Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T22:29:46.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Arabic Computational and Corpus Linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2021

Karin Ryding
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
David Wilmsen
Affiliation:
American University of Beirut
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abdelali, A., Darwish, K., Durrani, N., and Mubarak, H. (2016). Farasa: A fast and furious segmenter for Arabic. In Proceedings of the Meeting of the North America Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL). San Diego, California.Google Scholar
Abdul-Mageed, M. and Diab, M. (2012). Toward building a large-scale Arabic sentiment lexicon. In Proceedings of The International Global WordNet Conference. Matsue, Japan.Google Scholar
Abdul-Mageed, M., Kuebler, S., and Diab, M. (2012). SAMAR: A system for subjectivity and sentiment analysis of Arabic social media. In Proceedings of the Workshop in Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis. Jeju, Korea.Google Scholar
Al-Badrashiny, M., Eskander, R., Habash, N., and Rambow, O. (2014). Automatic transliteration of Romanized dialectal Arabic. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
Al Sallab, A. A., Baly, R., Badaro, G., Hajj, H., El Hajj, W., and Shaban, K. B. (2015). Deep learning models for sentiment analysis in Arabic. In Proceedings of the Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop (WANLP). Beijing, China.Google Scholar
Badaro, G., Baly, R., Hajj, H., Habash, N., and El Hajj, W. (2014). A large scale Arabic sentiment lexicon for Arabic opinion mining. In Proceedings of the EMNLP 2014 Workshop on Arabic Natural Language Processing (ANLP). Doha, Qatar, 165–73.Google Scholar
Bouamor, H., Habash, N., and Oflazer, K. (2014). A multidialectal parallel corpus of Arabic. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC). Reykjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar
Boudchiche, M., Mazroui, A., Bebah, M. O. A. O., Lakhouaja, A., and Boudlal, A. (2017). AlKhalil Morpho Sys 2: A robust Arabic morpho-syntactic analyzer. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 29(2), 141–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, D., Diab, M., Habash, N., Rambow, O., and Shareef, S. (2006). Parsing Arabic dialects. In Proceedings of the Meeting of the European Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL). Trento, Italy.Google Scholar
Diab, M. (2007). Improved Arabic base phrase chunking with a new enriched POS tag set. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Semitic Languages (CASL). Prague, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
Dukes, K., and Buckwalter, T. (2010). A dependency treebank of the Quran using traditional Arabic grammar. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Informatics and Systems (INFOS). Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
Dukes, K., Atwell, E., and Habash, N. (2013). Supervised collaboration for syntactic annotation of Quranic Arabic. In Language Resources and Evaluation, 47(1), 3362.Google Scholar
El Kholy, A. and Habash, N. (2012). Orthographic and morphological processing for English–Arabic statistical machine translation. Machine Translation, 26(1–2), 2545.Google Scholar
El Kholy, A. and Habash, N. (2015). Morphological constraints for phrase pivot statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Machine Translation Summit (MTSummit). Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
Elfardy, H. and Diab, M. (2013). Sentence-level dialect identification in Arabic. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Sofia, Bulgaria.Google Scholar
Elkateb, S., Black, W., Rodriguez, H., Alkhalifa, M., Vossen, P., Pease, A., et al. (2006). Building a WordNet for Arabic. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Genoa, Italy.Google Scholar
Eskander, R., Habash, N., Rambow, O., and Tomeh, N. (2013). Processing spontaneous orthography. In Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
Eskander, R., Habash, N., Rambow, O., and Pasha, A. (2016). Creating resources for dialectal Arabic from a single annotation: A case study on Egyptian and Levantine. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistic (COLING). Osaka, Japan.Google Scholar
Fellbaum, C. (ed.) (1998). WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Graff, D., Maamouri, M., Bouziri, B., Krouna, S., Kulick, S., and Buckwalter, T. (2009). Standard Arabic Morphological Analyzer – Version 3.1 Catalog No.: LDC2009E73. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Green, S. and Manning, C. D. (2010). Better Arabic parsing: Baselines, evaluations, and analysis. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Beijing, China, 394402.Google Scholar
Guzmán, F., Bouamor, H., Baly, R., and Habash, N. (2016). Machine translation evaluation for Arabic using morphologically-enriched embeddings. In Proceedings of COLING 2106. Osaka, Japan.Google Scholar
Habash, N. (2010). Introduction to Arabic Natural Language Processing, vol. 3. Morgan & Claypool.Google Scholar
Habash, N. and Roth, R. (2009). CATiB: The Columbia Arabic Treebank. In Proceedings of the ACL-JNLP Conference. Suntec, Singapore, 221–4.Google Scholar
Habash, N. and Sadat, F. (2006). Arabic preprocessing schemes for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL). New York.Google Scholar
Habash, N., Soudi, A., and Buckwalter, T. (2007). On Arabic transliteration. In Soudi, A., Neumann, G., and van den Bosch, A., eds., Arabic Computational Morphology: Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol. 38. Dordrecht: Springer, 1522.Google Scholar
Habash, N., Eskander, R., and Hawwari, A. (2012a). A morphological analyzer for Egyptian Arabic. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Morphology and Phonology. Montréal, Canada.Google Scholar
Habash, N., Diab, M., and Rambow, O. (2012b). Conventional orthography for dialectal Arabic. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
Habash, N., Zalmout, N., Taji, D., Hoang, H., and Alzate, M. (2017). A parallel corpus for evaluating machine translation between Arabic and European languages. In Proceedings of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Valencia, Spain.Google Scholar
Hirst, G. (ed.) (2008–2017). Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Morgan & Claypool.Google Scholar
Hovy, D. (2012). Programming in Python for Linguists: A Gentle Introduction. www.dirkhovy.com/portfolio/papers/download/pfl_handout.pdf; last accessed 10 December 2020.Google Scholar
Jarrar, M., Habash, N., Alrimawi, F., Akra, D., and Zalmout, N. (2017). Curras: An annotated corpus for the Palestinian Arabic dialect. Language Resources and Evaluation, 51, 745–75.Google Scholar
Jinxi, X. (2002). UN Parallel Text (Arabic-English), LDC Catalog No.: LDC2002E15. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D. and Martin, J. H. (2008). Speech and Language Processing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Khalifa, S., Habash, N., Abdulrahim, D., and Hassan, S. (2016). A large scale corpus of Gulf Arabic. In Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference 2016. Portorož, Slovenia.Google Scholar
Khalifa, S., Hassan, S., and Habash, N. (2017). A morphological analyzer for Gulf Arabic verbs. In Proceedings of the Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop (WANLP). Valencia, Spain, 3545.Google Scholar
Koehn, P. (2005). Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 10th Machine Translation Summit. Phuket, Thailand. 7986.Google Scholar
