Bartley, William Warren III 1984. Retreat to Commitment, second edition, La Salle, IL and London: Open Court.Google Scholar

Bartley, W. W. III, 1989. ‘Rehearsing a Revolution. Karl Popper: A Life. A section entitled Music and Politics: Karl Popper Meets Arnold Schönberg and the Eislers and Gives up Communism’. An extract made for delivery at the Pacific Regional Meeting of the Mont Pelerin Society, Christchurch, New Zealand, November 27–30, 1989; available at: http://bartleyinstitute.org/shelf/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Rehearsing-a-Revolution.pdfGoogle Scholar

Benesch, P. 2012. The Viennese Socrates: Karl Popper and the Reconstruction of Progressive Politics, Bern: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyer, A. 2005. ‘Is an Open Society A Just Society?’, Learning for Democracy 1, No. 2, 7–27.Google Scholar

Calhoun, C. (ed.) 1993. Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Carey, G. W. (ed.) 1986. Order, Freedom and the Polity, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Dahms, H.-J. 2006. ‘Karl Poppers erste Schritte in die in die Philosophie: Leonard Nelsons Paradoxien der Souveränität und Nelsons sowie Poppers Lösungsversuche’, in Jarvie et al. 2006, pp. 83–98.Google Scholar

Dahrendorf, R. 1975. The New Liberty, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Eidlin, F. 2005. ‘Popper, Social-Democratic Politics and Free-Market Liberalism’, Critical Review 17, No. 1–2, 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, S. 2004. Kuhn vs. Popper: The Struggle for the Soul of Science, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1991[1962]. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hacohen, M. 2000. Karl Popper: The Formative years, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. 1944. The Road to Serfdom, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. 1967. Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, F. 1973. Law, Legislation and Liberty, volume 1, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. 2007. The Road to Serfdom: Text and Documents, ed. Caldwell, Bruce, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayes, C. 2001. Popper, Democracy and the Market, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Hayes, C. 2009. Popper, Hayek and the Open Society, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

James, R. 1980. Return to Reason, Shepton Mallet: Open Books.Google Scholar

Jarvie, I. Milford, Karl and Miller, David (eds.) 2006. Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, Volume 1, Basingstoke: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Magee, B. 1995. ‘What Use Is Popper to a Politician?’ in O’Hear, A. (ed.) Karl Popper: Philosophy and Problems, Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 259–73.Google Scholar

Naraniecki, A. 2013. Returning to Karl Popper: A Reassessment of His Politics and Philosophy, Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Nelson, L. 1928. Politics and Education, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Parvin, P. 2010. Karl Popper, New York and London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. 1997. Republicanism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1957. The Poverty of Historicism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1959 [1934]. The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1970. ‘Normal Science and Its Dangers’, in Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popper, K. 1972. Objective Knowledge, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1976. Unended Quest, London: Fontana.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1982–83. Postscript to The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Realism and the Aim of Science; Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics, and The Open Universe), ed. Bartley, W. W. III, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1992. In Search of a Better World, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1994. The Myth of the Framework, ed. Notturno, Mark, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 2008. After the Open Society, ed. Shearmur, Jeremy and Turner, Piers, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pressman, J. and Wildavsky, A. 1984. Implementation, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Salamun, K. 1999. ‘Critical Rationalism and Political Education: Karl Popper´s Advice How to Neutralise Anti-Democratic Thought-Patterns’, in Zecha, Gerhard (ed.) Critical Rationalism and Educational Discourse. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, pp. 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sampson, G. 1984. An End to Allegiance, London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar

Sassower, R. 2006. Popper's Legacy: Rethinking Politics, Economics and Science, Stocksfield: Acumen.Google Scholar

Schilpp, P. (ed.) 1974. The Philosophy of Karl Popper, La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

Shearmur, J. 1984. ‘Hayek and the Spirit of the Age’, in Burton, J. et al., Hayek’s ‘Serfdom’ Revisited, London: Institute of Economic Affairs, pp. 66–85.Google Scholar

Shearmur, J. 1989. ‘Popper, Hayek and Classical Liberalism’, The Freeman, February. http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail/popper-hayek-and-classical-liberalism#axzz2fPQPUFC1Google Scholar

Shearmur, J. 1996a. Political Thought of Karl Popper, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Shearmur, J. 1996b. Hayek and After, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shearmur, J. 2002. ‘Living with a Marsupial Mouse’, Policy, Winter 2002; see http://www.cis.org.au/policy/winter02/polwin02-4.htm.Google Scholar

Shearmur, J. 2004. ‘Popper’s Emory Lectures’ (unpublished), presented at a conference on Popper and his work: Philosophy: Problems, Aims, Responsibilities, held at the University of Warwick.Google Scholar

Shearmur, J. 2005. ‘Popper, Political Philosophy and Social Democracy: Reply to Eidlin’, Critical Review 18, No. 4, 361–76.Google Scholar

Shearmur, J. 2006a. ‘Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, and the British Conservative Party’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought; 28, No. 3, September, 309–14.Google Scholar

Shearmur, J. 2006b. ‘The Logic of Scientific Discovery’ in Shand, J. (ed.) Central Works of Philosophy: Volume 4: The Twentieth Century: Moore to Popper, Chesham, Bucks: Acumen, pp. 262–86.Google Scholar

Shearmur, J. 2006c. ‘The Empirical Basis’, in Jarvie, Ian, Milford, Karl and Miller, David (eds.) Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, volume 2: Metaphysics and Epistemology, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 197–208.Google Scholar

Shearmur, J. 2009. ‘Critical Rationalism and Ethics’ in Parusniková, Zuzana and Cohen, Robert (eds.) Rethinking Popper, Boston: Springer, pp. 339–55.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. 1998. Liberty before Liberalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stokes, G. 1989. Popper: Philosophy, Politics and Scientific Method, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. 1995. ‘Incompletely Theorized Agreements’, Harvard Law Review 108, 1733–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, J. 1993. ‘Social Citizenship and the Defense of Welfare Provision’, in Liberal Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 271–308.Google Scholar

Wettersten, J. 2005. ‘New Insights on Young Popper’, Journal of the History of Ideas 66, Number 4, 603–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, D. 1989. Truth, Hope and Power, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. 1991. Bureaucracy, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar