Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T12:39:49.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Measuring performance: the operations management perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

By
Andy Neely
Edited by
Andy Neely
Andy Neely
Affiliation:
Professor Operations Strategy and Performance at Cranfield School of Management, UK
Andy Neely
Affiliation:
Cranfield University, UK
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter explores performance measurement from an operations perspective. Members of the operations management community have been interested in performance measurement – at both the strategic and the tactical level – for decades. Wickham Skinner, widely credited with the development of the operations strategy framework, for example, observed in 1974:

A factory cannot perform well on every yardstick. There are a number of common standards for measuring manufacturing performance. Among these are short delivery cycles, superior product quality and reliability, dependable delivery promises, ability to produce new products quickly, flexibility in adjusting to volume changes, low investment and hence higher return on investment, and low costs.

These measures of manufacturing performance necessitate trade-offs – certain tasks must be compromised to meet others. They cannot all be accomplished equally well because of the inevitable limitations of equipment and process technology. Such trade-offs as costs versus quality or short delivery cycles versus low inventory investment are fairly obvious. Other trade-offs, while less obvious, are equally real. They involve implicit choices in establishing manufacturing policies.

(Skinner, 1974, 115)

Skinner's early work on operations (initially manufacturing) strategy influenced a generation of researchers, all of whom subsequently explored the question of how to align operations policies with operations objectives (see, for example, Hayes and Wheelwright, 1984; Hayes, Wheelwright and Clark, 1988; Hill, 1985; Mills, Platts and Gregory, 1995; Platts and Gregory, 1990; Slack and Lewis, 2001).

It was during this phase of exploration that the operations management community's interest in performance measurement was probably at its peak, with numerous authors asking how organizational performance measurement systems could be aligned with operations strategies (for a comprehensive review of these works, see Neely, Gregory and Platts, 1995).