Maamouri, M., Bies, A., Buckwalter, T., and Mekki, W. (2004). The Penn Arabic Treebank: Building a large-scale annotated Arabic corpus. In Proceedings of the NEMLAR Conference on Arabic Language Resources and Tools. Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
Maamouri, M., Bies, A., Kulick, S., Ciul, M., Habash, N., and Eskander, R. (2014). Developing an Egyptian Arabic Treebank: Impact of dialectal morphology on annotation and tool development. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC). Reykjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar
Manning, C. and Schutze, H. (1999). Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marton, Y., Habash, N., and Rambow, O. (2013). Dependency parsing of Modern Standard Arabic with lexical and inflectional features. Computational Linguistics, 39(1), 161–94.Google Scholar
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., and Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781.Google Scholar
Mohit, B., Rozovskaya, A., Habash, N., Zaghouani, W., and Obeid, O. (2014). The first QALB shared task on automatic text correction for Arabic. In Proceedings of the Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop (WANLP). Doha, Qatar.Google Scholar
Munteanu, D. S. and Marcu, D. (2007). ISI Arabic–English Automatically Extracted Parallel Tex. Catalog No.: LDC2007T08. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Nivre, J., de Marneffe, M.-C., Ginter, F., Goldberg, Y., Hajic, J., Manning, C. D., et al. (2016). Universal Dependencies v1: A Multilingual Treebank Collection. In Proceedings of International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Portorož, Slovenia.Google Scholar
Pasha, A., Al-Badrashiny, M., El Kholy, A., Eskander, R., Diab, M., Habash, N., et al. (2014). MADAMIRA: A fast, comprehensive tool for morphological analysis and disambiguation of Arabic. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Reykjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar
Rafalovitch, A. and Dale, R. (2009). United Nations General Assembly Resolutions: A six-language parallel corpus. In Proceedings of the 12th Machine Translation Summit. Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Salloum, W. and Habash, N. (2011). Dialectal to Standard Arabic paraphrasing to improve Arabic–English statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Algorithms and Resources for Modelling of Dialects and Language Varieties. Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Shahrour, A., Khalifa, S., Taji, D., and Habash, N. (2016). CamelParser: A system for Arabic syntactic analysis and morphological disambiguation. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Osaka, Japan, 228–32.Google Scholar
Shoufan, A. and Alameri, S. (2015). Natural language processing for dialectical Arabic: A survey. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Arabic Natural Language Processing. Beijing, China, 3648.Google Scholar
Smrž, O. (2007). ElixirFM: Implementation of functional Arabic morphology. In Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Semitic Languages: Common Issues and Resources. Prague, Czech Republic, 18.Google Scholar
Smrž, O., Bielický, V., Kouřilová, I., Kráčmar, J., Hajič, J., and Zemánek, P. (2008). Prague Arabic Dependency Treebank: A word on the million words. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Marrakech, Morocco.Google Scholar
Taji, D., Habash, N., and Zeman, D. (2017). Universal dependencies for Arabic. In Proceedings of the Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop. Valencia, Spain, 166–76.Google Scholar
Tounsi, L., Attia, M., and van Genabith, J. (2009). Automatic treebank-based acquisition of Arabic LFG dependency structures. In Proceedings of the EACL 2009 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Semitic Languages. Athens, Greece, 4552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. C. E. (2007). The Phonology and Morphology of Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zaghouani, W. (2014). Critical survey of the freely available Arabic corpora. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Free/Open-Source Arabic Corpora and Corpora Processing Tools. Reykjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar
Zaghouani, W., Diab, M., Mansouri, A., Pradhan, S., and Palmer, M. (2010). The Revised Arabic Propbank. In Proceedings of the Linguistic Annotation Workshop. Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Zaghouani, W., Mohit, B., Habash, N., Obeid, O., Tomeh, N., Rozovskaya, A., et al. (2014). Large-scale Arabic error annotation: Guidelines and framework. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation . Reykjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar
Zalmout, N. and Habash, N. (2017). Don’t throw those morphological analyzers away just yet: Neural morphological disambiguation for Arabic. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Zbib, R., Malchiodi, E., Devlin, J., Stallard, D., Matsoukas, S., Schwartz, R., et al. (2012). Machine translation of Arabic dialects. In Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Montréal, Canada.Google Scholar

References

Abdelnour, J. (1983). Dictionnaire Arabe–Français. Bayreuth: Dar el-Ilm lil-Malayin.Google Scholar
Abouenour, L., Bouzoubaa, K., and Rosso, P. (2013). On the evaluation and improvement of Arabic WordNet coverage and usability. Language Resources and Evaluation 47, 891917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ad-Dahdah, A. (1990). Muʿjam qawāʿid al-ʿarabiyya al-ʿālamiyya [A Dictionary of Universal Arabic Grammar]. Beirut: Maktabat Lubnan.Google Scholar
Adouane, W. and Dobnik, S. (2017). Identification of languages in Algerian Arabic multilingual documents. In Habash, N., Diab, M., Darwish, K. et al., eds., Proceedings of the Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop. Valencia: Association for Computational Linguistics, 18.Google Scholar
Al-Badrashiny, M. (2017). Layered language model based hybrid approach to automatic full diacritization of Arabic. In Habash, N., Diab, M., Darwish, K. et al., eds., Proceedings of the Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop. Valencia: Association for Computational Linguistics, 177–84.Google Scholar
Alfaifi, A. (2015). Building the Arabic Learner Corpus and a System for Arabic Error Annotation. PhD thesis, University of Leeds, School of Computing.Google Scholar
Alhawiti, K. (2014). Adaptive Models of Arabic Text. PhD dissertation, Bangor University, Wales, UK.Google Scholar
Alkhazi, I. (2017). Classifying and segmenting Classical and Modern Standard Arabic using minimum cross-entropy. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8(4), 421–30.Google Scholar
Al-Marwani, N. and Diab, M. (2017). Arabic textual entailment with word embeddings. In Habash, N., Diab, M., Darwish, K. et al., eds., Proceedings of the Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop, Valencia: Association for Computational Linguistics, 177–84.Google Scholar
Almujaiwel, S. (2017). Discursive patterns of anti-feminism and pro-feminism in Arabic newspapers of the KACST corpus. Discourse & Communication, 11(5), 441–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Najem, T. (2007). Inheritance-based approach to Arabic verbal root-and-pattern morphology. In Soudi, A., van den Bosch, A., and Neumann, G., eds., Arabic Computational Morphology: Knowledge-Based and Empirical Methods. Dordrecht: Springer, 6787.Google Scholar
Alosaimy, A. and Atwell, E. (2017). Tagging Classical Arabic text using available morphological analysers and part of speech taggers. Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics, 32(1), 126.Google Scholar
Alqassas, A. (2017). Arabic diglossia and heritage language acquisition: Remarks on acquisition planning. In Mehdat-Lecocq, H., ed., Arabe standard et variations regionals, Quelle(s) politique(s) linguistique(s)? Quelle(s) didactique(s)? Paris: Éditions des archives contemporaires, 8197.Google Scholar
Al-Sayed, A., Hammo, B., and Yagi, S. (2017). Construction of an English–Arabic political parallel corpus. in Proceedings of the New Trends in Information Technology (NTIT-2017). Amman: The University of Jordan.Google Scholar
Al-Shargi, F. and Rambow, O. (2015). DIWAN: A dialectal word annotation tool for Arabic. In Habash, N., Vogel, S., and Darwish, K., eds., Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Arabic Natural Language Processing. Beijing: Association for Computational Linguistics, 4958.Google Scholar
Alshutayri, A. and Atwell, E. (2017). Exploring Twitter as a source of an Arabic dialect corpus. International Journal of Computational Linguistics, 8(2), 3744.Google Scholar
Al-Thubaity, A. and Almujaiwel, S. (2017). A quantitative inquiry into the keywords between primary and reference Arabic corpora. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 25(2), 121–41. DOI: 10.1080/09296174.2017.1359883, 120.Google Scholar
Badawi, E., Carter, M. G., and Gully, A. (2003). Modern Written Arabic: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernardi, F., Chakhaia, L., and Leopold, L. (2017). ‘Sing me a song with social significance’: The (mis)use of statistical significance testing in European sociological research. European Sociological Review, 33(1), 115.Google Scholar
Biadsy, F., Hirschberg, J., and Habash, N. (2009). Spoken Arabic dialect identification using phonotactic modeling. In Rosner, M. and Shuly, W., eds., Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on Computational Approaches to Semitic Languages, Athens, ACL, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 5361.Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1993). Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–57.Google Scholar
Blanc, H. (1960). Style variations in Spoken Arabic: A sample of interdialectal educated conversation. In Ferguson, C., Contributions to Arabic Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 81161.Google Scholar
Bouamor, H., Habash, N., and Oflazer, K. (2014). A Multidialectal Parallel Corpus of Arabic. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’ 14), European Language Resources Association. (ELRA) Reykjavik, Iceland, 1240–5.Google Scholar
Boudchiche, M., Mazroui, A., Ould Bebah, M. O. M., Lakhouaja, A., and Boudlal, A. (2017). AlKhalil Morpho Sys 2: A robust Arabic morpho-syntactic analyzer. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 29(2), 141–6.Google Scholar
Boudelaa, S. and Marslen-Wilson, W. (2010). Aralex: A lexical database for Modern Standard Arabic. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 481. https://aralex.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/aralex.online/.Google Scholar
Bougrine, S. Chorana, A., Lakhdari, A., and Cherroun, H. (2017). Toward a web-based speech corpus for Algerian Arabic dialectal varieties. In Habash, N., Diab, M., Darwish, K. et al., eds., Proceedings of the Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop. Valencia: Association for Computational Linguistics, 138–46.Google Scholar
Buchberger, E. (2009). Book review: Arabic Computational Morphology. Natural Language Engineering, 15, 309–10.Google Scholar
Buckwalter, T. (2007). Issues in Arabic morphological analysis. In Soudi, A., van den Bosch, A., and Neumann, G., eds., Arabic Computational Morphology: Knowledge-Based and Empirical Methods. Dordrecht: Springer, 2341.Google Scholar
Buckwalter, T. and Parkinson, D. (2011). A Frequency Dictionary of Arabic Core Vocabulary for Learners, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cahill, L. (2007). A syllable-based account of Arabic morphology. In Soudi, A., Bosch, A., and Neumann, G., eds., Arabic Computational Morphology, Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol. 38. Dordrecht: Springer, 4567.Google Scholar
Carter, M. G. (2004). Sibawayhi. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies.Google Scholar
Cleary, J. and Witten, I. (1984). Data compression using adaptive coding and partial string matching. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-32(4), 396402.Google Scholar
Darwish, K. (2007). Adapting morphology for Arabic information retrieval. In Soudi, A., van den Bosch, A., and Neumann, G., eds., Arabic Computational Morphology. Knowledge-Based and Empirical Methods. Dordrecht: Springer, 245–62.Google Scholar
Darwish, K., Mubarak, H., and Abdelali, A. (2017a). Arabic diacritization: Stats, rules, and hacks. In Habash, N., Diab, M., Darwish, K. et al., eds., Proceedings of the Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop, Valencia, 917.Google Scholar
Darwish, K., Mubarak, H., Abdelali, A., and Eldesouki, M. (2017b). Arabic POS tagging: Don’t abandon feature engineering just yet. In Habash, N., Diab, M., Darwish, K., et al. eds., Proceedings of the Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop, Valencia, 130–7.Google Scholar
Diab, M., Al-Badrashiny, M., Aminian, M., Attia, M., Elfardy, H., Habash, N., et al. (2014). Tharwa: A large scale dialectal Arabic–Standard Arabic–English Lexicon. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), European Language Resources Association (ELRA) Reykjavik, Iceland, 3782–9.Google Scholar
Diab, M., Hacioglu, K., and Jurafsky, D. (2007). Automatic processing of Modern Arabic text. In Soudi, A., van den Bosch, A., and Neumann, G., eds., Arabic Computational Morphology: Knowledge-Based and Empirical Methods. Dordrecht: Springer, 159–79.Google Scholar
Dichy, J. (2002). L’enseignement de l’arabe, langue pluriglossie que dans la France d’aujourd’hui. In Bistolfi, R. and Giordan, A., eds., Les langues de la méditerranée, volume des Cahiers de Confluences Méditerranée. Paris: l’Harmattan, 313–29.Google Scholar
Dichy, J. (2017). Polyglossie de l’Arabe et subsidiarité: au-delà des confusions entraînées par la naotion de diglossie. In Mehdat-Lecocq, H., ed., Arabe standard et variations regionals, Quelle(s) politique(s) linguistique(s)? Quelle(s) didactique(s)? Paris: Éditions des archives contemporaires, 123.Google Scholar
Dichy, J. and Farghaly, A. (2007). Grammar–lexis relations in the computational morphology of Arabic. In Soudi, A., van den Bosch, A., and Neumann, G., eds., Arabic Computational Morphology: Knowledge-Based and Empirical Methods. Dordrecht: Springer, 115–40.Google Scholar
Ditters, E. (2013). Issues in Arabic computational linguistics. In Owens, J., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Arabic Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 213–40.Google Scholar
Eddakrouri, A. (2018). Al-mudāwwanāt al-luġawiyyyat wa dawruha fi mucālajat an-nuṣūṣ al-ʿarabiyya [Arabic Corpora and Their Role in the Analysis of Arabic Texts]. Riyadh: King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz International Center for the Arabic Language.Google Scholar
El-Kah, A., Zeroual, I., and Lakhouaja, A. (2017). Application of Arabic language processing in language learning. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Big Data, Cloud and Applications, New York: Association for Computing Machinery. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3090354.3090390, 16.Google Scholar
