Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Sources for the period
- 2 The succession to Alexander
- 3 Monarchies and monarchic Ideas
- 4 The formation of the Hellenistic kingdoms
- 5 Ptolemaic Egypt
- 6 Syria and the East
- 7 Macedonia and Greece
- 8 Cultural, social and economic features of the Hellenistic world
- 9 Hellenistic science: its application in peace and war
- 10 Agathocles
- 11 The Syrian-Egyptian Wars and the new lingdoms of Asia Minor
- 12 Macedonia and the Greek leagues
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Index
- Map 3. Egypt.
- Map 4. Hellenistic Asia.
- Map 5. The Greek mainland and the Aegean.
- References
6 - Syria and the East
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Sources for the period
- 2 The succession to Alexander
- 3 Monarchies and monarchic Ideas
- 4 The formation of the Hellenistic kingdoms
- 5 Ptolemaic Egypt
- 6 Syria and the East
- 7 Macedonia and Greece
- 8 Cultural, social and economic features of the Hellenistic world
- 9 Hellenistic science: its application in peace and war
- 10 Agathocles
- 11 The Syrian-Egyptian Wars and the new lingdoms of Asia Minor
- 12 Macedonia and the Greek leagues
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Index
- Map 3. Egypt.
- Map 4. Hellenistic Asia.
- Map 5. The Greek mainland and the Aegean.
- References
Summary
ORGANIZATION, THE MONARCHY, THE COURT
Of the various Hellenistic kingdoms which arose out of the dissolution of Alexander the Great's dominions, that which most resembled the empire conquered and for a time ruled over by the Macedonian king was the Seleucid kingdom. It was similar in size and structure, in racial and social composition, in its economic functioning and in its political ideology. This kingdom sprang from the struggles of the Diadochi and was consolidated in the battles fought by Seleucus I against Antigonus Monophthalmus, Demetrius Poliorcetes an Lysimachus. It was to last, formally, until its final subjection to Rome and the reduction of the small parts of it that still remained to the condition of a province, in the course of Pompey's reorganization of the East in 63 B.C. The conflict with Rome makes it convenient to divide the history of the kingdom (which began in 312 B.C. with the official initiation of the Seleucid era and thus lasted a little less than 250 years) into two clearly distinct periods. Following its defeat by Rome in 189 B.C. and the subsequent peace of Apamea in 188, the Seleucid kingdom finally lost its control of western Asia Minor (the part which lies to the west of the Taurus Mountains). It had ruled this region for nearly a century, with some interruptions and upheavals caused by the rebellion of Pergamum, the Galatian invasion, the civil wars and revolts led by Antiochus Hierax and Achaeus, and conflicts with other kings who tried to dispute its possession. The change in the size of the kingdom between the first and the second periods of Seleucid history also brought with it a change in its general political orientation.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Ancient History , pp. 175 - 220Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1984
References
‘Antioco il Grande’, in I Protagonisti, 11.3 Milan, 1968.
Études d'histoire ancienne (= A 2), esp. ‘Le protocole royal grec’, ‘Βασιλενς Μακεδόνων’,, ‘La monarchie hellénistique II: L'institution monarchique’, ‘Sur l'assemblée macédonienne’, ‘Tutelle et usurpation dans les monarchies hellénistiques’ (230–9). Paris, 1967.Google Scholar
The Seleucid Army. Organization and Tactics in the Great Campaigns. Cambridge, 1976.
Die Strategic in der hellenistischen Zeit. Ein Beitrag zum antiken Staatsrecht (Münch. Beitr. Papyr. 26, 32, 36). Ed. 2 Munich, 1964–7.
‘Aï Khanum on the Oxus. A Hellenistic city in central Asia’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 53 (1967).Google Scholar
Fouilles d'Aï Khanoum: Campagnes 1965, 1966, 1967, 1968, Paris, 1973.
Institutions des Séleucides. Paris, 1938.
‘Colonisation hellénistique et populations indigènes; la phase d'installation’, Klio
60 (1978).Google Scholar
‘Remarques sur “laoi” et esclaves ruraux en Asie Mineure hellénistique’, Actes Besançon 1971 (1972).Google Scholar
‘New evidence on temple-estates in Asia Minor’, in Studies in Roman Economic and Social History in honor of Allan C. Johnson, ed.
and others, Princeton, 1951.Google Scholar
and
Sardis VII.I: The Greek Inscriptions. Leiden, 1932.