Type
Chapter
Information
Business Performance Measurement
Unifying Theory and Integrating Practice
 , pp. 64 - 81
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Argyris, C. (1952). The Impact of Budgets on People. New York: Controllership Foundation.Google Scholar
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beamon, B. M. (1999). Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(3–4), 275–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicheno, J. (1989). Exploring productivity accounting for management and strategy in manufacturing and services. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 9(5), 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourne, M. C. S., Mills, J. F., Wilcox, M., Neely, A. D., and Platts, K. W. (2000). Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(7), 754–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffa, E. S. (1980). Research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 1(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, T. F. (1990). A review of productivity. Work Study, 39(1), 6–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camp, R. C. (1989). Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices that Lead to Superior Performance. Milwaukee: ASQS Quality Press.Google Scholar
Campanella, J., and Corcoran, F. J. (1983). Principles of quality costs. Quality Progress, 16(4), 16–22.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D. (1977). The Visible Hand: Managerial Revolution in American Business. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operations Research, 2(6), 429–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, R. B. (1980). A classification and evaluation of research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 1(1), 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, C. E., and Harris, C. R. (1973). Total productivity measurement at the firm level. Sloan Management Review, 14(3), 13–29.Google Scholar
Crosby, P. B. (1972). Quality Is Free. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Delbridge, R., Lowe, J., and Oliver, N. (1995). The process of benchmarking: a study from the automotive industry. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(4), 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deming, W. E. (1982). Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Deming, W. E.(1986). Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, J. R., Nanni, A. J., and Vollmann, T. E. (1990). The new performance challenge: measuring operations for world-class competition. Homewood, IL: Dow-Jones Irwin.Google Scholar
Drucker, P. (1954). The Practice of Management. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
DTI (2003). Innovation Report: Competing in the Global Economy. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
Feigenbaum, A. V. (1961). Total Quality Control. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Ferdows, K., and Meyer, A. (1990). Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: in search of a new theory. Journal of Operations Management, 9(2), 168–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., Brignall, S., Silvestro, R., and Voss, C. (1991). Performance Measurement in Service Business. London: Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.Google Scholar
Flynn, B. B., and Flynn, E. J. (2004). An exploratory study of the nature of cumulative capabilities. Journal of Operations Management, 22(5), 439–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, D., and Waldron, D. (1988a). Throughput accounting part 1: the need for a new language for manufacturing. Management Accounting, 66(10), 34–5.Google Scholar
Galloway, D., and Waldron, D.(1988b). Throughput accounting part 2: ranking products profitability. Management Accounting, 66(11), 34–5.Google Scholar
Galloway, D., and Waldron, D.(1989a). Throughput accounting part 3: a better way to control labour costs. Management Accounting, 67(1), 32–3.Google Scholar
Galloway, D., and Waldron, D.(1989b). Throughput accounting part 4: moving on to complex products. Management Accounting, 67(2), 40–1.Google Scholar
Garvin, D. A. (1987). Competing on the eight dimensions of quality. Harvard Business Review, 65(6), 101–9.Google Scholar
Gerwin, D. (1987). An agenda for research on the flexibility of manufacturing processes. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 7(1), 38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghoshal, S., and Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: a critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Globerson, S. (1985). Issues in developing a performance criteria system for an organization. International Journal of Production Research, 23(4), 639–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldratt, E. M., and Cox, J. (2004). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. London: Gower.Google Scholar
Hall, R. W. (1983). Zero Inventories. Homewood, IL: Dow-Jones Irwin.Google Scholar
Hanson, P., and Voss, C. (1995). Benchmarking best practice in European manufacturing sites. Business Process Engineering and Management Journal, 1(1), 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, R. H., and Abernathy, W. J. (1980). Managing our way to economic decline. Harvard Business Review, 58(4), 67–77.Google Scholar
Hayes, R. H., and Clark, K. B. (1986). Why some factories are more productive than others. Harvard Business Review, 64(5), 66–73.Google Scholar
Hayes, R. H., and Wheelwright, S. C. (1984). Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing through Manufacturing. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Hayes, R. H., Wheelwright, S. C., and Clark, K. B. (1988). Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the Learning Organisation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hill, T. J. (1985). Manufacturing Strategy: The Strategic Management of the Manufacturing Function. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, B., and Milgrom, P. (1991). Multitask principal agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership and job design. Journal of Law, Economics and Organisation, 7, 24–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huselid, M., Becker, B., and Beatty, R. (2005). The Workforce Scorecard. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Huselid, M., Becker, B., and Ulrich, D. (2001). The HR Scorecard: Linking People, Strategy and Performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen: The Key to Japan's Competitive Success. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. (1994). The nature of man. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 7(2), 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H. T. (1972). Early cost accounting for internal management control: Lyman Mills in the 1850s. Business History Review, 46(4), 466–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H. T.(1975a). Management accounting in early integrated industry: E. I. duPont de Nemours powder company 1903–1912. Business History Review, 49(2), 184–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H. T.(1975b). The role of history in the study of modern business enterprise. Accounting Review, 50(3), 444–50.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. T.(1978). Management accounting in an early multidivisional organisation: General Motors in the 1920s. Business History Review, 52(4), 490–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H. T.(1980). Markets, hierarchies, and the history of management accounting. Paper presented at Third International Congress of Accounting Historians, London, 16–18 August.
Johnson, H. T.(1981). Toward a new understanding of nineteenth-century cost accounting. Accounting Review, 56(3), 510–18.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. T.(1983). The search for gain in markets and firms: a review of the historical emergence of management accounting systems. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 2/3, 139–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H. T., and Kaplan, R. S. (1987). Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. S., and Cooper, R. (1997). Cost and Effect: Using Integrated Cost Systems to Drive Profitability and Performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. S., and Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Keegan, D. P., Eiler, R. G., and Jones, C. R. (1989). Are your performance measures obsolete?Management Accounting, 70(12), 45–50.Google Scholar
Kendrick, J. W. (1984). Improving Company Productivity: Handbook with Case Studies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, E., and Latham, G. (1989). A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Lynch, R. L., and Cross, K. F. (1991). Measure Up! Yardsticks for Continuous Improvement. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Marr, B., and Neely, A. D. (2003). Balanced Scorecard Software Report. Stamford, CT: Gartner.Google Scholar
Miller, J. G., and Roth, A. V. (1994). A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies. Management Science, 40(3), 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. G., and Vollmann, T. E. (1985). The hidden factory. Harvard Business Review, 63(5), 142–50.Google Scholar
Mills, J. F., Platts, K. W., and Gregory, M. J. (1995). A framework for the design of manufacturing strategy processes: a contingency approach. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(4), 17–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monden, Y. (1996). The Toyota Management System: Linking the Seven Key Functional Areas. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
Mundel, M. (1987). Measuring Total Productivity of Manufacturing Organisations. White Plains, NY: Unipub-Kraus International.Google Scholar
Neely, A. D. (2005). The evolution of performance measurement research: developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the next. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 25(12), 1264–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neely, A. D., Adams, C., and Kennerley, M. (2002). The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Stakeholder Relationships. London: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Neely, A. D., Gregory, M. J., and Platts, K. W. (1995). Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(4), 80–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neely, A. D., Mills, J. F., Gregory, M. J., Richards, A. H., Platts, K. W., and Bourne, M. C. S. (1996). Getting the Measure of Your Business. Horton Kirby, Kent: Findlay Publications.Google Scholar
Neely, A. D., Mills, J. F., Platts, K. W., Gregory, M. J., and Richards, A. H. (1994). Realising strategy through measurement. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 14(3), 140–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neely, A. D., Richards, A. H., Mills, J. F., Platts, K. W., and Bourne, M. C . S. (1997). Designing performance measures: a structured approach. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 17(11), 1131–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neely, A. D., and Wilson, J. (1992). Measuring product goal congruence: an exploratory study. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 12(4), 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New, C., and Szwejczewski, M. (1995). Performance measurement and the focussed factory: empirical evidence. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(4), 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Mahony, M., and Boer, W. (2002). Britain's relative productivity performance: has anything changed?National Institute Economic Review, 179, 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pande, P. S., Neuman, R. P., and Cavanagh, R. (2001). The Six Sigma Way Team Fieldbook: An Implementation Guide for Project Improvement Teams. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Platts, K. W., and Gregory, M. J. (1990). Manufacturing audit in the process of strategy formulation. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 10(9), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plunkett, J. J., and Dale, B. G. (1988). Quality costs: a critique of some economic cost of quality models. International Journal of Production Research, 26(11), 1713–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M., and Ketels, C. (2003). UK Competitiveness: Moving to the Next Stage. London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ridgway, V. F. (1956). Dysfunctional consequences of performance measurements. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1(2), 240–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruch, W. A. (1982). The measurement of white-collar productivity. National Productivity Review, 1(14), 416–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schonberger, R. J. (1982). Japanese Manufacturing Techniques. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schonberger, R. J.(1986). World Class Manufacturing. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schonberger, R. J.(1990). Creating a Chain of Customers. London: Guild Publishing.Google Scholar
Sink, D. S. (1985). Productivity Measurement: Planning, Measurement and Evaluation, Control and Improvement. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Skinner, W. (1969). Manufacturing: missing link in corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 47(3), 136–45.Google Scholar
Skinner, W.(1974). The focused factory. Harvard Business Review, 52(3), 113–21.Google Scholar
Slack, N. (1983). Flexibility as a manufacturing objective. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 3(3), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slack, N.(1987). The flexibility of manufacturing systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 7(4), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slack, N.(1991). The Manufacturing Advantage: Achieving Competitive Manufacturing Operations. London: Mercury.Google Scholar
Slack, N., and Lewis, M. (2001). Operations Strategy. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Stalk, G. (1988). Time: the next source of competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 66(4), 41–51.Google Scholar
Turney, P. B. B., and Anderson, B. (1989). Accounting for continuous improvement. Sloan Management Review, 30(2), 37–48.Google Scholar
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., and Roos, D. (1990). The Machine that Changed the World. New York: Rawson Associates.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×