Farghaly, A. (2010). Arabic Computational Linguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Farghaly, A. and Shaalan, K. (2009). Arabic natural language processing: Challenges and solutions. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing (TALIP), 8(4), Article 14.Google Scholar
Fasha, M., Obeid, N., and Hammo, B. (2017). A proposed model for extracting information from Arabic-based controlled text domains. In Proceedings of the New Trends in Information Technology, Amman: University of Jordan, 8692.Google Scholar
Fashwan, A. and Alansary, S. (2017). SHAKKIL: An automatic diacritization system for Modern Standard Arabic texts. In Habash, N., Diab, M., Darwish, K. et al., eds., Proceedings of the Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop, Valencia, Association for Computational Linguistics, 8493.Google Scholar
Habash, N. and Roth, R. (2009). CATiB: The Columbia Arabic Treebank. In Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009, Conference Short Papers, 221–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habash, N., Zalmout, N., Taji, D., Hoang, H., and Alzate, M. (2017). A parallel corpus for evaluating machine translation between Arabic and European languages. In Lapata, M., Blunsom, P., and Koller, A., eds., Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 2, Short Papers, Valencia: Association for Computational Linguistics, 235–41.Google Scholar
Hajič, J., Hajivcová, E., Pajas, P., Panevová, J., Sgall, P., and Hladka, B. (2001). Prague Dependency Treebank 1.0. www.researchgate.net/publication/307174711_Prague_Dependency_Treebank_10.Google Scholar
Hinds, M. and Badawi, E. (2009). A Dictionary of Egyptian Arabic, Arabic–English. Beirut: Librairie du Liban.Google Scholar
Holes, C. (2013). Orality, culture and language. In Owens, J., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Arabic Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 281–99.Google Scholar
Hoogland, J. (2003). Woordenboek Arabisch–Nederlands [Arabic–Dutch Dictionary]. Amsterdam: Dutch Language Union – Bulaaq.Google Scholar
Ibrahimi, K. (2017). L’arabe standard, une langue en quête de reconnaissance et de promotion. In Mehdat-Lecocq, H., ed., Arabe standard et variations regionals, Quelle(s) politique(s) linguistique(s)? Quelle(s) didactique(s)? Paris: Éditions des archives contemporaires, 2531.Google Scholar
Jarrar, M., Habash, N., Alrimawi, F., Akra, D., and Zalmout, N. (2017). Curras: An annotated corpus for the Palestinian Arabic dialect. Language Resources and Evaluation, 51(3), 745–75.Google Scholar
Kazimirski, A. (1860). Dictionnaire Arabe–Français. Beyrouth: Librairie du Liban, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Khalifa, S., Hassan, S., and Habash, N. (2017). A morphological analyzer for Gulf Arabic verbs. In Habash, N., Diab, M., Darwish, K. et al., eds., Proceedings of the Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop, Valencia, 3544.Google Scholar
Koplenig, A. (2017). Against statistical significance testing in corpus linguistics. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 15(2). doi: 10.1515/cllt-2016–0036.Google Scholar
Köprü, S. and Miller, J. (2009). A unification-based approach to the morphological analysis and generation of Arabic. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Arabic Script-based Languages (CAASL3).Google Scholar
Larkey, L. S., Ballesteros, L., and Connell, M. E. (2007). Light stemming for Arabic information retrieval. In Soudi, A., van den Bosch, A., and Neumann, G., eds., Arabic Computational Morphology. Knowledge-Based and Empirical Methods. Dordrecht: Springer, 221–43.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (2007). New resources, or just better old ones? The Holy Grail of representativeness. In Hundt, M., Nesselhauf, N., and Biewer, C., eds., Corpus Linguistics and the Web. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 133–49.Google Scholar
Lelubre, X. (2017). Variations regionals et communication scientifique en arabe. In Mehdat-Lecocq, H., ed., Arabe standard et variations regionals, Quelle(s) politique(s) linguistique(s)? Quelle(s) didactique(s)? Paris: Éditions des archives contemporaires, 5979.Google Scholar
Maamouri, M. and Bies, A. (2009). Penn Arabic Treebank Guidelines version 4.92. Tech. report, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Maamouri, M., Bies, A., Buckwalter, T., and Mekki, W. (2004). The Penn Arabic Treebank: Building a large-scale annotated Arabic corpus. In Proceedings of the NEMLAR Conference on Arabic Language Resources and Tools.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 373418.Google Scholar
McEnery, T. Xiao, R., and Tono, Y. (2006). Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mdhaffar, S. (2017). Sentiment analysis of Tunisian dialect: Linguistic resources and experiments. In Habash, N., Diab, M., Darwish, K. et al., eds., Proceedings of the Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop, Valencia, 5561.Google Scholar
Menacer, M., Mella, O., Fohr, D., Jouvet, D., Langlois, D., and Smaili, K. (2017). An enhanced automatic speech recognition system for Arabic. Proceedings of the Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop. Valencia, 157–65.Google Scholar
Mohamed, E., Mohit, B., and Oflazer, K. (2012). Annotating and learning morphological segmentation of Egyptian colloquial Arabic. In Proceedings of International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 873–7.Google Scholar
Muhammed, R., Farrag, M., Elshamly, N., and Abdel-Ghaffar, N. (2011). Summary of Arabizi or Romanization: The dilemma of writing texts. in Proceedings of Jil Jaded Conference, University of Texas at Austin, 18–19 February (2011).Google Scholar
Nagoudi, E. and Schwab, D. (2017). Semantic similarity of Arabic sentences with word embeddings. In N. Habash, M. Diab, K. Darwish et al., eds., Proceedings of the Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop. Valencia, 18–24.Google Scholar
Parkinson, D. (2001). Future variability: A corpus study of Arabic future particles. In Parkinson, D. and Farwaneh, S., eds., Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XV. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 191211.Google Scholar
Pasha, A., Al-Badrashiny, M., El Kholy, A., Eskander, R., Diab, M., Habash, N., et al. (2014). MADAMIRA: A fast, comprehensive tool for morphological analysis and disambiguation of Arabic. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Reykjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar
Pinon, C. (2017). Intégrer les variations dans l’enseignement de l’arabe langue étrangère: enjeux et méthodes. In Mehdat-Lecocq, H., ed., Arabe standard et variations regionals, Quelle(s) politique(s) linguistique(s)? Quelle(s) didactique(s)? Paris: Éditions des archives contemporaires, 123.Google Scholar
Ryding, K. (2005). A Reference Grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saleh, M. (2012). Al-ḥāsūb wa-l bahth al luġawiyy (al mudawannāt alluġawiyyat namūdajan) [The Computer and Linguistic Research (Corpora as a Model)]. Jaamiʾat al-Malik Sauud, Riyadh, 79.Google Scholar
Samih, Y., Attia, M., Eldesouki, M., Mubarak, H., Abdelali, A., Kallmeyer, L., et al. (2017). A neural architecture for dialectal Arabic segmentation. In Habash, N., Diab, M., Darwish, K. et al. eds., Proceedings of the Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop, Valencia, 4654.Google Scholar
Schultz, T. and Schlippe, T. (2014). GlobalPhone: Pronunciation dictionaries in 20 languages. In Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., and Declerck, T. et al., eds., Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2014), Reykjavik: European Languages Resources Association, 337–41.Google Scholar
Sforza, V. and Soudi, A. (2007). Arabic computational morphology: A trade-off between multiple operations and multiple stems. In Soudi, A., van den Bosch, A., and Neumann, G., eds., Arabic Computational Morphology. Knowledge-Based and Empirical Methods. Dordrecht: Springer, 89114.Google Scholar
Soliman, A., Eissa, K., and El-Beltagy, S. A. (2017). Aravec: A set of Arabic word embedding models for use in Arabic. Procedia Computer Science, 117, 256–65.Google Scholar
Soudi, A., van den Bosch, A., and Neumann, G. (2007). Arabic Computational Morphology: Knowledge-Based and Empirical Methods. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Taji, D., Habash, N., and Zeman, D. (2017). Universal dependencies for Arabic. In Habash, N., Diab, M., Darwish, K. et al., eds., Proceedings of the Third Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop, Valencia, 166–76.Google Scholar
Tratz, S. (2016). Arabic Dependency Treebank. ARL, US Army Research Laboratory, https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/docs/LDC2016T18/ARL-TN-0735.pdf.Google Scholar
Van den Bosch, A., Marsi, E., and Soudi, A. (2007). Memory-based morphological analysis and part-of-speech tagging of Arabic. In Soudi, A., van den Bosch, A., and Neumann, G., eds., Arabic Computational Morphology: Knowledge-Based and Empirical Methods. Dordrecht: Springer, 201–17.Google Scholar
Van Mol, M. (1998). Variatie in Modern Standaard Arabisch in radionieuwsbulletins, Een synchronisch descriptief onderzoek naar het gebruik van complementaire partikels. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Van Mol, M. (2000). Arabic language and vocabulary acquisition. MIDEO, 24, 434–40.Google Scholar
Van Mol, M. (2001). Evolution of MSA: The case of some complementary particles. In Parkinson, D. and Farwaneh, S., eds., Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XV. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 135–47.Google Scholar
Van Mol, M. (2003). Variation in Modern Standard Arabic in Radio News Broadcasts, A Synchronic Descriptive Investigation in the Use of Complementary Particles, Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta, 117. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Van Mol, M. (2005). From lexical database to tagged Arabic corpus. Paper Presented at the ACIDA/ICMI Conference, Tozeur, 56 November. https://ilt.kuleuven.be/arabic/pdf/Mark%20Van%20Mol%20A031.pdf; last accessed 11 December 2020.Google Scholar
Van Mol, M. (2010). Arabic oral media and corpus linguistics: A first methodological outline. In Bassiouni, R., ed., Arabic and the Media: Linguistic Analyses and Applications. Leiden: Brill, 6379.Google Scholar
Van Mol, M. (2012). From paper dictionary to an elaborate electronic lexicographical database. In Vatvedt, R. and Torjusen, J. M., eds., Proceedings of the 15th EURALEX International Congress,711 August (2012). Oslo: Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies, University of Oslo, 758–63.Google Scholar
Van Mol, M. (2014). تطوير متكامل إلكتروني لتدريس اللغة العربية لللناطقين بغيرها [The development of an all compassing electronic device for L2 Arabic learners] In Al-Qahtani, A. et al., eds., أعمال مؤتمر :اتجاهات حديثة في تعليم لغة ثانية [Proceedings of the Current Tendencies in the Teaching of Arabic as L2 Language Conference]. Ryadh: Dār Jāmicat al-Malik Sacūd lil-Nashr, 219–55.Google Scholar
Van Mol, M. (2017a). La langue arabe et la definition de ses différents niveaux de langue. Éxigences, possibilités et limitations d’une analyse numérique sur base de corpus représentatifs. In Mehdat-Lecocq, H., ed., Arabe standard et variations regionals, Quelle(s) politique(s) linguistique(s)? Quelle(s) didactique(s)? Paris: Éditions des archives contemporaires, 346.Google Scholar
Van Mol, M. (2017b). Arabic language teaching and the real linguistic situation: What does linguistic empirical research teach us about Arabic language levels. In Shigeki, K., ed., Proceedings of the 8th Congress of Arabic Linguistics (2015). Kyoto: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, 331–51.Google Scholar
Van Mol, M. and Berghman, K. (2001a). Leerwoordenboek Modern Arabisch– Nederlands, (Learners Dictionary Modern Arabic–Dutch). Amsterdam: The Dutch Language Union, Bulaaq.Google Scholar
Van Mol, M. and Berghman, K. (2001b). Leerwoordenboek Nederlands – Modern Arabisch (Learners Dictionary Dutch–Modern Arabic). Amsterdam: The Dutch Language Union, Bulaaq.Google Scholar
Wehr, H. (1994). Arabic–English Dictionary, 4th ed. Urbana, IL: Spoken Language Services.Google Scholar
Whitcomb, L. and Alansary, S. (2018). Using linguistic corpora in Arabic Foreign Language Teaching. In Wahba, K., England, L., and Taha, Z. A., eds., Handbook for Arabic Language Teaching Professionals in the 21st Century, vol. II. New York: Routledge, 219–31.Google Scholar
Yaghan, M. A. (2008). Arabizi: A contemporary style of Arabic slang. Design Issues, 24, 3952.Google Scholar
Yassen, K., Sawalha, M., and Al Zaghoul, F. (2017). Part-of-speech tagging for Classical and MSA text using NLTK. In Proceedings of the New Trends in Information Technology. Amman: University of Jordan, 106–12.Google Scholar
Yaʾqub, I. (1988). Mawsuʿat al-ḥurūf [Thesaurus]. Beirut: Dar al Jayl.Google Scholar
Zaghouani, W. (2014). Critical survey of the freely available Arabic corpora. In Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., and Declerck, T. et al., eds., Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2014), Reykjavik: European Languages Resources Association, 18.Google Scholar
Zahran, M. A., Magooda, A., Mahgoub, A. Y., Raafat, H., Rashwan, M., and Atyia, A. (2015). Word representations in vector space and their applications for Arabic. In Gelbukh, A., ed., International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics. Dordrecht: Springer, 430–43.Google Scholar
Zeroual, I., Lakhoaga, A., and Belhabib, R. (2017). Towards a standard part of speech tagset for the Arabic language. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 29(2), 171–8.Google Scholar

Corpora and Web Resources

Broad Operational Language Translation (BOLT) program: https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC2017T07.Google Scholar
LDC (Linguistic Data Consortium) www.ldc.upenn.edu/.Google Scholar
Prague Arabic Dependency Treebank (PADT) 1.0: https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC2004T23.Google Scholar
Quamus Arabic Lexicography: Buckwalter T (2002). www.qamus.org/.Google Scholar

References

Abdulrahim, D. (2013). A Corpus Study of Basic Motion Events in Modern Standard Arabic. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
Abdulrahim, D. (2019a). Go constructions in Modern Standard Arabic: A corpus-based study. Constructions and Frames, 11(1), 142.Google Scholar
Abdulrahim, D. (2019b). Quantitative approaches to analysing COME constructions in Modern Standard Arabic. In McEnery, T., Hardie, A., and Younis, N., eds., Arabic Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 170200.Google Scholar
Abdul-Fattah, A. (2010). A Corpus-Based Study of Conjunction in Arabic Translated and Non-Translated Texts Written by the Same Translators/Authors. Doctoral dissertation, University of Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
