Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T19:47:45.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The public, the private and the state: civil society 1680–1880

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

Richard Price
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

Origins and definition

Civil society is that domain in which public activities of a collective and individual kind may be freely enacted. Civil society is bounded on one side by the jurisdiction of the state and on the other side by the private world of the individual. The kinds of institutions that fill the spaces, define the character and determine the values of civil society vary over different historical periods. Similarly, the relationship between the formal structures of the state, the public world of civil society and the intimate world of the individual will vary over time and place. Understanding the dynamics of civil society in any period requires appreciating the arrangements that govern the relationships between three elements: the institutional state, the public world of civil society and the private world of the individual.

Before the seventeenth century, there was no concept of the “public” as the core of civil society. There was the court, the Lords and an occasional Parliament, and then there were the people. No legitimate space existed for public associations of private individuals. Over the course of the century the role of the court and of Parliament were transformed. Functional specialization between the political, cultural and economic sectors created a public sphere. By the end of the seventeenth century, the contours of a public sphere were drawn by a greatly expanded associational life. This was primarily an urban phenomenon. Institutions like the coffee shops, the newspapers, the pamphlet literature and various political associations provided the seedbeds for the development and expression of public opinion. Bodies such as charities, theaters, assembly rooms and voluntary hospitals expressed the civic responsibilities of individuals within the public sphere.

Type
Chapter
Information
British Society 1680–1880
Dynamism, Containment and Change
, pp. 192 - 233
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×