Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T11:46:05.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Chinese Business Organization

from Part I - 1800–1950

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2022

Debin Ma
Affiliation:
Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo
Richard von Glahn
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

In this chapter we will examine how key institutions were mobilized to shape China’s early modern business practices under weak state engagement of the economy, and a growing foreign presence. Business practices in the late imperial period rested on four pillars, each a fundamental part of the institutional framework that structured social and economic life. The first, family, provided templates for the utilization of capital and labor and the mobilization of trust, tools that proved as useful for China’s late imperial commercial economy as for the early modern economy of industrial enterprise and global engagement. The second might be termed the system of private ordering that served generations of Chinese merchants and others in combining capital and establishing the terms of economic interaction, often through written contracts whose provisions established highly flexible forms of partnership that continued to form the basis of most Chinese business until the early PRC. The third, native place, in significant ways mirrored the intangible assets provided by ties of kinship, offering a predetermined basis for co-operation, nurturing and protecting group interests and skills and, like the fourth, grounding these intangibles in very tangible organizations catering to inhabitants of a particular city, region, or province.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

“The Canton Trade: Life and Enterprise on the China Coast, 1700–1845,” at www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1xwbc2, accessed September 14, 2020.Google Scholar
Chan, K.Y., Business Expansion and Structural Change in Pre-war China: Liu Hongsheng and His Enterprises, 1920–1937 (Hong Kong, Hong Kong University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Chan, K.Y., “Making Sense of the ‘Business Group’ in Modern China: The Rong Brothers Businesses, 1901–37,” Australian Economic History Review 51.3 (2011), 219–44.Google Scholar
Chan, W.K.K., “The Organizational Structure of the Traditional Chinese Firm and Its Modern Reform,” Business History Review 56.2 (1982), 218–35.Google Scholar
Cheong, W.E., The Hong Merchants of Canton: Chinese Merchants in Sino-Western Trade (Richmond, Curzon, 1997).Google Scholar
Cochran, S., Big Business in China: Sino-Foreign Rivalry in the Cigarette Industry, 1890–1930 (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Cochran, S., Encountering Chinese Networks: Western, Japanese, and Chinese Corporations in China, 1880–1937 (Berkeley, University of California Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Fang, L., “Chinese Partnership,” Law and Contemporary Problems 52.3 (1989), 4368.Google Scholar
Faure, D., “The Control of Equity in Chinese Firms within the Modern Sector from the Late Qing to the Early Republic,” in Brown (ed.), R.A., Chinese Business Enterprise in Asia (London, Routledge, 1995), 60–79.Google Scholar
Feuerwerker, A., China’s Early Industrialization: Sheng Hsuan-Huai (1844–1916) and Mandarin Enterprise (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardella, R., “Contracting Business Partnerships in Late Qing and Republican China: Paradigms and Patterns,” in Zelin, M., J., K. Ocko, and Gardella (eds.), R., Contract and Property in Early Modern China (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2004), pp. 327–47.Google Scholar
Kim, K., Borderland Capitalism: Turkestan Produce, Qing Silver, and the Birth of an Eastern Market (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Kirby, W.C., “China Unincorporated: Company Law and Business Enterprise in Twentieth-Century China,” Journal of Asian Studies 54.1 (1995), 4363.Google Scholar
Köll, E., From Cotton Mill to Business Empire: The Emergence of Regional Enterprises in Modern China (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Asia Center, 2003).Google Scholar
Kwan, M.B., “Managing Market, Hierarchy, and Network: The Jiuda Salt Industries, Ltd., 1917–1937,” Enterprise & Society 6.3 (2005), 395418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, C.-K., “The Qing State and Merchant Enterprise: The China Merchants’ Company, 1872–1902,” in J.K. Leonard, J.R. Watt, and Cornell University (eds.), To Achieve Security and Wealth: The Qing Imperial State and the Economy, 1644–1911 (Ithaca, NY, East Asia Program, Cornell University, 1992), p. 146.Google Scholar
Liu, K.-C., “Financing a Steam-Navigation Company in China, 1861–62,” Business History Review 28.2 (1954), 154–81.Google Scholar
Lufrano, R.J., Honorable Merchants: Commerce and Self-Cultivation in Late Imperial China (Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Moll-Murata, C., “Chinese Guilds from the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Centuries: An Overview,” International Review of Social History 53, Supplement S16 (2008), 213–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motono, E., Conflict and Cooperation in Sino-British Business, 1860–1911: The Impact of the Pro-British Commercial Network in Shanghai (New York and London, St. Martin’s Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomeranz, K., “‘Traditional’ Chinese Business Forms Revisited: Family, Firm, and Financing in the History of the Yutang Company of Jining, 1779–1956,” Late Imperial China 18.1 (December 22, 1997), 138.Google Scholar
Qiao, Zhijian, “The Rise of Shanxi Merchants: Empire, Institutions, and Social Change in Qing China, 1688–1850,” Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 2017.Google Scholar
Qiu, Pengsheng 邱澎生, “由公产到法人–清代苏州,上海商人团体的制度变化” (From “Common Property” to Corporation: The Institutional Changes of the Merchant Associations of Suzhou and Shanghai in Late Qing), 法制史研究 (Research on Legal History) 10 (2006), 117–40.Google Scholar
Rowe, W.T., Hankow, Commerce and Society in a Chinese City, 1796–1889 (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Ruskola, T., “Conceptualizing Corporations and Kinship: Comparative Law and Development Theory in a Chinese Perspective,” Stanford Law Review 52.6 (2000), 15991729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelin, M., The Merchants of Zigong: Industrial Entrepreneurship in Early Modern China (New York, Columbia University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×