Abdul-Fattah, A. (2018). Explicating structural shifts in English–Arabic translation: A corpus-based study of the causal conjunctives because and li’anna. Arab World English Journal for Translation and Literary Studies, 2(1), 3959.Google Scholar
Abu Kwaik, K., Chatzikyriakidis, S., and Dobnik, S. (2019). Can Modern Standard Arabic approaches be used for Arabic dialects? Sentiment analysis as a case study. In El-Haj, M., Rayson, P., Atwell, E., and Alsudias, L., eds., Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Arabic Corpus Linguistics (WACL-3). Association for Computational Linguistics, 4050. www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-5606/; last accessed 14 December 2020.Google Scholar
Abu Kwaik, K., Saad, M., Chatzikyriakidis, S., and Dobnik, S. (2018a). Shami: A corpus of Levantine Arabic dialects. In Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Cieri, C., Declerck, T. et al., eds., Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation: European Languages Resources Association (ELRA), 3645–52. www.aclweb.org/anthology/L18-1576; last accessed 14 December 2020.Google Scholar
Abu Kwaik, K., Saad, M., Chatzikyriakidis, S., and Dobnik, S. (2018b). A lexical distance study of Arabic dialects. Procedia Computer Science, 142, 213.Google Scholar
Al-Raisi, F., Lin, W., and Bourai, A. (2018). A monolingual parallel corpus of Arabic. Procedia Computer Science, 142, 334–8.Google Scholar
Al-Sulaiti, L. and Atwell, E. (2006). The design of a corpus of contemporary Arabic. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(1), 136.Google Scholar
Alasmri, I. and Kruger, H. (2018). Conjunctive markers in translation from English to Arabic: A corpus-based study. Perspectives: Studies in Translation Theory and Practice, 26(5), 767–88.Google Scholar
Albadarneh, J., Talafha, B., Al-Ayyoub, M., Zaqaibeh, B., Al-Smadi, M., Jararweh, Y., et al. (2015). Using big data analytics for authorship authentication of Arabic tweets. In Anjum, A. and Papadopolous, G., eds., Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing, IEEE Press, 448–52.Google Scholar
Alfaifi, A. and Atwell, E. (2013). Potential uses of the Arabic Learner Corpus. In Proceedings of the Leeds Language, Linguistics and Translation PGR Conference (2013). Leeds, UK.Google Scholar
Alfaifi, A., Atwell, E., and Hedaya, I. (2014). Arabic Learner Corpus (ALC) v2: A new written and spoken corpus of Arabic learners. In Ishikawa, S, ed., Proceedings of the Learner Corpus Studies in Asia and the World (LCSAW), 7789.Google Scholar
Alotaibi, H. M. (2017). Arabic–English Parallel Corpus: A new resource for translation training and language teaching. Arab World English Journal, 8(3), 319–37.Google Scholar
Alshutayri, A. and Atwell, A. (2019). Classifying Arabic dialect text in the Social Media Arabic Dialect Corpus (SMADC). In El-Haj, M., Rayson, P., Atwell, E., and Alsudias, L., eds., Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Arabic Corpus Linguistics (WACL-3). Association for Computational Linguistics, 51–9.Google Scholar
Arts, T., Belinkova, Y., Habash, N., Kilgarriff, A., and Suchomel, V. (2014). arTenTen: Arabic corpus and word sketches. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 26, 357–71. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319157814000330; last accessed 14 December 2020.Google Scholar
Atwell, E. (2019). Using the web to model Modern and Qur’anic Arabic. In McEnery, T., Hardie, A., and Younis, N., eds., Arabic Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 100–19.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (1993). Corpus Linguistics and Translation Studies: Implications and Applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bazzi, S. (2014). Foreign metaphors and Arabic translation: An empirical study in journalistic translation practice. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(1), 120–51.Google Scholar
Beeby, A., Rodríguez Inés, P., and Sánchez-Gijón, P. (2009). Corpus Use and Translating: Corpus Use for Learning to Translate and Learning Corpus Use to Translate. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Belinkov, Y., Madigow, A., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Schmidman, A., and Romanov, M. (2019). Studying the history of the Arabic language: Language technology and a large-scale historical corpus. Language Resources and Evaluation, 53, 771805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-019-09460-w; last accessed 14 December 2020.Google Scholar
Ben Salhi, H. (2010). Small parallel corpora in an English–Arabic translation classroom: No need to reinvent the wheel in the era of globalization. In Shiyab, S. M., Rose, M. G., House, J., and Dural, J., eds., Globalization and Aspects of Translation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 5367.Google Scholar
Bernardini, S., Stewart, D., and Zanettin, F. (2007). Corpora in translator education: An introduction. In Zanettin, F., Bernardini, S., and Stewart, D., eds., Corpora in Translator Education. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 114.Google Scholar
Bouamor, H., Habash, N., and Oflazer, K. (2014). A multidialectal parallel corpus of Arabic. In Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Declerck, T., Loftsson, H. et al., eds., Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014). European Languages Resources Association (ELRA), 1240–5.Google Scholar
Boudad, N., Faizi, R., Haj Thami, R., and Chiheb, R. (2018). Sentiment analysis in Arabic: A review of the literature. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9(4), 2479–90.Google Scholar
Braun, S. (2007). Integrating corpus work into secondary education: From data-driven learning to needs-driven corpora. ReCALL, 19(3), 307–28.Google Scholar
Brustad, K. (2000). The Syntax of Spoken Arabic: A Comparative Study of Moroccan, Egyptian, Syrian, and Kuwaiti Dialects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Buckwalter, T. and Parkinson, D. (2011). A Frequency Dictionary of Arabic: Core Vocabulary for Learners (Routledge frequency dictionaries). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burton, G. (2012). Corpora and coursebooks: Destined to be strangers forever? Corpora, 7(1), 91108.Google Scholar
Camilleri, J. J. (2016). Digitizing the grammar and vocabulary of Maltese. In Puech, G. and Saade, B., eds., Shifts and Patterns in Maltese. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 359–85.Google Scholar
Campoy, M., Bellés-Fortuño, B., and Gea-Valor, M. (2010). Corpus-Based Approaches to English Language Teaching. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Chambaz, A. and Desagulier, G. (2016). Predicting is not explaining: Targeted learning of the dative alternation. Journal of Causal Inference, 4(1), 130.Google Scholar
Chambers, A. (2007). Popularising corpus consultation by language learners and teachers. In Hidalgo, E., Quereda, L., and Santana, J., eds., Corpora in the Foreign Language Classroom: Selected Papers from the Sixth International Conference on Teaching and Language Corpora (TALC 6). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 314.Google Scholar
Clark, A. and Lappin, S. (2011). Linguistic Nativism and the Poverty of the Stimulus. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Conrad, S. (2005). Corpus linguistics and L2 teaching. In Hinkel, E., ed., Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge, 393411.Google Scholar
Conrad, S., and Biber, D. (2009). Real Grammar: A Corpus-Based Approach to English. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Corpas Pastor, G. and Seghiri, M. (2010). Size matters: A quantitative approach to corpus representativeness. In Rabadán, R., ed., Lengua, traducción, recepción: en honor de Julio César Santoyo / Language, translation, reception. To honor Julio César Santoyo. León: Universidad de León, 111–46.Google Scholar
Cowie, F. (1999). What’s Within? Nativism Reconsidered. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Desagulier, G. (2017). Noam Chomsky’s colorless green idea: ‘Corpus linguistics doesn’t mean anything’. Around the Word, 5 December 2017. https://corpling.hypotheses.org/252; last accessed 14 December 2020.Google Scholar
Duwairi, R., Ahmed, N. A., and Al-Rifai, S. (2015). Detecting sentiment embedded in Arabic social media: A lexicon-based approach. Journal of Intelligent Fuzzy Systems, 29(1), 107–17.Google Scholar
El-Fiqi, H., Petraki, E., and Abbass, H. A. (2019). Network motifs for translator stylometry identification. PLOS ONE 14(2), 2039–45. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0211809; last accessed 14 December 2020.Google Scholar
Farghaly, A. and Shaalan, K. (2009). Arabic natural language processing: Challenges and solutions. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing, 8, 120.Google Scholar
Frankenberg-Garcia, A., Flowerdew, L., and Aston, G. (2010). New Trends in Corpora and Language Learning (Research in corpus and discourse). New York: Continuum International Publications.Google Scholar
Gadalla, H. (2006). Arabic imperfect verbs in translation: A corpus study of English renderings. Meta: Translator’s Journal, 51(1), 5171.Google Scholar
Gaskell, D. and Cobb, T. (2004). Can learners use concordance feedback for writing errors? System, 32(3), 301–19.Google Scholar
Götz, S. and Mukherjee, J. (2019). Learner Corpora and Language Teaching, Studies in Corpus Linguistics, vol. 92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Granger, S. (2008). Learner corpora. In Lüdeling, A. and Kytö, M., eds., Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, vol. 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 259–75.Google Scholar
Guidère, M. (2002). Toward corpus-based machine translation for Standard Arabic. Translation Journal, 6(1). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/268e/f55030a49207071c56538c634965ee568ed8.pdf; last accessed 14 December 2020.Google Scholar
Habash, N. Y. (2010). Introduction to Arabic Natural Language Processing (Synthesis lectures on human language technologies, #10). San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.Google Scholar
Hidalgo, E., Quereda, R, and Santana, J. (2007). Corpora in the Foreign Language Classroom: Selected Papers from the Sixth International Conference on Teaching and Language Corpora (TALC 6), University of Granada, Spain, 4–7 July 2004 (Language and Computers, no. 61). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Hoogland, J. (1996). The use of OCR software for Arabic in order to create a text corpus of Modern Standard Arabic for lexicographic purposes. In Ubaydli, A., ed., Proceedings of the International Conference and Exhibition on Multi-Lingual Computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2701–16.Google Scholar
Hu, K. (2016). Introducing Corpus-based Translation Studies (New frontiers in translation studies). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Inoue, G., Habash, N., Matsumoto, Y. and Aoyama, H. (2018). A parallel corpus of Arabic–Japanese news articles. In Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Gangemi, A., Maegaard, B. et al., eds., Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluations, LREC 2018, 918–24. https://aclweb.org/anthology/L18-1147; last accessed 14 December 2020.Google Scholar
Izwaini, S. (2010). Translation and the Language of Information Technology: A Corpus-Based Study of the Vocabulary of Information Technology in English and Its Translation into Arabic and Swedish. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.Google Scholar
Khalifa, S., Habash, N., Abdulrahim, D., and Hassan, S. (2016). A large-scale corpus of Gulf Arabic. In Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Cieri, C., Declerck, T. et al., eds., Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Portorož, Slovenia. Luxembourg: European Languages Resources Association (ELRA), 4282–9. www.aclweb.org/anthology/L16-1679; last accessed 14 December 2020.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Charalabopoulou, F., Gavrilidou, M., Johannessen, J. B., Khalil, S., Johansson Kokkinakis, S., et al. (2014). Corpus-based vocabulary lists for language learners for nine languages. Language Resources and Evaluation, 48(1), 121–63.Google Scholar
Kruger, A. (2002). Corpus-based translation research: Its development and implications for general, literary and Bible studies. Acta Theologica Supplementum, 2, 70106.Google Scholar
Laviosa, S. (1998). The corpus-based approach: A new paradigm in translation studies. Meta: Translators’ Journal, 43(4), 474–9.Google Scholar
Lo, M. (2019). The Arabic Classroom: Context, Text and Learners. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lulu, L. and Elnagar, A. (2018). Automatic Arabic dialect classification using deep learning models. Procedia Computer Science, 142, 262–9.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2004). A multiple process solution to the problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 31(4), 883914.Google Scholar
Malmkjaer, K. (2003). On a pseudo-subversive use of corpora in translator training. In Zanettin, F., Bernardini, S., and Stewart, D., eds., Corpora in Translator Education, Manchester, UK: St. Jerome, 119–34.Google Scholar
Mansour, M. A. (2013). The absence of Arabic corpus linguistics: A call for creating an Arabic National Corpus. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(12), 8190.Google Scholar
McEnery, T., Hardie, A. and Younis, N. (2019a). Introducing Arabic Corpus Linguistics. In McEnery, T., Hardie, A., and Younis, N., eds., Arabic Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 116.Google Scholar
McEnery, T., Hardie, A., and Younis, N. (2019b). Arabic Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
McNeil, K. (2019). Tunisian Arabic Corpus: Creating a written corpus of an ‘unwritten’ language. In McEnery, T., Hardie, A., and Younis, N., eds., Arabic Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 3055.Google Scholar
Oakes, M., and Ji, M. (2012). Quantitative Methods in Corpus-Based Translation Studies: A Practical Guide to Descriptive Translation Research, Studies in Corpus Linguistics, vol. 51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M., and Carter, R. (2007). From Corpus to Classroom: Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olohan, M. (2004). Introducing Corpora in Translation Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Omer, A. and Oakes, M. (2019). The writing styles of Salwa and Al-Qarni. In El-Haj, M., Rayson, P., Atwell, E., and Alsudias, L., eds., Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Arabic Corpus Linguistics (WACL-3). Association for Computational Linguistics, 1621.Google Scholar
Owens, J. and Hassan, J. (nd). In Their Own Words: A Sociolinguistically Informed Corpus of Nigerian Arabic. Ms. Universität Bayreuth. www.neu.uni-bayreuth.de/de/Uni_Bayreuth/Fakultaeten/4_Sprach_und_Literaturwissenschaft/islamwissenschaft/arabistik/en/Idiomaticity__lexical_realignment__and_semantic_change_in_spoken_arabic/Nigerian_Arabic/index.html; last accessed 14 December 2020.Google Scholar
