Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T09:02:36.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Restaging a Vital Center within Radicalized Civil Societies

The Media, Performativity, and the Charlie Hebdo Attack

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2019

Jeffrey C. Alexander
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Trevor Stack
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Farhad Khosrokhavar
Affiliation:
Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris
Get access

Summary

On January 7, 2015, Said and Chérif Kouachi assaulted the offices of the French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo, leaving twelve people dead, including the magazine’s editor Stéphane Charbonnier and other well-known French cartoonists. The publication, which had caricatured the Prophet Muhammad, had already been threatened on several occasions since 2006 when it first reprinted cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad that had originally been published by the Danish newspaper Jyllands-posten. Worldwide news coverage described the 2015 attack as “among the deadliest in postwar France” (New York Times, January 7, 2015). Expressions of public outrage and large rallies supporting Charlie Hebdo took place in Paris and other cities around the world. Under the slogan Je Suis Charlie (“I am Charlie”), two million people marched in Paris’s Place de la République on January 11, bringing together sentiments of solidarity with the victims and freedom of expression. The slogan became a symbol of the spirit of French unity amidst what was considered a national trauma. However, this unifying rallying cry rapidly turned into a complex and, to some extent, exclusionary label. The slogan did not appeal to those who, under the opposite slogan of Je Ne Suis Pas Charlie (“I am not Charlie”), utterly condemned the attack but refused to show their support for the magazine’s editorial (Badouard 2016).

Type
Chapter
Information
Breaching the Civil Order
Radicalism and the Civil Sphere
, pp. 123 - 144
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, J. C. 2006. The Civil Sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, J.C. 2016a. “Progress and Disillusion: Civil Repair and Its Discontents.” Paper presented at the ISA Sociological Theory Conference. Cambridge, UK, 27–29 June.Google Scholar
Alexander, J.C. 2016b. “Introduction: Journalism, Democratic Culture, and Creative Reconstruction.” In Alexander, J. C, Breese, E. B., Luengo, M. (eds.). The Crisis of Journalism Reconsidered: Democratic Culture, Professional Codes, Digital Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 128.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. C., Breese, E. B., Luengo, M. 2016. The Crisis of Journalism Reconsidered: Democratic Culture, Professional Codes, Digital Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. C. and Jacobs, R. 1998. “Mass Communication, Ritual, and Civil Society.” In Leibes, T. and Curran, J. (eds.) Media, Ritual and Identity. London: Routledge, pp. 2341.Google Scholar
Austin, J. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Badouard, R. 2016. “‘Je ne suis pas Charlie’ Pluralité des prises de parole sur le web et les réseaux sociaux.” In Lefébure, P. and Sécail, C. (eds.). Le défi Charlie. Les médias à l’épreuve des attentats. Paris: Lemieux Editeur, pp. 187220.Google Scholar
Breese, E. B. and Luengo, C. 2016. “News Innovations and Enduring commitments.” In Alexander, J. C., Breese, E. B., Luengo, M. (eds.). The Crisis of Journalism Reconsidered: Democratic Culture, Professional Codes, Digital Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 282–89.Google Scholar
Broesman, M. 2010. “Journalism as Performative Discourse: The Importance of Form and Style in Journalism.” In Rupar, V. (ed.) Journalism and Meaning-Making: Reading the Newspaper. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp. 1535.Google Scholar
Cottle, S. 2008. “Reporting Demonstration: The Changing Media Politics of Dissent.” Media, Culture & Society 30 (6): 853–72.Google Scholar
Cottle, S. 2006. Mediatized Conflict: Developments in Media and Conflict Studies. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Cottle, S. 2004. The Racist Murder of Stephen Lawrence: Media Performance and Public Transformation. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1957. Professional Ethics and Civil Codes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Luengo, M. 2012. “Narrating Civil Society: A New Theoretical Perspective on Journalistic Autonomy.” Communication & Society 25 (2): 2956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, D. 2000. “Movement Strategy and Dramaturgic Framing in Democratic States: The Case of the American Civil Rights Movement.” In Chambers, S. and Costain, A. (eds.). Deliberation, Democracy and the Media. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 117–34.Google Scholar
Melucci, A. 1992. Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Örnebring, H. 2008. “The Consumer as Producer – of What? User-Generated Tabloid Content in The Sun UK and Aftonbladet (Sweden).” Journalism Studies 9: 771–85.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schudson, M. 1995. The Power of News. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. B. 1995. The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Todd, E. 2015. Who Is Charlie? Xenophobia and the New Middle Class. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. 2014. Discourse and Knowledge: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verjus, A. 2017. “A Disputed Truth: Defending Emmanuel Todd’s Approach of Je suis Charlie.” American Sociology 48: 478503.Google Scholar
Waddington, D. 1992. “Media Representation of Public Disorder.” In Waddington, D. (ed.). Contemporary Issues in Public Disorder. London: Routledge, pp. 160–78.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×