intersection of Feminist Theory and Cognitive Science, eds. Bluhm, R., Jacobson, A. J., and Maibom, H. L.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kansaku, K and Kitazawa, S.. 2002. Imaging studies on sex differences in the lateralization of language, Neuroscience Research 41: 333–337.Google Scholar
Keller, E. F. 1995. Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth Century Biology. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, E. F. 1997. Developmental biology as a feminist cause? Osiris 12: 16–28.Google Scholar
Kinsbourne, M. 1980. If sex differences in brain lateralization exist, they have yet to be discovered, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3(4): 20–36.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1985. Vaulting Ambition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas A. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kunetka, J. 1982. Oppenheimer: The Years of Risk. New Jersey, US: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Lancaster, J. 1973. In praise of the achieving female monkey. Psychology Today 7(4): 20–36.Google Scholar
Laqueur, T. 1987. Orgasm, generation, and the politics of reproductive biology. In The Making of the Modern Body, eds. Gallagher, C. and Laqueur, T.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Levy-Agresti, and J. R. and Sperry, W. 1968. Differential perceptual capacities in major and minor hemispheres, National Academy of Sciences 61, 1151 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. 1993. Objectivity and the double-standard for feminist epistemologies, Synthese 104(3): 351–381.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. 1996. Science and anti-science: objectivity and its real enemies. In Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, eds. Nelson, L. H. and Nelson, J.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. 2003. Violence against science: rape and evolution. In Evolution, Gender, and Rape, ed. Travis, C.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 235–262.Google Scholar
Longino, H. E. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Longino, H. E. 1996. Cognitive and non-cognitive values in science: Rethinking the dichotomy. In Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, eds. Nelson, L.H. and Nelson, J.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 39–58.Google Scholar
Longino, H. E. 2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Longino, H. E. and Doell, R. 1983. Body, bias, and behavior: A comparative analysis of reasoning in two areas of biological science, Signs 9(2): 106–127.Google Scholar
Lyell, C. 1830. Principles of Geology. London: John Murray, Albemarle Street.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E. and Jacklin, C.. 1974. The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1798. An Essay on the Principles of Population. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
Marieskind, H. 1975. The women’s health movement, International Journal of Health Services. 5(2): 217–223.Google Scholar
Martin, E. 1991. The egg and the sperm: how science has constructed a romance based on stereotypical male-female roles, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 16.Google Scholar
Martin, E. 2001. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1972. Sexual selection and natural selection. In Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, ed. Campbell, B.. London: Heinemann, 87–104.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1989. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McGuinnes, C. and Pribram, K. 1980. The neuropsychology of attention: Emotional and motivational controls. In The Brain and Psychology, ed. Wittrock, M. C.. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure, 2nd ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Milan, E. L. 2012. Making males aggressive and females coy: Gender across the animal-human boundary, Signs 37(4): 935–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1869. The Subjection of Women. London: Longmans, Green, Reader & Dyer.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. H. 1990. Who Knows: From Quine to a Feminist Empiricism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. H. 1995. A feminist naturalized philosophy of science, Synthese 104(3): 399–421.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. H. 2003. The descent of evolutionary explanations: Darwinian vestiges in the social sciences. In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, eds. Turner, S. and Roth, P.. Oxford, UK: Blackwell: 258–290.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. H. and Wylie, A., eds., 2004. Hypatia Special Issue: Feminist Science Studies. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Nesse, R. M. and Williams, G. C.. 1994. Why We Get Sick: The New Science of Darwinian Medicine. New York: Time Books.Google Scholar
Parker, P. and Burley, N. T. 1997. Avian Reproductive Tactics: Male and Female Perspectives, Ornithological Monographs. Lawrence KS: Allen Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. 2009. How the Mind Works. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Potter, E. 2001. Gender and Boyle’s Law of Gases. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Profit, M. 1993. Menstruation as a defense against pathogens transported by sperm, Quarterly Review of Biology 68(3): 335–386.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1960. Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1966. Posits and Reality. In The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. New York: Random House: 233–241.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1981. On the nature of moral values. In Theories and Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1987. Quiddities: An Intermittingly Philosophical Dictionary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Resnik, D. B. and Elliott, K. C.. 2016. The ethical challenges of socially responsible science, Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance 23(1): 31–46.Google Scholar
Richardson, R. 2001. Evolution without history: critical reflections on evolutionary psychology. In Conceptual Challenges in Evolutionary Psychology: Innovative Research Strategies, ed. Halcomb, H. R.. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 327–373.Google Scholar
Rose, H. 1994. Love, Power, and Knowledge: Towards a Feminist Transformation of the Sciences. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, C. E. 1979. The therapeutic revolution: Medicine, meaning, and social change in nineteenth-century America. In The Therapeutic Revolution: Essays in the Social History of American Medicine, eds. Vogel, M. J. and Rosenberg, C. E.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 3–25.Google Scholar
Rosser, S. 1986. The relationship between women’s studies and women in science. In Feminist Approaches to Science, ed. Bleier, R.. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Rowell, T. E. 1974. The concept of social dominance, Behavioral Biology 11(2): 131–154.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 2008. Darwinism and its Discontents. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 2012. The Philosophy of Human Evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 2017. Darwinism as Religion: What Literature Tells Us about Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sade, D. S. 1968. Inhibition of mother-son mating among free-ranging rhesus monkeys, Science and Psychoanalysis 12: 18–38.Google Scholar
Sade, D. S. 1972. A longitudinal study of social relations of rhesus monkeys. In Functional and Evolutionary Biology of Primates, ed. Tuttle, R. H.. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton Press.Google Scholar
Sayers, J. 1982/1990. Biological Politics: Feminist and Anti-Feminist Perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schum, J. E. and Wynne-Edwards, K. E.. 2005. Estradiol and progesterone in paternal and non-paternal hamsters (Phodopus) becoming fathers conflict with hypothesized roles, Hormones and Behavior 47: 410–418.Google Scholar
Shamoo, A. E. and Resnick, D. B. 2014. Responsible Conduct of Research, 3rd edition. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schatten, G. and Schatten, H.. 1983. The energetic egg, Sciences 23(5): 28–34.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, L. 1999. Has Feminism Changed Science? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shamoo, A.E. and Resnick, D.B. 2014. Responsible Conduct of Research, 3rd edition. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Short, R. V. 1972. Reproduction in Mammals, Book 2. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge niversity Press.Google Scholar
Synthese 2010. Special Issue: Making Philosophy of Science Socially Relevant, eds. Plaisance, K.S. and Fehr, C.. Synthese 177 (3).Google Scholar
Singh, D. 1993. Body shape and women’s attractiveness: the critical role of waste-to-hip ratio, Human Nature 4:297–3211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slocum, S. 1975. Woman the gatherer. In Toward an Anthropology of Women ed. Reiter, R.R.. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Small, M. F. ed. 1984. Female Primates: Studies by Women Primatologists. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc.Google Scholar
Smith-Rosenberg, C. 1973. Puberty to menopause: the cycle of femininity in nineteenth-century America, Feminist Studies, Vol. 1, No. 3/4 58–72.Google Scholar
Smuts, B. 1992. Male aggression against women: an evolutionary perspective, Human Nature (3): 1–44.Google Scholar
Sober, E. 1993. Philosophy of Biology. Boulder, CO and San Francisco, CA: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. and Masters, J.. 1992. Sexual selection: Contemporary debates. In Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, eds. Keller, E. F. and Lloyd, E. A.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sperling, S. 1991. Baboons with briefcases: feminism, functionalism, and sociobiology in the evolution of primate gender, Signs 17:1, Autumn 1991, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevert, L.L. 2006. Menopause: A Biocultural Perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Stevert, L.L. 2008. Should women menstruate? An evolutionary perspective on menstrual-suppressing oral contraceptives. In Trevathan, et al. 2008: 181–195.Google Scholar
Strier, K. 1994. The myth of the typical primate, Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 37: 233–271.Google Scholar
Swedell, L. 2012. Primate sociality and social systems, Nature Education Knowledge 3 (10): 84.Google Scholar
Symons, D. 1992. On the use and misuse of Darwinism in the study of human behavior. In The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, eds. Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J.. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press: 137–159.Google Scholar
Takasaki, H. 2000. Traditions of the Kyoto school of field primatology in Japan. In Primate Encounters, ed. Strum, S. C. and Fedigan, L. M.. University of Chicago Press: 151–164.Google Scholar
Tang-Martinez, Z. 2000. Paradigms and primates: Bateman’s principle, passive females, and perspectives from other taxa. In Primate Encounters: Models of Science, Gender, and Society, eds. Strum, S. C. and Fedigan, L. M.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 261–274.Google Scholar
Taub, D. 1980. Female choice and mating strategies among wild Barbary macaques. In The Macaques, ed. Lindburg, D.. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold: 287–344.Google Scholar
Tavris, C. 1992. The Mismeasure of Woman. New York: Touchstone: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
The Boston Women’s Health Book Collective. 1973. Our Bodies, Ourselves. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R. and Palmer, C.. 2000. A Natural History of Rape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Trevathan, W. et al, eds. 2008. Evolutionary Medicine and Health: New Perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, ed. Campbell, B.. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton: 136–179.Google Scholar
Truth, Sojourner. 1851. Ain’t I a woman? Speech delivered at the Women’s Convention in Akron Ohio and transcribed by Marius Robinson and published in The Anti-Slavery Bugle.Google Scholar
Tuana, N. 2010 Leading with ethics, aiming for policy, Synthese 177(3): 471–492.Google Scholar
Tuttle, R. H. 2014. Apes and Human Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Wade, N. 1977. The Ultimate Experiment: Man-Made Evolution. New York, New York: Walker Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Washburn, S. L. 1961. The Social Life of Early Man. New York: Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology.Google Scholar
Washburn, S. L. and Lancaster, C. S.. 1968. The evolution of hunting. In Man the Hunter, eds. Lee, R. B. and Devore, I.. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton Press: 293–303.Google Scholar
Williams, G. C. and Nesse, R. M.. 1991. The dawn of Darwinian medicine, The Quarterly Review of Biology 66(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 1978a. On Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilson, E. O. 1978b. Academic vigilantism and the political significance of Socioibiology, Bioscience 26(3): 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrangham, R. W. 1980. An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups, Behaviour 75: 262–300.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. 1997. The engendering of archaeology, Osiris 12: 80–99.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. 2003. Why standpoint matters. In Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology, eds. Figueroa, R. and Harding, S.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wyndman, et al. 2015. Social Responsibility: A Preliminary Inquiry into the Perspectives of Scientists, Engineers, and Health Professionals. Washington, DC: AAAS.Google Scholar
Zihlman, A. 1978. Women in human evolution, Part II, subsistence and social organization among early hominids, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 4: 4–20.Google Scholar
Zuk, M. 1997. Darwinian medicine dawning in a feminist light. In Gowaty, P., ed., Feminism and Evolutionary Biology: Boundaries, Intersections, and Frontiers. New York: Chapman & Hall: 417–430.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Lynn Hankinson Nelson, University of Washington
  • Book: Biology and Feminism
  • Online publication: 31 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316106280.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Lynn Hankinson Nelson, University of Washington
  • Book: Biology and Feminism
  • Online publication: 31 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316106280.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Lynn Hankinson Nelson, University of Washington
  • Book: Biology and Feminism
  • Online publication: 31 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316106280.011
Available formats
×