Parkinson, D. (2003). Future variability: A corpus study of Arabic future particles. In Parkinson, D. and Farwaneh, S., eds., Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XV: Papers from the Fifteenth Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Salt Lake City (2001). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 191211.Google Scholar
Parkinson, D. (2006). Using Arabic Synonyms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, D. (2008). Sentence subject agreement variation in Arabic. In Ibrahim, Z. and Makhlouf, S., eds, Linguistics in an Age of Globalization: Perspectives on Arabic Language and Teaching. Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press, 6790.Google Scholar
Parkinson, D. (2019). Under the hood of arabiCorpus. In McEnery, T., Hardie, A., and Younis, N., eds., Arabic Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1729.Google Scholar
Parkinson, D. and Ibrahim, Z. (1999). Testing lexical differences in regional standard Arabics. In Benmamoun, E., ed., Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XII. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 183202.Google Scholar
Procházka, S. and Dallaj, I. (2020). Polar questions in Tunis Arabic. In G. Chikovani and Z. Tskhvediani, eds., Studies on Arabic Dialectology and Sociolinguistics: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of AIDA held in Kutaisi, June 10–13, 2019. Kutaisi: Akaki Tserteli State University Press, 233–40.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K. and Scholz, B. C. (2002). Empirical Assessments of the poverty of stimulus arguments. The Linguistic Review, 19, 950.Google Scholar
Romanov, M. (2019). Toward the digital history of the pre-modern Muslim world: Developing text-mining techniques for the study of Arabic biographical collections. In Andrews, T. L. and Macé, C., eds., Analysis of Ancient and Medieval Texts and Manuscripts: Digital Approaches. Brepols Online, 229–44.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. (2003). Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 110–14.Google Scholar
Salameh, M., Bouamor, H., and Habash, N. (2018). Fine-grained Arabic dialect identification. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), 1332–44.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. (1989). Language acquisition: Growth or learning? Philosophical Papers, 18, 203–40.Google Scholar
Samy, D., Sandoval, A. M., Guirao, J. M., and Alfonseca, E. (2006). Building a parallel multilingual corpus (Arabic–Spanish–English). In Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Gangemi, A., Maegaard, B. et al., eds., Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluations (LREC 2006). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 2176–81.Google Scholar
Shiyab, S., Rose, S., House, J., and Duval, J. (2010). Globalization and Aspects of Translation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. and Swales, J. (2001). Corpus Linguistics in North America: Selections from the 1999 Symposium. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1993). British traditions in text analysis: From Firth to Sinclair. In Baker, M., Francis, G., and Tognini-Bonelli, E., eds., Text and Technology. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 133.Google Scholar
Thackston, W. M. Jr. (1996). The Vernacular Arabic of the Lebanon. Cambridge, MA: Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Tymoczko, M. (1998). Computerized corpora and the future of translation studies. Meta, 43(4), 452–9.Google Scholar
Van Mol, M. (2000). The development of a new learner’s dictionary for Modern Standard Arabic: The linguistic corpus approach. In Heid, U., Evert, S., Lehmann, E., and Rohrer, C., eds., Proceedings of the Ninth EURALEX International Congress. Stuttgart, 831–6.Google Scholar
Whitcomb, L. and Alansary, S. (2018). Using linguistic corpora in Arabic foreign language teaching and learning. In Wahba, K., England, L., and Taha, Z., Handbook for Arabic Language Teaching Professionals in the 21st Century, vol. II. New York: Routledge, 219–31.Google Scholar
White, M. G. and Lonsdale, D. W. (2019). Verbs in Egyptian Arabic: A case for register variation. In El-Haj, M., Rayson, P., Atwell, E., and Alsudias, L., eds., Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Arabic Corpus Linguistics (WACL-3). Association for Computational Linguistics, 6071. www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-5608; last accessed 14 December 2020.Google Scholar
Wichmann, A. (1997). Teaching and Language Corpora (Applied Linguistics and Language Study). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. (1991). The description and prescription of language. In Alatis, J., ed., Georgetown University Roundtable on Language and Linguistics, 1991–Linguistics and language pedagogy: The State of the Art. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1124.Google Scholar
Wilmsen, D. (2010). Dialects of written Arabic: Syntactic differences in the treatment of object pronouns in the Arabic of Egyptian and Levantine newspapers. Arabica, 57(1), 99128.Google Scholar
Wilmsen, D. (2013). The Demonstrative iyyā-: A little-considered aspect of Arabic deixis. Arabica, 60, 332–58.Google Scholar
Wilmsen, D. (2015). Perfect modality: Auxiliary verbs and finite subordinates in Levantine (and other) Arabics. Al-ʿArabiyya, 48, 157–74.Google Scholar
Zaghouani, W. (2014). Critical survey of the freely available Arabic corpora. In Proceedings of International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014), Reykjavic, Iceland. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.07835.pdf; last accessed 14 December 2020.Google Scholar
Zaki, M. (2017). Corpus-based teaching in the Arabic classroom: Theoretical and practical perspectives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 514–41.Google Scholar
Zantout, R. and Guessoum, A. (2015). Obstacles facing Arabic machine translation: Building a neural network-based transfer module. In Izwaini, S., ed,. Papers in Translation Studies. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Zemánek, P. (2001). Clara (Corpus Linguae Arabicae): An overview. In ELSNET, ed., Proceedings of ACL/EACL Workshop on Arabic Language Processing. Toulouse, France. www.elsnet.org/acl2001-arabic.html; last accessed 14 December 2020.Google Scholar
Zemánek, P. and Milička, J. (2014). Quotations, relevance and time depth: Medieval Arabic literature in grids and networks. In Feldman, A., Kazantseva, A., and Szpakowicz, S., eds., Proceeding of the 3rd Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature (CLFL). Association for Computational Linguistics, 1724. www.aclweb.org/anthology/W14-0903; last accessed 14 December 2020.Google Scholar
Zeroual, I. and Lakhouaja, A. (2018). Arabic corpus linguistics: Major progress, but still a long way to go. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 740, 613–36.Google Scholar
Zitouni, I., Olive, J. P., Iskra, D., Choukri, K., Emam, O., Gedge, O., et al. (2002). ORIENTEL: Speech-based interactive communication applications for the Mediterranean and the Middle East. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 2002). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fec6/336ef6a292e18fb83a46841fea9c80b77955.pdf; last accessed 14 December 2020.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×