The Seleucid Colonies. Studies in founding, administration and organisation (Historia Einzelschr. 30). Wiesbaden, 1978.
Labraunda. Swedish Excavations and Researches iii. 1–2: The Greek Inscriptions (Acta Instituti Atheniensis Regni Sueciae, Series in 4°, V). Lund, 1969 and Stockholm, 1972. (Critical review of III.I: Chr. Habicht in Gnomon
44 (1972)).
‘Rome and the Greek world: economic relationships’, Economic History Review
30 (1977).Google Scholar
and
déesse de Hierapolis Castabala (Cilicie). Paris, 1964.
and
(eds.) Die Inschriften von Erythrai und Klazomenai I. Bonn, 1972.
‘Rom, Antiochos der Grosse und Teos’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik
39 (1980).Google Scholar
‘Greek-Phoenician bilingual inscriptions from Rhodes’, Annual of the British School at Athens
65 (1970).Google Scholar
, , , , and
Laodicée du Lycos: le nymphée (Campagnes 1961–63). Quebec-Paris, 1969.
‘Raphia, 217 B.C.E., revisited’, Scripta Classica lsraelica
3 (1976/7 [1978]). (Also published separately with corrigenda).Google Scholar
Étude géographique de la plaine d' Aï-Khanoum et de son irrigation depuis les temps antiques, Paris, 1978.
Das Orakel von Didyma in hellenistischer Zeit. Eine Interpretation von Stein-Urkunden (Mitteilungen des deutschen archäologischen Instituts, Istanbuler Abteilung Beiheft 4). Tübingen, 1971. (Critical review by
, Göttingische gelehrte Anzeigen
226 (1974)).
‘Die herrschende Gesellschaft in den hellenistischen Monarchien’, Vierteljahrschrift für Social- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte
45 (1958).Google Scholar
and
‘Asylieurkunden aus Kos’, Abhandlungen der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, phil.-hist. Klasse (later ‘der deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Klasse für Sprache, Literatur und Kunst’ or ‘Klasse für Philosophie, Geschichte etc.’) 1952 no. 1.Google Scholar
Stadt und Herrscher des Hellenismus in ihren staats- und völkerrechtlichen Beziehungen (Klio Beiheft 39). Leipzig, 1937.
Conquerors and Slaves. Cambridge, 1978.
L' identité de l'Antioche Epidaphné. Ghent, 1963.
Die lnschriften von Magnesia am Sipylos, Bonn, 1978.
, Bull. Epig. in Rev. Et. Cr.
83 (1970) ;.
‘A royal message to Ikaros; the Hellenistic temples of Failaka’, Kuml (1960) (in Danish; English summary).Google Scholar
Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft im Seleukidenreich. Die Eigentums- und Abhängigkeitsverhältnisse. Berlin, 1978.
Né liberi né schiavi. Gruppi sociali e rapporti di lavoro nel mondo ellenistico-romano. Milan, 1976.
Roman Rule in Asia Minor to the End of the Third Century after Christ. 2 vols. Princeton, N.J., 1950.
‘La capitale del regno di Seleuco I’, Rendiconti del Istituto Lombardo di scienze e lettere
106 (1972).Google Scholar
and
‘The treaty of Apamea (188 B.C.): the naval clauses'’, Journal of Roman Studies
59 (1969).Google Scholar
Blüte und Niedergang des Hellenismus in Asien. Berlin, 1925.
‘Über die ptolemäischen Hofrangtitel’, in Antidorum W. Peremans (Studia Hellenistica 16), Louvain, 1968.Google Scholar
‘La hiérarchie du cour ptolémaïque: contribution à l'etude des institutions et des classes dirigeantes à l'époque hellénistique’, Studia Hellenistica
23. Louvain, 1977.Google Scholar
‘I regni ellenistici’, in
1977, VIII. : (H 11).
Milesische Volksbeschlüsse. Eine Untersuchung zur Verfassungsgeschichte der Stadt Milet in hellenistiscber Zeit (Hypomnemata 47). Göttingen, 1976.
‘Il regno ellenistico’, in
1977, VII. : (H 11).
‘Il commercio degli schiavi e del grano: il caso di Puteoli. Sui rapporti tra l'economia italiana della tarda repubblica e le economie ellenistiche’, in The Seaborne Commerce of Ancient Rome (MAAR 36), edd.
and
, Rome, 1980.Google Scholar
‘Morte e culto del sovrano in ambito ellenistico (in particolare sulle tombe-santuario dei sovrani della Commagene)’, in La mort, les morts dans les sociétés anciennes, eds.
and
, Cambridge, 1982.Google Scholar
‘Osservazioni in margine a documenti delle cancellerie ellenistiche’, Annali di Pisa2
26 (1957).Google Scholar
‘Lo stato dei Seleucidi. Dinastia popoli città da Seleuco I ad Antioco III’, Studi class, e orient. 15 (1966).Google Scholar
‘Aspetti dell'organizzazione seleucidica in Asia Minore nel III sec. a. C.’, La parola del passato
20 (1965).Google Scholar
The Indo-Greeks, Oxford, 1957 (with excellent bibliography).
‘Zeuxis’,
, and others, Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Altertums-Wissenschaft
X.A. (1972) cols.Google Scholar
Königlicher Machtanspruch und städtische Freiheit (Münch. Beitr. Papyr. 71). Munich, 1977. (Review by
, Gnomon
52 (1980)).
and
A Bilingual Graeco-Aramaic Edict by Asoka, Rome, 1964.
IGLS vii: Arados et régions voisines. Paris, 1970.
, Hellenica
VII (1949) ;.
and
La Carie. Histoire et geographic historique avec le recueil des inscriptions antiques. ii: Le plateau de Tabai et ses environs. Paris, 1954.
The Social and Economic History of the Hellenistic World. 3 vols. Ed. 2. Oxford, 1953.
Greek and Roman Chronology, Calendars and Years in Classical Antiquity (Müllers Handbücher der Altertumswissenschaft 1.7). Munich, 1972.
‘The letter of Antiochus III to Zeuxis regarding the establishment of Jewish military colonies in Phrygia and Lydia’, Jewish Quarterly Review
50 (1960).Google Scholar
, , and
‘Une bilingue gréco-araméenne d' Asoka’, Journal asiatique
246 (1958). (For the Greek part of the text see SEG 20 (1964) no. 326).Google Scholar
Untersuchungen zur Geschichte Antiochos' des Grossen und seiner Zeit (Historia Einzelschr. 6). Wiesbaden, 1964.
. Die hellenistischen Städtegründungen von Alexander dem Grossen bis auf die Römerzeit (Philol. Suppl. B.XIX.I). Leipzig, 1927.
Alexander the Great. 2 vols. Cambridge, 1948.
The Greeks in Bactria and India, Ed. 2. Cambridge, 1951.
Asoka and the Decline of the Mauryas, Oxford, 1961.
, , and
Un editto bilingue di Asoka, Rome, 1958.
Il buon uso del tradimento. Flavio Giuseppe e la guerra giudaica, Rome, 1980.
Il ‘tempio stato’ di Pessinunte fra Pergamo e Roma nel II–I secolo a.C. (C.B. Welles, Royal Corr., 55–61). Pisa, 1981.
A Historical Commentary on Polybius. 3 vols. Oxford, 1957 (I); 1967 (II); 1979 (III).
Die kommagenischen Kultreformen unter König Mithridates I Kallinikos und seinem Sohne Antiochos I. Leiden, 1973.
‘Abhängige Landbevölkerungenauf “Tempel-territorien” im hellenistischen Kleinasien und Syrien’, Ancient Society
10 (1979).Google Scholar
and
Didyma
II; Die Inschriften. Berlin, 1958.
Histoire politique du monde hellénistique. 2 vols. Nancy, 1967 (II); 1979 (I, ed. 2); 1982 (II, ed. 2).
‘The decay of the Iranian Empire of the Seleucids and the chronology of the Parthian beginnings’, Berytus
12 (1956–8).Google Scholar
‘L'origine de la relation d'Arrien sur la paire des frères Arsacides, Arsace et Tiridate’, Acta antiqua academiae scientiarum Hungaricae, 24 (1976).Google Scholar
The Greeks in India, London, 1966.
‘Antiochos I., Achaios der Ältere und die Galater. Eine neue Inschrift in Denizli’, Chiron
5 (1975).Google Scholar
- 16
- Cited by