Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to CHRISTIAN POLITICAL THEOLOGY
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- CHRISTIAN POLITICAL THEOLOGY
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Part I The Shape of Contemporary Political Theology
- Part II Contemporary Questions in Political Theology
- The Contemporary Discipline and Traditional Sources
- Issues
- Ends
- Index
- References
The Contemporary Discipline and Traditional Sources
from Part II - Contemporary Questions in Political Theology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2015
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to CHRISTIAN POLITICAL THEOLOGY
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- CHRISTIAN POLITICAL THEOLOGY
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Part I The Shape of Contemporary Political Theology
- Part II Contemporary Questions in Political Theology
- The Contemporary Discipline and Traditional Sources
- Issues
- Ends
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Christian Political Theology , pp. 156 - 195Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Further Reading
Agamben, G., The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, E., Atheism in Christianity: The Religion of the Exodus and the Kingdom. New York: Herder, 1972.Google Scholar
Daley, B., The Hope of the Early Church: A Handbook of Patristic Eschatology. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2010.Google Scholar
Davis, J. B., and Harink, D., ed., Apocalyptic and the Future of Theology with and beyond J. Louis Martyn. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2012.Google Scholar
Jennings, T. W., Outlaw Justice: The Messianic Politics of Paul. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Rowland, C., Christian Origins: An Account of the Setting and Character of the Most Important Messianic Sect of Judaism, rev. ed. London: SPCK, 2002.Google Scholar
Stringfellow, W., An Ethic for Christians and Other Aliens in a Strange Land. Waco, TX: Word, 1973.Google Scholar
Taubes, J., The Political Theology of Paul. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Burnell, P., The Augustinian Person. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Deane, H., The Political and Social Ideas of St. Augustine. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodaro, R., Christ and the Just Society in the Thought of Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J., Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, E., Politics and the Order of Love: An Augustinian Ethic of Democratic Citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A., Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Maritain, J., The Person and the Common Good, trans. Fitzgerald, J. J.. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1947.Google Scholar
Markus, R. A., Saeculum: History and Society in the Theology of St. Augustine, rev. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Mathewes, C., The Republic of Grace: Augustinian Thoughts for Dark Times. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar
Milbank, J., Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J. C., We Hold These Truths: Catholic Reflections on the American Proposition. New York: Sheed and Ward, 1960.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, R., Christian Realism and Political Problems. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1953.Google Scholar
Simon, Y. R., Philosophy of Democratic Government. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Weithman, P. J., “Augustine and Aquinas on Original Sin and the Function of Political Authority,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 30.3 (1992): 353–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar